QResear.ch

#18097110 at 2023-01-07 11:57:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #49: Short Bread but Long Hours Edition

>>18046565
>if such numbering was critical, what about the numerous acknowledged lost posts? If the post number was so critical then how would one recover from the critical post being mis-numbered?

Fren, when is a map useful? If I am in a new location and driving to a known destination, I might need a map BEFORE I set out but, in my own way, I do not refer to the map as I drive to that destination. I look for markers that were on the map that I noticed before setting out. For example, if I know to find a key intersection, then, I look for the one or two beyond that intersection, on the map, so that if I drive past the target intersection I would have some clue to turn back and retrace to that intersection.

That is just an example which may be fairly common.

However, if I am driving, or walking, in a location new to me and I have no particular destination because am just out for a tour or a stroll, like getting to know a place almost at leisure, then, the map would be in back pocket ready to reference as interesting sites catch my interest. In a way, this is like leaving bread crumbs in the forest to find my way back during an adventure.

Just another example that may be fairly common.

Both examples are about exploring new territory. But how about known territory? When is a map useful? When a specific destination is the goal? But that would suggest need for an address so as to use the map effectively?

A map might be useful when giving directions, yes, but also when giving options, such as a tourist map with sites of interest from which to choose. Such a use of a map would be more user focused - to serve the user rather than to serve the instructor.

And this is my long way to get at the bit quoted at the top of this post. The "lost" or "deleted" posts? Useful on the map?

This may be a stretch, but think of the changes we were instructed to look for - markers that exist no more in actuality but only in documented images that captured history, and that marked deltas in time and also in geography (geometry). These markers were "lost" or "deleted" but served a purpose in our imagining the Q scenes captured in the London Pics.

What is the expression, you do not know where you are going if you do not know where you are coming from? Or some variation.

Example: bike hire stall on Northumberland at corner of Victoria Embankment. Look there, here, there. It was in an image that Q reposted from 2012, prior to its removal, and it left marks on the pavement that were captured in the Q pics.

Related example: Same reposted image was marked-up on the assumption that the Q camera was the traffic camera Perched on a post above the Hungerford Bridge. It seems that camera was not the one that captured the CH pics, and very likely also not the camera that captured the ROT pics (although this is not nailed down completely). The camera was there in 2012 but, as we have discovered, it was not there at times during the following year-plus.

Another related example: the ad boards on the handrail of the Hispaniola entrance. The number of these and the colours marked the passage of time. These were "signs" on the map of the EMB pics. But these were "lost" or "deleted".

Thots?

#18020408 at 2022-12-27 00:58:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #49: Short Bread but Long Hours Edition

>>18020396

… continued re Behind = [HERE]

>>18016960

The Embankment pics may not show us much in the geographic "behind" but Q did repost that pic of the bridge and the illustrative arrow showing the traffic cam position. Perhaps that is the main message for determining the year of the pics taken at that scene. Maybe there is more to discover, such as in the south sky at night? IDK.

The Corinthia Hotel pics came with an abbreviation, CH, which might suggest looking behind the hotel. Well, over one should there is the New Zealand House balcony just visible in the far distance. At that location in the "back" ground, the "behind", there is also Canada House or CH. And across from the street is Bus Shelter 'S'. All of that behind the Corinthia Hotel in that scene. Might this connect to the Black Box pic which is also the location of another Bus Shelter 'S'? That bus shelters is behind the black box with the stickers festooned upon its surface. And we have noted that there are stickers, or remnants of stickers, behind the #QAnon sticker.

I think Anons here may get what I am putting down. Behind may link across the London pics. And that may lead to the truth behind Spygate, or the predecessor/s to Spygate, that is somehow relevant to the year 2013.

As per Anon's 20.13 decode above.

Another meaning of "behind" is to refer to the backing of some effort. Who is behind that? Who is in the background supporting such and such? What caused this - what is behind this? What is in support of that?

Also, we have discovered that the EMB and CH pics may well have been taken by a recorder on foot. Not necessarily a fixed camera on a perch; but a camera Perched in the hands of an asset on the ground and mobile. Think "behind" when thinking of where to look for such an asset. Each of the London pics may depend on a view with legs.

Now revisit the WW pic of legs. What was behind the scene in that pic if not a map?

WWG1WGA

#17439564 at 2022-08-25 07:18:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #48: Return to Northumberland Edition

Just thought to remind Anons of the approximate positions from which Q's Corinthia Hotel [CH] pics were taken.

The CH set of pics were not taken from the TRAF CAM Perched on a pole above the elevator, but rather from a pedestrian-held position [CH1] on the surface of the footbridge and [CH2] part way down the stairs and [CCH3] on the walkway by the foot of the stairs at the Cabman shelter (green building near kerbside).

#15311525 at 2022-01-05 05:34:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #42: "One Year Delta" Edition

>>15311199, >>15300662, >>15310945

Can fairly say that CH2 camera location is now firmly established for elevation at a few steps above the 3rd landing, if not on the footbridge above those steps.

Think can also reason that to achieve a 1 match, the position would need to be at the streetside railing with an unobstructed.view.

However, don't think same positon, or nearly the same, on this stairway can match CH1. More on that later, but for now consider the appearance of the two signs and the top of the lamp post in the lower left quadrant of CH1. This means the camera position for CH1 would need to be farther back toward the junction.

So of the 4 CH pics, we have one firmly established on the higher of three landings on the stairway, one on the ground level in front of the Cabbie Shelter but just beyond the lamp post there, and perhaps two others on the footbridge several steps from the post on which the traf cam was Perched.

Pic related.

#15281403 at 2021-12-31 00:15:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #42: "One Year Delta" Edition

Camera position for the London Pics has been useful in dating some of the scenes captured. The EMB-CH pics have varying vantage points. So there is a range of camera 'movement' within the set.

First draft of a pair of infographics for figuring the location of the camera for the EMB and CH PICs. The following is a walk through, which over-explains because of the weaknesses in the graphics so far. Will adjust with feedback.

SV MAY 2012 provides best open source view of lamp posts, sign posts, and other landmarks without traffic in the way. With these images can come fairly close to a Q match on the ground. Not so much on the bridge. That's ok because can line up the landmarks very close to how they line up in the Q pics. And can move about up and down the streets to doublecheck details. As I write this am thinking of a simple vid to illustrate. For now this pair of graphics shows the approximate location beneath the Q vantage point on the bridge. And, as a further reference, the second graphic shows the reverse view, looking back at that position.

The key marker on the ground is the differently colour pedestrian crosswalk across Northumberland on the hotel side of Victoria Embankment. Perhaps ironically, on the ground at that corner are the words Look Right with an arrow pointing in the direction that one would need to move the SV vantage point so as to more closely match the Q vantage points. Kek.

Another marker is the stop line on that side of Northumberland at the junction. It can be 'extended' toward the ground entrance to the bridge's elevator and thus extrapolated upward to the footbridge level. In this way it becomes evident that the traffic camera is too far away to be the Q vanatage point, or range as per the way this was figured and illustrated.

The set of pics of the junction and of CH show movement in the camera position. Some slight and some quite a lot. Obviously, LISAMI6 and CH3 show the greatest difference in positioning of the camera or cameras. Later will illustrate the CH pics and how the camera position for those actually extended the range within which that camera movement took place. For now, the red shaded areas show the estimated range for the set of pics.

Here is a guide to the pair of infographics on the bridge vantage point.

A. The roadside monument lines up with The Eye, almost. The camera position is off by a few steps. Given the close matches with other landmarks, this is a fair Q match.

The red arrows indicate the direction in which the vantage would need to change to even more closely match the London Pics. How much change remains an open question, natch, hence the range shown. The takeaway is that this range's boundary is several steps away from the post on which the traffic camera is Perched.

B. Lamp posts line up almost 'on top of each other' with the foremost obscuring that behind, farther up the kerbside.

C. The gap between the post and the concrete edging or base under the fence at Whitehall Gardens is the marker. The positioning is very close to a match.

D. The white sign on the fence is rectangular, long side on the horizontal. The lampost intersects at about the middle of the length of that sign, in the Q pics, but is off a step or two in the best matching SV image. Again, the red arrow points in the direction for the needed correction in vantage.

The RED bracket shows the range of camera movement; and the white bendy arrow shows where the camera position would have been, just off frame in this SV image; the position would have been overhead on the footbridge. A vid would illustrate this notion more clearly than text description. The stop line on the road is highlighted in yellow.

These markers can be compared with the second infographic. Throwing in a third image that shows the camera position on the ground level. Later will do same for the CH pics.

#15253785 at 2021-12-25 20:57:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #42: "One Year Delta" Edition

.
Screencaps from a vid shot in 2011, before the rennovations had been completed and the Corinthia Hotel reopened, provides view from footbridge which can be used to compare against the 4 Q pics that featured the CH.

The focal length is a bit different, however, the elevation of the camera is a fairl Q match, I think, based on various points of comparison such as tree branches and lamposts.

The idea here is that we may have an objective basis for determining whether or not the Q pics were taken from the more elevated traffic camera which was Perched on a pole. That vantage point seems to have been 15 feet or so higher than a handheld camera position on the pedestrian bridge.

Also, there is pictorial evidence that the camera on the pole was removed by mid March 2014 and did not reappear for months. Might it have been gone during the time that the Q pics had been taken? It was there in SV images of MAY 2012 but not in MAY 2014; was present in GE JUL 2013. So far have not found direct evidence of it being on its perch during winter 2013/2014.

Based on these images, it may be possible to objectively assess whether the height of the camera is about 5ft above the bridge or about 20 ft above.

Three screencaps to compare with ROT1, CH1, CH2, and CH3.

Pics related. Moar…

#15253770 at 2021-12-25 20:54:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #42: "One Year Delta" Edition

Screencaps from a vid shot in 2011, before the rennovations had been completed and the Corinthia Hotel reopened, provides view from footbridge which can be used to compare against the 4 Q pics that featured the CH.

The focal length is a bit different, however, the elevation of the camera is a fairl Q match, I think, based on various points of comparison such as tree branches and lamposts.

The idea here is that we may have an objective basis for determining whether or not the Q pics were taken from the more elevated traffic camera which was Perched on a pole. That vantage point seems to have been 15 feet or so higher than a handheld camera position on the pedestrian bridge.

Also, there is pictorial evidence that the camera on the pole was removed by mid March 2014 and did not reappear for months. Might it have been gone during the time that the Q pics had been taken? It was there in SV images of MAY 2012 but not in MAY 2014; was present in GE JUL 2013. So far have not found direct evidence of it being on its perch during winter 2013/2014.

Based on these images, it may be possible to objectively assess whether the height of the camera is about 5ft above the bridge or about 20 ft above.

Three screencaps to compare with ROT1, CH1, CH2, and CH3.

Pics related. Moar…

#15031272 at 2021-11-19 02:34:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #41: "Audit the 2021 London Elections" Edition

>>15031214

Note that the bike hire stall has been returned to the kerbside it formerly occupied in 2012. The motif is now the red of its new sponsor.

There is no security camera Perched where one had been spotted in the Anon SV cap that Q repoosted.

Recall that the reposted SV image was within a very short sequence taken in that location, at that corner, in MAY 2012; in that sequence the SV camera captured an individual at Whitehall Gardens who seemed to be waiting for the GOOMAP camera – and he gave a thumbs-up as it passed, then, he was gone. That short sequence appears to have been a re-take or aspecial take of that scene at that time; it was redundant as there was an uninterupted SV sequence that covered the same ground in MAY 2012 and the images of that corner were not defective but actually pretty good views of the street scene there.

#13617653 at 2021-05-09 03:27:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #37: "Richard Trevithicks 250 Birthday" Edition

London Pics.
Northumberland at EMBANKMENT.

NIGHT view of lit area on the north side of the road. The Playhouse Theatre marquee showed Dreamboats and Petticoats. The blue lights may hve caused a blue reflection on surfaces that appeared in night time Q pics near the Corinthia Hotel.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/thefella/5428038158/in/photostream/

Dreamboats And Petticoats to Close at the Playhouse Theatre, Thursday, 2nd Aug 2012.
https://www.boxoffice.co.uk/news/dreamboats-and-petticoats-to-close-at-the-playhouse-theatre-754.aspx

The show has been in the capital for a fair few years now, originally opening at the Savoy Theatre in 2009 before disappearing from the capital and reappearing at the Playhouse the following January [2010].

"Dreamboats & Petticoats" continues at the Playhouse Theatre and is now taking bookings to its end date of Saturday 4th August 2012.

So, uninterrupted January 2010 to 4 August 2012. The bollards and traffic islands in SV imagery of MAY 2012 closely resemble the Q pics. That is relevant because CH2, and possibly also CH3, were shot BEFORE 2 MAR 2014, based on details in a stock photo taken on that date.

ROT1 is another night time shot that featured The Corinthia Hotel inside the camera frame. The ROT series was shot with a traffic camera that had been Perched above the stairs to the footbridge. We have dated that series from BEFORE APR 2014, based on elements in the three pics.

(That traffic camera does not appear in SV images of MAY 2014 nor in a vid of ST PAT's Day parade taken on Sunday 16 MAR 2014. Whether or not it reappeared during the interval between those dates, we have not yet determined.)

Here is another night pic of CH, M1Y 2011, showing the other side of Northumberland, across from the Playhouse and EMBANKMENT PLACE. Look closely at the traffic island and bollard positions. Compare with another CH pic, daytime, that was taken sometime before FEB 2013 and which also closely resembles Q's pics and SV images from MAY 2012.

Here is an infographic from back when discovering the details of the Corinthia related pics.

This serves to illustrate how unchanged that particular traffic island and bollard location had been BEFORE the London Pics there were taken. With 2 MAR 2014 as a new NOT AFTER date, we are missing a corresponding NOT BEFORE date to bookend the interval during which these Q pics could have been taken of the hotel.

We do have evidence that the bike docking station had a stall along the kerb of NORTHUMBERLAND, something to which I think Q drew attention when he confirmed the location of the traffic camera based on SV image of MAY 2012. It was removed during the interval between that date and MAY 2014 as per another set of SV images.

So far that still means a NOT BEFORE date of MAY 2012, for CH2, and prolly also CH3. And a firm NOT AFTER date of 2 MAR 2014. That is a wide set of bookends, 1 YEAR 2 MONTHS.

Looks like we can sequence these two subsets of EMB pics. CH2 and CH3 taken before the ROT pics, at least tentatively.

And taken before the Winter Wonderland pics, given the dates that theme park was open from mide DEC 2013 to first week of JAN 2014.

The RED BUS pic, and prolly the two PICCADILLY pics, taken BEFORE 23 MAR 2014 and no earlier than 31 OCT 2013, based on details within the RED BUS photo.

And the most recent pic, we know, was the BLACK BOX at Shelter S because of details in the sequencing of the labels affixed to its side by SUMMER of 2018.

Have found a stash of boris bike images taken around that docking station and will come back with what observations i might make.

#11681314 at 2020-11-17 16:46:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #25: "Spinning plates of London" Edition

>>11681256
When I look at an enlarged image the post where you have the green circle is a decorative "filial" and a bid Perched on the top. LONDON 2847 coud still be a full motion camera on the Jubilee Bridge, just angled down slightly

#11332581 at 2020-10-29 01:43:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #24: "Piccadilly Revisited" Edition

>>11330906

What are the odds that the sensor on the Perched traf cam would be the same as that used in a mobile cam or phone in 2014?

So the images that Q dropped had about 1/3 black above the actual live pic area and about 1/3 black below. The total image area for the traff cam pics and other EMB/CH pics stood at 591 wide by 1280 high. The pic area stood at 591 wide by 443 high. That left a deadzone of 591 x 837 in each image dropped. What accounts for so much black or dead area versus live area? Is the black area used for imprinting contextual info such as timestamps and locations and camera ID and so on? That got wiped instead of cropped?

Not sure that a retail camera would have that kind of dead area and still be viable in the marketplace. Could the traf cam have been taken down and used, or its sensor/lense swapped out and used in a mobile application? Then returned to its perch. Memory card? Aren't security cam images handled by a system that archives DVR?

#10268062 at 2020-08-12 23:56:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #20: "Spinning Sliders Come Not Here" Edition

>>10264373
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_graffiti

TY Anon, v much.

The tag we are discussing showed up in SV 2015 JUL and appeared in 2015 OCT, 2016 JUN, 2016 AUG, 2016 OCT, 2017 MAR, 2018 JAN, but not in 2018 DEC.

The pic for 2018 DEC is a screencap from a vid where the camera was Perched at the front window of a double-decker bus. (Makes me think that the RED BUS pic and its reflections point to this means of learning moar about the surroundings.) It shows a cleaned-up box with just the official Shelter ID sticker.

Q's pic shows the gum residue left over from the removed stickers but also shows the tag that is affixed beneath #QANON. This is fairly matched with SV 2018 JAN which also shows the scuff mark below all the stickers. Now, that mark may also be gum residue, IDK, but got no image that shows a sticker there.

The next SV images show neither the scuff mark nor the stickers. 2019 APR shows the shelter sticker and also the gum residue where the other stickers had been. No scuff mark is discernible. 2019 JUL looks the same to my eye. 2019 SEP shows the same but moar clearly so. The scuff mark did not make a re-appearance so it seems to me that the stickers were removed, the box wiped down fairly lightly such that the residue remained, mostly, and other less delible marks removed.

Alternatively, a thorough cleaning was applied prior to the 2018 vid but moar stickers were affixed and removed later, leaving the residue.

If stickers go on and are scraped off, a few times, I suppose it may be a telltale sign of ?other great writers tend to slash out self-proclaimed kings who have not gained that rank yet in their eyes? as per the write-up in wikipedia. Pic related.