8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (8)
#20231315 at 2024-01-12 15:43:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24824: Heads Explode: CPAC Endorses Trump Edition
In the United States, freedom of religion is a constitutionally protected right provided in the religion clauses of the First Amendment.[1] As stated in the Bill of Rights: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…". Freedom of religion is linked to the countervailing principle of separation of church and state, a concept advocated by Colonial founders such as Dr. John Clarke, Roger Williams, William Penn, and later Founding Fathers such as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson.[2][3]
#18703922 at 2023-04-16 13:17:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22947: Then, Now, Forever Edition
>>18703851
>KILLED IN ACTION BY THE BRITISH WHILST FIGHTING FOR IRELAND DURING EASTER WEEK 1916
>There were 38 children - aged 16 and under
>Connolly Sean; Corcoran James; Coyle Harry; Costello John; Cromean John; Crinigan John; Clarke Philip; Carrigan Charles; Darcy Charles; Darcy Peter;Donelan Brendan;
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN ANON???? IT TWIZZLES THE ALMONDS MIGHTLY…
#18703851 at 2023-04-16 12:52:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22947: Then, Now, Forever Edition
>>18703729
> Scituate, MA
>Donelan
>LOTS OF FBI TIES
>CIA
>>18703655
Welcome to the most Irish town in America
Scituate, Massachusetts, has a higher concentration of Irish than anywhere else in US
Joe Duffy's list of Children Killed By The British in 1916 Rising
https://static.rasset.ie/documents/radio1/joe-duffys-list-of-children-killed-in-1916-rising.pdf
KILLED IN ACTION BY THE BRITISH WHILST FIGHTING FOR IRELAND DURING EASTER WEEK 1916
Material is added to this site on a regular basis - information on this page may change
Of the 590 people killed during the Easter Rising, 374 were civilians, 116 British Soldiers, 77 Irish Republicans and 23 members of the police forces. There were 38 children - aged 16 and under - killed. More than 2,600 people were wounded. Many of the civilians were killed or wounded by British artillery fire or were mistaken for rebels.
Adams John; Allen Tomas; Byrne Andrew; Byrne James; Byrne Joseph; Burke Frank;
Connolly Sean; Corcoran James; Coyle Harry; Costello John; Cromean John; Crinigan John; Clarke Philip; Carrigan Charles; Darcy Charles; Darcy Peter;Donelan Brendan;
#14960630 at 2021-11-09 19:03:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #18926: Pelosi holds press conference at COP26 climate summit Edition
>>14960544
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE6OEY4XqTk&t
This anons opinion is that it is of moar value to read, and know the law of the land versus, delving to deeply into the minefield of disinformation/misinformation from potential clowns.
98% of what is out there is ridiculous bullshit sprinkled with crumbs of truth. (including below possibly)
Eustace Mullins Exposed Dr. John Coleman In 1992
https://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/eustace-mullins-exposed-dr-John-coleman-1992
According to the late, great Eustace Mullins, Dr. John Coleman (the name he goes by, anyway) not only lifted the materials he used in his books and lectures from both Mullins and Lyndon Larouche publications, but he also may have lifted material from the Anti-Defamation League...while working as a Mossad agent-agitator against America!
Check out below what Mullins had to say about Coleman back in 1992, and see if what Mullins said holds any water. Given that it's from Mullins, I'd say it holds a glass that is over half-full.
Some Illuminating Background On The Character "John Coleman", Agent-Agitator Finally Exposed
(Editor's note: Regular readers will recall that much space in the 9/8/92 LIBERATOR was devoted to explaining an insipid array of attacks from one "Dr. John Coleman" aka John Clarke and likely actually one Joseph Pavlonsky, of Russian Khazarian origin. It seems that some of the excellent sources "Coleman" "borrowed" material from have seen fit to discuss this colorful character and in so doing, provide an illuminating - if sadly destructive - pattern of activity we would share with our readers. The following is an extract from an article purportedly by Eustace Mullins in Lawrence Patterson's publication Criminal Politics for July or August of 1992.)
A specter is haunting the American conservative movement - a specter using an alias (among others) of Dr. John Coleman. Coleman bills himself as "the World's Greatest Intelligence Expert - with secret but highly placed ties to British Intelligence." He appeared out of the blue at a Bob White, Sound Monetary Conference meeting in Costa Rica in 1984.
#11639719 at 2020-11-14 08:38:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #14861: CodeMonkey finds Discrepancies Edition
>>11639683
SQUID
The game-changing scientific device you've never heard of.
(Inside Science) Meet the game-changing scientific device you've never heard of SQUID. No, not the slimy animal with tentacles that wrestles sperm whales in Moby Dick. We're talking about an entirely different kind of squid.
You can find them in machines doctors use to monitor cardiac and brain activities. You can also find them in detectors geologists use to find underground oil and silver deposits.
"So, the basic concept that we're going to be talking about is called the SQUID and that's an acronym for superconducting quantum interference device," said John Clarke from the University of California, Berkeley.
By taking advantage of a physical phenomenon known as the Josephson effect, named after physicist Brian David Josephson, who laid the theoretical groundwork for the effect in 1962, SQUIDS use a loop made of superconducting material to measure the smallest changes in a magnetic field. The result? A device that is sensitive to magnetic fields that are a thousand trillion times smaller than a typical refrigerator magnet. It's so sensitive that it can even detect the tiniest magnetic signals from your heart or brain.
"Someone with an array of SQUIDS could tell whether or not you're actually paying attention to what I'm saying," said Clarke.
More at this link.
https://insidescience.org/video/squid
#10730488 at 2020-09-21 10:55:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #13733: Enjoy The Show Edition
>>10730475
>https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1307295478661419010
Nominee & days to confirm from nomination:
Lewis Powell -45
Ruth Bader Ginsburg -42
Sandra Day O'Connor -33 (*the vacancy)
Harlan Stone -31
Wiley Rutledge -28
Harry Blackmun -27 (*wrote Roe v Wade)
Arthur Goldberg -25
Robert Jackson -25
John Roberts -23 (*became Chief Justice)
Mahlon Pitney -23
John Paul Stevens -19
Sherman Minton -19
Warren Burger -17 (*became Chief Justice)
Charles Whittaker -17
Tom Clark -16
Pierce Butler -16
Harlan Stone -15 (*became Chief Justice)
William Douglas -15
Abe Fortas -14
Fred Vinson -14 (*became Chief Justice)
Frank Murphy -12
Felix Frankfurter -12
Owen Roberts -11
Charles Hughes -10
Stanley Reed -10
John Clarke -10
James McReynolds -10
Benjamin Cardozo -9
William Moody -9
Byron White -8
Charles Hughes -7 (*became Chief Justice)
Horace Lurton -7
Hugo Black -5
Edward Sanford -5
William Day -4
Joseph Lamar -3
Willis Devanter -3
Oliver Holmes -2
Harold Burton -1
James Byrnes -0
George Sutherland -0
William Taft -0 (*became Chief Justice)
Edward White -0
(Yes, four SCOTUS Justices had SAME DAY nominations and confirmations by the Senate. And Byrnes never even attended law school before FDR put him on the court)
#10716082 at 2020-09-20 02:30:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research Genearl #13714: Best President/Peaceful Protestor Evah! Edition
Supreme Court vacancies in presidential election years
In the wake of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, questions have arisen about whether there is a standard practice of not nominating and confirming Supreme Court Justices during a presidential election year. The historical record does not reveal any instances since at least 1900 of the president failing to nominate and/or the Senate failing to confirm a nominee in a presidential election year because of the impending election. In that period, there were several nominations and confirmations of Justices during presidential election years.
The first nomination during an election year in the twentieth century came on March 13, 1912, when President William Taft (a Republican) nominated Mahlon Pitney to succeed John Marshall Harlan, who died on October 14, 1911. The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed Pitney on March 18, 1912, by a vote of fifty to twenty-six.
President Woodrow Wilson (a Democrat) made two nominations during 1916. On January 28, 1916, Wilson nominated Louis Brandeis to replace Joseph Rucker Lamar, who died on January 2, 1916; the Democratic-controlled Senate confirmed Brandeis on June 1, 1916, by a vote of forty-seven to twenty-two. Charles Evans Hughes resigned from the Court on June 10, 1916 to run (unsuccessfully) for president as a Republican. On July 14, 1916, Wilson nominated John Clarke to replace him; Clarke was confirmed unanimously ten days later.
On February 15, 1932, President Herbert Hoover (a Republican) nominated Benjamin Cardozo to succeed Oliver Wendell Holmes, who retired on January 12, 1932. A Republican-controlled Senate confirmed Cardozo by a unanimous voice vote on February 24, 1932.
On January 4, 1940, President Franklin Roosevelt (a Democrat) nominated Frank Murphy to replace Pierce Butler, who died on November 16, 1939; Murphy was confirmed by a heavily Democratic Senate on January 16, 1940, by a voice vote.
On November 30, 1987, President Ronald Reagan (a Republican) nominated Justice Anthony Kennedy to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Lewis Powell. A Democratic-controlled Senate confirmed Kennedy (who followed Robert Bork and Douglas Ginsburg as nominees for that slot) on February 3, 1988, by a vote of ninety-seven to zero.
In two instances in the twentieth century, presidents were not able to nominate and confirm a successor during an election year. But neither reflects a practice of leaving a seat open on the Supreme Court until after the election.
On September 7, 1956, Sherman Minton announced his intent to retire in a letter to President Dwight D. Eisenhower, and he served until October 15, 1956. With the Senate already adjourned, Eisenhower made a recess appointment of William J. Brennan to the Court shortly thereafter; Brennan was formally nominated to the Court and confirmed in 1957. The fact that Eisenhower put Brennan on the Court is inconsistent with any tradition of leaving a seat vacant.
And in 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson nominated Abe Fortas, who was already sitting as an Associate Justice, to succeed Chief Justice Earl Warren, but the Fortas nomination was the target of a bipartisan filibuster - principally in reaction to the Warren Court's liberalism and ethical questions about Fortas, although objections were certainly also made that it was inappropriate to fill the seat in an election year. That filibuster prompted Homer Thornberry, whom Johnson nominated to succeed Fortas as an Associate Justice, to withdraw his name from consideration in October 1968, because there was no vacancy to fill. Moreover, the failure to confirm Fortas as the Chief Justice did not leave the Court short a Justice, because Chief Justice Earl Warren remained on the bench.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/supreme-court-vacancies-in-presidential-election-years/
#9121055 at 2020-05-11 11:11:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11674: The Ghosts of Shadilay! Edition
>>9120955
John Clarke has passed away now.
He and Dawes were funny as fuck sending up current affairs.
There will never be any quite like them again.
8chan/8kun QResearch CANADA Posts (1)
#11257147 at 2020-10-24 20:38:34 (UTC+1)
Welcome to Q Research Canada #8 - Red October - Leaf Edition - WWG1WGA
>>11249460
>>11255423
>>11251000
Just did some checks…it's Jason Kenney with Aga Khan!! Turns out he's the Premier of Alberta.
He studied philosophy at the University of San Francisco, a Jesuit university in San Francisco, California, but failed to complete coursework. During his time in San Francisco, he was interviewed by CNN, for a segment exploring "religious values". In the segment, he was credited as "Jason Kenny - Anti-abortion Activist". He argued against Jesuit professors, including Rev. John Clarke, who declared free speech essential to a university. Allowing pro-choice activists on campus, Kenney argued in the CNN interview, was "destroying the mission and the purpose of this university". In the student newspaper, he suggested that if the school gave a platform to pro-choice groups in the name of free speech, it would have no basis to refuse a similar platform to pedophiles or to the Church of Satan.
So Kenney supports free speech for pedophilia and the Church of Satan…what about the constitution and laws?