8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (6)
#16111928 at 2022-04-20 13:17:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #20380: [DS] Losing The War Bigly. NCSWIC Edition
>>16111723
Those were the dark days, when the share price was less than the cost of a copy of the Sunday paper and the Mexican billionaireCarlos Slimhad to loan the company $250 million to keep it afloat. (Remember when the New York Post ran a picture of Arthur Sulzberger Jr. with ablack eyewearing a sombrero?)…
Joe's middle initial is just F - no name is attached, but his parents reportedly wanted him to share initials withJFK.…
Kahn also cited as a favorite The Honourable Schoolboy, aJohn le Carr? spy novel."I ended up being a foreign correspondent in Hong Kong," said Kahn, "and that had a foreign correspondent in Hong Kong, so it was kind of intriguing."…
He went to China as a freelancer during the Tiananmen Square protests and convinced his former colleagues in Dallas to print his stories. After beingdeported by the Chinese government,…
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/joe-kahn-new-york-times-profile.html
bit of a spook resume
#14393386 at 2021-08-19 02:06:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #18208: This could be—Afghanistan—another Dunkirk situation Edition
Ex-New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr.'s divorce gets dirty
Could he be putting the pinch on his estranged wife in their divorce?
Former New York Times publisher Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr. is apparently living up to his nickname in his divorce battle with his wife of fewer than six years Gabrielle Greene.
According to a source, things have become so bitter, they are warring in court over the terms of the prenup they signed before they married in 2014.
One source sniped, "Arthur gave Gabrielle a prenup before they married, and now he doesn't want to stick to it."
But a rep for Sulzberger Jr. insisted, "Mr. Sulzberger is fully complying with his prenup, including the provisions regarding confidentiality, and only wants this marriage to come to a peaceful end. Ms. Greene is misinterpreting the prenup to meet her demands."
The terms of the prenup are not known, but the source speculated it could cover marital property and New York Times stock.
Sulzberger Jr. bought an Upper West Side penthouse for $4 million in 2011. He also owns a Hudson Valley mansion in New Paltz.
The NYT scion, 69, reportedly worth around $16 million, filed for divorce from Greene, a 60-year-old financier who did a brief stint as chair of Whole Foods, on Feb. 4, The Post first revealed.
The divorce records are sealed, but docket information shows it's a "contested matrimonial" suit filed in New York State Supreme Court. The former couple is said to be back in court today - and both have hired powerful legal guns.
When asked about the prenup battle, Greene's attorney Sheila Riesel, a partner at top divorce firm Blank Rome, who has represented Al Pacino and Woody Allen, said, "I can't comment. This is a private matter."
Sulzberger Jr.'s attorney Adria Hillman - who famously represented Ron Perelman in his scorched-earth divorce from socialite Patricia Duff - also declined to comment when reached by Page Six by phone.
Sulzberger, Jr. is often referred to as "Pinch," a variation of his father's nickname, "Punch." He retired as chairman of the New York Times Company in December 2020, passing the torch to his son A.G. Sulzberger, the fifth generation of the Ochs-Sulzbergers to take the reins as publisher in more than 120 years of family ownership.
Greene is Sulzberger Jr.'s second wife. The two wed at the Outermost Inn on Martha's Vineyard on Aug. 30, 2014, according to their wedding announcement in the Times, which said that the bride planned to take her husband's name, although the divorce papers filed by Pinch identify his soon-to-be-ex only as Gabrielle Greene.
https://pagesix.com/2021/08/18/ex-new-york-times-publisher-Arthur-Sulzberger-jr-s-divorce-gets-dirty/
#9292334 at 2020-05-24 00:38:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11892: Trolling Activated, Dank Shift On! Edition
>2019/03/25
'Now that President Trump has been vindicated and the Fat Lady is singing, it's high time we hear from another matriarch- the Gray Lady.
The New York Times should apologize for misleading America - again.
Back in 2016, three days after Trump turned the world upside down with his election victory, the publisher and the editor of the Times wrote to subscribers. Their remarkable letter was in large part an apology for failing to understand the Trump phenomenon and for missing the signs that he could win.
"After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions," then publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and editor Dean Baquet wrote. "Did Donald Trump's sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters?"
While they also defended themselves, saying the paper "reported on both candidates fairly," they promised to "rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor."
As I wrote then, "Had the paper actually been fair to both candidates, it wouldn't need to rededicate itself to honest reporting. And it wouldn't have been totally blindsided by Trump's victory."
And now, as Yogi Berra once said, "it's deja vu all over again."
Because it didn't keep the promise to report "without fear or favor," the paper is facing a new storm of criticism. This time, of course, the topic is RussiaGate. And once again, the Times is accused of accepting and spreading fake news, and of missing the truth.
We don't need a trial. Guilty as charged. The Times was way out front, along with the Washington Post, in peddling the Russia collusion hoax. And because of its prominence and the power of its news service, the vast bulk of the media followed the Times' lead. It is the bell cow, and it led the media over the cliff by getting the big story wrong.
And not just one or two or even three times, but for more than two years, the paper of record acted like a prosecutor making the case that Trump was at least compromised by Russia, and maybe even conspired with Vladimir Putin to steal the election.
…'
https://nypost.com/2019/03/25/the-new-york-times-owes-trump-americans-a-big-fat-apology/
#8075680 at 2020-02-08 19:37:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10337: 2+2=4 Edition
(1)
The Subversive Intentions of Our Mainstream Media
The bias and censoring impulse that we observe in our news coverage isn't incidental.
Many media observers will recall the New York Times' response to Donald Trump's unexpected victory in 2016. In their subtle, tacit admission that the paper had covered the election with some bias, publisher Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. and editor Dean Baquet promised to "rededicate" themselves to the fundamental mission of the Times and to bring "fairness" to their coverage.
Other mainstream news outlets and journalists issued similar mea culpas. Just about all of them had treated Trump's campaign and supporters with an attitude of spiteful hilarity. The great irony in the media's hatred, of course, is that his rise would not have been possible without them and their vain attempt to hijack the Republican presidential primary process to ensure Hillary Clinton had the weakest opponent possible.
With the 2020 election less than nine months away and with all the laughs silenced and the tears shed, we have enough distance to assess whether the media learned the lessons of 2016.
They have not. Alarmingly, it seems as though the only adjustment most media elites are making is to reject even more stridently the traditional standards and principles of their profession.
This was perhaps the main takeaway from the Columbia Journalism Review's "Sleepwalking into 2020," a recent survey of major media figures examining how they can avoid making the mistakes of 2016 in their coverage of 2020. The results aren't pretty.
Many of the respondents emphasized the need for a bolder rejection of the standards of neutrality and objectivity. As Margaret Sullivan, a columnist at Jeff Bezos' Washington Post, explained: "One of the things we didn't do well covering the presidential election last time was that we failed to distinguish between the serious and not so serious-the term false equivalency comes to mind."
https://amgreatness.com/2020/02/07/the-subversive-intentions-of-our-mainstream-media/
#7018149 at 2019-07-12 22:04:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8979: Shills Using Antifa Chants Edition!
Mark Thompson, CEO of the failing NY Times, he was director general of pedovore cover up for the posh pedovore apologist BBC.
NY Times, now a Mexican owned failing
newspaper who largest shareholder is the pedovore Carlos Slim Helu, who's businesses include drug and child trafficking as well as a mobile phone monopoly.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-new-york-times-warrants-carlos-slim-idUSKBN0KN2M820150114
Carlos Slim, respectfully known to narcotics traffickers as Gordo Porco Slim (Fat Pig Slim) is now doubt furious over NY Times picking Mark Thompson an slippery limey pedovore who orchestrated the Jimmy Saville cover up at BBC before joining the failing Mexican Cartel owned New York Times. .
>Thompson, the former BBC director-general who was selected as the paper's new chief months ago, has denied squelching an exposé by a BBC investigative program that claimed that children's TV host Jimmy Savile, a much-lauded star at the corporation, routinely coerced teenage girls into sex.
Questions about the slipperly Thompson's involvement in ritual sexual abuse and sacrifice of children did not disturb the cartel newspaper's publisher Arthur Sultzberger Jr
>.. Arthur Sulzberger Jr., who served as the interim CEO of the company during the months-long executive search, has stuck by Thompson, insisting in a quarterly earnings call with investors that he was "satisfied" with the British executives' answers to questions about the scandal.
#1352293 at 2018-05-09 22:58:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #1695: Brave New Hunting Edition
>>1352205
CEO Mark Thompson (former BBC, covered up Savile/House of Lords scandal)
Chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr.
Part-owner Carlos Slim w/NY Times Co