8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (5)
#24220226 at 2026-02-05 17:34:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #29518: [theY] call it the 'TEMPLE' on LSJ Island Edition
FCC Authorizes Logos Space to Deploy 3,960-Satellite Mega-Constellation for Enterprise Connectivity
February 5, 2026
On February 5, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) officially granted Logos Space Services, Inc. the authority to construct, launch, and operate a major new non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) satellite system.
The approval clears the path for the company to deploy a constellation of 3,960 broadband satellites, a significant move that signals the government's continued commitment to expanding domestic satellite infrastructure and fostering competition in the low Earth orbit (LEO) sector.
A Specialized Network for the "EW Era"
Founded by former Google executive Milo Medin and veteran technologist Rama Akella, Logos Space is positioning itself as a secure alternative to consumer-focused networks like Starlink.
The constellation is specifically "purpose-built" for enterprise and government users who require high-performance connectivity that can withstand the rigors of modern electronic warfare (EW).
Advanced Spectrum Usage: Unlike traditional commercial networks, Logos will operate in high-frequency V and E spectrum bands (alongside Ka and Q/V bands). These higher frequencies allow for very narrow beams that are inherently more difficult to jam or intercept.
Coherent Optical Crosslinks: The satellites are equipped with advanced optical links, enabling high-speed data transfer between spacecraft. This reduces the need for ground-based "transit" through terrestrial fiber, creating a more resilient and lower-latency global network.
Dual-Use Capabilities: The system is designed for both commercial multi-gigabit business services and mission-critical government communications, such as supporting Navy vessels on the high seas or connecting remote industrial data centers.
Phased Deployment and Market Impact
The FCC-approved plan outlines a three-phase rollout strategy. The initial phase involves the launch of 1,092 satellites, which will provide sufficient capacity for Logos to begin serving its first tier of enterprise customers globally.
Subsequent phases will scale the constellation to its full 3,960-satellite capacity, operating at altitudes between 860 km and 925 km.
The entry of Logos Space into the market is backed by Thomas Tull's U.S. Innovative Technology (USIT) fund, reflecting a broader trend of private capital flowing into "sovereign-commercial" space ventures.
By securing this license, Logos joins a small group of high-capacity LEO operators-including SpaceX's Starlink and Amazon's Leo-aiming to provide ubiquitous global broadband.
However, by focusing strictly on the MPLS and Ethernet connectivity needs of the enterprise market, Logos aims to fill a gap for "fiber-like performance" without the security vulnerabilities of the public internet.
Strategic Regulatory Environment
The approval comes amid a period of intense regulatory activity at the FCC.
Under Chairman Brendan Carr, the agency has moved toward a more streamlined "assembly line" approach for licensing mega-constellations, aiming to reduce backlogs and maintain U.S. leadership in space technology.
The FCC's decision on the Logos application followed extensive technical reviews to ensure the new constellation would not cause harmful interference to existing satellite systems or pose an undue risk of orbital debris.
https://news.satnews.com/2026/02/05/fcc-authorizes-logos-space-to-deploy-3960-satellite-mega-constellation-for-enterprise-connectivity/
#11807177 at 2020-11-27 15:20:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15071: When Gilgamesh Did Bilderberg WIth Stacy Abrams In 2019 Edition
Scmidt and Defense Innovation Board…Did Schmidt bug the electronic vote? Pt1
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/01/bokhari-the-defense-innovation-board-may-just-be-a-google-lobbying-operation/
Despite its long track record of hostility to the Trump movement, including the wholesale suppression of pro-Trump media in its search engine, Google is on track to secure a major lobbying objective - overhauling the government's 5G strategy. Google seems to have an ally in reaching its target in the form of the Department of Defense's "Defense Innovation Board."
In 2016, Obama's Department of Defense created a "Defense Innovation Board" (DIB) chaired by then Alphabet CEO Eric Schmidt and also included Milo Medin, Google's head of Wireless, who is still on it. Schmidt only left the board this month due to term limits.
In addition to including members from the high ranks of Google, the revolving door at the Defense Innovation Board also rotates in the opposite direction.
In March this year, DIB Executive Director Josh Marcuse left the board to join Google as the head of strategy and innovation for the global public sector. He has since used his position at Google to advocate on 5G policy.
The overhaul of U.S. strategy on 5G appears to be a major objective of the DIB, especially its Google-linked members and alumni. Over the last few years, Medin and Schmidt have been advocating opening up the Defense Spectrum, worth billions and billions of dollars, for commercial use.
In 2019, Medin authored a report recommending a new 5G strategy that would share the DoD's mid-band spectrum with commercial providers.
In June 2020, the Government Accountability Office released a report entitled "5G Deployment: FCC Needs Comprehensive Strategic Planning to Guide its Efforts." Experts consulted during the drafting included Milo Medin, as well as Google-funded organizations including Public Knowledge, the Consumer Federation of America, and Next Century Cities.
Fast-forward to September of this year: top Republican operative Karl Rove gave the keynote presentation at a tech conference, calling for a national 5G strategy along the lines of Google's proposals. Rove acknowledged working directly with Eric Schmidt, Newt Gingrich and "other vendors from the private sector."
"We've got to beat the Chinese," Rove said. In return for getting access to shared government airwaves, he said, the private sector would commit to building a nationwide 5G network."
Rove told the conference separately that he's spoken with Schmidt and others including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, "very liberal" House lawmakers, Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) and Dell Technologies.
Eric Schmidt spoke at the same conference.
"We're definitely playing catch-up.... It's a national emergency," said Schmidt. "The solution is to act quickly."
"I like this notion of sharing the military spectrum. ...Use some form of wholesale model that would use private-sector money to build out the network very quickly."
A day after the conference, Eric Schmidt testified before the House Armed Services Intelligence Subcommittee.
Following the hearing, sources reported that Schmidt personally met with Senator Warner and other members to advocate for a 5G network using the DoD's Naval spectrum.
The years-long lobbying operation appeared to pay off. On September 18, the Department of Defense issued a request for information (RFI) on defense spectrum sharing that closely mirrored Milo Medin's 2019 report for the DIB.
#10889842 at 2020-10-02 20:45:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #13938: Shills Need Not Apply Edition
The 'Defense Innovation Board' May Just Be a Google Lobbying Operation
Despite its long track record of hostility to the Trump movement, including the wholesale suppression of pro-Trump media in its search engine, Google is on track to secure a major lobbying objective - overhauling the government's 5G strategy. Google seems to have an ally in reaching its target in the form of the Department of Defense's "Defense Innovation Board." In 2016, Obama's Department of Defense created a "Defense Innovation Board" (DIB) chaired by then Alphabet CEO Eric Schmidt and also included Milo Medin, Google's head of Wireless, who is still on it. Schmidt only left the board this month due to term limits. In addition to including members from the high ranks of Google, the revolving door at the Defense Innovation Board also rotates in the opposite direction. In March this year, DIB Executive Director Josh Marcuse left the board to join Google as the head of strategy and innovation for the global public sector. He has since used his position at Google to advocate on 5G policy. The overhaul of U.S. strategy on 5G appears to be a major objective of the DIB, especially its Google-linked members and alumni. Over the last few years, Medin and Schmidt have been advocating opening up the Defense Spectrum, worth billions and billions of dollars, for commercial use.
In 2019, Medin authored a report recommending a new 5G strategy that would share the DoD's mid-band spectrum with commercial providers. In June 2020, the Government Accountability Office released a report entitled "5G Deployment: FCC Needs Comprehensive Strategic Planning to Guide its Efforts." Experts consulted during the drafting included Milo Medin, as well as Google-funded organizations including Public Knowledge, the Consumer Federation of America, and Next Century Cities. Fast-forward to September of this year: top Republican operative Karl Rove gave the keynote presentation at a tech conference, calling for a national 5G strategy along the lines of Google's proposals. Rove acknowledged working directly with Eric Schmidt, Newt Gingrich and "other vendors from the private sector." "We've got to beat the Chinese," Rove said. In return for getting access to shared government airwaves, he said, the private sector would commit to building a nationwide 5G network." Rove told the conference separately that he's spoken with Schmidt and others including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, "very liberal" House lawmakers, Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) and Dell Technologies. Eric Schmidt spoke at the same conference. "We're definitely playing catch-up.... It's a national emergency," said Schmidt. "The solution is to act quickly." "I like this notion of sharing the military spectrum. ...Use some form of wholesale model that would use private-sector money to build out the network very quickly."
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/01/bokhari-the-defense-innovation-board-may-just-be-a-google-lobbying-operation/
#6599353 at 2019-05-27 05:54:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8438: Red White and Q. May 27th in USA. The Pre Dawn Edition
>>6599337
https://www.geekwire.com/2016/amazon-jeff-bezos-defense-innovation-advisory-board/
The advisory board is due to begin its work over the summer and provide Carter with a set of initial recommendations by October. In addition to Bezos, Schmidt, Hoffman, Levine, Pahlka and Tyson, board members include:
Adam Grant, professor, Wharton School of Business
Danny Hillis, computer theorist and co-founder, Applied Inventions
Walter Isaacson, president and CEO of the Aspen Institute
Eric Lander, president and founding director, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
J. Michael McQuade, senior vice president for science and technology, United Technologies
William McRaven, chancellor, University of Texas System
Milo Medin, vice president, Access Services, Google Capital
Richard Murray, professor, California Institute of Technology
Cass Sunstein, professor, Harvard Law School
#1009485 at 2018-04-12 06:30:22 (UTC+1)
QResearch #1258: Honeypots Edition
>>1007274
So I started doing some digging on Howard Shrobe, the MIT computer engineering and AI professor highlighted in the Wired article about LifeLog.
I discovered a video he's featured in called "Is the Internet Broken?" that was recorded at The Aspen Institute right after the major ransomware attack back in June. Pretty fascinating discussion with some tech heavyweights and major Deep State assets.
First, there's Walter Isaacson, CEO and president of The Aspen Institute. Also former chairman and CEO of CNN.
Second, John Carlin, head of The Aspen Institute cybersecurity program and former chief of staff of Robert Mueller when he was head of the FBI.
Third, Milo Medin, vice president for access services at Google. A member of the Defense Innovation Board and formerly worked at NASA.
The video is a little over an hour long and definitely worth listening to the whole thing, but there are a few highlights right at the beginning.
At the 2 minute mark, Isaacson talks about government agencies like DARPA and the NSA teaming up with private entities like Google to innovate on projects, admitting the fuckery connections.
At 7:15, Shrobe starts talking about the problems of the design of the Internet.
But if you're going to watch any of it, go to the 10 minute mark where they talk about privacy and anonymity on the Internet. Isaacson goes on to talk about having no anonymity on the Internet.
And at the 13:20 mark, Isaacson the scumbag specifically states it's time to give up all anonymity online. "Anonymity is not necessarily a good thing. Plato taught us that in 'The Republic.'…"I think we would now be better off if people were not anonymous on the Internet," followed by some pathetic applause in the audience.
I'm really thinking Shrobe is some sort of key player. He talks several times in the video about his experiences heading DARPA.
https:// www.aspenideas.org/speaker/howard-shrobe