QResear.ch

#22546551 at 2025-02-09 18:58:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #27555: What Business Do (you) Have Here? Edition

And what about Chabad Jewish Cult????

Ambassador David Friedman: Make U.S.-Controlled Gaza A 'Monument To The Failure Of Radical Islamism'

In an exclusive interview with Morning Wire, former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman discussed President Trump's plan to have the United States take control of Gaza, saying it could become a "permanent monument to the failure of radical Islamism" if executed correctly.

"Why not now take this extraordinarily valuable property in the hands of decent people, make it what it could be," Friedman told Daily Wire editor-in-chief John Bickley. "Let's create a permanent monument to the failure of radical Islamism. Because that's what this will become."

During a Tuesday press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump announced his plans to relocate all Gazans out of the area and to rebuild the strip into a U.S.-owned-development zone.

Friedman said the effort could be funded by the new American Sovereign Wealth Fund, a government-owned investment portfolio that will be used to purchase assets and invest for future generations.

"He's looking at the incredible violence and waste and human misery and then he's looking at what this could be," Friedman said. "When I was working on this, we always had one gaping issue when it came to Gaza, which is, how are we going to get Hamas out?"

Friedman pointed out that Hamas has a lot of support and was democratically elected in 2006, though the terror group has not held elections since. But despite this, Friedman believes that many Gazans would willingly relocate for the chance at a better life.

"From my direct conversations with lots of people who come from Gaza, many people would love to leave," Friedman said, adding that although some people will say they rather fight to the media, "there aren't a lot of people who really feel that way."

He added that he knew of many Gazans who wanted to leave before Hamas' war with Israel began after October 7.

"I got a pretty good sense from people living in Gaza how desperate they were to get out," he said. "It's a terrible place to live. It's under the most repressive radical Islamic regime, Sharia law regime that people want to get out and there's a lot of educated people in Gaza because, oddly enough, there's so little to do there. There's actually a lot of people reading books. And so it's not completely an uneducated place, and they want to get out and they want to move on with their lives."

He estimated that more than 90 percent of "non-Hamas terrorist sympathizers" would want to leave.

"I would say we're talking about probably a million and a half people at least who would gladly get on a boat and go someplace else," Friedman said.

But Friedman says even Gazans who want to stay have to go.

"Whatever the legal issues may be, whatever the moral issues may be, they can't stay," He said. "There's no place for them to stay. There's not a building there which wouldn't be condemned by any zoning board in the United States. They're all going to fall down."

The key is getting people to recognize that it's simply not practical to stay, according to Friedman.

"I just think that once you reach the conclusion that the people who live there now have to leave for their own safety, for their own health, they have to leave. Then it opens up a much wider focus on what could be."

Friedman said the United States should continue to pressure Jordan and Egypt to take in Gazan refugees, pointing out that Jordan receives massive amounts of financial support from the United States.

A good solution, according to Friedman, would be relocating the Gazans to Egypt's large and rural Sinai peninsula, which Israel returned to Egypt in 1979.

"Sinai has basically been neglected by Egypt since Israel handed it back, so I think there's opportunities there," Friedman said.

Alternatively, Friedman said the over 20 Muslim countries could consider taking in 20,000 to 30,000 Gazan refugees each.

Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and other key players have rejected Trump's idea.

Hamas, the terrorist organization that raped, murdered, and kidnapped more than a thousand people in Israel on October 7, called Trump's plan a "crime against humanity."

Listen to the entire interview here.

https://www.womensystems.com/2025/02/ambassador-david-friedman-make-us.html

#16560036 at 2022-06-29 22:47:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #20952; MAJOR FORCES POSTS, THINGS ARE MOVING EDITION

Old article from 2016, so it seems like Bankrupting the US and shutting down the Corporation of the USA was always the plan. I know I downloaded the papers he signed sometime in June 2020, can't find them now so,was this whole thing plannedalong with the election?

Trump: Yeah, So I'll Declare America Bankrupt
By John Bickley Jun 22, 2016 DailyWire.com
In a discussion on CBS News Wednesday about how he would handle America's crushing debt, Donald Trump said he'd use the same approach he's used for his businesses: "renegotiate the debt." In other words, walk America through a form of national bankruptcy. When pressed by O'Donnell about the "very severe consequences" of such an act, the self-described "King of Debt" immediately reversed himself, saying, "I wouldn't renegotiate the debt."

Trump's talk about renegotiating/not renegotiating the national debt came during a larger discussion about his economic policies with CBS host Norah O'Donnell on Wednesday (video below).
"The current plan that you've put forward, independent economic analysts have looked at it and said it would add $30 trillion to the deficit, because you're going to reduce taxes, you're not going to cut entitlements, there's some questions about," said O'Donnell.
"I'm going to bring back jobs," replied Trump. "I'm going to bring back businesses. We're going to have people come into our country."

"I'm the king of debt. I'm great with debt, nobody knows debt better than me. I made a fortune by using debt."

Donald Trump
Asked how he planned to do that, Trump said, "Look, companies now are leaving the United States. Corporate inversion, they're leaving the United States, we have almost $5 trillion sitting out there, where they can't get the money back, they can't bring it in because there's no mechanism to bring it back in and the tax is so high. I'm going to bring tremendous amounts of money, tremendous amounts of jobs, tremendous numbers of companies, and yes the tax is going to be cut from the highest tax nation anywhere in the world to a fairly low tax. Not the lowest in the world, but to a fairly low tax."

When O'Donnell said that Hillary Clinton had called him the "king of debt," Trump said that was false: he called himself the king of debt.

"I'm the king of debt," said Trump. "I'm great with debt, nobody knows debt better than me. I made a fortune by using debt. And if things don't work out I renegotiate the debt, I mean that's a smart thing not a stupid thing. And I made a fortune."

O'Donnell noted that the Federal Reserve chairman had chastised Trump for previously suggesting he'd make a deal with creditors.
"Janet Yellen, who you know, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, blasted you for saying that the U.S. could load up on debt and then make a deal with creditors if the economy has soured," said O'Donnell. "She said there would be very severe consequences if an elected president tried to renegotiate the nation's debt."

Trump responded by contradicting his previous statement, saying,"I wouldn't renegotiate the debt."

https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-yeah-so-ill-declare-america-bankrupt-james-barrett

#10686818 at 2020-09-17 22:22:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #13677: PandoraSoros Box Open Edition

Facebook Censors Ad On Biden Raising Taxes Despite Fact-Checker Contradicting Its Own "Mostly False" Rating

Facebook has censored a pro-Trump ad despite fact-checker PolitiFact contradicting its own "mostly false" rating with pretzel logic.

As the Daily Wire's John Bickley writes, the ad launched on August 4 was given a "mostly false" rating by the partisan fact-checker, and subsequently banned by Facebook.

The ad directly quotes Biden declaring, "If you elect me, your taxes are going to be raised, not cut," and warns that his plan will raise taxes "on all income groups." -Daily Wire

PolitiFact then goes to great lengths to discredit the ad - calling it "mostly false" because the PAC which produced it, America First, 'lacked context' and gave the 'wrong impression' about what Biden meant.

The 'fact-checker' then inserts their own logic, claiming that only the "biggest earners" would be hit harder by Biden's plan, while increases on lower-income groups "would be relatively small."

Except PolitiFact admits: "[S]ome tax experts estimate that Biden's plan would mean higher taxes on average for all income groups."

In other words, Biden literally told an audience that their taxes would rise - which "some tax experts" confirmed, yet PolitiFact took it upon themselves to 'clarify' - and Facebook has banned the above ad over it.

More via the Daily Wire:

* * *

In other words, PolitiFact uses a Democratic talking point about the rich paying more in an attempt to distract from the fact that the ad's claim is actually true.

Here's how the fact check begins (emphasis added):

A new ad from a pro-Trump super PAC uses out-of-context footage of Joe Biden to claim that the former vice president wants to raise taxes for Americans across the board.

Versions of the ad from America First Action began airing Aug. 4 on Facebook and on TV screens in Wisconsin and North Carolina. They focus largely on a comment Biden made in response to a voter during a February campaign stop in South Carolina.

But the America First Action ad presents that remark out of context. And while some tax experts estimate that Biden's plan would mean higher taxes on average for all income groups, those increases would be relatively small for all but the biggest earners.

In its attempt to argue that the ad is "mostly false," PolitiFact specifically cites a "Biden campaign official" as supposed evidence of the Democrat's intent (emphasis added):

The full exchange shows that Biden was saying his plan would raise taxes for people who, in his words, "benefited from" the GOP's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. A Biden campaign official said his point was that the wealthy - not all Americans - would not benefit from his plan.

The ad's portrayal of the exchange leaves a different impression.

The fact check goes on to make a similarly flimsy case against the ad's inclusion of Biden warning that his tax increases could "go higher." The supposed evidence of this being "mostly false" is the following full quote from Biden:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/facebook-censors-ad-biden-raising-taxes-despite-fact-checker-contradicting-its-own-mostly

#9887716 at 2020-07-07 21:29:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12653: Q Has Gifted Us With Vision........... Edition

https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/07/ben-shapiro-daily-wire-editor-in-chief-John-Bickley/

#9885346 at 2020-07-07 17:54:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12651: WWG1WGA Edition

Ben Shapiro Steps Down As The Daily Wire's Editor-In-Chief

Conservative political commentator Ben Shapiro is stepping down as the editor-in-chief of The Daily Wire, The Blaze reported Monday.

Shapiro founded the site in 2015. The decision to step down comes as the company nears its five-year anniversary. Shapiro will remain a co-owner of The Daily Wire, according to The Blaze. John Bickley, a writer and editor who has been with the website since the beginning, will be taking over as editor-in-chief, The Blaze reported, citing the Wire's co-CEO Jeremy Boreing.

The political commentator will be stepping into a new role as editor emeritus and will not be responsible for the website's editorial direction.

"John Bickley isn't just a tremendous editor and writer, he's a principled conservative and an honest human being," Shapiro said in a statement to The Blaze. "I can't think of anyone better to take over as EIC, and I look forward to seeing the new, exciting editorial direction of the site."

Bickley has been performing many of the editor-in-chief duties over the past two years and this move formalizes his role, according to Boreing.

The Wire's new editor-in-chief has used the pseudonym "James Barrett" during his time at the website, according to The Blaze.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/07/ben-shapiro-daily-wire-editor-in-chief-John-Bickley/