8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (23)
#20344092 at 2024-02-02 05:00:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24960: Mullet Rapper Reloaded Edition
>>20344013
in our case i think that's fema or the un wef? can we take our pick?
so it'd okay to nek ppl if they think differently then you is this their reasoning?
how repulsive and unjust.
" oh but we couldn't let it spread"
Who on earth gave you the right to force anything upon one being because you think it's the right way? I find that someone who travels thru many destinations always miss the road but eventually the road comes full circle. The easiest road would be to walk in a straight line, but that's too easy.
The OPS originated in the Public Safety program under the International Cooperation Administration (ICA) in 1954. In 1962, when the ICA was replaced by the USAID, the program was reorganised under the new title of 'Office of Public Safety', consolidating various disparate overseas police training and assistance projects across the globe.[1] Its director, CIA operative and police reformer Byron Engle, served from 1962 until his retirement in 1973.[3]
Police assistance projects overseas had been established by the Eisenhower administration, but military intervention and covert action by the CIA was the primary method of addressing communist groups and other subversives in poor and recently decolonised countries. In the 1950s and 60s, covert action was increasingly unsuccessful, the most infamous example being the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion.[4] Already a proponent of modernization theory and international development programs as an alternative method of combating the spread of Communism, Kennedy was receptive to the efforts of national security advisor Robert W. Komer to grow police assistance and make it the primary agent of counterinsurgency.[5] Komer considered the police to be "more valuable than Special Forces in our global counter-insurgency efforts" and more cost-effective in that they did not require the expensive equipment and weaponry that military forces did. He described them as more successful as a preventative measure than any other program, providing "the first line of defense against demonstrations, riots and local insurrections. Only when the situation gets out of hand (as in South Vietnam) does the military have to be called in". Police were, as USAID director David Bell put it, "a most sensitive point of contact between the government and people, close to the focal points of unrest, and more acceptable than the army as keepers of order over long periods of time. The police are frequently better trained and equipped than the military to deal with minor forms of violence, conspiracy and subversion".[6]
#20098662 at 2023-12-19 12:03:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24665: Unexplainable Behavior, AMERICA at Siege Edition
ARCHIVING - ANDREW BRIDGEN SPEECH TO THE PANDEMIC TREATY WHICH WILL GIVE THE W.H.O POWERS TO CALL A PANDEMIC FOR ANY REASON ON ANY COUNTRY OR ALL TOGETHER INCLUDING VACCINATION OF POPULATIONS BY FORCE.
note: there are 194 nations signed up to the w.h.o out of 196 in total. Once this takes hold it will part of the Social health passports and the great reset global agenda 2030.
full speech is 25 minutes in length from monday 18th Dec 2023.
==========
WHO debate, UK parliament
https://youtu.be/n9rRbVycNQk
-----------------–
88,209 views 18 Dec 2023
Mr. Andrew Bridgen. Link to poorly attended UK Parliament debate on the International Health Regulations, Westminster Hall, Monday 18th December 2023, https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index…
Full transcript
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons…
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dame Maria. I, too, thank the 116,000 members of the public who signed this public petition so that we can have this important debate today. I would also like to thank Dr David Bell-someone who actually worked for the WHO for a number of years-for his briefings to me, and also the Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse for his contributions to the information I have with me today.
I would like to start by agreeing with the hon. Member for Shipley (Philip Davies). Both he and I spoke in the public petition debate on 17 April this year when we considered the pandemic treaty. It is impossible to consider either the pandemic treaty or the amendments to the international health regulations in isolation; they are two linked instruments of the WHO, and they need to be considered in parallel. My opening question is this: why does the WHO make false claims regarding proposals to seize states' sovereignty?
continued
#19853627 at 2023-11-03 13:26:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24376: Just Another Night Shift Edition
How Did the Corruption of Public Health Happen?
"The Covid-19 response of the international health industry, led by the World Health Organisation (WHO), impoverished the public and degraded health." Now, there is a current push to grant even more authority to the WHO and while funding initiatives that provide access to essential healthcare services may benefit the global community, giving the WHO more power should not be mistaken for an effort to enhance public health. In fact, allocating public funds to the WHO would further diminish individual freedoms and fundamental human rights and would be detrimental to society.
David Bell of the Brownstone Institute argues "International institutions, supported by our taxes, must never be in a position to undermine democracy, curtail freedom of expression, or override our fundamental right to work, education, and normal family life. Doing so would be the antithesis of bodily autonomy and human rights. It would be the antithesis of democracy. And it would be the antithesis of good public health." he asks:
How Did the Corruption of Public Health Happen?
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/03/how-did-the-corruption-of-public-health-happen/
#19775133 at 2023-10-21 08:12:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24282: The Sword of Truth Cuts Through the Fog of War Edition
FDA ties with Gates Foundation
A collaboration between US drug regulator and the Gates Foundation has raised concerns about undue influence over the regulation of pandemic countermeasures.
MARYANNE DEMASI, PHD
OCT 4, 2023
In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Under the MOU, the two entities agreed to share information to "facilitate the development of innovative products, including medical countermeasures," such as diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics to combat disease transmission during a pandemic.
The FDA has MOUs with many academic and non-profit organisations, but few have as much to gain as Bill Gates, who has invested billions into pandemic countermeasures.
Experts are concerned the Gates Foundation could have undue influence over the FDA's regulatory decisions of these countermeasures.
David Gortler, an ex-senior adviser to the FDA commissioner between 2019 and 2021, says he is "suspicious" of the MOU.
"If the Gates Foundation establishes an MOU with a regulator on a product they want to develop, it seems like it would be a conflict of interest. What if every other drug company did the exact same thing as the Gates Foundation?" he says.
David Gortler, former senior advisor to FDA commissioner 2019-2021
Gortler, now a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington DC, explained that normally, meetings between developers and regulators are supposed to be an official part of the public record and subject to Freedom of Information Act requests.
"However, an MOU such as this can circumvent the usual requirements for the transparency of official communications," says Gortler. "This way their communications can be kept secret."
David Bell, a former medical officer for the World Health Organisation (WHO) who now works as a public health physician and biotech consultant, agrees that the MOU has potential to corrupt the regulatory process.
"The narrative is that philanthropic foundations can only be good, because they're making vaccines and saving thousands of lives, so we need to cut the red-tape and help the FDA get stuff done quickly otherwise children will die," says Bell. "But in reality, it has potential to corrupt the whole system."
David Bell, physician and biotech consultant
Bell adds, "Speaking generally, close relationships between regulators and developers raise inevitable risks that shortcuts and favours will breakdown the rigorousness of the product review, putting the public at risk."
Revolving door
The FDA has been roundly criticised for its "revolving door." Ten of the past 11 FDA commissioners left the agency and secured roles with pharmaceutical companies they once regulated.
Similarly, the Gates Foundation hired high-ranking members of the FDA, who bring with them intimate knowledge of the regulatory process.
For example, Murray Lumpkin had a 24-year career at the FDA, serving as senior advisor to the FDA commissioner and representative for global issues. Now, he is deputy director of regulatory affairs at the Gates Foundation, and signatory on the MOU.
And Margaret Hamburg, who served as FDA commissioner between 2009 and 2015, is now on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Gates Foundation.
#19772690 at 2023-10-20 23:27:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24279: Shut it Down Edition
The FDA's Ties to the Gates Foundation
In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Under the MOU, the two entities agreed to share information to "facilitate the development of innovative products, including medical countermeasures," such as diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics to combat disease transmission during a pandemic.
The FDA has MOUs with many academic and non-profit organisations, but few have as much to gain as Bill Gates, who has invested billions into pandemic countermeasures.
Experts are concerned the Gates Foundation could have undue influence over the FDA's regulatory decisions of these countermeasures.
David Gortler, an ex-senior adviser to the FDA commissioner between 2019 and 2021, says he is "suspicious" of the MOU.
"If the Gates Foundation establishes an MOU with a regulator on a product they want to develop, it seems like it would be a conflict of interest. What if every other drug company did the exact same thing as the Gates Foundation?" he says.
Gortler, now a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, DC, explained that normally, meetings between developers and regulators are supposed to be an official part of the public record and subject to Freedom of Information Act requests.
"However, an MOU such as this can circumvent the usual requirements for the transparency of official communications," says Gortler. "This way their communications can be kept secret."
David Bell, a former medical officer for the World Health Organisation (WHO) who now works as a public health physician and biotech consultant, agrees that the MOU has potential to corrupt the regulatory process.
"The narrative is that philanthropic foundations can only be good, because they're making vaccines and saving thousands of lives, so we need to cut the red tape and help the FDA get stuff done quickly otherwise children will die," says Bell. "But in reality, it has potential to corrupt the whole system."
Bell adds, "Speaking generally, close relationships between regulators and developers raise inevitable risks that shortcuts and favours will breakdown the rigorousness of the product review, putting the public at risk."
Revolving door
The FDA has been roundly criticised for its "revolving door." Ten of the past 11 FDA commissioners left the agency and secured roles with pharmaceutical companies they once regulated.
Similarly, the Gates Foundation hired high-ranking members of the FDA, who bring with them intimate knowledge of the regulatory process.
MORE
https://brownstone.org/articles/fda-ties-to-gates-foundation/
#19590437 at 2023-09-21 20:12:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24058: The Border Isn't Open Edition
UN President Approves Pandemic Declaration
The United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly (UNGA) president today approved the non-binding U.N declaration on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response (PPPR), without a full assembly vote and over the objections of 11 nations.
Critics called the declaration, which seeks to create a global pandemic authority with the power to enforce lockdowns, universal vaccination and censorship of "misinformation," "hypocrisy" and "unhinged."
The approval came as part of a high-level meeting on PPPR. But what does the declaration mean in practice?
For proponents, the declaration is a key step toward global coordination in pandemic prevention and public health.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it "presents an opportunity ... to prevent and prepare for pandemics and their consequences, using an approach that involves all government sectors."
The WHO also said the PPPR aims to "apply lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic" and "comes as the world faces multiple humanitarian and climate-related crises which are threatening lives and livelihoods around the world."
In a statement, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said, "If COVID-19 taught us nothing else, it's that when health is at risk, everything is at risk." He linked the PPPR to the U.N.'s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), saying world leaders should "show they have learned the painful lessons of the pandemic."
Attorney Lawrence Gostin, head of Georgetown University's WHO Collaborating Center - a key figure "playing a key behind-the-scenes role in negotiations" for the proposed "pandemic treaty" and amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) - said the high-level meeting "is our best chance to gain support and deep engagement of heads of state and government."
'Unprecedented' Agreement Comes at Expense of National Sovereignty
Other experts took a different view. Author and podcaster Frank Gaffney, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, told The Defender it is "very worrying" that the U.N. and WHO "will further encourage, if not actually authorize, the kind of standing capability or authority on their part to essentially dictate what constitutes emergencies."
"There's no getting around the fact that it's going to come at the expense of the sovereignty of the various nations that will subsequently be told that they have an emergency and told what they have to do about it," he added. "This is unprecedented."
Gostin said "Negotiators are at a loss" as to how to balance accountability and sovereignty when implementing instruments like the PPPR, IHR or "pandemic treaty."
Writing for the Brownstone Institute, Dr. David Bell, a public health physician, biotech consultant and former director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund, said "the main aim" of the PPPR "is to back" the "pandemic treaty" and IHR amendments currently under negotiation by WHO member states.
Bell said a "silence procedure" is in place, "meaning that States not responding will be deemed supporters of the text." He said the text is "clearly contradictory, sometimes fallacious, and often quite meaningless," and intended to centralize the WHO's power.
Bell told The Defender, "The declaration was not written with serious intent, but is essentially empty rhetoric promoting a continued centralization of control that the U.N. and WHO are openly seeking, at the expense of democracy, human rights and equality."
p1
read://https_www.globalresearch.ca/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.globalresearch.ca%2Fun-president-approves-pandemic-declaration-privacy-experts-warn-digital-gulag%2F5833360
#19590256 at 2023-09-21 19:44:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24058: The Border Isn't Open Edition
UN President Approves Pandemic Declaration - Privacy Experts Warn of 'Digital Gulag'
The United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly (UNGA) president today approved the non-binding U.N declaration on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response (PPPR), without a full assembly vote and over the objections of 11 nations.
Critics called the declaration, which seeks to create a global pandemic authority with the power to enforce lockdowns, universal vaccination and censorship of "misinformation," "hypocrisy" and "unhinged."
The approval came as part of a high-level meeting on PPPR. But what does the declaration mean in practice?
For proponents, the declaration is a key step toward global coordination in pandemic prevention and public health.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it "presents an opportunity ... to prevent and prepare for pandemics and their consequences, using an approach that involves all government sectors."
The WHO also said the PPPR aims to "apply lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic" and "comes as the world faces multiple humanitarian and climate-related crises which are threatening lives and livelihoods around the world."
In a statement, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said, "If COVID-19 taught us nothing else, it's that when health is at risk, everything is at risk." He linked the PPPR to the U.N.'s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), saying world leaders should "show they have learned the painful lessons of the pandemic."
Attorney Lawrence Gostin, head of Georgetown University's WHO Collaborating Center - a key figure "playing a key behind-the-scenes role in negotiations" for the proposed "pandemic treaty" and amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) - said the high-level meeting "is our best chance to gain support and deep engagement of heads of state and government."
'Unprecedented' Agreement Comes at Expense of National Sovereignty
Other experts took a different view. Author and podcaster Frank Gaffney, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, told The Defender it is "very worrying" that the U.N. and WHO "will further encourage, if not actually authorize, the kind of standing capability or authority on their part to essentially dictate what constitutes emergencies."
"There's no getting around the fact that it's going to come at the expense of the sovereignty of the various nations that will subsequently be told that they have an emergency and told what they have to do about it," he added. "This is unprecedented."
Gostin said "Negotiators are at a loss" as to how to balance accountability and sovereignty when implementing instruments like the PPPR, IHR or "pandemic treaty."
Writing for the Brownstone Institute, Dr. David Bell, a public health physician, biotech consultant and former director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund, said "the main aim" of the PPPR "is to back" the "pandemic treaty" and IHR amendments currently under negotiation by WHO member states.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/un-president-approves-pandemic-declaration-privacy-experts-warn-digital-gulag/5833360
#19563284 at 2023-09-16 21:13:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24025: Texas AG Ken Paxton ACQUITTED! Edition
>>19563282
The UN and WHO do recognise that some will question this illogic. In PP35, they characterise such scepticism as "health-related misinformation, disinformation, hate speech and stigmatisation".
The WHO recently publicly characterised people who discuss adverse effects of Covid vaccines and question WHO policies as "far-Right", "anti-science aggressors" and "a killing force".
This is unhinged. It is the denigration and hate speech that fascist regimes use. The reader must decide whether such an organisation should control his or her freedom of expression and decide what constitutes truth.
It is not helpful here to give details of all 13 pages of right-speak, contradiction and fallacy. You will find similar rhetoric in other UN and WHO documents, particularly on pandemic preparedness. Straight-talk is contrary to business requirements. However, the first paragraph in the Declaration's 'Call to Action' sets the tone:
We therefore commit to scale up our efforts to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response and further implement the following actions and express our strong resolve to:
OP1. Strengthen regional and international cooperation, multilateralism, global solidarity, coordination and governance at the highest political levels and across all relevant sectors, with the determination to overcome inequities and ensure the sustainable, affordable, fair, equitable, effective, efficient and timely access to medical countermeasures including vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics and other health products to ensure high-level attention through a multisectoral approach to prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics and other health emergencies, particularly in developing countries;
There are 48 more. You paid taxes so that someone could write that!
Those millions of girls suffering at night, the hundreds of millions of children who had their futures stolen, the mothers of those malaria-killed children, and all suffering under the increasing burden of poverty and inequality unleashed by this farce are watching. The Declaration, like the IHR amendments and pandemic treaty it supports, await the signatures of the Governments that purport to represent us.
Dr. David Bell is a clinical and public health physician with a PhD in population health and background in internal medicine, modelling and epidemiology of infectious disease. Previously, he was Programme Head for Malaria and Acute Febrile Disease at FIND in Geneva, and coordinating malaria diagnostics strategy with the World Health Organisation. He is a member of the Executive Committee of PANDA.
3 of 3
#19121285 at 2023-07-04 14:17:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23483: INDEPEDENCE DAY 2023 Edition
>>19121261
https://twitter.com/TheHitmanTony/status/1444448973947813891?
David Bell is TRASH!!!!!
@TheHitmanTony
I'm sorry @brandonbrown_68
but the #Talladega crowd wasn't chanting for you. Congrats on the win. #Nascar #FJB @barstoolsports
@DanScavino
@Gutfeldfox
@seanhannity
@DonaldJTrumpJr
0:01 / 0:16
12:47 PM ? Oct 2, 2021
#19082293 at 2023-06-27 11:03:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23434: In the Dark of the Night There is Light! Edition
https://slaynews.com/news/ex-who-official-raises-alarm-global-pandemic-treaty/
This includes caving to the WHO on treatments, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and government surveillance.
Under the treaty, the WHO would have the power to lock the public in their homes or censor the American people in violation of their First Amendment rights, overriding the Constitution.
Even more chillingly, the White House wants to bypass submitting this agreement for Senate approval.
The Biden admin argues that it is not an official treaty despite it having the full force of one.
In a seminal discussion before the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) in the UK, leading health experts raised serious concerns over the WHO's new powers.
Dr. David Bell, a former WHO senior medical officer, and Professor Garrett Wallace Brown, who chairs Global Health Policy at the University of Leeds, raised the alarm over the sweeping new powers that the WHO will be granted.
They outlined how the proposals could reshape the dynamics between the WHO and its member nations and imperil critical health initiatives.
The contentious point revolves around the unprecedented authority these proposals could vest in the WHO.
According to Dr. Bell, the WHO could wield the power to demand hefty financial contributions from countries, suppress scientific discourse, and enforce travel restrictions, lockdowns, and compulsory vaccinations in response to health emergencies, which the body can declare at its discretion.
Bell explained the transformation of the WHO since its inception in 1946.
indicative of political, rather than scientific, decision-making.
Stringer stressed that the potential impact on public health, democracy, civil liberties, and individual rights necessitates rigorous debate and transparent review.
Both experts and parliamentarians conveyed the urgent need for caution and thorough analysis of the WHO's proposed changes, calling for countries to retain autonomy in addressing public health challenges, and for the protection of global health initiatives from undue influence.
#18984147 at 2023-06-10 19:38:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23308: Walk The Line Edition
WHO gets record-high $6.83 BILLION budget increase and approval for replenishment mechanism to raise MORE FUNDS
A record-high increase of $6.83 billion in the budget of the World Health Organization (WHO) for 2024-2025 has been approved to fight "pandemics fueled by climate change" and "emergencies of all kinds" during the 76th World Health Assembly (WHA) in Switzerland.
The staggering increase in budget and the launch of a new "replenishment" initiative for the agency were given the green light despite the fact that the WHA failed to come up with a final agreement on the pandemic treaty or amendments to the international health regulations (IHR).
WHO member states on May 22 agreed to the WHO budget hike, which is a 20 percent increase in assessed contributions (or membership fees). The nations vowed to contribute $1.15 billion via their membership fees while another $5.69 billion will come from "voluntary contributions" from member states and other contributors. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus thanked the member states for the rise in the assessed contributions saying, this was "a historic milestone."
Dr. David Bell, a public health physician, biotech consultant and former director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund, said the approval of more funds "illustrates that global health as a discipline has completely lost the plot and been taken over by people interested in making a profit."
WHO's budget priorities focus on expanding universal health coverage, protecting the world from health emergencies and promoting "better health and well-being" for one billion and more people." The funds will also go to WHO support to countries, polio eradication, special programs and emergency operations.
According to independent journalist James Roguski, the WHO spent twice as much on salaries ($1.164 billion) as it did on medical supplies and materials in 2022, which represented only 13 percent of expenditures.
In addition to the increase in member states' contribution, WHO is also doing the "replenishment mechanism" to raise even more funds, from private actors. It will increase the predictability of WHO's funding by encouraging multiyear commitments. It will also attract new donors and "enhance political support for the full financing of the base segment of WHO's program budget through a year-long, inclusive engagement process that culminates in a high-visibility financing event."
The replenishment mechanism and several "investment rounds" should start in 2024. And to make this opportunity enticing for investors, there will be a "$35 return for every $1 invested in WHO," the agency announced.
WHO shows true colors by partnering with globalist group Rockefeller Foundation
http://www.womensystems.com/2023/06/who-gets-record-high-683-billion-budget.html
#18468794 at 2023-03-08 19:01:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22646: #J6 Confirmed - False Flag Event Edition
>>18468791
The WHO intends to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering and loss of individual freedom.
The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering - not to mention the loss of individual freedom.
The Long-Term Plan: One-Size-Fits-All Health Care
Eventually, the WHO will probably implement a universal or "socialist-like" health care system worldwide, as part of The Great Reset. While a WHO-based universal health care system is not currently being discussed, there's every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his "central priority" as director-general is to push the world toward universal health coverage.12
And, considering the WHO changed its definition of "pandemic" to "a worldwide epidemic of a disease,"13 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,14,15 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. As mentioned above, some of the IHR amendments also further broaden the scope of the situations in which a public health emergency might be applied.
Sustainable Goals Will Fall Under the WHO's Purview
The WHO's "One Health surveillance" initiative, which is part of the pandemic treaty, also signals where this is really headed. As explained by The Epoch Times:16
"One Health is a concept that has been embraced by the United Nations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Bank, and other global organizations.
'The term originally meant a way of seeing human and animal health as linked - they sometimes are - so that you could improve human health by acting more broadly,' [public health physician and former WHO epidemic policy staffer David] Bell said.
'It has become hijacked and now is used to claim that all human activities, and all issues within the biosphere, affect health, and are therefore within Public Health's remit.
So public health can be deemed to include climate, or racism, or fisheries management, and this is being used to claim that addressing carbon emissions is a health issue and therefore a health 'emergency.'"
Redefining Human Rights
The pandemic treaty is also redefining human rights into a set of collective rights that are centered on public health. The Epoch Times continues:17
p4
#18389137 at 2023-02-21 18:35:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22543: All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic Edition
Dr. Fauci Comes Clean on Vaccines and Respiratory Viruses
(article is too long, see link and other info below. As always Fauci tells lies and truth, this is for science fags)
By David Bell February 21, 2023
"Attempting to control mucosal respiratory viruses with systemically administered non-replicating vaccines has thus far been largely unsuccessful." ~ Dr A Fauci (former director of NIAID), 2023, commenting on vaccines for Covid-19.
The journal Cell Host & Microbe recently published one of the more important papers (Link below) of the Covid era; 'Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and other respiratory viruses.'This elicited surprisingly little fanfare considering its authorship and contents.
Firstly, the final author was Dr. Anthony Fauci, the recently retired director of the United States National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), normally a magnet for the media. Secondly, because Dr. Fauci and his co-authors provide evidence that much of what those in authority have told the public regarding Covid vaccines was contrary to what they knew to be true.
Kudos to Dr. Fauci for coming clean on the basics of viruses and immunology. If leading medical journals such as the New England Journal of
Medicine or the Lancet had employed editors with such knowledge three years ago, they might have contributed to public health rather than the gutting of society and global human rights. If those in authority had explained these truths and based their policies on them, things would also have been different.
Likewise for the entire medical establishment. Much death, poverty and inequality might have been avoided. Trust may also have been maintained in the institutions within which they work.
The paper co-written by Dr. Fauci discusses the potential to develop coronavirus vaccines and vaccines for other fast-mutating respiratory viruses. It is best to step through the paper in three parts; reviewing the evidence provided by the authors, noting the residual dogma that persists despite being contrary to this evidence, and lastly considering the implications of the paper regarding the Covid public health response.
Reading the original paper is recommended, as this article only highlights extracts.
1. Poor vaccine efficacy and the superiority of natural immunity.
The review makes clear that vaccines against respiratory viruses such as influenza or coronaviruses (e.g. SARS-CoV-2 responsible for Covid) are highly unlikely to achieve the levels of effectiveness we expect from other vaccines. The authors note CDC data showing influenza vaccines, now pushed for all ages from 6 months upward, have an efficacy ranging from just 14 percent to a maximum of 60 percent since 2005 (extending back 17 years would have lowered this to 10 percent, with the average vaccine efficacy (VE) just below 40 percent). As Dr Fauci notes:
"...our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases."
Indeed:
"...it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines."
The authors provide clear explanations for this lack of efficacy:
"The vaccines for these two very different viruses have common characteristics: they elicit incomplete and short-lived protection against
evolving virus variants that escape population immunity."
It is not just the high mutation rate that is a problem, but also the mode of infection:
"They replicate predominantly in local mucosal tissue, without causing viremia, and do not significantly encounter the systemic immune system or the full force of adaptive immune responses, which take at least 5-7 days to mature, usually well after the peak of viral replication and onward transmission to others."
As this honest appraisal notes, Covid vaccines were never expected to significantly reduce infection or transmission. Continued.....
https://brownstone.org/articles/dr-fauci-comes-clean-on-vaccines-and-respiratory-viruses/
Title and Link to the paper:
Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses
- David M. Morens
- Jeffery K. Taubenberger
- Anthony S. Fauci
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2022.11.016
https://www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00572-8?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS1931312822005728%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
#18373769 at 2023-02-19 03:56:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22523: Night Shift On Pain Edition
>>18373751
The Biden administration is preparing to sign up the United States to a "legally binding" accord with the World Health Organization (WHO) that would give this Geneva-based UN subsidiary the authority to dictate America's policies during a pandemic.
Despite widespread criticism of the WHO's response to the COVID pandemic, U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra joined with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in September 2022 to announce "the U.S.-WHO Strategic Dialogue." Together, they developed a "platform to maximize the longstanding U.S. government-WHO partnership, and to protect and promote the health of all people around the globe, including the American people."
These discussions and others spawned the "zero draft" (pdf) of a pandemic treaty, published on Feb. 1, which now seeks ratification by all 194 WHO member states. A meeting of the WHO's Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) is scheduled for Feb. 27 to work out the final terms, which all members will then sign.
Written under the banner of "the world together equitably," the zero draft grants the WHO the power to declare and manage a global pandemic emergency. Once a health emergency is declared, all signatories, including the United States, would submit to the authority of the WHO regarding treatments, government regulations such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates, global supply chains, and monitoring and surveillance of populations.
Centralized Pandemic Response
"They want to see a centralized, vaccine-and-medication-based response, and a very restrictive response in terms of controlling populations," David Bell, a public health physician and former WHO staffer specializing in epidemic policy, told The Epoch Times. "They get to decide what is a health emergency, and they are putting in place a surveillance mechanism that will ensure that there are potential emergencies to declare."
The WHO pandemic treaty is part of a two-track effort, coinciding with an initiative by the World Health Assembly (WHA) to create new global pandemic regulations that would also supersede the laws of member states. The WHA is the rule-making body of the WHO, comprised of representatives from the member states.
"Both [initiatives] are fatally dangerous," Francis Boyle, professor of international law at Illinois University, told The Epoch Times. "Either one or both would set up a worldwide medical police state under the control of the WHO, and in particular WHO Director-General Tedros. If either one or both of these go through, Tedros or his successor will be able to issue orders that will go all the way down the pipe to your primary care physicians."
Physician Meryl Nass told The Epoch Times: "If these rules go through as currently drafted, I, as a doctor, will be told what I am allowed to give a patient and what I am prohibited from giving a patient whenever the WHO declares a public health emergency. So they can tell you you're getting remdesivir, but you can't have hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. What they're also saying is they believe in equity, which means everybody in the world gets vaccinated, whether or not you need it, whether or not you're already immune."
Regarding medical treatments, the accord would require member nations to "monitor and regulate against substandard and falsified pandemic-related products." Based on previous WHO and Biden administration policy, this would likely include forcing populations to take newly-developed vaccines while preventing doctors from prescribing non-vaccine treatments or medicines.
Circumventing America's Constitution
A key question surrounding the accord is whether the Biden administration can bind America to treaties and agreements without the consent of the U.S. Senate, which is required under the Constitution. The zero draft concedes that, per international law, treaties between countries must be ratified by national legislatures, thus respecting the right of their citizens to consent. However, the draft also includes a clause that the accord will go into effect on a "provisional" basis, as soon as it is signed by delegates to the WHO, and therefore it will be legally binding on members without being ratified by legislatures.
p1
#16934093 at 2022-07-29 17:44:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #21232: Spammers Won't Keep Anons Down Edition
Not Safe: UK Health Service Shuts Down Tavistock, Infamous for Child Trans Treatments
England's National Health Service (NHS) is shutting down the infamous Tavistock clinic, the country's key hub for child gender swapping treatment, but there is yet no indication of what will happen to the staff at the centre who permitted the scandals to take place.
The Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust's Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) had become hugely controversial in recent years, with the number of girls, in particular, being diagnosed as having gender dysphoria increasing by 5,000 per cent in less than ten years, according to The Times.
Whistleblowers alleged that girls were deemed to be trans on such flimsy pretexts as not liking "pink ribbons and dollies", with a former governor of the trust, Dr David Bell, warning that there was "virtually no psychological scrutiny at all" before children were shunted onto a pathway towards life-altering medication and surgery by some physicians.
The number of children seeking gender reassignment reportedly surged by another 20 per cent during the Wuhan virus lockdowns, and issues including a so-called "detransitioner" suing the Tavistock after she was "rushed" into gender reassignment after "roughly three" short sessions and "no real investigation" of any mental issues possibly underlying her teenage belief that she was born in the wrong body have plagued the clinic.
Consequently, the paediatrician leading a review of the GIDS has brought forward some of her recommendations early - possibly seeking to get ahead of a looming scandal, previously predicted by the likes of JK Rowling.
Chief among the recommendations from Dr Hilary Cass is that treatment at the Tavistock is "not a safe or viable long-term option" for patients and that its focus on gender identity has "overshadowed" considerations of other mental health issues.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/07/29/not-safe-uk-health-service-shuts-down-tavistock-infamous-for-child-trans-treatments/
#16004762 at 2022-04-03 18:37:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #20242: Sunday Morning at the Q Movie Edition
UK Doctors to Be Paid for Putting People on Transgender Sex Change Hormones
Family doctors in Britain will be paid by the government when they provide hormone-altering drugs to transgender patients.
The trial scheme, which was launched on Friday, will see General Practitioners (GPs) in Sussex receive ?178 per year in taxpayer cash for every person they sign up to take "cross-sex hormone therapy" and an additional ?91 a year for annual health checks for transgender, non-binary, and intersex (TNBI) patients, The Times of London reports.
According to the British newspaper of record, concerns have been raised surrounding the issuing of powerful drugs without accompanying mental health therapy. Those who were born as biological males will receive oestrogen drugs and those born as biological females will receive testosterone.
A transgender advocate, Debbie Hayton, who underwent a medical "transition" in 2012, said that no matter the intention, the scheme will see more people placed on hormone-altering substances, describing the system as "desperate measures for desperate times".
"When I transitioned I had an hour with a therapist every week for months," Hayton said. "That's what I needed to understand myself. An annual review is a pale shadow of that."
A document seen by The Times reportedly said that the trial scheme in Sussex is "not designed to promote the initiation of hormonal treatment in general practice", however, it also said that the distribution and the decision to begin hormone therapy will be "at the discretion of the individual GP".
In order to be qualified for the scheme, doctors will merely be required to take a two and a half hour online training session. The programme is set to run in Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, and West Sussex for the next three years.
The stated purpose of providing financial incentives for doctors to take on more transgender sex therapy cases is to take some strain off dedicated gender clinics, such as the Tavistock Centre in London.
The radical LGBT activist group Stonewall praised the programme, saying: "With enough capacity and training, schemes like this could ensure trans people can access the specialist care they need in their local community and without the lengthy wait."
"Transgender, non-binary and intersex (TNBI) people experience significant health inequalities - something we are committed to tackling," a spokeswoman for Sussex Commissioners added.
Gender clinics focussing on sex reassignment have been overwhelmed by a massive increase of people seeking treatment over the past five years, with a 240 per cent increase during the time span.
The trend of rising transgender cases has also been seen among children, with a 20 per cent increase seen among minors seeking to change their gender since the introduction of lockdowns in 2020.
There has been a growing debate over the ethics of providing life-altering hormone therapies to children, with an interim review by former President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Dr Hilary Cass, finding that many doctors are afraid of challenging leftist orthodoxy surrounding gender issues.
The full report, which will likely have an impact on the government's gender policies going forward, is set to be published later this year.
The former governor of the Tavistock Centre, Dr David Bell, has also been critical of gender clinics being too quick to assume young girls are transgender if they display tomboy traits or for not liking the colour pink or playing with dolls.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/04/03/doctors-to-be-paid-for-putting-transgender-people-on-sex-change-hormones/
#9999000 at 2020-07-18 15:29:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12795: Musk Kickin It With Doge Edition
>>9998371
The Communist Party USA identifies Progressive Caucus members as its "allies in Congress." (CPC) FROM April 2011: Xavier BECERRA, ... Corrine Brown, Andre Carson ...Yvette Clarke... Elijah CUMMINGS ... KEITH ELLISON (CO-CHAIR) ..., Sheila Jackson-Lee ... JOHN LEWIS... Jerrold NADLER... Bernie Sanders (CPC's lone Senator), Maxine WATERS, Frederica Wilson... https://archive.is/yJ0iF
A 2002 report by Joelle Fishman, chair of the Communist Party USA's Political Action Committee, stated that the Progressive Caucus "provides an important lever that can be used to advance workers' issues and move the debate to the left in every Congressional District in the country."
In a 2010 CPUSA report, Party member David Bell identified Progressive Caucus members as his organization's "allies in Congress."
As of April 2011, CPC consisted of 74 members of the House of Representatives-all of them leftist Democrats-and one U.S. Senator (Bernie Sanders...
MORE on FRONTs https://archive.is/xoqhd
From its inception, the CPUSA had put resources into recruiting African Americans into ranks...
incorporate RACIAL RADICALISM
CPUSA's modus operandi is to delegitimize and smear American society by depicting it as deeply and irremediably infested with racism, sexism, homophobia, and all manner of injustice.
#9826360 at 2020-07-02 16:34:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12576: Red Scarf Club Has A New Member? Edition
>>9826323
31m
Lyndy Jacob
Lyndy Jacob · 10:28 Prosecutor in West Palm said Trump was the only one who helped him in the investigation
Manage
24m
Jeff T. Little
Jeff T. Little · 1:33 This is going to turn a lot of peoples worlds upside down.
Manage
33m
Whitney Hamby
Whitney Hamby · 22:15 Just replay Andrew's BBC interview. That should give you plenty of conflicting information to bring him in for questioning.
Manage
12m
1 Reply
Andrew Allen
Andrew Allen · 4:35 Watching the last 7 mins of "Last of the Mohicans" while we wait ;P
Manage
30m
1 Reply
Magz Lock
Magz Lock · 22:12 Its all going to explode about time prince andrew there coming for you
Manage
12m
Jeff Forshee Jr.
Jeff Forshee Jr. · 19:42 Next week darkness coming into the light!
Manage
15m
1 Reply
Brooke Elizabeth
Brooke Elizabeth · 7:01 They deserve the most PAINFUL suffering for every second of pain they put an innocent child through. GET THEM.
Manage
28m
Christopher Schwaber
Christopher Schwaber · 24:04 Bunch of dumbasses in the comments thinking this is a partisan issue
Manage
10m
Jude O'Connor
Jude O'Connor · 10:12 Hilarious that people think this is not going to end well for Trump. This is going to be terrible for the LEFT!
Manage
24m
1 Reply
David Bell
David Bell · 19:40 You're next Tom hanks and Steve Spielberg. Bruce Springsteen. Oprah. Seth green. Half of Hollywood and DC
#9037095 at 2020-05-05 13:17:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11568: Great Awakening Is Get'n Real Edition
this sounds bad, why did Navy personnel give confidential information to a Korean citizen
Owner of U.S. Navy Husbanding Services Provider Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Commit Bribery
The owner and Chief Executive Officer of a Republic of Korea-based company, DK Marine, that provided ship husbanding services to the U.S. Navy pleaded guilty today for his role in a bribery conspiracy.
Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, Special Agent in Charge David Bell of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service's (NCIS) Far East Field Office, and Special Agent in Charge Stanley A. Newell of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service's (DCIS) Transnational Operations Field Office made the announcement.
Sung Yol "David" Kim, 49, a citizen of the Republic of Korea, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery before U.S. District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith of the Eastern District of Michigan. Sentencing has been scheduled for Nov. 17, 2020, before Judge Goldsmith.
Pursuant to his guilty plea, Kim admitted that between October 2013 and January 2014, Kim conspired with James Russell Driver III, a civilian U.S. Navy cargo ship captain, and another civilian U.S. Navy employee to have Kim and his company provide husbanding services for Driver's ship during a December 2013 port visit in Chinhae, Republic of Korea, in violation of appropriate U.S. Navy husbanding procedures.
Driver also provided Kim with confidential and other proprietary, internal U.S. Navy information. In exchange, Kim paid bribes to Driver, including personal travel expenses for Driver and his family. Driver pleaded guilty for his role in the conspiracy in March 2019
NCIS and DCIS investigated the case. Trial Attorney Jessee Alexander-Hoeppner of the Criminal Division's Fraud Section is prosecuting the case.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/owner-us-navy-husbanding-services-provider-pleads-guilty-conspiracy-commit-bribery
Husbanding
A general term used for managing the affairs of a ship while in port, including such tasks as customsformalities, fueling, supplies, repairs and any requirements of the crew. Husbanding is normally handled by ship line employees, or vessel owners or their agents.
#8612035 at 2020-03-29 15:54:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11026: God is Good Edition
>>8611994
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2020/02/06/18830488.php
Dr. Frances Boyle talks about the Wuhan Coronavirus and how in his view it is a genetically engineered bioweapon that was accidentally released from the Wuhan Biosafety (BSL-4) laboratory.
Feb 6, 2020
WorkWeek host Steve Zeltzer interviews Dr. Fancis Boyle who is a law professor at the University of Illinois.
He was the draft author of the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.
He discusses the likelihood in his view that coronavirus or 2019-nCoV virus was a genetically engineered virus that may have been accidentally released from the Biosafety (BSL-4) laboratory located in Wuhan, China.
He also has said that the sars virus may also have been released from the same laboratory.
He reports that the World Health Organization WHO is also aware of this release and is keeping it a secret from the public.
Boyle also calls for the shutdown of all (BSL-4) laboratories both in China and the United States and around the world and discusses the dangerous lack of health and safety at these biotech laboratories including in California where there is a large biotech industry.
This interview was done on 2/6/20 at KPOO in San Francisco
Additional media:
Injured Agraquest Biotech Worker David Bell Tells His Story
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHF3aNE9FoA
The Biotech Health/Safety Crisis, Biotech Workers & Industry With Becky McClain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU5PMiUf2AA&t=9s
Becky McClain: Public Awareness of Public Health and Safety in Biotechnology - Tarrytown 2011
https://youtu.be/uwgABDwiNVw
Researcher Had Bacteria for Plague at His Death
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/22/us/22chicago.html
Dr. Francis Boyle Creator Of Bioweapons Act SaysCoronavirus Is Biological Warfare Weapon
https://youtu.be/TsyujjitOFM
WorkWeek
https://soundcloud.com/workweek-radio
Production of Labor Video Project
http://www.laborvideo.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHxbBDIeJFY
#7658034 at 2019-12-30 01:26:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9798: Tremendous Spirit Edition
>>7657058 Holder Tweets re: John Lewis (PB)
THE NORTH STAR
Condemned by many as blatant Communist propaganda to help rally support for the alliance between the United States and Russia at the time, The North Star is a fascinating blend of politics and melodrama.
The idea to make The North Star came initially as a request from President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to producer Sam Goldwyn… http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/276075%7C0/The-North-Star.html
(Copypasta) reminder:
Socialists in Congress with Ties to Communist Party USA
The Communist Party USA identifies Progressive Caucus members as its "allies in Congress."
A 2002 report by Joelle Fishman, chair of the Communist Party USA's Political Action Committee, stated that the Progressive Caucus "provides an important lever that can be used to advance workers' issues and move the debate to the left in every Congressional District in the country." In a 2010 CPUSA report, Party member David Bell identified Progressive Caucus members as his organization's "allies in Congress."
This is an alphabetical list of all members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus(CPC) as of April 2011:Tammy Baldwin, Karen Bass, Xavier Becerra, ...Corrine Brown, Michael Capuano, Andre Carson, Donna Christensen, Judy Chu, David Cicilline, Yvette Clarke, William "Lacy" Clay, ... John Conyers, Elijah Cummings, Danny Davis... Keith Ellison (co-chair)... Jesse Jackson Jr., Sheila Jackson-Lee,...Dennis Kucinich, Barbara Lee,
John Lewis,
...Jerrold Nadler, Linda Sanchez,Bernie Sanders (CPC's lone Senator), Jan Schakowsky, Jose Serrano, Louise Slaughter...Maxine Waters, ... Frederica Wilson, and Lynn Woolsey.For a list of noteworthy former members who left the CPC prior to April 2011,click here. Read more: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1301
https://cpc-grijalva.house.gov/caucus-members/ From its inception, the CPUSA had put resources into recruiting African Americans into ranks. ... Herbert Aptheker, a long-time member and founder of the American Institute for Marxist Studies, and Angela Davis now attempted to incorporate RACIAL RADICALISM into the Party.
Late in 2010, CPUSA member C.J. Atkins called for his comrades to drop their "communist" label, so that they could work more effectively inside the Democratic Party. ... CPUSA's modus operandi is to delegitimize and smear American society by depicting it as deeply and irremediably infested with racism, sexism, homophobia, and all manner of injustice. ...for instance, for an explanation of how the organization in 2014 used its flagship publication, People's World, to foment racial strife in Ferguson, Missouri... The group also has strong ties to China, Cuba, and other nations hostile to the United States. https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/organizations/communist-party-usa-cpusa/
#5418052 at 2019-02-27 17:55:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6926: Cohen Sounds Like CNN Edition
NHS Child Sex Change Clinic Chief Resigns After Damning Report
A governor of the NHS trust in charge of England's flagship child sex change clinic has resigned in protest amidst allegations it was "fast-tracking" young people into gender reassignment as a result of pressure from "highly politicised" LGBT campaigners.
Breaking off a 35-year-long association with the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, Marcus Evans quit after it dismissed an internal report branding its Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) "not fit for purpose".
"Adolescence and childhood is a time when people are developing socially and biologically - a time when young people are identifying with different groups, and with male and female aspects of themselves," Mr Evans told the BBC's Today programme Monday.
"There is pressure from the child who is in a distressed state, there is pressure from the family and the peer group and from the pro-trans lobbies - and all of this puts pressure on the clinician who may want to help the individual to resolve their distressed state by going along with a quick solution.
"There is a lot at stake here as these decisions have far reaching consequences," the consultant psychotherapist warned, speaking after he told the Sunday Times that GIDS was trying to "dismiss or undermine" concerns raised by its own medical staff in a leaked review compiled late last year.
Dr David Bell, who drew up the report, warned children were at risk of "long-term damage" as a result of the NHS clinic's "inability to stand up to pressure" from transgender activist groups such as Mermaids UK, which has been criticised for false claims that delaying gender-bending medical treatments which have irreversible effects on young patients' fertility causes gender-confused youths to commit suicide.
Staff governor at the time of compiling the report, Dr Bell said clinicians felt children were being put onto life-changing drugs without sufficient assessment of the role played by their personal histories and by wider psychosocial issues in patients' gender dysphoria.
Noting that some youths view gender reassignment as a "solution" to "multiple problems such as historic child abuse in the family, bereavement... homophobia and a very significant incidence of autism spectrum disorder", and the observation that children seemed to have been "coached" online and by activist groups, the report's warnings also echoed worried voiced by other professionals who work with young people.
After a review into the respected consultant psychiatrist's findings by Tavistock and Portman's medical director, Dinesh Sinha, said the clinic was "safe and operating in line with the best care in this field internationally" the NHS trust issued a statement attacking claims in the leaked report as "unsubstantiated" and alleging Dr Bell had "no expertise in this field".
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/02/27/nhs-child-sex-change-clinic-resigns/
#196079 at 2018-01-29 02:28:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #238 - 13,000 Sealed Indictments Edition
Governance
The current members of the board of directors of ""The Economist Group"" are: Rupert Pennant-Rea (Chairman), Zanny Minton Beddoes (editor-in-chief of the Economist magazine), Lady Suzanne Heywood, Brent Hoberman, Sir David Bell, John Elkann, Alex Karp, Sir Simon Robertson,
""Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild"", Chris Stibbs and Baroness Jowell.[10] Former board members include:
Andrew Rashbass, Rona Fairhead, Philip Mengel[10] and _""Eric Schmidt""_ (of Alphabet, parent company of Google). The current trustees of the Group are: Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, Lord O'Donnell, Tim Clark and Bryan Sanderson.[11]
Connection of LdR and Eric S.
The Economist
8chan/8kun QResearch AUSTRALIA Posts (4)
#19606880 at 2023-09-25 10:55:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research AUSTRALIA #32: YOU ARE NOT ALONE IN THIS FIGHT Edition
>>19606877
2/2
David Bell, an Australian doctor who worked at the World Health Organisation for eight years, expressed his profound concerns about the direction of global health policy in a July article in the American Journal of Economics and Sociology.
There are three principles of public health, he argues, that were lost during Covid-19, and which must be revived. First, public health should be based on a weighting of costs and benefits. The near maniacal obsession with stopping Covid-19 came at immense costs, social and economic, that very likely outweighed the benefits.
"Reducing death from a single respiratory virus became the primary function of public health," Bell writes.
Second, public health used to be about maximising quality-adjusted years of life remaining, rather than minimising deaths regardless of age. "Though the average age of death from Covid-19 was similar to the age of all-cause death in most countries, and life-years lost is so fundamental to understanding disease burden, age was seldom mentioned in media reports," he points out.
"Nearly everyone on Earth would agree that the impact of the death of a five-year-old will be greater than that of an 85 year old." Yet by pushing hundreds of millions of people globally into poverty, by shutting down global trade, governments in rich countries contributed to the deaths of many young people.
Third, public health once defined individual health in terms of physical, mental and social wellbeing, as opposed to simply not dying from a respiratory virus.
"This is why the WHO, in its 2019 recommendations on pandemic influenza management, strongly advised against measures such as border closures, or quarantine or restriction of healthy people," he adds.
To my mind, there is no question the world would be far healthier, happier and prosperous today if governments had done nothing in 2020 except provide the public with the best information they had about SARS-Cov2, compared to the socio-economic bonfire that we all witnessed beginning in early 2020.
While delaying a review into our response is advisable, it won't make much of a difference anyway. We all learned a lot during the Covid-19 pandemic, about ourselves, our friends and family, government and human nature.
And one of those main lessons must be that in a time of panic, well-considered and sensible plans and viewpoints will be dumped. We should remember that rational behaviour is the exception not the norm.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pandemic-inquiry-useless-without-admitting-to-failures/news-story/811905d6006348b96658619ef947a05a
#7355119 at 2019-11-14 07:30:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 - YEAR OF THE BOOMERANG Edition
#5 - Part 7
>>6864031 Rugby Australia denies offering Israel Folau money to take down controversial Instagram post
>>6864041 Australia Has First Bilateral Meeting With President Trump at G-20 Summit
>>6864080 Australia Planning New Naval Port For US To Counter China
>>6864108 USAF Tweet mentioning Australia: U.S.: "arrangement enhances readiness, cooperation"
>>6864229 Sydney Daily Telegraph 28 June 2019 Front Page - TRUMP & SCOMO
>>6871219 'No news' for US press in Morrison's dinner with Trump ("Learn our comms.")
>>6871346 Ivanka Trump Tweet: with @POTUS and the U.S. delegation at a working dinner with Australia's Prime Minister!
>>6875337 Owners of Social Media Pages Are Liable for Comments Posted by Others, NSW Supreme Court Finds
>>6875364 Australian Anon JesseJames digs into the dirt on every crooked American Democratic politician
>>6875465 Another Australian Anon with an extremely interdasting and deep insight into the "Q phenomenon"
>>6876741 Scott Morrison secures G20 deal to block violent terrorism on Facebook and social media
>>6877111 Social media giants need to 'raise the bar', PM says ahead of crackdown on streamed terror violence
>>6877195 Report of the Australian Taskforce to combat terrorist and extreme violent material online ("testing event")
>>6881114 Anons responses to proposed Social Media crackdown by Scott Morrison
>>6891804 Labor questions Julie Bishop's new job after politics
>>6894958 US ambassador's message for Morrison: 'embrace power role in Pacific'
>>6894966 Scott Morrison: missing Alek Sigley the focus of prayers
>>6895274 Vatican defends confessional secret as sexual abuse crisis stings
>>6903888 American war hero, Staff Sargeant David Bellavia, and Australian war correspondent, Michael Ware
>>6903902 Trump awards Medal of Honor to David Bellavia
>>6912108 Alek Sigley 'released from detention' in North Korea, Scott Morrison says
>>6912742 Islamic State-linked trio planned to attack embassies, police and defence facilities in central Sydney
>>6912774 Drama teacher advised boys to 'wear knee pads' to give directors oral sex for acting roles
>>6913256 New legal advice puts council fluoridation programs on shaky ground
>>6922875 NBN Outages - Part of recent web outages?
>>6923134 Google Maps down, sparking mass disorientation
>>6923142 Australian banking regulator confirms looser mortgage lending rules
>>6923150 Australian student 'very happy' in Tokyo after North Korea detention
>>6923476, >>6923898, >>6924071 >>6924526, Ausanon on the 4th of July Spectacular - WWG1WGA World Wide!
>>6937684 Was Alek Sigley detained to keep him quiet ahead of the Donald Trump meeting?
>>6937798 Judge orders 'potentially explosive' files on sex trafficking allegations against Jeffrey Epstein must be released
>>6938004 Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking bust: Convicted pedophile arrested on the tarmac
>>6938045 Jeffrey Epstein arrested for sex trafficking of minors
>>6938045 US Marines Tweet: Judgement Day
>>6939103 Q Posts referencing 'epstein'
>>6949356 North Korea says freed Australian student had been spying: KCNA
>>6963417 Epstein's Australian accuser "deeply pleased"
>>6964494 Israeli Police gearing up to indict minister suspected of aiding alleged pedophiles, including Malka Leifer
>>6964670, >>6964886 Chinese spy warship under close surveillance as it monitors Australian-U.S. military exercises
>>6964709, >>7057103 Anti-Iran protester arrested after climbing Sydney Harbour Bridge to deliver 'message to Trump'
>>6964788 BBC report on Christchurch killer and his connections to Europe far right groups
>>6978965 No way on Huawei: Morrison government doubles down on ban of Chinese telco supplier
>>6979179 Climate change doomsday report predicts end of human civilisation
>>6979202 Anons comments about cultural and symbolic relevance of Owls
>>6992525 Israeli medical committee rules Leifer faked medical condition to avoid extradition
>>6993196, >>7007824 Brisbane News Magazine - Astrology and Occult symbolism in a "post-Christian phase"
>>7007842 Half-Blood Thunder Moon Eclipse on July 17 in Asia and Australasia
>>7007905 Hillary Clinton videos of 2018 New Zealand visit are being censored by location
>>7008748 Joint US-Australian military exercise, "Talisman Sabre", begins in Queensland
>>7008771 Australia, US view world with same eyes: PM
#6903902 at 2019-07-03 08:59:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 - Shill count HIGH Edition
>>6903888
Trump awards Medal of Honor to David Bellavia
US President Donald Trump has awarded the Medal of Honor to David Bellavia for his role in the Iraq War in the US Army.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zTAg9BF6wc
#6903888 at 2019-07-03 08:47:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 - Shill count HIGH Edition
How an American war hero was convinced by an embedded Australian reporter that it was a 'rational idea' to save his platoon by single-handedly taking on a house full of 'suicidal jihadists'
An American war hero awarded the nation's highest military honour has credited an embedded Australian journalist for his bravery.
Former Staff Sargeant David Bellavia single-handedly took on a house full of 'suicidal jihadists' in the Battle of Fallujah in Iraq in 2004.
He on Tuesday became the first and only surviving Medal of Honor recipient from the Iraq war when US President Donald Trump recognised his bravery in a White House ceremony.
Sgt Bellavia, now 43, was leading a squad in support of Operation Phantom Fury in November 2004.
After helping his platoon escape fire, he entered a house and killed at least four insurgents who were firing rocket-propelled grenades, the White House said.
Sgt Bellavia acknowledged the persistence of Australian war correspondent Michael Ware, who encouraged him to re-enter a jihadist hideout to save his platoon.
'I looked at Michael Ware and I needed someone to just give me some confidence, some ability that I could do (it),' Sgt Bellavia said.
'At that point in my life a guy from Australia, who I literally didn't want anything to do with, an embedded reporter, that embedded reporter gave me a lot of confidence that this was a very rational idea.'
Ware - who has worked for Time Magazine and CNN - followed Sgt Bellavia into the home with his camera and became the only eyewitness of his bravery, eventually using the footage to create his award-winning Netflix film Only The Dead.
Sgt Bellavia said he initially considered Ware a nuisance, and said he had no interest in working with journalists on the battlefield.
He said he didn't want to feel like he had to 'babysit' a journalist, but by the end of the trip, the pair had a mutual respect for one another and their roles in the war.
'I learnt a great deal of respect of the role that journalists have on the battlefield. Without them, men and women who do this job, Americans will not know what we do, it would go unremarked.
'Our families would never know, our citizens would never know the sacrifice. I'm awful grateful for Michael Ware's body of work and what he represents.'
President Trump told a room full of supporters at the White House that Sgt Bellavia's squad was tasked with clearing 12 houses, and on the 10th house, insurgents opened fire, wounding multiple soldiers.
'Bleeding and badly wounded, David single-handedly defeated the forces who had attacked his unit and would have killed them all had it not been for the bravery of David,' Trump said.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7181973/War-hero-David-Bellavia-credits-Australian-journalist-Michael-Ware-Trump-jihadi-bravery-award.html
8chan/8kun QResearch CANADA Posts (3)
#20558335 at 2024-03-12 20:50:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research Canada #55: Techno-Tyranny Edition
Freedom rallies warn Canadians of dystopian future under the WHO pandemic treaty
https://www.rebelnews.com/freedom_rallies_warn_canadians_of_dystopian_future_under_the_who_pandemic_treaty
According to David Bell, a public health physician and former WHO epidemic policy specialist, the global agency wants to implement a 'centralized, vaccine-and-medication-based response ... in terms of controlling populations.' Continue…
#19350223 at 2023-08-13 13:16:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research Canada #45: Parental Concerns Mount Edition
David Bell: Pandemic Preparedness and the Road to International Fascism
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/David-Bell-pandemic-preparedness
"Public health, presented as a series of health emergencies, is being used once again to facilitate a fascist approach to societal management."
The World Health Organization's broad definition of health embraces physical, mental and social well-being. Expressed in its 1946 constitution alongside concepts of community participation and national sovereignty, it reflected an understanding of a world emerging from centuries of colonialist oppression and the public health industry's shameful facilitation of fascism. Health policy would be people-centered, closely tied to human rights and self-determination. Continue…
#15151386 at 2021-12-07 14:25:37 (UTC+1)
'''Q Research Canada #25: Charter of Rights and Freedoms Edition'''
INTERVIEW: Dr. David Bell, renowned scientist in global health and infectious disease
https://www.rebelnews.com/interview_dr_David_Bell_renowned_scientist_in_global_health_and_infectious_disease
Here is the other side of the story of the science around COVID-19.
Dr. David Bell is a scientist in health innovation and technology, based in Issaquah, Washington. Originally from Australia, he has travelled all across the planet in his work. Dr Bell has partnered with some of the world's most significant health organizations in identifying and leading diagnostics and health technology development.
A malaria expert, Dr. David Bell has published more than 100 publications and authored various guidance volumes in global health and infectious diseases. Today, he is one of the few scientists who are standing up and speaking out. He saw throughout the pandemic what was wrong.
We talk about his career, the political situation we are living through, and the World Health Organization when he was working there.
Here is the other side of the story of the science.
8chan/8kun QResearch UK Posts (1)
#6057510 at 2019-04-05 12:50:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #5: Brexit Fkry edition Ebake
Common purpose was linked to the Leveson Inquiry re Sir David Bell whom was part of CPUK and media standards trust..