8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (24)
#17832197 at 2022-11-28 04:55:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #21861: Late Night E Missions Edition
>Hmm. They couldn't patent our DNA because it's made by nature. Can they now patent the DNA that they've ALTERED with the MRNA shot?
2010
Who Owns Your Genes? You Do.
… federal district court Judge Robert Sweet made history by issuing the first ruling ever that human genes can't be patented.
…the judge issued his decision in our breast cancer gene patents lawsuit, which challenges the government's granting of and Myriad Genetics' control of patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 human genes, which are associated with breast and ovarian cancer.
The judge declared that all 15 patent claims that we challenged are invalid, based on the fact that they cover products of nature and abstract ideas. He wrote in his decision:
The resolution of these motions is based upon long recognized principles of molecular biology and genetics: DNA represents the physical embodiment of biological information, distinct in its essential characteristics from any other chemical found in nature. It is concluded that DNA's existence in an "isolated" form alters neither this fundamental quality of DNA as it exists in the body nor the information it encodes. Therefore, the patents at issue directed to "isolated DNA" containing sequences found in nature are unsustainable as a matter of law and are deemed unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. ? 101.
#9838288 at 2020-07-03 08:38:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12591: Clean Dough, Anons Please Post Here Edition
Dershowitz loses bid for access to confidential papers naming Epstein's closest associates
Celebrity attorney Alan Dershowitz has lost an audacious legal bid to gain access to a trove of confidential papers naming some of the Jeffrey Epstein's closest associates.
The top secret documents are part of a historic defamation case that Virginia Giuffre, previously known as Virginia Roberts, brought against the dead pedophile's alleged madam and facilitator, Ghislaine Maxwell, who was arrested Thursday in New Hampshire and is due to appear in court later.
The cache is subject to a long-standing protective order but attorneys for Dershowitz, 81, argued that it contains depositions and materials crucial for his own defense as he battles Giuffre in a separate, ongoing defamation case.
Senior US District Judge Loretta Preska turned down the Harvard professor's request this week saying he had not presented 'an extraordinary circumstance or compelling need' to overturn the 2016 protection order made by her deceased predecessor, Judge Robert Sweet.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8483599/Alan-Dershowitz-loses-bid-access-confidential-papers-naming-Jeffrey-Epsteins-associates.html
#8998696 at 2020-05-02 13:55:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11518: Securing the United States Bulk-Power System Edition
Judge Accelerates Process for Unsealing Jeffrey Epstein Docs, Naming Names on 'Rolling Basis'
A federal judge in New York on Friday amended the protocol the court will follow in releasing a trove of documents concerning deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. This will allow for documents that include the names of non-party individuals to be released on a rolling basis. The documents in question are part of a defamation dispute involving Epstein's alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell and alleged victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre.
Senior U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska previously ruled that only those motions which now-deceased U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet ruled on when he presided over the litigation-and documents relevant to those motions-will be released to the public after the court conducts an individualized review of each sealed item.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-accelerates-process-for-unsealing-jeffrey-epstein-docs-naming-names-on-rolling-basis/
Strange the embedded Court order has been removed for Scribd??
https://www.scribd.com/document/459391487/Preska-Order#from_embed
#7567339 at 2019-12-20 03:39:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9680: Even the NYT thinks Brennan is F'ed Edition
>>7567148
>Jeffrey Epstein
Anyone remember the judge who presided over the Epstein case? The one that resulted in the "Sweet-heart" deal? That guy's name is Robert Sweet. He had a wife. His wife was the daughter of Dorothy Schiff.
https://idaho.funeral.com/2019/03/23/Robert-Sweet/
Not the only Schiff connection that can be found in these cases (pic related)
#7266576 at 2019-07-31 00:23:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9297: Hunters become the HUNTED : The Chupacabra Edition
>>7266418
What does this have to do with "neon revolt"?
I don't like famefags either.
Here is another source: https://nypost.com/2019/03/25/Robert-Sweet-federal-judge-who-presided-over-harvey-weinstein-case-dead-at-96/
#6952069 at 2019-07-08 17:28:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8894:Epstein's Goose continues to cook! Edition
Why is Carter speaking against Trump now?
Did he fail to stop the Epstein case when he had Judge Robert Sweet killed?
Is Carter implicated with Epstein? Is Carter implicated in Sweet's death? Why does Carter owe Clinton dark favors?
No, Q, we do NOT believe in coincidences.
#6938064 at 2019-07-07 03:45:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8875: Night Shift Winning Edition
Remember when:
Judge overseeing key Jeffrey Epstein-related suit dies
U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet was appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1978, confirmed that same year and continued to hear and rule on cases through the last few months.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/25/judge-jeffrey-epstein-case-dies-1292394
#5899799 at 2019-03-26 10:33:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7547: RBG Mystery Edition
Judge presiding over a key lawsuit relating to financier pedophile Jeffrey Epstein dies, aged 96
US District Court Judge Robert Sweet died on Sunday; he was 96 years old
Sweet presided over a key lawsuit relating to pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein
He was assigned to a lawsuit that emerged 10 years ago following Epstein's controversial plea deal to two prostitution-related offenses
Sweet oversaw the lawsuit that involved alleged sex slave Virginia Giuffre against Epstein-friend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was accused of aiding Epstein
The filing was initially kept private by Judge Sweet with the understanding that they would become public at the time of trial, according to Giuffre's attorney
But there never will be a trial, because the lawsuit was settled in May of 2017
Epstein has been accused by alleged victims of bringing at least 40 underage girls to his Palm Beach, Florida, mansion for sexual encounters
Authorities said he had female fixers who would look for suitable girls, some local and others recruited from Eastern Europe and other parts of the world
Epstein took a controversial plea deal in 2008 which allowed him to avoid federal charges by pleading guilty to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution
The judge presiding over a key lawsuit relating to pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, has died.
US District Court Judge Robert Sweet, who is based in Manhattan, died on Sunday. He was 96 years old.
Sweet, who ruled on cases through the last few months, was assigned to a lawsuit that emerged 10 years ago following Epstein's controversial plea deal, according to Politico.
At the time, he pleaded guilty to two prostitution-related offenses.
Sweet oversaw the lawsuit that involved alleged sex slave Virginia Giuffre (now Roberts) against Epstein-friend Ghislaine Maxwell, who Giuffre has accused of aiding Epstein, 66, in sex trafficking.
Giuffre and other victims waived their right to sue Epstein in exchange for settlements.
Maxwell and two others going only by 'John Doe' and 'J. Doe' argue that keeping the documents sealed, or at least covering up names and personal information of other people not named as a party in the lawsuit, is necessary to protect people 'whose privacy and reputations may be jeopardized,' according to court documents obtained by DailyMail.com.
Former federal prosecutor Nick Lewin on behalf of a 'John Doe,' and Washington-based gender equality attorney Kerrie Campbell on behalf of a 'J. Doe,' have now joined Maxwell in fighting to keep whatever is stated in those documents a secret.
According to Lewin, Sweet described the documents as including 'a range of allegations of sexual acts involving Plaintiff [Giuffre] and non-parties to this litigation, some famous, some not,' as well as 'the identities of non-parties who either allegedly engaged in sexual acts with Plaintiff or who allegedly facilitated such act[s].'
Sweet said about the case: 'This defamation action from its inception in September 2015 to its settlement in May 2017 has been bitterly contested and difficult to administer because of the truth or falsity of the allegations concerning the intimate, sexual, and private conduct of the parties and of third persons, some prominent, some private.'
Lewin is now arguing that to make the documents public as a whole 'will almost certainly disclose… allegations that may be the product of false statements or, perhaps, simply mistake, confusion, or failing memories of events alleged to have occurred over a decade and half ago.'
Campbell said her client, J. Doe, is 'objecting to public disclosure of specific content pertaining to Doe to protect compelling personal privacy interests'.
The filing was initially kept private by Judge Sweet with the understanding that they would become public at the time of trial, according to Giuffre's attorney.
But there never was, and never will be a trial, because the lawsuit was settled in May of 2017.
It was three other parties seeking to make the documents public that resulted in Judge Sweet ruling they should remain private, Politico reported.
Harvard law professor and former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is now a prominent Trump defender, along with filmmaker and far-right social media personality Mike Cernovich, and the Miami Herald, each asked the judge to unseal the filings.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6849321/Judge-presiding-key-lawsuit-relating-financier-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-dies-aged-96.html
#5894093 at 2019-03-26 02:11:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7540: Day Of Reckoning Edition
Start of list per Q drop # 3130 (March 20, 2019) Suspicious Death List
- {Obama Admin} Alan Krueger Hussein's Chief Economist (58yrs old) March 18, 2019. (not sure on cause of death)
- {Parkland High} Sydney Aiello died gunshot wound to the head (19yrs old) March 17, 2019 """SUICIDE"""??
- {Parkland High} Male Sophomore (name not released, investigation ongoing) March 24, 2019 """SUICIDE"""??
- {SANDY HOOK} Jeremy Richman "father of Avielle Richman" Sandy Hook """SUICIDE"""?? (49yrs old) 3/25/2019 at Esmond Town Hall
- {Epstein Judge} Judge Robert Sweet 3/24/2019 (96yrs old) """OLD AGE"""????
#5888656 at 2019-03-25 22:13:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7533: Barrage of FAKE NEWS Attacks Edition
>>5888537
https:// www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2019/02/20/weinsteins-new-legal-team-to-meet-with-judge.html
https:// www.apnews.com/0342afbeaec842ceb8f0ad63cb0d8def
https:// nypost.com/2019/03/25/Robert-Sweet-federal-judge-who-presided-over-harvey-weinstein-case-dead-at-96/
#5888538 at 2019-03-25 22:07:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7533: Barrage of FAKE NEWS Attacks Edition
Start of list per Q drop # 3130 (March 20, 2019) SUICIDE AND SUSPICIOUS DEATH LIST (PLEASE COPY FOR UPDATING)
- {Obama Admin} Alan Krueger Hussein's Chief Economist (58yrs old) March 18, 2019.
- {Parkland High}
- {Parkland High} Sydney Aiello died gunshot wound to the head (19yrs old) March 17, 2019
- {Parkland High} Male Sophomore (name not released, investigation ongoing) March 24, 2019
- {SANDY HOOK} Jeremy Richman "father of Avielle Richman" Sandy Hook """SUICIDE""" (49yrs old) 3/25/2019 at Esmond Town Hall
- {Epstein Judge} Judge Robert Sweet 3/24/2019 (96yrs old)
#5888537 at 2019-03-25 22:07:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7533: Barrage of FAKE NEWS Attacks Edition
>>5888406
>U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet
OK, Starting to get it now
DEAD EPSTEIN SANDBAG JUDGE IS A JUDGE IN SDNY
DEAD EPSTEIN SANDBAG JUDGE IS A JUDGE IN SDNY
DEAD EPSTEIN SANDBAG JUDGE IS A JUDGE IN SDNY
#5888406 at 2019-03-25 22:00:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7533: Barrage of FAKE NEWS Attacks Edition
>>5888047 pb
>https://www.thedailybeast.com/anthony-comello-gambino-mob-boss-shooting-suspect-radicalized-by-qanon-far-right-sites-even-trump-lawyer-says
Manhattan-based U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet passed away Sunday at age 96, the court announced. Sweet was appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1978, confirmed that same year and continued to hear and rule on cases through the last few months.
Sweet was assigned to a lawsuit that emerged from the aftermath of Epstein's controversial plea deal a decade ago, in which he escaped federal charges by pleading guilty to two prostitution-related offenses in state court. Epstein ended up spending 13 months in jail, with daily furloughs that allowed him to work in his office.
Sweet approved blanket sealing of many of the submissions from both sides, detailing some of the best arguments and evidence they intended to present if the case went to trial.
Q why are judges not retired after 80 years of age? Why was he "assigned" to the "Stein" cases?
The best justice money can buy
#5888401 at 2019-03-25 22:00:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7533: Barrage of FAKE NEWS Attacks Edition
>>5887803 lb
FTA: "Manhattan-based U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet passed away Sunday at age 96 .."
The man was 96 ... 96!
So, Q is inferring that deep sate offed a 96 year old man, and he didn't just, you know, DIE ?
This is possibly the best piece of schumer that Q has ever dished out … and anons still believe this ficking larper.
#5887943 at 2019-03-25 21:41:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7532: Melania Monday Edition
>>5887803
FTA: "Manhattan-based U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet passed away Sunday at age 96 .."
Are you fucking kidding me Q?
The man was 96 … 96!
It's not a coincidence and it wasn't some hit that you or the deep state put out … the man was fucking 96 years old!
How stupid do anons have to be to think that this means anything. put out
#5886339 at 2019-03-25 20:19:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7530: Winning Intensifies Edition
Judge involved in Epstein case has died.
By JOSH GERSTEIN
03/25/2019 03:33 PM EDT
An elderly federal judge presiding over a key lawsuit relating to financier pedophile Jeffrey Epstein died Sunday, adding another twist to the drawn-out legal saga and to efforts to unseal still-secret details about the conduct of Epstein, his enablers and one of his accusers.
Manhattan-based U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet passed away Sunday at age 96, the court announced. Sweet was appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1978, confirmed that same year and continued to hear and rule on cases through the last few months.
Sweet was assigned to a lawsuit that emerged from the aftermath of Epstein's controversial plea deal a decade ago, in which he escaped federal charges by pleading guilty to two prostitution-related offenses in state court. Epstein ended up spending 13 months in jail, with daily furloughs that allowed him to work in his office.
Critics have denounced the plea deal and the government official who negotiated it: Alexander Acosta, then the top federal prosecutor in south Florida and now U.S. secretary of Labor. The sentence, critics say, was excessively lenient for a man who faced allegations of procuring dozens of teenage girls for sex acts.
The sex trafficking lawsuit that Sweet oversaw pitted one of Epstein's alleged victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, against a longtime friend of Epstein and heir to a newspaper fortune, Ghislaine Maxwell.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/25/judge-jeffrey-epstein-case-dies-1292394
#5886210 at 2019-03-25 20:12:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7530: Winning Intensifies Edition
Judge overseeing key Jeffrey Epstein-related suit dies
An elderly federal judge presiding over a key lawsuit relating to financier pedophile Jeffrey Epstein died Sunday, adding another twist to the drawn-out legal saga and to efforts to unseal still-secret details about the conduct of Epstein, his enablers and one of his accusers.
Manhattan-based U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet passed away Sunday at age 96, the court announced. Sweet was appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1978, confirmed that same year and continued to hear and rule on cases through the last few months.
Sweet was assigned to a lawsuit that emerged from the aftermath of Epstein's controversial plea deal a decade ago, in which he escaped federal charges by pleading guilty to two prostitution-related offenses in state court. Epstein ended up spending 13 months in jail, with daily furloughs that allowed him to work in his office.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/25/judge-jeffrey-epstein-case-dies-1292394
#5819989 at 2019-03-22 02:01:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7445: Qmap.pub, will it blow, Captain? Edition
Wow, so WHY the need for all the secrecy and anonymity?
Thousands of pages!
Sexual conduct of Prominent People!
Anonymous figures argue against disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein case
A pair of mystery figures submitted last-minute court papers Tuesday to block the unsealing of (((thousands))) of potentially explosive documents in a lawsuit related to wealthy perv Jeffrey Epstein's alleged trafficking of underage women.
The (((unnamed litigants,))) whose legal briefs filed in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals were first reported by Politico, add to speculation that the trove of documents will include embarrassing details about the (((sexual antics of Epstein's famous friends.))) The court has indicated it is inclined to unseal records in the case, which was brought by alleged Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Ghislane Maxwell, who is accused of serving as the sex offender's madam.
One of the "John Doe" motions argued that the release of the unredacted documents "may well substantially infringe the privacy and (((reputational interests))) of many third persons … who have never been charged with a crime, have never been subject to civil proceedings, and have never been publicly identified by Giuffre," attorney Nicholas Lewin wrote on behalf of his unidentified client.
The brief supported the position of Maxwell, who has also objected to the unsealing of the material until names and certain personal identification information is redacted.
"It is hard to conceive of a case in which the privacy interests of third parties is more pointedly threatened: the summary judgment materials … concern the
intimate, sexual and private conduct of … third persons, some prominent,
some private," argued Lewin.
The second anonymous brief was filed by Kerrie Campbell, (((a Washington-based attorney))) who said client "J. Doe" was "objecting to public disclosure of specific content pertaining to (the client) to protect compelling personal privacy interests."
The suit against Maxwell was settled for an undisclosed amount two years ago after Federal Court Judge Robert Sweet accepted most of the pretrial court filings under seal, setting off a legal battle over their possible release.
As evidence that the law can make strange bedfellows, the Miami Herald moved last year to open all the records in the suit while reporting an investigative series on Epstein. Renowned Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, who once represented Epstein, asked for the release of records to refute allegations made by two women who claimed they engaged in sex with the attorney at the direction of Epstein.
Dershowitz has flatly denied those charges.
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-epstein-sealed-document-20190320-ipkejwbsuraqfn5za7n5mwl32u-story.html
#5669466 at 2019-03-14 01:23:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7250: Pray For The Victims Edition
A court is on the verge of unsealing hundreds of documents that could provide new evidence against alleged child sex trafficker #JeffreyEpstein and many of his potential cohorts. https://t.co/ZUtABtbK6w
Appeals Court Takes Major Step Toward Unsealing Epstein Documents
A federal appeals court is on the verge of unsealing hundreds of documents that could provide new evidence against alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and many of his potential cohorts.
On March 11, a three-judge panel at the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City gave all parties involved in a multi-year attempt to unseal court documents from a 2015 defamation case until March 19 to establish why the documents should remain sealed.
Failure to do so will result in more than 1,000 sealed or redacted documents becoming public.
The case was brought by one of Epstein's alleged victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and levied against his former partner, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.
According to a lower court ruling, Giuffre alleged that she was a "victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while she was a minor child," and that Maxwell helped facilitate the abuse, which allegedly occurred over a decade at numerous locations "around the world," and "with prominent and politically powerful men."
The lawsuit asserted that Giuffre was subjected to "public ridicule, contempt, and disgrace" when Maxwell publicly denied her allegations. The two settled before trial in 2017.
However, Judge Robert Sweet of the District Court for the Southern District of New York said the case involved "a lengthy and tumultuous discovery process" with "extreme sensitivities and privacy interests." As a result, he placed a protective order on the summary judgment and discovery documents spanning 18 hearings and 15 related decisions.
The Miami Herald has since spearheaded an attempt to unseal those documents. Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz and conservative filmmaker Michael Cernovich have also filed motions to unseal them, while only Maxwell remains opposed.
On March 6, the Herald offered oral arguments before the federal appeals court with the support of 32 other media organizations, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, Fox News, and The Associated Press.
Judge Sweet's previous ruling to keep the documents under wraps was challenged by the media coalition. According to a joint amici brief, the court "severely undervalued the powerful public interest in this case and vastly overstated the asserted countervailing interests in favor of secrecy."
"It further argues that the district court should have done an individualized right of access analysis on each judicial record, rather than authorizing blanket sealing and redaction," the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Presssaid in a statement.
So far, the appeals court is signaling agreement.
Following the March 19 ultimatum, Sanford Bohrer, the attorney representing The Miami Herald, was optimistic. "We're grateful that the court ruled the summary judgment papers are open and they are moving to expedite having them unsealed," he said.
Epstein, a wealthy 66-year-old financier, has been accused of molesting dozens of underage girls at his Palm Beach, Florida, mansion, and 72-acre private island estate in the Caribbean. The alleged abuses involved girls as young as 13 years old and took place over a period of years beginning nearly two decades ago.
In 2007, the politically connected former hedge fund manager received a stunning plea deal from federal prosecutors-now under investigation at the Department of Justice.
While facing the possibility of life in prison under human trafficking laws, Epstein was allowed to plead guilty to two state charges of soliciting prostitution and spend only 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail.
He was also afforded a work-release program that allowed him to leave the jail for 12 hours a day six days a week and work unsupervised at his downtown West Palm Beach office.
#5655357 at 2019-03-13 06:08:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7232: This Is Wire We Are Here Edition
Appeals Court Takes Major Step Toward Unsealing Epstein Documents
A federal appeals court is on the verge of unsealing hundreds of documents that could provide new evidence against alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and many of his potential cohorts.
On March 11, a three-judge panel at the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City gave all parties involved in a multi-year attempt to unseal court documents from a 2015 defamation case until March 19 to establish why the documents should remain sealed.
Failure to do so will result in more than 1,000 sealed or redacted documents becoming public.
The case was brought by one of Epstein's alleged victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and levied against his former partner, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.
According to a lower court ruling, Giuffre alleged that she was a "victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while she was a minor child," and that Maxwell helped facilitate the abuse, which allegedly occurred over a decade at numerous locations "around the world," and "with prominent and politically powerful men."
The lawsuit asserted that Giuffre was subjected to "public ridicule, contempt, and disgrace" when Maxwell publicly denied her allegations. The two settled before trial in 2017.
However, Judge Robert Sweet of the District Court for the Southern District of New York said the case involved "a lengthy and tumultuous discovery process" with "extreme sensitivities and privacy interests." As a result, he placed a protective order on the summary judgment and discovery documents spanning 18 hearings and 15 related decisions.
The Miami Herald has since spearheaded an attempt to unseal those documents. Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz and conservative filmmaker Michael Cernovich have also filed motions to unseal them, while only Maxwell remains opposed.
On March 6, the Herald offered oral arguments before the federal appeals court with the support of 32 other media organizations, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, Fox News, and The Associated Press.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/appeals-court-takes-major-step-toward-unsealing-epstein-documents_2835285.html
#5514796 at 2019-03-05 06:01:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7051: Dark Patterns Active Edition
Oral Arguments to Begin on Unsealing Epstein's Court Documents
Oral arguments about whether to unseal documents from a past court case involving accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein will begin March 6 at the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City. The case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, was a defamation lawsuit brought by one of Epstein's alleged victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre. The suit was settled in May 2017, but unsealing related court records could introduce volumes of new information regarding Epstein's alleged activities, and those of his powerful alleged co-participants.
Epstein, a wealthy financier, has been accused of molesting dozens of underage girls at his Palm Beach, Florida, mansion and his 72-acre private island estate in the Caribbean. The Department of Justice is currently investigating a 2007 plea deal that allowed him to only serve 13 months in a private area of a Palm Beach County jail, and work unsupervised at his downtown West Palm Beach office 12 hours a day, six days a week, during that period. In 2015, Giuffre sued Epstein's partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, after Maxwell publicly challenged her claims of abuse.
According to an August 2017 lower court ruling, Giuffre alleged that she was a "victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while she was a minor child," and that Maxwell helped facilitate the abuse, which allegedly occurred over a decade at numerous locations "around the world," and "with prominent and politically powerful men." The lawsuit asserted that Giuffre was subjected to "public ridicule, contempt, and disgrace" when Maxwell publicly denied her allegations. The two-year dispute involved what Judge Robert Sweet of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York called "a lengthy and tumultuous discovery process" with "extreme sensitivities and privacy interests." As a result, he placed a protective order on discovery documents and other items spanning 18 hearings and 15 related decisions.
Famed Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, who co-represented Epstein during the controversial 2007 plea agreement, unsuccessfully attempted to have three case documents unsealed in August 2016. Prominent blogger, journalist, author, and filmmaker Mike Cernovich filed a motion to unseal case materials in Jan. 2017, but was denied. Giuffre and Maxwell settled four months later, and on April 9, 2018, The Miami Herald filed a motion to unseal all case documents on First Amendment grounds. The Herald's court filing was then joined by Dershowitz, who requested to be advised of any unsealed records, so he could seek additional documents to be unsealed if needed. Giuffre and another women, Sarah Ransomme, have accused Dershowitz of abusing them in association with Epstein and Maxwell, which he vehemently denies. The Herald lost its initial attempt to unseal the documents, but has since garnered the support of 32 media organizations for its appeal on March 6, including The New York Times, Washington Post, Fox News, and the Associated Press.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/oral-arguments-to-begin-on-unsealing-epsteins-court-documents_2824549.html
Amici Brief,
https://www.rcfp.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/2018-12-17-Giuffre-v-Maxwell.pdf
Florida
Alan Dershowitz suggests curbing press access to hearing on Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article226922729.html
Alan Dershowitz
https://twitter.com/AlanDersh/status
/1101900952322408449
julie k. brown
https://twitter.com/jkbjournalist/status/1101655052740161537
https://twitter.com/jkbjournalist/status/1102177039409385472
#5507605 at 2019-03-04 23:17:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7042: "On the Eve of" Anticipation Edition
Oral Arguments to Begin on Unsealing Epstein's Court Documents
Oral arguments about whether to unseal documents from a past court case involving accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein will begin Wednesday, March 6, at the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City.
The case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, was a defamation lawsuit brought by one of Epstein's alleged victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre. The suit was settled in May 2017, but unsealing related court records could introduce volumes of new information regarding Epstein's alleged activities, and those of his powerful co-participants.
Epstein, a wealthy financier, has been accused of molesting dozens of underage girls at his Palm Beach, Florida, mansion and his 72-acre private island estate in the Caribbean. The Department of Justice is currently investigating a 2007 plea deal that allowed him to only serve 13 months in a private area of a Palm Beach County jail, and work unsupervised at his downtown West Palm Beach office 12-hours a day, six days a week, during that period.
In 2015, Giuffre sued Epstein's partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, after Maxwell publicly challenged her claims of abuse.
According to an August 2017 lower court ruling, Giuffre alleged that she was a "victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while she was a minor child," and that Maxwell helped facilitate the abuse, which allegedly occurred over a decade at numerous locations "around the world," and "with prominent and politically powerful men."
The lawsuit asserted that Giuffre was subjected to "public ridicule, contempt and disgrace" when Maxwell publicly denied her allegations.
The two-year dispute involved what Judge Robert Sweet of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York called "a lengthy and tumultuous discovery process" with "extreme sensitivities and privacy interests." As a result, he placed a protective order on discovery documents and other items spanning 18 hearings and 15 related decisions.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/oral-arguments-to-begin-on-unsealing-epsteins-court-documents_2824549.html
#2666747 at 2018-08-19 16:20:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3366 Evil People ,Go Away Edition
>>2666735
Psycho-Acoustic Projector
U.S. patent #3,566,347, (23/2/71)
A device/weapon which can actually deafen the target.
Silent Subliminal Messages
US Patent # 5,159,703. October 27th, 1992
Inventor - Dr Oliver M. Lowery
Non aural carriers in extreme audio frequency ranges are amplified or modulated with the desired material and propagated acoustically for direct inducement into the brain. This is an excellent method of influencing people without their knowledge. An alert reader would recognise how this could create coincidences and stir up conflict; especially if what's fed to one person corresponds with what's gathered (via surveillance) from another. It can also help to create coincidences of the sort the media creates (through surveillance feedback) only in reverse... where the subjects are fed information prior to the event (eg. a news story) and coerced into believing they are psychic.
Patented devices known to facilitate subliminal message delivery are too numerous to list. However, examples include: - Auditory subliminal message system and method. U.S. patent #4395600, Rene Lundy and David Tyler, 26/7/83. A system to mix messages into background music (ala the subliminal transmissions used in some U.S. department stores to prevent shoplifting or boost sales).
- Subliminal message generator. U.S. patent #5,270,800, Robert Sweet, 14/12/93. To be used with TV, cable TV and computers. (A visual medium).
- Superimposing method and apparatus useful for subliminal messages. U.S. patent #5,134,484, Joseph Wilson, 28/7/92. Relates to video signals. The subliminal data can be from a prerecorded or live signal.
And yes... the entertainment industry can use such technologies to boost sales of CD's, movie tickets etc. As intimated earlier, the criminals involved not only operate in media/political circles, they seek total control of everything. In time they may win due to suppression of information and their terrorist tactics.
N.B Sound can also be induced by radiating the head with microwaves. One unpublished application was the Gulf War but, more times than not, the targets are mostly innocent/oppressed civilians trying to exercise their basic rights to free speech in so-called western democracies.
Methods and Systems of Altering Consciousness
US Patent # 5,123,844. June 23rd, 1992
US Patent # 5,289,438. February 22nd, 1994
These systems stimulate the brain with different frequencies and wave forms to alter the subject's state of consciousness.
Electro Magnetic Field (EMF) monitoring/interference is one of the most insidious and secretive of all methods used by the agencies.
N.B. Similarly, EEG cloning feeds back the results of EMF monitoring in an attempt to induce emotional responses (e.g. fear, anger, even sleep etc.).
This could possibly work on certain members of a crowd or audience....again this could facilitate scams etc.
Dr Ross Adey concludes that all aspects of human behaviour can be affected, even controlled. He used 0.75 milliwatts per square centimetre of pulsed, modulated microwave at a frequency of 450 MHz.
Notably the Alaskan HAARP project (featuring the B.J.Eastland patented technology - U.S. patent #4,686,605, 11/4/87 - "Method and Apparatus for altering a region in the Earth's atmosphere, ionosphere or magnetosphere". AND others) also facilitates experiments in the disruption of human mental processes. It's the largest, most versatile radio frequency radiation transmitter in the world also allowing experimentation in weather "modification", wireless, electrical power beaming and communications "disruption". Its systems like this which could one day see attempts made to brainwash/control entire populations. And that is just as feasible as a wholesale nuclear holocaust.
#1000581 at 2018-04-11 19:33:51 (UTC+1)
Qresearch #1246: 1000000+ Posts Edition
>>1000346
I think this might be him:
Alexandra Wolfe, Andrew Schiff
Alexandra Kennerly Wolfe, the daughter of Sheila Wolfe and Tom Wolfe of Manhattan, was married Feb. 23 to Dr. Andrew Newman Schiff, a son of Lisa Schiff and David T. Schiff of Manhattan. Robert Sweet, a federal judge with the Southern District of New York, officiated at the Brook, a private club in Manhattan.
The groom's first marriage ended in divorce.
https:// www.nytimes.com/2018/02/25/fashion/weddings/alexandra-wolfe-andrew-schiff.html
Andrew Schiff, Karenna Gore
Karenna Gore, a daughter of Vice President and Mrs. Albert Gore Jr. of Washington, was married yesterday to Dr. Andrew Schiff, a son of Mr. and Mrs. David T. Schiff of New York. The Rt. Rev. Ronald H. Haines, the Episcopal Bishop of Washington, performed the ceremony at the Washington Cathedral.
https:// www.nytimes.com/1997/07/13/style/andrew-schiff-karenna-gore.html
8chan/8kun QResearch GERMANY Posts (1)
#5796633 at 2019-03-20 21:53:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research Germany | 1st Birthday Edition 03/15/18
>>5795457 (Q Drop)
PANIK!
1/2
Mysteriöse Parteien suchen Geheimhaltung in einem Jeffrey Epstein-bezogenen Fall.
Die zwei sagten, dass sie Peinlichkeit ertragen könnten, wenn das Gericht öffentliche Aufzeichnungen über den Prozess vorlegt, der einen langjährigen Epstein-Freund beschuldigt, sich am Sexhandel zu beteiligen
Zwei mysteriöse Prozessführer, die sich auf Datenschutzbedenken berufen, machen ein letztes Angebot, um einige Details in einer Klage geheim zu halten, die sich aus der Geschichte des wohlhabenden Finanzierers Jeffrey Epstein ergibt, minderjährige Mädchen für Sex zu bezahlen.
Kurz vor einer vom Gericht gesetzten Frist am Dienstag traten zwei anonyme Personen auf, um gegen die Aufhebung einer wichtigen untergeordneten Gerichtsentscheidung in dem Fall sowie gegen verschiedene Stellungnahmen der Parteien Einspruch zu erheben.
Beide Personen reichten ihre Beschwerden beim 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ein, das den Fall überwacht. Die beiden Personen sagten, sie könnten mit ungerechtfertigten Spekulationen und Verlegenheit konfrontiert werden, wenn das Gericht öffentliche Aufzeichnungen aus dem Prozess macht, in dem Virginia Giuffre, ein angebliches Epstein-Opfer, den langjährigen Epstein-Freund Ghislaine Maxwell beschuldigt, sich am Sexhandel zu beteiligen, indem er seine sexuellen Begegnungen mit Teenagermädchen erleichtert. Maxwell hat die Anklage zurückgewiesen.
" Die großflächige Entsiegelung der Summary Judgment Materials wird mit ziemlicher Sicherheit unvoreingenommene Behauptungen gegen Dritte offenlegen - Behauptungen, die das Produkt falscher Aussagen oder vielleicht einfach nur Fehler, Verwirrung oder mangelnde Erinnerungen an Ereignisse sein können, von denen behauptet wird, dass sie vor über anderthalb Jahrzehnten stattgefunden haben sollen", schrieb der ehemalige Bundesstaatsanwalt Nick Lewin in einem Amicusbrief, der am Dienstag eingereicht wurde.
Lewins Schriftsatz enthält keine Details über seinen Klienten - im Schriftsatz durch das Pseudonym "John Doe" identifiziert - über die Aussage hinaus, dass er "potentiell" in den zugrunde liegenden Gerichtsakten und Stellungnahmen erwähnt wird. Lewin, der in Manhattan ansässig ist, weigerte sich, einen Kommentar abzugeben.
"Wenn die Identitäten von Nicht-Parteien nicht angemessen geschützt sind, würde die Veröffentlichung der Summary Judgment Materials in diesem Fall wahrscheinlich einer Vielzahl von Nicht-Parteien schweren und irreparablen Schaden zufügen, einschließlich derjenigen, die in das Verhalten verwickelt sind und die möglicherweise von ihm geschädigt werden", heißt es im Brief.
Der andere anonyme Brief kam von der in Washington ansässigen Anwältin Kerrie Campbell, die sich mit Fällen von Geschlechtergleichstellung beschäftigt und mit der Time's Up-Bewegung zur Bekämpfung sexueller Belästigung verbunden ist. Campbell beantragte, dass der im Namen eines "J. Doe" eingereichte Brief unter Verschluss gehalten wird, sagte aber in Rechtspapieren, dass der Kunde "gegen die öffentliche Offenlegung bestimmter Inhalte von Doe zum Schutz zwingender persönlicher Datenschutzinteressen Einspruch erhebt".
Campbell reagierte nicht sofort auf eine Nachricht, die um einen Kommentar bat.
Giuffre und Maxwell haben die Klage für eine nicht offenbarte Summe im Jahr 2017 beigelegt, nachdem der Richter am U.S. District Court, Robert Sweet, Maxwells Angebot, einen Prozess abzuwenden, abgelehnt hatte. Im Vorfeld dieses Urteils akzeptierte Sweet fast alle Einreichungen im Fall unter Verschluss, ohne dass konkrete Anweisungen die Geheimhaltung rechtfertigten.
Drei verschiedene Parteien baten Sweet, die Aufzeichnungen in dem Fall zu entsiegeln: Harvard Jura-Professor und ehemaliger Epstein-Anwalt Alan Dershowitz - ein prominenter Trump-Verteidiger - Filmemacher und rechtsextreme Social Media-Persönlichkeit Mike Cernovich und der Miami Herald.