8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (9)
#18314081 at 2023-02-09 17:38:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22445: He who is whithout SINE Wave, cast the first stone OMen / Edition
German State-Sponsored Media Building Worldwide Project Against "Increasing Disinformation"
Is censorship going global?
The German state-sponsored news outlet ZDF is working with state-sponsored news outlets from Canada, Switzerland, and Belgium to "develop online-based solutions to enable civic engagement and democratic discourse in digital space away from hate comments and increasing disinformation."
That means censorship.
ZDF reported:
Together with public broadcasters from Canada (CBC), Switzerland (SRG SSR) and Belgium (RTBF), ZDF wants to develop online-based solutions to enable civic engagement and democratic discourse in digital space away from hate comments and increasing disinformation .
The international research project "Public Spaces Incubator" aims to develop and test innovative building blocks for open and respectful online discussions. The focus is on the interests of the users. Commercial aspects are irrelevant.
ZDF Director Dr. Norbert Himmler: "Democracy thrives on an open and fair dialogue in society. We must not leave that to the major American platforms. The 'Public Spaces Incubator' project is intended to show ways in which public broadcasting can create independent and fact-based communication spaces in the digital world can build. Our common goal is to counter the increase in hatred, violence, propaganda and defamation on social media with a public service alternative."
The four broadcasting companies are conducting the research project in cooperation with the non-profit organization New_ Public, which has extensive experience and expertise in non-profit-oriented digital communication. Co-founder Eli Pariser is known in Germany as the author of the book "The Filter Bubble: How We Are Being Disenfranchised on the Internet". Parisian and co-founder Deepti Doshi, together with the New_Public team, design interdisciplinary digital spaces to strengthen democratic civic coexistence.
During the 1930s, the German state-controlled media also colluded with western media outlets.
A major example of this was the Associated Press.
In return for access to Germany, The Associated Press agreed to not publish anything "calculated to weaken the strength of the Reich abroad or at home".
The Guardian reported (March 2016):
The Associated Press news agency entered a formal cooperation with the Hitler regime in the 1930s, supplying American newspapers with material directly produced and selected by the Nazi propaganda ministry, archive material unearthed by a German historian has revealed.
...
In an article published in academic journal Studies in Contemporary History , historian Harriet Scharnberg shows that AP was only able to retain its access by entering into a mutually beneficial two-way cooperation with the Nazi regime.
The New York-based agency ceded control of its output by signing up to the so-called Schriftleitergesetz (editor's law), promising not to publish any material "calculated to weaken the strength of the Reich abroad or at home".
This law required AP to hire reporters who also worked for the Nazi party's propaganda division. One of the four photographers employed by the Associated Press in the 1930s, Franz Roth, was a member of the SS paramilitary unit's propaganda division, whose photographs were personally chosen by Hitler. AP has removed Roth's pictures from its website since Scharnberg published her findings, though thumbnails remain viewable due to "software issues".
Ninety years later, is it happening again?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/comes-german-state-sponsored-media-building-worldwide-project-increasing-disinformation/
https://presseportal.zdf.de/pressemitteilung/zdf-und-internationale-partner-starten-forschungsprojekt-fuer-offenen-dialog-im-netz
#14863065 at 2021-10-26 22:01:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #18800: Enter The Comfefe Edition
George Soros Bankrolls New Media Corporation That Will Pay Journalists To Fight 'Misinformation,' Control Local News Outlets
Soros, LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman, and other left-wing billionaires aim to destroy "misinformation" with big-dollar investments
A coalition of left-wing billionaires, including controversial hedge fund manager George Soros, are bankrolling a new media company according to a report on Tuesday from left-leaning outlet Axios. The report states that a "new public benefit corporation backed by billionaires Reid Hoffman, George Soros, and others is launching Tuesday to fund new media companies and efforts that tackle disinformation."
The news comes as the corporate media continues to struggle to convince most Americans that all information which does not conform to the personal political bEliefs of corporate journalists should be labeled "misinformation" and discarded.
Branded "Good Information Inc." by its funders , the new company will be led by Tara McGowan, who previously led a left-wing organization called ACRONYM that reportedly spent over $100 million to ensure that President Donald Trump would lose the 2020 presidential election. ACRONYM was the subject of a complaint from the Federal Elections Commission last year.
Axios reported the the organization's advisory committee consists of "nearly two dozen political, media and tech experts, including former White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, Civic Signal Founder Eli Pariser, Check My Ads co-founder Nandini Jammi, former Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times Editor Mark Jacob, Accountable Tech co-founder Nicole Gill and others."
Additionally, the organization has reportedly expressed an interest in giving money to organizations that purport to be conservative so long as they fight against anything Soros and the other investors consider "misinformation." Local news outlets are also a key target of the new firm, with Good information inc. looking to invest in "progressive" local outlets to fight disinformation around the country.
https://nationalfile.com/george-soros-bankrolls-new-media-corporation-that-will-pay-journalists-to-fight-misinformation-control-local-news-outlets/
#12811841 at 2021-02-03 19:05:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16354: Have You Red Pilled Your Congressman Lately Edition
https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/avaaz_expenses_and_financial_information/
Avaaz is 100% member-funded and thus only accountable to its members - not to major donors, foundations, or any special interests. Our entire staff recognizes the incredible amount of trust and hope that comes with our members' donations. Each and every member of the Avaaz team takes the responsibility of being excellent stewards of this hope and trust very seriously. Here's a bit more on how we do it.
While Avaaz is a global organization with staff and members across the world, we are currently incorporated as a non-profit 501(c)4 organization in the state of Delaware, USA. Under New York State law, Avaaz must conduct an annual independent audit of our finances. Our audits are conducted by Grassi & Co.
https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/ricken-patel/
Ricken Patel was born on January 8, 1977 in the Canadian city of Edmonton. After graduating from Balliol College at Oxford University - where he studied politics, philosophy, and economics - he went on to earn a master's degree in public policy from Harvard. Over the years, Patel has worked as a consultant for such entities as CARE International, the Gates Foundation, the International Center for Transitional Justice, the International Crisis Group, the Rockefeller Foundation, Harvard University, Oxford University, and the United Nations. He also served a stint alongside MoveOn.org founder Eli Pariser on the advisory council of J Street.
When Patel saw how effectively MoveOn was able to raise massive sums of money via Internet-based activities, he thought: "[W]ow! This is the tool."
In 2003, Patel and other activists - most notably former Virginia congressman Tom Perriello - formed the nonprofit organization Res Publica, for which Patel served as nominal executive director). Under the stewardship of Patel and Perriello, Res Publica concentrated its early efforts on promoting left-wing activism in the American faith community.
The following year, Patel and Perriello worked with the National Council of Churches to establish Faithful America, an online movement-building initiative designed to be "a rEligious version of MoveOn.org." Faithful America was later taken over by Faith in Public Life, where Patel served as a member of the board.
In 2006, Patel and Perriello initiated Avaaz.org,[1] as a global "e-advocacy" project of Res Publica. When Avaaz subsequently became an independent nonprofit in 2007, Patel became the organization's executive director.
https://avaazimages.avaaz.org/Avaaz%202019%20Form%20990.pdf
#9820366 at 2020-07-02 02:53:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12569: Mutual Respect? WTF does that mean, EXACTLY, NBA? Edition
Anons,
I was digging through my batch of Soros leaks from way back in the day and found
something interesting–it's a .pdf with a section detailing the "Minutes of the
meeting of the U.S. Programs Board of the Open Society Institute October 1-2,
2015":
pg. 71:
''A meeting of the U.S. Programs ("USP") Board (the "Board") of the Open Society Institute ("OSI")
was held at the offices of OSI in New York, New York on October 1 and 2, 2015. There were
present Board members: Yochai Benkler, Deepak Bhargava, Rosa Brooks, Geoffrey Canada, Steve
Coll, Eli Pariser, Alexander Soros, Jonathan Soros, Andy Stern, Bryan Stevenson and Christopher
Stone.''
''Attending portions of the meeting by invitation were: Melody Barnes, Rebecca Carson, Maria
Cattaui, Vera Franz, Leslie Gross-Davis, Eric Halperin, Damon Hewitt, Laleh Ispahani, Suzanne
James, Diana Morris, Lenny Noisette, Andrea Batista Schlesinger, Charis Shafer, Herbert Sturz, Bill
Vandenberg, Chancellar Williams, and Ken Zimmerman. Guests invited to present were: Margaret
Egan, Tara Huffman, Mike Jacobson, Ai-Jen Poo, Nuria Ortiz, Mike Soto, and
Zephyr Teachout.''
…
pg. 73:
''On day two, Diana Morris introduced the topic of Developments in Criminal Justice Reform and in
turn introduced Tara Andrews Huffman, Director of the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Program at
OSI-Baltimore, who discussed how OSI Baltimore grantees are well poised on issues such as police
reform and removing barriers to employment. The Board had questions regarding the engagements
of those in the Black Lives Matter movement, about the involvement of Fellows, and tensions
between the movement and organized philanthropy, including OSI Baltimore. Diana Morris noted
the heavy involvement of Fellows and the decrease in prison population.''
…
''After that, Ken Zimmerman prefaced the Black Lives Matter discussion with a video summary of
local movement leader observations. Discussants Geoff Canada, Deepak Bhargava and Eli Pariser
remarked on the philanthropic relationship to movements, the potential of participants for fatigue,
infrastructure development within movements, '''creating partnerships between activists
internationally, creating a leadership pipEline, and what supportable exist organizations in the space.
The Board discussed political objectives, the unpredictable nature of activist movements, and
strategies for developing the capacity for leadership.'
Obviously Soros has had a hand in all this, but here we have an actual document
showing intent.
I'm posting the document here–it's a .pdf, unfortunately, so you'll have to
decide for yourself whether it's worth looking at.
#5575357 at 2019-03-08 16:49:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7129: Ohr Transcript Analysis Edition
>>5575219
https://archive.is/7EAVj Silverstring attended a conference with people from BBN Technologies.
https://archive.fo/ZPFYi in 2012, a few months after Highlands Forum co-chair Regina Dugan left DARPA to join Google as a senior executive, then NSA chief Gen. Keith Alexander was emailing Google's founding executive Sergey Brin to discuss information sharing for national security.
https://archive.fo/ZPFYi (again) By 2007, a year after the Island Forum meeting that included Gilman Louie, Facebook received its second round of $12.7 million worth of funding from Accel Partners. Accel was headed up by James Breyer, former chair of the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) where Louie also served on the board while still CEO of In-Q-Tel. Both Louie and Breyer had previously served together on the board of BBN Technologies - which had recruited ex-DARPA chief and In-Q-Tel trustee Anita Jones.
https://archive.is/I6wHO Matt Cohler is a co-founder of FWD.US
https://archive.is/sUQpU Matt Cohler is part of Benchmark Capital
https://archive.is/sUQpU Matt Cohler former lieutenant to Reid Hoffman and Mark Zuckerberg
(no source) Steve Chen, former PayPal engineer who co-founded YouTube - alleged member of Paypal Mafia
(no source) Chris Hughes was Director of Online Organizing for 2008 Obama Campaign
https://archive.is/pyjHi The AccessNow International Advisory Board includes
* Andrew McLaughlin
* Chris Hughes
* Joe Rospars
* Scott Heiferman
(no source) and also Ricken Patel and Eli Pariser of Avaaz / Purpose Action
#4866972 at 2019-01-23 01:05:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6213: even the devil hates Hillary Edition
The ADL Took $1.75 Million from a Funder of Alt-Left Anti-Semitism, Now It's Ignoring Alt-Left Hate
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/272511/adl-took-175-million-funder-alt-left-anti-semitism-daniel-greenfield https://archive.is/0Uuid
> Omidyar's money set up the Center on Technology and Society, using the ADL brand to provide cover for a deeply disturbing program for potentially automating online censorship. And the board of tech experts named by the ADL's Greenblatt includes at least one figure with anti-Semitic connections… Eli Pariser, the board president of MoveOn and a co-founder of Avaaz, radical left-wing groups with their own histories of anti-Semitism. Both organizations are notorious for their Soros backing, their hostility to Israel and friendliness to hate.
Avaaz: Imperialist Pimps of Militarism, Protectors of the Oligarchy, Trusted Facilitators of War
http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2012/09/10/avaaz-imperialist-pimps-of-militarism-protectors-of-the-oligarchy-trusted-facilitators-of-war/ https://archive.is/Ys1ij
The activist group Color of Change is pressuring Reddit's advertisers to defund the site…
https://reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3hyzu6/activist_pressure_on_advertisers_is_driving/ https://archive.is/EROSD
Avaaz and Color of Change working together: https://archive.is/xq0nx
> Sign Avaaz's open letter on democracy. Demand a civil rights audit via Color of Change.
Was ADL captured by Qatari intelligence? https://voat.co/v/politics/2922043 https://archive.is/kGAWA
The center's board includes Reddit CEO Steve Huffman and Danielle Citron who co-hosted a podcast with Brianna Wu. The center's stated purpose is to suppress Islamophobia.
https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/leading-tech-platforms-and-cyber-experts-join-new-adl-advisory-board-to-clamp https://archive.is/Muv2N
Let's learn about Islamophobia. https://8ch.net/gamergatehq/res/327591.html#327791 https://archive.is/oxh4K
> In practice the term Islamophobia is used to suppress any opposition to the radicals, the terrorists, the extremists.
DIG HERE. And don't just dig. Make phone calls, and write and mail physical letters to FBI, DHS, and military intelligence offices demanding arrests.
#4864903 at 2019-01-22 22:16:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6210: Senate Debates Wall Funding Edition
THE ADL TOOK $1.75 MILLION FROM A FUNDER OF ALT-LEFT ANTI-SEMITISM, NOW IT'S IGNORING ALT-LEFT HATE
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/272511/adl-took-175-million-funder-alt-left-anti-semitism-daniel-greenfield
> And yet the board of tech experts includes Eli Pariser, the board president of MoveOn and a co-founder of Avaaz
Look into Avaaz
Here is the list of board members for the ADL's Center for Technology and Society https://archive.is/Muv2N
#4662664 at 2019-01-08 17:07:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #5949: Can't Boycott the TRUTH Edition
Sauce:
https://politicalvelcraft.org/soros-ii/
Having experienced this success in 2000, Soros moved to exploit the
power of 527s on a much larger scale during the 2004 election cycle.
Toward that end, he was a key force in the creation of the so-called "Shadow Party" in 2003. This term refers to a nationwide network of unions, non-profit activist groups, and think tanks whose agendas are ideologically to theleft, and which are engaged in campaigning for the Democrats. This network's activities include fundraising, get-out-the-vote drives, political advertising, opposition research, and media manipulation.
"The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional
republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is ...
George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party,
bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the
instrument through which he exerts that control.... It works by
siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions
that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times and
putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He
then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit. In
2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a SHADOW OR MIRROR IMAGE OF THE PARTY. It performs all the functions we would normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth. However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr. Soros and his associates. The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of money. By controlling the Democrat purse strings, the Shadow Party can make or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him. During the 2004 election cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser, to declare, 'Now it's our party. We bought it, we own it....'"
Asserting that America needed "a regime change" to oust Bush, Soros
declared that derailing the President's reelection bid in 2004 "is the
central focus of my life ... a matter of life and death." "America under
Bush," he said, "is a danger to the world, and I'm willing to put my
money where my mouth is."
When Soros targets a country for "regime change," he begins by creating a shadow government - a fully formed government-in-exile, ready to assume power when the opportunity arises. The Shadow Party he has built in America greatly resembles those he has created in other countries prior to instigating a coup.
The leader of these radicals is ... George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control. ... It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit.
In 2004 Soros spent some $26 million of his own money in an effort to drive Bush from office. THAT SUM INCLUDED A $5 MILLION DONATION TO MOVEON.ORG, a $10 million grant to a Democratic Party 2004 GET-OUT-THE-VOTE INITIATIVE CALLED AMERICA COMING TOGETHER, and $3 million to the CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS (CAP), A THINK-TANK HEADED BY FORMER CLINTON CHIEF-OF-STAFF JOHN PODESTA.
(Soros himself was instrumental in establishing CAP in 2003 as "a
nonpartisan research and educational institute" aimed at "developing a
long-term vision of a progressive America.")
Though Soros and his Shadow Party failed to bring about "regime change" in 2004, the vast network of interrelated Shadow Party groups would prove to be key players in the 2006 midterm elections that saw Democrats seize control of Congress. Of particular significance was Democracy Alliance, a non-tax-exempt nonprofit entity registered in the District of Columbia, which Soros had founded in 2005, and whose long-term objective was to develop a funding clearinghouse for leftist groups.
#19733 at 2018-01-11 07:54:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22: Be Ready For ANYTHING Edition
>>13117
I finally got to where I can use a real computer, and the first thing I did was look into Upworthy. On the surface, they look like idealists. There are connections to Al Gore and MoveOn. org. Should this organization concern us? I'm not sure. This is what I came up with.
Upworthy .com
Owned and operated by Cloud Tiger Media Inc., founded 2011
One of the goals is behavior change. They work with Gates Foundation to measure it. "With the Gates Foundation, the publications measured how content changed peoples' interest in social issues based on how they behaved weeks later. Were they more likely to sign a petition, for example?"
https:// adexchanger. com/publishers/post-merger-profitability-upworthy-goods-happy-marriage/
Mr. Benjamin Goldhirsh, CEO & Co-Founder, the son of Inc. magazine founder Bernie Goldhirsh.
Previously founded GOOD Worldwide Inc. in 2006, global media brand and social impact company, with high school and college friends including Al Gore III. Subscription fees to their magazine were donated entirely to charities.
GOOD includes GOOD Media, GOOD Corps, and GOOD Studio. We help people and organizations be forces for good.
https:// en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Good_Worldwide
http:// www.imdb. com/name/nm1644664/?ref_=nv_sr_1
https:// www.politico. com/media/story/2017/01/upworthy-to-merge-with-good-worldwide-consolidating-newsrooms-004919
Ben runs Goldhirsh Foundation with a sibling. "Through its LA2050 challenge, the foundation provides three types of capital to create networks for innovators: financial capital, social capital, and human capital."
https:// www.insidephilanthropy. com/fundraising-los-angeles-grants/goldhirsh-foundation-los-angeles-grants.html
Mr. Eli Pariser, Co-Founder & President, Cloud Tiger Media Inc. Also, board president of MoveOn. org.
https:// en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Eli_Pariser
Oddly, Upworthy suffered from Facebook manipulation, too.
https:// www.npr. org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/06/20/533529538/upworthy-was-one-of-the-hottest-sites-ever-you-wont-bElieve-what-happened-next
http:// www.nytimes. com/2003/03/09/magazine/smart-mobbing-the-war.html
8chan/8kun QResearch AUSTRALIA Posts (1)
#10793361 at 2020-09-26 03:24:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 - INFORMATION WARFARE Edition
>>10793340
2/2
QAnon conspiracies
Of the 45 people to comment on this Migration Watch meme shared by Brighton & Hove UKIP - 27 were women and most, from what I could tell from their profiles, were middle-aged grandmothers. When I looked at what other content these women were sharing, I found memes about anti-animal cruelty, anti-Black Lives Matter protests, anti-BBC proms and content in favour of Brexit.
Some of the women were also worried about the threat to "our" children posed by paedophile rings. And in this they demonstrated the next level of political meme sharing - freely interacting with content from both the UK and the US.
For one woman that meant sharing conspiracy theories from Mama Wolf, one of the Facebook accounts circulating QAnon content. One of these was entitled "Epstein Islands frequent flyers" a hotch-potch of unfounded accusations linking Hilary Clinton, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Madonna, the Queen, and other (mostly black or Jewish) "Elites" to the late Jeffrey Epstein, a global child trafficking network, drugs harvested from children's blood, and secret messages coded into Trump's press briefings on his plans to save the children.
I found one of the same Facebook users who had shared the Migration Watch meme also sharing a post calling for people to flood the BBC's Facebook page on August 25 with the #saveourchildren tag. "They won't cover child trafficking so we will bring it to them. It's time to take this up a level," said the meme.
Hidden radicalisation
The bubble communities we inhabit on Facebook shield us from alternative views to our own, while also making it easier for views to be reinforced, enhanced - groomed even - towards more radical positions.
Facebook encourages pools of the like-minded, whether through architecture that encourages what the activist Eli Pariser's termed "filter bubbles", or what the psychologist Daniel Kahneman called "cognitive ease" - our willingness to bElieve ideas that are familiar, comfortable - easy - to bElieve, and to avoid ideas that would take effort to accept. It's also possible to game Facebook's algorithms to manipulate public opinion, as the investigative work of journalists such as Carole Cadwalladr and Craig Silverman has shown.
But seeing a radical meme isn't enough to trigger more of the same content, it's how we interact with the content that matters to Facebook. The depth of interest needed to comment and then share a political idea will trigger more of the same and, potentially, take the user through increasing levels of radicalisation.
A slightly racist granny can quickly become groomed towards adopting more radical views. Or a fellow mum be taken from conspiracy theories about the Coronavirus Act to those about Epstein's island. And then that can lead to thousands of protesters to march in London in late August against mask wearing and in defence of a "truth" only they are being shown.
It can be tempting to dismiss the anti-mask protesters or groups marching to Buckingham Palace to #SaveOurChildren as a few thousand cranks in a sea of sensible people. But we do not know the size of the iceberg - beneath each visible protester may be thousands of partial bElievers, including an unknown number of grandmothers helping QAnon to grow.
https://theconversation.com/how-british-grannies-are-spreading-qanon-conspiracy-theory-memes-on-facebook-145820
8chan/8kun QResearch GERMANY Posts (1)
#7856555 at 2020-01-19 21:14:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research Germany #34 | MC Brothers in Arms - Edition
>>7853620
January 19, 2020
Meinungsfreiheit in akuter Gefahr: NGO-Fundamentalismus lässt Al Qaeda alt aussehen
Ist es eigentlich noch fünf vor Zwölf oder schon später?
Kennen Sie Avaaz?
Wenn nicht, dann sollten Sie sich schnellstens für diese NGO, die auch als "Campaign Group" bezeichnet wird, interessieren.
Avaaz ist eine der größten Gefahren für die westliche Zivilisation und die Meinungsfreiheit schlechthin.
Avaaz wurde 2007 gegründet. Pate standen Res Publica und Moveon.org. Die Verflechtungen zwischen den drei Gruppen sind offenkundig: Geschäftsführender Direktor von Res Publica und Avaaz ist der Kanadier Ricken Patel. Vorsitzender im Aufsichtsrat von Avaaz ist Eli Pariser, der geschäftsführende Direktor von Moveon.org.
Moveon.org wird seit Jahren von den Open Society Foundations, also von George Soros gesponsert. Dabei wird nicht gekleckert, sondern geklotzt.
https://sciencefiles.org/2020/01/19/meinungsfreiheit-in-akuter-gefahr-ngo-fundamentalismus-lasst-al-qaeda-alt-aussehen/