QResear.ch

#21212952 at 2024-07-15 20:40:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25997: RNC 2024 CONVENTION MILWAUKEE WISCONSIN DAY 1 Edition

>>21212890
>>21212737
>>21212409
Case l:12-cv-00252-GLS-ATB Document 1-1 Filed 02/09/12 Page 28 of 41



At the time this case was filed, the presiding judge, Thomas J. McAvoy,
denied NXIVM/ESP's request for the issuance of a Temporary Restraining
Order against Ross and The Ross Institute on procedural grounds.
Thereafter, Judge McAvoy also denied NXIVM/ESP's request for the
issuance of a Preliminary Injunction against Ross and The Ross Institute on
substantive grounds.

- NXIVM/ESP appealed the denial of the Preliminary Injunction to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - and lost that appeal ( Note:
NXIVM/ESP was represented by Justin Heller/Nolan & Heller LLP in this
appeal ). Thereafter, NXIVM/ESP appealed the Second Circuit's decision to
the United States Supreme Court which denied certiorari ( Note:
NXIVM/ESP was represented by Carter Phillips/Sidley Austin LLP in this
appeal ).
https://archive.org/stream/292927-ohara-v-raniere/292927-ohara-v-raniere_djvu.txt

#11972555 at 2020-12-10 18:59:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15284: E-bake

>>11972429
>https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163237/20201209155924009_2020-12-9%20Texas%20Scotus%20Amici%20Brief-%20FINAL.pdf

RINOs in question (From Appendix A):
Carter Phillips, Assistant to the Solicitor General, 1981-1984.
Stuart M. Gerson, Acting Attorney General, 1993; Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division, 1989-1993; Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, 1972-1975.
Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, 2001-2003; Governor, New Jersey, 1994-2001.
John Danforth, United States Senator from Missouri, 1976-1995; United States Ambassador to the United Nations, 2004-2005; Attorney General of Missouri, 1969-1976.
Lowell Weicker, Governor, Connecticut, 1991-1995; United States Senator from Connecticut, 1971-1989; Representative of the Fourth Congressional District of Connecticut in the United States House of Representatives, 1969-1971.
Constance Morella, Representative of the Eighth Congressional District of Maryland in the United States House of Representatives, 1987-2003; Permanent Representative from theUnited States to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003-2007.
Christopher Shays, Representative of the Fourth Congressional District of Connecticut in the United States House of Representatives, 1987-2009.
Donald Ayer, Deputy Attorney General 1989-90; Principal Deputy Solicitor General 1986-88; United States Attorney, E.D. Cal 1982-86; Assistant U.S. Attorney, N.D. Cal 1977-79.
Edward J. Larson, Counsel, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, United States Department of Education, 1986-1987; Associate Minority Counsel, Committee on Education and Labor, United States House of Representatives, 1
John Bellinger III, Legal Adviser to the Department of State,2005-2009; Senior Associate Counsel to the President and Legal Adviser to the National Security Council, 2001-2005.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Attorney-Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, 1989-1991; Special Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia, 1986; Staff Attorney, Criminal Appellate Section, United States Department of Justice, 1986; currently University Chair & Professor of Law, The University of St. Thomas.
Alan Charles Raul, Associate Counsel to the President, 1986-1988; General Counsel of the Office of Management and Budget, 1988-1989; General Counsel of the United States Department of Agriculture, 1989-1993; Vice Chairman of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, 2006-2008.
Paul Rosenzweig, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Department of Homeland Security, 2005-2009; Office of Independent Counsel, 1998-1999; United States Department of Justice, 1986-1991; currently Professorial Lecturer In Law, The George Washington University Law School.
Robert Shanks, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, 1981-1984.Stanley Twardy, U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut, 1985-1991.
Keith E. Whittington, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics, Princeton University, 2006-present; currently Visiting Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center.
Richard Bernstein, Appointedby the United States Supreme Court to argue in Carmell v. Texas, 529 U.S. 513, 515 (2000);Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718, 725 (201

#11863218 at 2020-12-02 00:32:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15143: It's Illegal to Transport Ballots Across State Lines Edition

>>11863190
repost late last bread….John Danforth mixed up in Pennsylvania election……..

Pennyslvania??? running danforth on Twitter....found this

The Court notes that proposed amici curiae

Christine Todd Whitman, John Danforth,

Lowell Weicker, Constance Morella, Christopher Shays, Carter Phillips, Stuart Gerson, Donald Ayer, John Bellinger III, Edward J. Larson, Michael Stokes Paulsen, ....... , and Richard Bernstein

https://twitter.com/appalachiatiger/status/1332641003208118273

#11863172 at 2020-12-02 00:29:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15142: If God is With Us Who can be Against Us? Edition

>>11862991
Pennyslvania??? running danforth on Twitter….found this

The Court notes that proposed amici curiae

Christine Todd Whitman, John Danforth,
Lowell Weicker, Constance Morella, Christopher Shays, Carter Phillips, Stuart Gerson, Donald Ayer, John Bellinger III, Edward J. Larson, Michael Stokes Paulsen, ……. , and Richard Bernstein

https://twitter.com/appalachiatiger/status/1332641003208118273

#7663553 at 2019-12-30 18:27:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9806: E-Bake Edition

Trump impeachment trial drags Roberts into spotlight

Chief Justice John Roberts has tried to prevent the Supreme Court from being seen as just another political body, but when he presides over President Trump's likely impeachment trial in the Senate, the partisan glare will be hard for him to avoid.

The 64-year-old chief justice who famously said judges should simply call balls and strikes will now hold influence over the most bitterly partisan impeachment trial in modern American history, a situation more akin to umpiring a bench-clearing brawl.

The contentious affair threatens to put Roberts, a George W. Bush appointee, under political pressure from all sides, a role court watchers say the mild-mannered jurist will assume with great reluctance.

"He will look the part, and he will play the part, but he does not want the part," said Carter Phillips, a partner at Sidley Austin who has argued dozens of cases before the Supreme Court.

The timing of Trump's impeachment trial could hardly be less auspicious for a chief justice eager to avoid the political fray, especially as Roberts has morphed into something of a swing vote between the court's reliably conservative and liberal blocs.

The Senate trial, expected to start in January, will also unfold as the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the coming months in a landmark separation of powers fight involving efforts by House Democrats and New York state prosecutors to obtain years of Trump's financial records and tax returns.

Roberts could cast the deciding vote to disclose or shield Trump's financial records and may tip the scale in other hot-button cases that involve LGBT and abortion rights and the deportation status of nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants.

Decisions in these politically charged disputes should arrive this summer, just months before Americans head to the polls to determine if Trump gets a second term in the White House.

Trump and Roberts have at times had a difficult relationship.

The chief justice pushed back in a speech after the president branded a judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals "an Obama judge" for a 2018 decision that Trump disagreed with.

"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts responded at the time, defending the federal judiciary.

Trump would later say that he held "a lot of respect" for Roberts, even as the president doubled down on his criticism of the appeals court decision.

The political drama surrounding Roberts as he prepares to preside over the impeachment trial is likely to heighten his sensitivity to the public perception of the high court and the judiciary.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/475570-trump-impeachment-trial-drags-roberts-into-spotlight