8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (5)
#22751915 at 2025-03-13 12:59:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #27794: Blood Moon Eclipse Btw Edition
>>22751876
2/2
Comments:
First the courts in DC and every large city rely on completely corrupt and controlled judges, the only way for law fair to work is to compromised.Remember when "John Here to Help" revealed Rosenstein etc had compromised, corrupted and trapped every judge and Court in DC and country wide, he used and may interfere with his violations of law, including killing them and others.
When this corrupt law firm "Perkins Coie" is eliminated, all corrupt law firms can be eliminated in DC, NY and Worldwide.that's what is called "draining the swamp"via Tsunami.
And when and if the Supreme Court gets involved they willonce again rule on the "Plenary Powers of the President, Commander in Chief and the Chief Magistrate is unlimited!
Done and finished. That is why their lawyer said this below.
The "tsunami" he speaks ofis about the Corrupt Lawfare Law Firms will go down with the tsunami Trump created. And it will block all law firms into the future, that even try to do this to another President, and it removes their illegal power to control the position of President by lawfare:
" Dane Butswinkas, a lawyer representing Perkins Coie, described the president's order as "like a tsunami waiting to hit the firm."
#22751876 at 2025-03-13 12:47:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #27794: Blood Moon Eclipse Btw Edition
Crazy Lawfare - DC District Judge Beryl Howell Now Rules President Trump Cannot Make National Security Decisions on Private Enterprise or Law Firms 1/2
March 12, 2025 | Sundance |
In more than a few ways this decision is even more crazy than District Judge Beryl Howell's prior rulings.
Judge Howell (pictured below) issued a temporary restraining order, blocking President Trump from barring the law firm of Perkins Coie from representing federal contractors.
There are a few outlines of the hearing HEREand HERE that essentially tell the story. Consider this quote:
"When you say that if the president, in his view, takes the position that an individual or an organization or a company is operating a way that is not in the nation's interests, he can issue an executive order like this and take steps to bar that individual, that entity, that company from doing any business with the government, terminate whatever contracts they've got, bar them from federal buildings,"Howell said. "I mean, that's a pretty extraordinary power for the president to exercise."
Yes, and that's called the power of the presidency. Apparently Judge Howell has never heard of 'executive power' that allows the elected President of the United States to determine what is in our nation's best interests. Approving his ability to make these decisions, is what that whole voting thing is all about.
Howell further pressed - what would happen if Trump were to "get annoyed" by the law firm representing Perkins Coie in this lawsuit and issue a separate order targeting them?
"If he made a finding that there's a national security risk with a particular law firm, then yes," Mizelle responded.
Chad Mizelle is not exactly the best voice to be making the DOJ argument, after all it was this knucklehead who as Rod Rosenstein's counselwrote the authorities for the Robert Mueller special counsel. However, on this issue Mizelle is exactly correct.
Yes, the president has the ability to make decisions about national security threats and private enterprises who the President might feel are detrimental to the national security of our nation, like Perkins Coie. Howell then went into crazyville to extend her logic.
The executive order, which Trump issued last week, "runs head on into the wall of First Amendment protections," the judge concluded.
No. That's not at all what the executive order does. Perkins Coie is free to talk about how terrible Donald Trump is, free to rail against him, free to take to the public square and decry his approach, free to do and say anything they want; the law firm just cannot represent federal contractors or hold security clearances granting them access to materials that are national security matters.
The core of Beryl Howell's decision boils down to her wanting to ==protect the business interests of Perkins Coie.
Howell/Coiewant the firm to retain access to clients who are federal contractors.
Even Perkins Coie didn't try to keep their security clearancesbecause they know the President has absolute plenary power to issue or remove them.
[...] The executive order also stripped security clearances from lawyers at the firm, but the firm has not challenged that provision.Under Supreme Court precedent, the president has nearly unfettered discretion to grant or remove security clearances.
Dane Butswinkas, a lawyer representing Perkins Coie, described thepresident's order as "like a tsunami waiting to hit the firm."
"It truly is life-threatening. ... It will spell the end of the law firm," he said. (source)
Apparently, stopping Perkins Coie from representing federal contractors will "spell the end of the law firm."
That's interesting.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/12/crazy-lawfare-dc-district-judge-beryl-howell-now-rules-president-trump-cannot-make-national-security-decisions-on-private-enterprise-or-law-firms/
#22748867 at 2025-03-12 21:40:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #27791: JUSTICE. Edition
Judge Temporarily Blocks Parts of Trump Order on Law Firm
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-executive-order-law-firm/2025/03/12/id/1202541/
Wednesday, 12 March 2025 05:32 PM EDT
A federal judge blocked President Donald Trump's administration Wednesday from enforcing portions of an executive order designed to punish a prominent law firm linked to Democrat-funded opposition research during the 2016 presidential campaign into alleged ties between the Republican candidate and Russia.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington granted a temporary restraining order sought by the firm, Perkins Coie, one day after it filed a federal lawsuit alleging it's being illegally targeted because of its legal work. The judge said the president's action sends a chilling message that lawyers can be punished for representing clients or advancing views unfavorable to the administration.
"Such a circumstance threatens the very foundation of or legal system," said Howell, who was nominated to the bench by Democrat President Barack Obama. "Our justice system is based on the fundamental belief that justice works best when all parties have zealous advocates."
The order came during an extraordinary court hearing in which Attorney General Pam Bondi's chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, defended the latest in a series of retributive moves targeting the president's perceived adversaries. It's highly unusual for such a high-ranking Justice Department official to argue on behalf of the government in the trial court.
Mizelle, who's also serving as the acting associate attorney general, argued that the president has the clear authority to take action against entities he believes present a threat to national security.
"If that means excluding individuals that are no longer trustworthy with the nation's secrets, that's a bedrock principle of our republic," Mizelle said.
Perkins Coie says it's already suffering financial consequences of the order, which calls for limiting firm employees' access to federal buildings and terminating any government contacts of its clients. The judge's temporary restraining order doesn't block the administration from enforcing another provision that seeks to strip Perkins Coie attorneys of security clearances.
Perkins Coie says all 15 of its top clients have government contracts, and several clients have already ended their legal arrangements with the firm or threatened to do so. Dane Butswinkas, an attorney representing Perkins Coie, said keeping the order in place will "spell the end of the law firm."
"This executive order takes a wrecking ball to the rule of law, to the principles that promote democracy," Butswinkas said.
Perkins Coie represented the 2016 presidential campaign of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, Trump's opponent, and also represented Democrats in a variety of voting rights challenges during the 2020 election. The firm made headlines in 2017 when it was revealed to have hired a private investigative research firm during the 2016 campaign to conduct opposition research on Trump. That firm, Fusion GPS, subsequently retained a former British spy, Christopher Steele, who researched whether Trump and Russia had suspicious ties.
#7489339 at 2019-12-12 17:45:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9579: Chill Greta Chill! Edition
Tesla's Third General Counsel In The Last Year Quits
While Tesla's stock price is holding up well into year end, the company's notorious insider defections continue. Jonathan Chang - Tesla's third general counsel in the past year - has now left the company. According to the Detroit News, Chang had just been promoted to the role in February and is leaving Tesla to take on the GC role at startup company SambaNova.
Chang joined Tesla back in 2011 and was put into the GC role after Dane Butswinkas, who was the "adult in the room" hired to help clean up Tesla's legal mess, lasted only two months (~60 whole days) at the company. Preceding Butswinkas was Todd Maron, Elon Musk's former divorce attorney, who had the role since 2014.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/teslas-third-general-counsel-last-year-quits
#5293171 at 2019-02-21 01:23:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6764: This is MAGA Country Edition
Tesla Loses Yet Another Top Executive
Tesla's general counsel Dane Butswinkas is leaving his post in the electric car company after just two months on the job, Reuters reported.
The former general counsel is one of dozens of top Tesla executives to leave the company in the past two years, according to Reuters Wednesday.
Butswinkas is leaving the company to take up his former role as Tesla's outside counsel at the law firm Williams & Connolly. Tesla legal department vice president Jonathan Chang will replace Butswinkas.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/20/tesla-Dane-Butswinkas-elon-musk/