8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (227)
#20776055 at 2024-04-25 12:32:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25482: Lest We Forget Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
Road to Rome: U.S.-Vatican diplomatic ties still vital after 40 years
Vatican City - March 14, 2024
The United States established formal diplomatic relations with the Holy See 40 years ago, and the current ambassador in Rome says its mission has been a wonderful success.
"We've tried to hew very closely to the mission that we've been given, and we have a great relationship with the Vatican," said Joe Donnelly, U.S. ambassador to the Holy See.
A former U.S. senator from Indiana and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Donnelly assumed his new and unexpected diplomatic post in Rome in April 2022, presenting his letters of credential to Pope Francis.
https://www.ncronline.org/road-rome-us-vatican-diplomatic-ties-still-vital-after-40-years
#20742505 at 2024-04-18 15:41:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25441: Enemy Exposed Edition
NIGHT SHIFT CAN'T HELP IT!
How stupid and scared you are!!
kek!!!
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
Road to Rome: U.S.-Vatican diplomatic ties still vital after 40 years
Vatican City - March 14, 2024
The United States established formal diplomatic relations with the Holy See 40 years ago, and the current ambassador in Rome says its mission has been a wonderful success.
"We've tried to hew very closely to the mission that we've been given, and we have a great relationship with the Vatican," said Joe Donnelly, U.S. ambassador to the Holy See.
A former U.S. senator from Indiana and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Donnelly assumed his new and unexpected diplomatic post in Rome in April 2022, presenting his letters of credential to Pope Francis.
https://www.ncronline.org/road-rome-us-vatican-diplomatic-ties-still-vital-after-40-years
#20720714 at 2024-04-13 16:23:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25414: Ebake For Victory Edition
#16 Lincoln was replaced by #17 Andrew Johnson
#35 Kennedy was replaced by #36 Lyndon Johnson
Mike Johnson is currently 2nd in line after the VP?
#20691818 at 2024-04-07 11:28:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25378: Absolute State of Comfefe Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
Road to Rome: U.S.-Vatican diplomatic ties still vital after 40 years
Vatican City - March 14, 2024
The United States established formal diplomatic relations with the Holy See 40 years ago, and the current ambassador in Rome says its mission has been a wonderful success.
"We've tried to hew very closely to the mission that we've been given, and we have a great relationship with the Vatican," said Joe Donnelly, U.S. ambassador to the Holy See.
A former U.S. senator from Indiana and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Donnelly assumed his new and unexpected diplomatic post in Rome in April 2022, presenting his letters of credential to Pope Francis.
https://www.ncronline.org/road-rome-us-vatican-diplomatic-ties-still-vital-after-40-years
#20650420 at 2024-03-30 02:08:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25328: Good E-Bake Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20629911 at 2024-03-26 14:51:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25301: Hold this 175M while you get wrek'd Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20627392 at 2024-03-26 02:41:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25298: Into The Comfy Night Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
Road to Rome: U.S.-Vatican diplomatic ties still vital after 40 years
Vatican City - March 14, 2024
The United States established formal diplomatic relations with the Holy See 40 years ago, and the current ambassador in Rome says its mission has been a wonderful success.
"We've tried to hew very closely to the mission that we've been given, and we have a great relationship with the Vatican," said Joe Donnelly, U.S. ambassador to the Holy See.
A former U.S. senator from Indiana and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Donnelly assumed his new and unexpected diplomatic post in Rome in April 2022, presenting his letters of credential to Pope Francis.
https://www.ncronline.org/road-rome-us-vatican-diplomatic-ties-still-vital-after-40-years
#20627385 at 2024-03-26 02:41:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25298: Into The Comfy Night Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
Road to Rome: U.S.-Vatican diplomatic ties still vital after 40 years
Vatican City - March 14, 2024
The United States established formal diplomatic relations with the Holy See 40 years ago, and the current ambassador in Rome says its mission has been a wonderful success.
"We've tried to hew very closely to the mission that we've been given, and we have a great relationship with the Vatican," said Joe Donnelly, U.S. ambassador to the Holy See.
A former U.S. senator from Indiana and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Donnelly assumed his new and unexpected diplomatic post in Rome in April 2022, presenting his letters of credential to Pope Francis.
https://www.ncronline.org/road-rome-us-vatican-diplomatic-ties-still-vital-after-40-years
#20623700 at 2024-03-25 15:43:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25294: VOTER INTIMIDATION by the White House THUGS Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20612107 at 2024-03-23 11:18:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25279: Ending the Abuse of Power Edition
>>20612104
We are talking LOW LOW IQ here…
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20605072 at 2024-03-22 02:46:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25270: Vast Network of Comfefe Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20600393 at 2024-03-21 09:36:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25265: Last Bread of the Night Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20591541 at 2024-03-19 19:08:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25254: Major Evidence In SC Case Edition
>>20591538
>>20591537
>>20591535
>>20591531
>>20591522
>>20591524
>>20591525
>>20591527
>>20591520
>>20591517
>>20591516
>>20591513
>>20591512
>>20591510
>>20591502 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< YOU SO SLOW THOUGH!!! KEK
>>20591499
>>20591498
>>20591494
THAT WAS EASY HUH KIDS?
>>20591491
>>20591465
>>20591469
>>20591471
>>20591479
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
Road to Rome: U.S.-Vatican diplomatic ties still vital after 40 years
Vatican City - March 14, 2024
The United States established formal diplomatic relations with the Holy See 40 years ago, and the current ambassador in Rome says its mission has been a wonderful success.
"We've tried to hew very closely to the mission that we've been given, and we have a great relationship with the Vatican," said Joe Donnelly, U.S. ambassador to the Holy See.
A former U.S. senator from Indiana and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Donnelly assumed his new and unexpected diplomatic post in Rome in April 2022, presenting his letters of credential to Pope Francis.
https://www.ncronline.org/road-rome-us-vatican-diplomatic-ties-still-vital-after-40-years
NO VATICAN RELATIONS FOR 117 YEARS DIRECTLY AFTER THE LINCOLN ASSASSINATION > 1984 REAGAN < AND EVERY PRESIDENT AFTER REAGAN WAS A CLOWN > YOU ARE A CLOWN
LET'S SEE HOW FAST THEY MOP NIGHT SHIFT'S FEET
WORK TRAITOR WHORES!
#20572473 at 2024-03-15 18:56:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25231:Ides of March Only ONE Potential Liar Allowed? Decisions Decisions Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20547063 at 2024-03-10 16:49:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25200: Sunday morning weekly recap edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20546985 at 2024-03-10 16:26:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25200: Sunday morning weekly recap edition
>>20546979
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20541551 at 2024-03-09 17:19:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25194: Saturday Afternoon 8 Ballers Shift Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20540363 at 2024-03-09 09:08:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25192: Jim Watkins - Showtime! Edition
>>20540359
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20506611 at 2024-03-02 19:37:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25152: MARCH MADNESS INCOMING Keepin It Real Saturday Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20506605 at 2024-03-02 19:36:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25152: MARCH MADNESS INCOMING Keepin It Real Saturday Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20506600 at 2024-03-02 19:36:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25152: MARCH MADNESS INCOMING Keepin It Real Saturday Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20506596 at 2024-03-02 19:35:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25152: MARCH MADNESS INCOMING Keepin It Real Saturday Edition
>>20506571
>>20506572
>>20506573
>>20506574
>>20506575
>>20506577
>>20506579
>>20506581
>>20506583
>>20506585
>>20506586
>>20506588
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20466696 at 2024-02-24 05:12:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25106: Late Night Zone Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20441260 at 2024-02-19 17:52:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25076: Welcome to Anonymous #NeverForget Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20436281 at 2024-02-18 19:41:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25071: Dead Cat Bounce Edition
>>20436272
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20400442 at 2024-02-12 06:55:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #25027: After the Superbowl Lull Edition
IF ONLY…
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
#20368265 at 2024-02-06 21:31:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24989: "[L]et's [G]o [B]randon" -[T]he [Q] & (AHOHS) Edition
Lincoln made a big mistake when he picked Andrew Johnson as his veep in '64.
RFKjr was never a contender for 47-2IC.
#20256793 at 2024-01-17 08:08:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24855: The Big Comfy Edition
>>20256712
>Andrew Johnson
17th President
#20256712 at 2024-01-17 07:41:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24855: The Big Comfy Edition
>>20256667
>Johnson County
Andrew Johnson comms?
#20119696 at 2023-12-23 16:21:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24691: Rising with the Morning Sun Edition
>>20119691
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See%E2%80%93United_States_relations
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/11/world/us-and-vatican-restore-full-ties-after-117-years.html
https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-the-holy-see/
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/975/vatican-city-u-s-recognition-of
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/01/10/US-establishes-full-diplomatic-relations-with-the-Vatican-for-the-first-time-in-116-years/2880442558800/
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX.
Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level.
These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See.
This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited.
There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
#20109910 at 2023-12-21 17:26:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24679: Winter Solstice Edition
>>20109905
HISS, HISS!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See%E2%80%93United_States_relations
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/11/world/us-and-vatican-restore-full-ties-after-117-years.html
https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-the-holy-see/
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/975/vatican-city-u-s-recognition-of
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/01/10/US-establishes-full-diplomatic-relations-with-the-Vatican-for-the-first-time-in-116-years/2880442558800/
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX.
Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level.
These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See.
This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited.
There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
Several presidents designated personal envoys to visit the Holy See periodically for discussions of international humanitarian and political issues. The first was Postmaster General James Farley, the first high-ranking government official to normalize relations with the Holy See.
In 1933, Farley set sail for Europe, along with Soviet Commissar of Foreign Affairs Maxim Litvinov, on the Italian liner SS Conte di Savoia. In Italy, Farley had an audience with Pope Pius XI and dinner with Cardinal Pacelli, who was to succeed to the papacy in 1939.[4] Myron Charles Taylor served Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman from 1939 to 1950.[5]
The Vatican has historically been accused of being un-American, at least until the presidency of John F. Kennedy (see Americanism (heresy), nativism and anti-Catholicism in the United States).
The bulk of the accusation is found in Paul Blanshard's book American Freedom and Catholic Power, which attacked the Holy See on grounds that it was a dangerous, powerful, foreign and undemocratic institution.
#20096044 at 2023-12-18 23:56:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24662: Distractions Everywhere Edition
>>20095788
That's statue represented Unity after the Civil War, which was the plaform Abrham Lincoln and his vice-POTUS Andrew Johnson ran on, and won on.
The reason they took it is because HUSSAIN wants race war.
UNITY of USA of America is against their plans.
The enemies (ursurper criminals) want defeat, not unity and peace
THERES A REASON FOR A UNION SQUARE IN BOTH NYC AND SAN FRANCISCO.
THE CRAZIES WANT TO REMOVE THE GEORGE WASHINGTON STATUE FROM UNION SQUARE NYC
#20084698 at 2023-12-16 20:19:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24649: TRUMP TELLS THE THE SNAKE: DURHAM Edition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See%E2%80%93United_States_relations
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/11/world/us-and-vatican-restore-full-ties-after-117-years.html
https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-the-holy-see/
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/975/vatican-city-u-s-recognition-of
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/01/10/US-establishes-full-diplomatic-relations-with-the-Vatican-for-the-first-time-in-116-years/2880442558800/
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX.
Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level.
These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See.
This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited.
There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
#20071895 at 2023-12-14 06:37:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24634: Looking for Hunter Again Edition
>>20071868
Article II, Section 3:
"He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States."
In its 1867 decision Mississippi v. Johnson, the Supreme Court established that the President is largely beyond the reach of the judiciary by holding that it could not direct President Andrew Johnson in how he exercised his purely executive and political powers. The Court stated, it had no jurisdiction . . . to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties.
ArtII.S3.5.1 Presidential Immunity to Suits and Official Conduct
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-5-1/ALDE_00013392/
#19532256 at 2023-09-11 21:45:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23988: 9/11 Special - We Will NEVER Surrender Our Country! Edition
>>19532232
>>19532223
>>19532247
>>19532254
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See%E2%80%93United_States_relations
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/11/world/us-and-vatican-restore-full-ties-after-117-years.html
https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-the-holy-see/
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/975/vatican-city-u-s-recognition-of
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/01/10/US-establishes-full-diplomatic-relations-with-the-Vatican-for-the-first-time-in-116-years/2880442558800/
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX.
Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level.
These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See.
This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited.
There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
#19532247 at 2023-09-11 21:43:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23988: 9/11 Special - We Will NEVER Surrender Our Country! Edition
>>19532232
>>19532223
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See%E2%80%93United_States_relations
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/11/world/us-and-vatican-restore-full-ties-after-117-years.html
https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-the-holy-see/
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/975/vatican-city-u-s-recognition-of
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/01/10/US-establishes-full-diplomatic-relations-with-the-Vatican-for-the-first-time-in-116-years/2880442558800/
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX.
Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level.
These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See.
This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited.
There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
#19171711 at 2023-07-13 13:08:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23546: Time Is Almost Up For Evil Edition
>>19171688
Legal Fact Check: Pardons
A U.S. president has broad powers to issue pardons to individuals involved in criminal investigations. But are those powers unlimited? No, there are some limitations such as for offenses on a state level. And, it is unsettled whether a president can pardon him- or herself.
A U.S. president has broadbut not unlimited powers to pardon. For example, a president cannot pardon someone for a state crime. And constitutional experts are divided on whether a president can pardon him- or herself.
The U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 reads: "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment (emphasis added)."
There is a strong consensus among legal experts that apresident cannot pardon someone for a state offense, as the Constitution notes "offenses against the United States." In other words, state law enforcement authorities could review any criminal allegations, without presidential intervention, to determine if they rise to the level of a state offense.
The legal record is also clear that a president can pardon for a presumptive crime, like what then-President Gerald Ford did with his predecessor Richard Nixon on Sept. 8, 1974. In the aftermath of Watergate, Ford gave Nixon, who resigned from the presidency a month earlier, an "absolute pardon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from Jan. 20, 1969 through Aug. 9, 1974."
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the presidential power to pardon in ex parte Garland, an 1866 case involving a former Confederate senator who had been pardoned by President Andrew Johnson. In that case, the high court made clear that the pardon power "extends to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment."
One unsettled legal question is whether a president can pardon himself. The Constitution says a president cannot pardon "in cases of impeachment." Expert legal opinions on this question vary, and the U.S. Supreme Court has not weighed in on this issue.
https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/publications/washingtonletter/dec-2020-wl/legal-fact-check-pardons-1220wl/
#19088900 at 2023-06-28 15:46:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23442: Patriots Shine N Shillz Whine Edition
>>19088847
so this is different from the one for $5 million which broke a few days ago?
Looking through a great American History book from last turn of the century;
Remember there was a question about the last time a POTUS had to suspend the Constitution to save the Union (different from what Biden's done - they do it to steal , cover-up and ultimately save their own asses)
So I looked around to see what happened back then
THIS IS WHAT I FOUND
Couldn't find it (yet) about suspension of the Constitution - but yep, it was eluded to. (Screen grabs of pages will be forthecoming at some point)
big news for me.
There was so much disruption in the Country (USA) from the War that both Parties were split;
So the segment of Dems and segment of Republicans who stood for BOTH perservation of the Union and eliminating slavery, Joined together to form a third Party.
UNION Party.
Lincoln (Republican) ran and won on the ticket of the Third Party.
Andrew Johnson (Democrat) ran as his Vice-President on the same ticket.
They won.
citation / sauce
"Mace's School History of the United States" Rand McNally publishing 1904
"National Union Party"
met in Baltimore and nominated Lincoln for POTUS and Johnson for Vice-president.
Parallels our time of War meow
https://archive.org/details/aschoolhistoryu00macegoog/page/276/mode/2up
#18941642 at 2023-06-02 19:17:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23254: LGB-T: Queer Theory- Marxist Sexualization To Render Society Edition
>>18941639
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
#18940901 at 2023-06-02 16:44:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23253: Demon Edition
Does ROMAN CATHOLIC PAPAL DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY count as a Protection?
Like in a PROTECTED Class?
Like LAW?
ASKING FOR VERY SERIOUS FREN
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
#18935232 at 2023-06-01 16:17:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23246: Chicken Roosting Edition
>>18935224
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
Several presidents designated personal envoys to visit the Holy See periodically for discussions of international humanitarian and political issues. The first was Postmaster General James Farley, the first high-ranking government official to normalize relations with the Holy See. In 1933, Farley set sail for Europe, along with Soviet Commissar of Foreign Affairs Maxim Litvinov, on the Italian liner SS Conte di Savoia. In Italy, Farley had an audience with Pope Pius XI and dinner with Cardinal Pacelli, who was to succeed to the papacy in 1939.[4] Myron Charles Taylor served Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman from 1939 to 1950.[5]
The Vatican has historically been accused of being un-American, at least until the presidency of John F. Kennedy (see Americanism (heresy), nativism and anti-Catholicism in the United States). The bulk of the accusation is found in Paul Blanshard's book American Freedom and Catholic Power, which attacked the Holy See on grounds that it was a dangerous, powerful, foreign and undemocratic institution.
#18924922 at 2023-05-30 14:57:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23233: Reminder - June is Groomer Month Edition
>>18924913
no charges will be filed
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
Several presidents designated personal envoys to visit the Holy See periodically for discussions of international humanitarian and political issues. The first was Postmaster General James Farley, the first high-ranking government official to normalize relations with the Holy See. In 1933, Farley set sail for Europe, along with Soviet Commissar of Foreign Affairs Maxim Litvinov, on the Italian liner SS Conte di Savoia. In Italy, Farley had an audience with Pope Pius XI and dinner with Cardinal Pacelli, who was to succeed to the papacy in 1939.[4] Myron Charles Taylor served Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman from 1939 to 1950.[5]
#18917000 at 2023-05-28 20:22:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23223: Apple Flavored Napalm Editon
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
Now…what is blatantly missing from U.S. History?
#18916132 at 2023-05-28 16:57:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23222: Fake Conservatives Agree To Fake Spending Cuts Edition
Holy See-United States relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See_United_States_relations
The current United States Ambassador to the Holy See is Joe Donnelly, who replaced the ad interim Charg? d'Affaires, Patrick Connell, on April 11, 2021. The Holy See is represented by its apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who assumed office on April 12, 2016. The U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is located in Rome, in the Villa Domiziana. The Nunciature to the United States is located in Washington, D.C., at 3339 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
History
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
History
1867-1984
From 1867 to 1984, the United States did not have diplomatic relations with the Holy See in the wake of rumors of Catholic implication in the Lincoln assassination.[3]
The critics finally won out in 1867 when the US Congress withdrew all funding for the legation in Rome.
The apparent reason was a rumor relating to the religious freedom of Protestants in the Papal States. From the beginning of the legation in Rome, Papal authorities had allowed the celebration of Protestant religious services in the home of the American Minister.
When the services grew, they were moved to a rented apartment under the seal of the American Legation to accommodate the participants. The news floating around Washington and being reported in the New York Times was that the Pope had forced the Protestant group outside the walls of Rome.
That, according to Rufus King, the American Minister himself, was untrue in its entirety.
In his June 1908 apostolic constitution, Sapienti Consilio, Pope Pius X decreed that as of November 3 that year, the Catholic Church in the United States would no longer be supervised by the Vatican's missionary agency, the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (Propaganda Fide) and would now be a mission-sending Church, not "mission territory."
#18895915 at 2023-05-24 15:43:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23196: Digital Dollar Up Next Edition
>>18895898
that feels better
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Abraham_Lincoln
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See%E2%80%93United_States_relations
1797-1867
The United States maintained consular relations with the Papal States from 1797 under President George Washington and Pope Pius VI to 1867 and President Andrew Johnson and Pope Pius IX. Diplomatic relations existed with the Pope, in his capacity as head of state of the Papal States, from 1848 under President James K. Polk to 1867 under President Andrew Johnson, though not at the ambassadorial level. These relations lapsed when on February 28, 1867, Congress passed legislation that prohibited any future funding of United States diplomatic missions to the Holy See. This decision was based on mounting anti-Catholic sentiment in the United States,[1] fueled by the conviction and hanging of Mary Surratt, and three other Catholics, for taking part in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. Her son, John Surratt, also Catholic, was accused of plotting with John Wilkes Booth in the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He served briefly as a Pontifical Zouave but was recognized and arrested. He escaped to Egypt but was eventually arrested and extradited. There was also an allegation that the Pope had forbidden the celebration of Protestant religious services, which had been held weekly in the home of the American Minister in Rome, within the walls of the city.[2]
#18761642 at 2023-04-27 15:22:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #23022: We Are The News Now Edition
This is an old one
First heard this from Cooper
Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.
Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.
Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head.
Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .
Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln , was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln , was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.
Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford.'
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford.'
Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.
Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
And here's the kicker…
A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe , Maryland
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was in Marilyn Monroe.
#18738465 at 2023-04-23 02:45:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22992: Cool Story Bro Edition
>>18738427
U prolly right. DT told him to get ready… Sec of Defense?
Sidenote… The 12 Generals who became POTUS
1. George Washington
2. Andrew Jackson
3. William Henry Harrison
4. Zachary Taylor
5. Franklin Pierce
6. Andrew Johnson
7. Ulysses S Grant
8. Rutheford B Hayes
9. James A Garfield
10. Chester A Artur
11. Benjamin Harrison
12. Dwight Eisenhower
#18590762 at 2023-03-27 20:06:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22804: THEY must control local police / schools for false flags to work Edition
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
7m
https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/03/27/anti-trump-hush-money-case-has-more-holes-his-doral-golf-course/
Anti-Trump 'Hush Money' Case Has More Holes Than Doral Golf Course
If Trump is indicted on flimsy "hush money" charges and then arrested, it will confirm America's final plunge into Third World status.
The Daily Signal
Mar 27, 2023, 3:56 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110097004918577931
Anti-Trump 'Hush Money' Case Has More Holes Than His Doral Golf Course
Deroy Murdock / March 27, 2023
If filed, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's highly anticipated "hush money" indictment against former President Donald Trump will be unprecedented. No sitting or former president of the United States has ever been indicted.
The U.S. House impeached Trump twice - and Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, once each. The Senate failed to convict any of them after their respective House "indictments."
If Trump is indicted and then arrested, it will confirm America's final plunge into Third World status. The U.S. justice system will be fully exposed as a tool to forgive Democrats and persecute Republicans, not least Joe Biden's leading GOP rival. "Equal justice under law" will become a dim memory rather than a national ideal.
Until then, Americans should marvel at Bragg's reported case. Manhattan's far-left, George Soros-funded, thug-hugging DA might unseal an indictment with more holes in it than Trump's Doral Golf Club.
First, hush money is no crime, unless someone gets paid to stay silent among police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, or judges. That is obstruction of justice.
Trump would be a criminal had he instructed his then-attorney Michael Cohen to wire $130,000 to Stephanie Clifford (nom de porn Stormy Daniels) to clam up if law enforcement asked about the adulterous affair that she alleges, and Trump denies.
Alas for Bragg, Trump reputedly paid Daniels not to talk with journalists. This is perfectly legal. Anyone who has signed a nondisclosure agreement (as Daniels did) understands this.
So, no crime undergirds Bragg's fetish.
Second, the Federal Election Commission failed to judge any of this a crime. The FEC convened on Feb. 23, 2021. Its four voting members-two appointed by Democrats and two by Republicans-deadlocked. They could have criminalized this scenario, but they didn't.
Third, the statutes of limitations have lapsed on all but one charge against Trump. The FEC's First General Counsel Report specified on Dec. 7, 2020, that Trump faced three matters under review: The deadline for prosecution on MURs 7313 and 7319 was "Oct. 27, 2021 (earliest) - Dec. 8, 2021 (latest)."
MUR 7379's limitation is "October 26, 2021 (earliest) - April 17, 2023 (latest)." While the expiration date on this accusation remains ahead (barely), Bragg has a huge problem. On page 6 of its report, the FEC's general counsel wrote: "... we recommend that the Commission dismiss the allegation that Cohen, Trump, and the Trump Committee violated 52 U.S.C. ? 30114(b) by converting campaign funds to personal use."
Oops.
Fourth, with two-year, misdemeanor statutes of limitations hindering him, Bragg reportedly wants to file felony charges against Trump. These carry five-year deadlines and threaten stiffer penalties.
However, to make this a federal felony case (puzzling work for a local prosecutor), the alleged violation (filing false campaign-finance reports) must be tied to a second, separate underlying crime. Since the FEC failed to rule any of this criminal, Bragg's felony indictment would be a hot-air balloon anchored to absolutely nothing.
Fifth, beyond the FEC, Gotham's U.S. attorney and Bragg's predecessor, Cyrus Vance Jr., both declined to prosecute Trump for hush money.
For his part, "Bragg appeared not to be focused on the case," The Washington Post reported soon after he took office in January 2022. "Bragg didn't seem keenly interested."
That Feb. 23, Bragg's Trump-related "inactivity," as The Post described it, triggered the resignations of his deputies, Carey Dunne and Mark Pomerantz.
"I believe that your decision not to prosecute Donald Trump now, and on the existing record, is misguided and completely contrary to the public interest," Pomerantz wrote Bragg as he quit. Pomerantz described the case against Trump as "suspended indefinitely."
Pomerantz's new book, People vs. Donald Trump: An Inside Account, bashes Bragg's decision. This pressure and relentless Democratic demands to "get Trump" apparently pushed Bragg to spurn the law and instead fashion fresh partisan gifts for his fellow leftists.
Armed with these facts, Trump's attorneys should file a motion to dismiss and then watch Bragg's untethered contraption go up, up, and away.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/03/27/anti-trump-hush-money-case-has-more-holes-his-doral-golf-course/
#18386295 at 2023-02-21 04:54:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22539: Night Shift And Beyond Edition
Fish 'rained from the sky', outback community says, in freak weather event
Residents of a remote outback community have been left marvelling at the heavens as fish "rained from the sky" in a surprising, but not unheard of, weather event.
Key points:
Lajamanu residents say they were stunned to see fish fall from the sky at the weekend
It isn't the first time the remote outback community has experienced the phenomenon
Experts say the strange weather events can be caused by strong updrafts, such as tornadoes
Locals in Lajamanu, a community 560 kilometres south-west of Katherine on the northern edge of the Tanami Desert, said they were stunned to see the fish drop during heavy rainfall.
"We've seen a big storm heading up to my community and we thought it was just rain," Lajamanu local and Central Desert councillor Andrew Johnson Japanangka said.
"But when the rain started falling we've seen fish falling down as well."
This is not the first time the strange weather event has swept through the community.
The same phenomenon occurred in Lajamanu in 2010, and was also reported in 2004 and as far back as 1974.
Weather experts believe incidents like these can be caused by strong updrafts, such as tornadoes, which suck water and fish from rivers and dump them hundreds of kilometres away.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-21/outback-community-fish-rain-sky-weather-event/102002588
#18253062 at 2023-01-30 14:28:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22365: Are You Ready for Brain Transparency? Edition
>>18252906
The 1947 secrets act created a fifth column within the government that has run without accountability to the people for 75 years. Looks like these satanic scum are operating on a 75 year cycle.
This is all preplanned by the cabal and the masons. Look at these date differences
First innauguration to Lee's surrender:
From and including: Thursday, April 30, 1789
To and including: Sunday, April 9, 1865
Result: 27,738 days
It is 27,738 days from the start date to the end date, end date included.
Or 75 years, 11 months, 11 days including the end date.
Or 911 months, 11 days including the end date.
Although Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered to Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, the head of the Union Army, on April 9, 1865 at Appomattox Court House in Virginia, the Civil War did not end until 16 months later. The official end came when President Andrew Johnson, who was vice president until the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln in April, declared a formal end to the war on Aug. 20th, 1866.
End of Civil War declared by Andrew Johnson to pearl harbor
Result: 27,503 days
It is 27,503 days from the start date to the end date, end date included.
or 75 years, 3 months, 18 days including the end date.
Or 903 months, 18 days including the end date.
Pearl Harbor to Election of Trump (The disruptor)
#18124184 at 2023-01-11 17:32:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22219: TY Jim Edition
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3
You're incorrectly assuming that the subpoenas would be to federal officials. More importantly, a POTUS cannot pardon state offenses.
https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/publications/washingtonletter/dec-2020-wl/legal-fact-check-pardons-1220wl/
This article was originally published on abalegalfactcheck.com.
A U.S. president has broad powers to issue pardons to individuals involved in criminal investigations. But are those powers unlimited? No, there are some limitations such as for offenses on a state level. And, it is unsettled whether a president can pardon him- or herself.
A U.S. president has broad but not unlimited powers to pardon. For example, a president cannot pardon someone for a state crime. And constitutional experts are divided on whether a president can pardon him- or herself.
The U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 reads: "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment (emphasis added)."
There is a strong consensus among legal experts that a president cannot pardon someone for a state offense, as the Constitution notes "offenses against the United States." In other words, state law enforcement authorities could review any criminal allegations, without presidential intervention, to determine if they rise to the level of a state offense.
The legal record is also clear that a president can pardon for a presumptive crime, like what then-President Gerald Ford did with his predecessor Richard Nixon on Sept. 8, 1974. In the aftermath of Watergate, Ford gave Nixon, who resigned from the presidency a month earlier, an "absolute pardon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from Jan. 20, 1969 through Aug. 9, 1974."
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the presidential power to pardon in ex parte Garland, an 1866 case involving a former Confederate senator who had been pardoned by President Andrew Johnson. In that case, the high court made clear that the pardon power "extends to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment."
One unsettled legal question is whether a president can pardon himself. The Constitution says a president cannot pardon "in cases of impeachment." Expert legal opinions on this question vary, and the U.S. Supreme Court has not weighed in on this issue.
#18087709 at 2023-01-06 09:29:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22171: Thank God It's Friday Edition
>>18087698
Culture and Living | Iceland Monitor | Tue 24 Jan 2017 | 19.30 GMT
Donald Trump is related to most Icelanders and Danish and Norwegian Royalty
President Donald J. Trump is the direct descendant of Hakon V King of Norway according to Icelandic genealogist Oddur F. Helgason. Mr. Trump is also related to Queen Margrethe II of Denmark, Icelandic President Gu?ni Th. Johannesson of Iceland, and in fact almost all Icelanders.
https://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/culture_and_living/2017/01/24/donald_trump_is_related_to_most_icelanders_and_dani/
Analysis
Why does Donald Trump want to buy Greenland?
Phillip Inman
The US president's talk of a 'large real estate deal' says a lot about his view of the world
What Greenlanders say about Trump's interest in their country - video report
Mon 19 Aug 2019 09.56 EDT
Last modified on Mon 30 Sep 2019 20.04 EDT
Greenland, and more specifically its purchase by the US, is being actively discussed in Donald Trump's Oval Office. But what exactly is it that makes one of the world's most desolate places such an attractive proposition?
For the president, it is the real estate deal of a lifetime, one that would secure a land mass a quarter the size of the US and cement his place in US history alongside President Andrew Johnson, who bought Alaska from Russia in 1867, and Thomas Jefferson, who secured Louisiana from the French in 1803.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/19/why-does-donald-trump-want-to-buy-greenland
#18003554 at 2022-12-23 16:11:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #22060: We Have It All Edition
>>18003541
reated:
Freemasonry has continued to be important in U.S. politics, and at least 15 presidents, five Supreme Court chief justices, and numerous members of Congress have been Masons. Presidents known to be Masons include Washington, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, James Garfield, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Warren Harding, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, and Gerald Ford. Today there are an estimated two million Masons in the United States.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/washington-becomes-master-mason
#17518416 at 2022-09-11 15:24:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #21475: Anons Hanging in There Edition
>>17518213
dunno which is correct but here's the counter
> https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2013/09/14/disinformation-in-flight-175-rare-video-posted-sep-11-2013/
Disinformation in Flight 175 Rare Video (Posted Sep 11 2013)
Andrew Johnson / Mark Conlon - 14 Sep 2013
Recently, a "Rare Video" of Flight 175 apparently hitting WTC 2 on 911 was re-circulated. This was originally shot by Michael Hezarkhani. In this video:
Though the video correctly states that the way the crash and explosion happens is impossible (if a normal plane was involved), the thrust of this video is that it must be fake, because the plane wing passes behind a certain building when it should not be able to do this, because it is claimed the building in question is behind WTC 2.
A short analysis by Mark Conlon clearly shows that this conclusion is not correct. See below this for additional information.
The picture below shows the Michael Hezarkhani video with the two buildings in question which Markus Allen claims the plane's wing passes behind.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Sx0svj1wExA/V5jeyVeSisI/AAAAAAAADvg/hKyKZ2VFvRYP7UcMpoY5IgVyOJ3EB3sswCLcB/s640/Herzarkhani%2Bcnn2.jpg
In the picture below it will help us to understand the two buildings location in relation to the South Tower in Michael Hezarkhani video.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C8kF3hdzI30/V5jfE_9UimI/AAAAAAAADvo/M_jwrzqykA8d7aDBcH-FCRSp8t4Cc0ZQQCLcB/s640/wtc_1999BC.jpg
The picture below also helps to demonstrate the location of the two buildings in question in relation to the Twin Towers at ground level. They are located to the right of the Twin Towers.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4A97Vttihw0/V5jfg5NolpI/AAAAAAAADvw/WAWhwz6fVrUrtBb4jHQEvb1UsV_kLTRnwCLcB/s640/WTC-looking_north2%2B-%2BAnalysis%2BComplete%2BVersion.jpg
Below I have inserted the plane's trajectory into the picture to demonstrate how plane's wing should have passed behind the two buildings in question, when you consider Michael Hezarkhani's location on board the ferry at Battery Park.
#16340007 at 2022-05-25 18:26:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #20671: Is Ra El? Edition
Pentagon unveils new names for 9 Confederate-named bases
On Tuesday, the Pentagon's naming commission announced its proposed new names for nine U.S. Army bases originally named in commemoration of Confederate military leaders during the Civil War.
The Pentagon naming commission was tasked in the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with providing Congress with new names for various bases, facilities and other pieces of military property that have been named after Confederate leaders and other controversial historical figures. In a press release, the naming commission announced it had proposed the following bases renamed: Fort Benning, Ga. to Fort Moore; Fort Bragg, N.C. to Fort Liberty; Fort Gordon, Ga. to Fort Eisenhower; Fort A.P. Hill, Va. to Fort Walker; Fort Hood, Texas to Fort Cavazos; Fort Lee, Va. to Fort Gregg-Adams; Fort Pickett, Va. to Fort Barfoot; Fort Polk, La. to Fort Johnson; and Fort Rucker, Ala. to Fort Novosel.
The commission recommended renaming Fort Benning - named after Confederate Gen. Henry L. Benning - to Fort Moore, after Lt. Gen. Hal and Julia Moore. Hal Moore led troops during the first major battle of the Vietnam War, the Battle of Ia Drang. The battle was depicted in the 2002 film "We Were Soldiers." While the battle continued in Vietnam, Julia Moore waited at home as she and the other military wives waited for casualty notifications, which at the time came in the form of telegrams delivered by taxicab drivers. Julia Moore would go on to advocate for the Army to establish uniformed casualty notification teams, which are still in use today.
The commission recommended Fort Bragg - named after Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg - be renamed Fort Liberty, in honor of the value of liberty.
The commission recommended Fort Gordon - named after Confederate Gen. John Brown Gordon - be renamed Fort Eisenhower after Gen. Dwight Eisenhower. Eisenhower served as the supreme allied commander during World War II and went on to serve as President from 1953 to 1961.
The commission recommended Fort A.P. Hill - named after Confederate Gen. Ambrose Powell Hill Jr. - be renamed Fort Walker after Dr. Mary Walker. Walker initially tried to join the Union Army at the start of the Civil War but was turned down. She was eventually hired as a surgeon for the Union Army. She was taken as a prisoner of war by Confederate forces in 1864. After the war, Walker wrote to President Andrew Johnson seeking a retroactive military commission for her efforts during the war. The Army determined there was no precedent at the time for commissioning a woman and Johnson instead awarded her the Medal of Honor, making her the only woman in history to receive this recognition.
The commission recommended Fort Hood - named after Confederate Gen. John Bell Hood - be renamed Fort Cavazos after Gen. Richard Cavazos, who received the Distinguished Service Cross in the Korean War and then again in the Vietnam War, both times for leading assaults on fortified enemy positions.
The commission recommended Fort Lee - named after Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee - be renamed Fort Gregg-Adams after Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg and Lt. Col. Charity Adams, two Black Army officers. According to the Progress-Index, Gregg began his 35-year military career at Fort Lee and retired as the deputy director of logistics for the entire Army. The Army established the annual LTG Arthur J. Gregg Sustainment Leadership Award in 2015, to recognize military logistics officers and officials who have made significant contributions to the Army's logistics.
Adams became the first black woman in the Women's Army Auxiliary Corps and she went on to command and the first World War II battalion comprised of all black women members.
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2022/05/pentagon-unveils-new-names-for-9-confederate-named-bases/
#16305349 at 2022-05-19 19:00:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #20626: US Marshalls have been deployed to the homes of the SCOTUS Edition
>>16305288
>We are still in a declared state of war
Conceded and not in dispute. We were at war when Milligan was put before a tribunal in 1864 as well. The court ruled that as long as there are functioning civil courts civilians cannot be tried before a military tribunal. White Hats would have to prove the courts have been infiltrated or compromised, which is of course, a possibility.
"The landmark case stemmed from a trial by a military commission of Lambdin P. Milligan (for whom the case is named), Stephen Horsey, William A. Bowles, and Andrew Humphreys that convened at Indianapolis on October 21, 1864. The charges against the men included, among others, conspiracy against the U.S. government, offering aid and comfort to the Confederates, and inciting rebellion. On December 10, 1864, Milligan, Bowles, and Horsey were found guilty on all charges and sentenced to hang. Humphreys was found guilty and sentenced to hard labor for the remainder of the war. (The sentence for Humphreys was later modified, allowing his release; President Andrew Johnson commuted the sentences for Milligan, Bowles, and Horsey to life imprisonment.) On May 10, 1865, Milligan's legal counsel filed a petition in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana at Indianapolis for a writ of habeas corpus, which called for a justification of Milligan's arrest. A similar petition was filed on behalf of Bowles and Horsey. The two judges who reviewed Milligan's petition disagreed about the issue of whether the U.S. Constitution prohibited civilians from being tried by a military commission and passed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case was argued before the Court on March 5 and March 13, 1866; its decision was handed down on April 3, 1866."
#15670598 at 2022-02-20 01:57:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #19814: Faith In God Will Sustain Us Edition
>>15670591
>The House
The House of Representatives has already adopted this conclusion. The article of impeachment adopted by the House found that Trump violated his oath to defend the Constitution "by willfully inciting violence against the Government of the United States." It also found that this conduct was "consistent with his prior efforts to subvert and obstruct the certification of the results of the 2020 presidential election." Thus, the House concluded, "In all of this, President Trump gravely endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of government."
Hemel's explanation of the relevant standard confused matters a bit because he discussed how "aid and comfort" was defined under the criminal law of treason, which applies to enemies "of the United States." The 14th Amendment is not identical to the criminal law of treason: It refers to enemies of the Constitution.
What America just experienced was an assault by enemies at home who, while claiming to be patriots, sought to override and thus overthrow the Constitution's procedures for electing a president. Though he had sworn to defend the Constitution as a public official, Trump gave aid and comfort to these enemies of the Constitution. He thereby, under the 14th Amendment, disqualified himself from holding future office unless the Congress chooses to remove the disqualification by a two-thirds vote.
The House already voted that Trump aided these enemies. The Senate could therefore just concur with the House's conclusion, by majority vote, in a resolution. To make the legal implication of this shared conclusion clear, the resolution could add that, by these actions, Donald Trump gave aid or comfort to enemies of the Constitution of the United States. This would explicitly invoke the 14th Amendment standard. Period.
Magliocca is reluctant to find power for a congressional finding because he believes some judicial involvement is needed to establish 14th Amendment disability. But the 14th Amendment expressly gives Congress the direct constitutional authority to enforce its provisions, including by legislation.
Some might worry that a congressional finding violates the constitutional prohibition on bills of attainder, a legislative act that pronounces an individual's guilt of a certain crime. But the congressional finding is not a prohibited bill of attainder. It is not a criminal conviction. The criminal law of treason is a separate matter with its own burdens of proof and penalties.
Magliocca refers to the use of the bill-of-attainder argument by a then-Supreme Court justice, Salmon Chase. The issue came up in the treason trial case of Jefferson Davis. It was voiced by one of the two circuit judges considering the matter, Supreme Court Chief Justice Chase, who was there in his circuit-riding role. The U.S. government thought this argument was meritless, as did the other judge hearing the case and as did lead sponsors of the 14th Amendment itself. The circuit court was therefore split. The issue was not settled by the U.S. Supreme Court only because President Andrew Johnson pardoned Davis before the case could be heard.
#15513600 at 2022-01-31 23:10:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #19619: Rig For Red. Multiple meanings? Big Rigs? Edition
OPINION - Joe Biden has been a Democrat all his life, but last week he became a Democat. The president should embrace being a cat person (although not literally). It may just save his presidency.
Not since President George W. Bush has a FCOTUS (First Cat of the United States) roamed the White House premises. Abraham Lincoln was the first president to have cats - Tabby and Dixie, a gift from Secretary of State William Seward. Lincoln viewed the pair as more honorable dinner companions than his human predecessor, James Buchanan.
Cat parenthood has proven to be good electoral politics. Of the nine cat president incumbents who sought another term in office, seven won, giving them a higher reelection rate than the non-feline commanders-in-chief. The Bidens passed the first test by naming their cat Willow. An unrelatable name can be a president's undoing - just ask Jimmy Carter and his daughter's cat Misty Malarky Ying Yang. "No Malark[e]y!" as Biden would say.
But it's who a cat is that can guide Biden. Dogs tell their humans, "I need you because I love you." Cats say, "I love you because I need you." It's unconditional love from dogs. It's very much conditional from cats. At this time of pandemic and inflation, Biden isn't getting love because Americans don't feel like he's fulfilling their needs. His approval rating is only higher at this point in a first term than Donald Trump's, the first non-pet president since Andrew Johnson.
https://www.rollcall.com/2022/01/31/joe-biden-can-reset-his-presidency-with-willow-the-cat/
#15499307 at 2022-01-30 11:19:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #19603: THANK YOU President Trump & Family Edition
Famous Masons
Many famous men were members of Masonic Lodges. A few of them were:
Composers: Irving Berlin, George M. Cohan, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, John Phillip Sousa, Richard Wagner, Franz Joseph Haydn, Franz Listz, and many others.
Entertainers: John Wayne, Gene Autry, Ernest Borgnine, Joe E. Brown, Bob Burns, Eddie Cantor, Charles D. Coburn, William F. "Buffalo Bill" Cody, Donald Crisp, Cecil B. DeMille, Richard Dix, Douglas Fairbanks Sr., W.C. Fields, Clark Gable, Arthur Godfrey, David W. Griffith, Oliver Hardy, Jean Hersholt, Harry Houdini, Al Jolson, Charles "Buck" Jones, Harry Kellar, Harold C. Lloyd, Tom Mix, Dick Powell, Will Rogers, Charles S. "Tom Thumb" Stratton, Richard B. "Red" Skelton, Paul Whiteman, Ed Wynn, Darryl Zanuck and many others.
Sculptors: Gutzon Borglum and his son, Lincoln Borglum (together carved Mt. Rushmore National Memorial), Johann G. Schadow (Prussian Court Sculptor) J. Otto Schweizer and many others.
Writers: Robert Burns, Samuel L. Clemens (Mark Twain), Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (Author of Sherlock Holmes), Edward Gibbon (Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire), Edgar A. Guest, Rudyard Kipling, Alexander Pope, Sir Walter Scott, Jonathan Swift, Lowell Thomas, Voltair, Wolfgang von Goethe, Friedrich Schiller and many others.
Business Leaders: John Jacob Astor (financier), Lloyd Balfour (Jewelry), Lawrence Bell (Bell Aircraft Corp.), William H. Dow (Dow Chemical Co.), Henry Ford, Alfred Fuller (Fuller Brush), King C. Gillett (Gillett Razor Co.), Sir Thomas Lipton (tea), Fredrick Maytag, Andrew W. Mellon (banker), James C. Penny, George Pullman, David Sarnoff (father of T.V.), Leland Stanford (railroads - Stanford Univ.) and many others.
Military Patriots: Generals John J. Pershing, George Marshall, Douglas MacArthur, Joseph Stillwell, Johnathon Wainwright, Curtis E. LaMay, Omar N. Bradley, Henry H. "Hap" Arnold, Claire L. Chenault, Mark Clark, James Doolittle, Admirals David G. Farragut (First Admiral of the U.S. Navy), Ernest J. King, Richard Byrd and many others.
United States Patriots: Francis Scott Key (wrote our National Anthem), Ralph Bellamy (wrote our Pledge of Allegiance), Paul Revere, John Paul Jones, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, Patrick Henry and many others.
United States Politicians: Thomas Dewey, Everett Dirksen, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, John Marshall, Barry Goldwater, Hubert Humphrey, Robert Dole, Jack Kemp and others. UNITED STATES PRESIDENTS: George Washington, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, James Garfield, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William H. Taft, Warren G. Harding, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman and Gerald Ford
World Leaders: Emilio Aguinaldo (Phillippine Patriot and General), Miguel Aleman (Mexican President 1947-52), Eloy Alfaro (President of Ecuador), Eduard Benes (President of Czechoslovakia 1939-48), Sveinn Bjornsson (1st President of Iceland), Simon Bolivar ("George Washington of S. America") Napoleon Bonaparte (and his four brothers), King Charles XIII (King of Sweden 1748-1818), Sir Winston Churchill, Randolph Churchill, King Edward VII and King Edward VIII (Kings of England, 1901-10 & 36, respectively), Francis II (Holy Roman Emperor, 1768-1806), Frederick the Great (King of Prussia 1740-86), George I & George II (Kings of Greece, 1845-1913 & 1922-47), George IV & George VI (Kings of England 1760-1820 & 1820-30), Gustavus VI Adolphus (King of Sweden 1792-1809), Kamehemeha IV and Kemehemeha V (Kings of Hawaii (1854-63 & 1863-72) Leopold I (King of Belgium (1831-65), Peter the Great (Emperor of Russia 1689-1725), William I (King of Prussia 1861-88), William II (King of the Netherlands (1792-1849), William IV (King of England (1830-37) and many others.
https://www.bavarialodge.org/about-us/freemasonry/
#15376812 at 2022-01-15 00:33:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #19450: Reclaim The Line Edition
Albert Pike was a Confederate War General. During the conflict, Pike was accused of using native Choctaw Indian warriors to take the scalps of slain Yankee soldiers. He would feast his soldiers and the Indians with wagons filled with bawdy whores and ply them with liquor.
President Abraham Lincoln declared rebel Pike a criminal menace and sought to capture and imprison the corrupt General. When the war ended, Pike immediately fled to the safety of neighboring Canada. Some believe that Albert Pike was involved in the conspiracy and plot to murder Lincoln. Nevertheless, he was pardoned after the war by Lincoln's successor, President Andrew Johnson, a southerner.
Albert Pike: Sovereign Grand Commander of the Masonic Lodge
Back home in South Carolina, Pike was chosen to become the top Mason in America as Sovereign Grand Commander of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. Pike, an academic and a poet (He wrote the famous song, Dixie), rewrote the 33 degree rituals still used up to this day. He authored Morals and Dogma, the authoritative book published by the Masonic Lodge, quoted often by the Lodge's leaders.
In Morals and Dogma, the satanic nature of the Lodge is meticulously laid out. Pike asserts that the Lodge's rituals are based strictly on Judaism's occultic Kabbalah. He urges Masons to "seek after light" and touts Lucifer as the Angel of Light to be followed and obeyed by Freemasons everywhere.
#15376804 at 2022-01-15 00:32:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #19450: Reclaim The Line Edition
Albert Pike was born on December 29, 1809, in Boston, and was the oldest of six children born to Benjamin and Sarah Andrews Pike. He studied at Harvard, and later served as a Brigadier-General in the Confederate Army. After the Civil War, Pike was found guilty of treason and jailed, only to be pardoned by fellow Freemason President Andrew Johnson on April 22, 1866, who met with him the next day at the White House. On June 20, 1867, Scottish Rite officials conferred upon Johnson the 4th to 32nd Freemasonry degrees, and he later went to Boston to dedicate a Masonic Temple.
Pike was said to be a genius, able to read and write in 16 different languages, although I cannot find a record anywhere of what those languages were. In addition, he is widely accused of plagiarism, so take with a pinch of salt. At various stages of his life we was a poet, philosopher, frontiersman, soldier, humanitarian and philanthropist. A 33rd degree Mason, he was one of the founding fathers, and head of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, being the Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry from 1859 and retained that position until his death in 1891. In 1869, he was a top leader in the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
Incidentally, Freemasonry itself is a fascinating subject and I could devote an entire website to it. Simon Gray, a Freemason, has compiled a stunning amount of information on Freemasonry that I recommend for anyone who wants to learn more about it.
Pike was said to be a Satanist, who indulged in the occult, and he apparently possessed a bracelet which he used to summon Lucifer, with whom he had constant communication. He was the Grand Master of a Luciferian group known as the Order of the Palladium (or Sovereign Council of Wisdom), which had been founded in Paris in 1737. Palladism had been brought to Greece from Egypt by Pythagoras in the fifth century, and it was this cult of Satan that was introduced to the inner circle of the Masonic lodges. It was aligned with the Palladium of the Templars. In 1801, Issac Long, a Jew, brought a statue of Baphomet (Satan) to Charleston, South Carolina, where he helped to establish the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. Long apparently chose Charleston because it was geographically located on the 33rd parallel of latitude (incidentally, so is Baghdad), and this council is considered to be the Mother Supreme Council of all Masonic Lodges of the World.
Pike was Long's successor, and he changed the name of the Order to the New and Reformed Palladian Rite (or Reformed Palladium). The Order contained two degrees:
Adelph (or Brother), and
Companion of Ulysses (or Companion of Penelope).
Pike's right-hand man was Phileas Walder, from Switzerland, who was a former Lutheran minister, a Masonic leader, occultist, and spiritualist. Pike also worked closely with Giusseppe Mazzini of Italy (1805-1872) who was a 33rd who founded the Mafia in 1860. Together with Mazzini, Lord Henry Palmerston of England (1784-1865, 33rd degree Mason), and Otto von Bismarck from Germany (1815-1898, 33rd degree Mason), Albert Pike intended to use the Palladian Rite to create a Satanic umbrella group that would tie all Masonic groups together.
Albert Pike died on April 2, 1891, and was buried in Oak Hill Cemetery, although the corpse of Pike currently lies in the headquarters of the Council of the 33rd degree of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in Washington, DC. see The Deadly Deception, by Jim Shaw - former 33rd degree Mason and Past Master of all Scottish Rite bodies.)
#15362294 at 2022-01-13 04:14:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General: #19431: Oh; So, You Wanted to Commit 18 USC Ch. 115 Eh? Edition
>>15362290
Albert Pike was born on December 29, 1809, in Boston, and was the oldest of six children born to Benjamin and Sarah Andrews Pike. He studied at Harvard, and later served as a Brigadier-General in the Confederate Army. After the Civil War, Pike was found guilty of treason and jailed, only to be pardoned by fellow Freemason President Andrew Johnson on April 22, 1866, who met with him the next day at the White House. On June 20, 1867, Scottish Rite officials conferred upon Johnson the 4th to 32nd Freemasonry degrees, and he later went to Boston to dedicate a Masonic Temple.
Pike was said to be a genius, able to read and write in 16 different languages, although I cannot find a record anywhere of what those languages were. In addition, he is widely accused of plagiarism, so take with a pinch of salt. At various stages of his life we was a poet, philosopher, frontiersman, soldier, humanitarian and philanthropist. A 33rd degree Mason, he was one of the founding fathers, and head of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, being the Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry from 1859 and retained that position until his death in 1891. In 1869, he was a top leader in the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
Incidentally, Freemasonry itself is a fascinating subject and I could devote an entire website to it. Simon Gray, a Freemason, has compiled a stunning amount of information on Freemasonrythat I recommend for anyone who wants to learn more about it.
Pike was said to be a Satanist, who indulged in the occult, and he apparently possessed a bracelet which he used to summon Lucifer, with whom he had constant communication. He was the Grand Master of a Luciferian group known as the Order of the Palladium (or Sovereign Council of Wisdom), which had been founded in Paris in 1737. Palladism had been brought to Greece from Egypt by Pythagoras in the fifth century, and it was this cult of Satan that was introduced to the inner circle of the Masonic lodges. It was aligned with the Palladium of the Templars. In 1801, Issac Long, a Jew, brought a statue of Baphomet (Satan) to Charleston, South Carolina, where he helped to establish the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. Long apparently chose Charleston because it was geographically located on the 33rd parallel of latitude (incidentally, so is Baghdad), and this council is considered to be the Mother Supreme Council of all Masonic Lodges of the World.
#14502640 at 2021-09-01 13:17:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #18346: Fauci The Greatest Liar in Gov’t in History Edition
Who breaks ties in the senate when there is no Vice President?
https://www.quora.com/Who-breaks-ties-in-the-senate-when-there-is-no-Vice-President?top_ans=60258044
Carter Moore
, Political Science, BA
Answered 3 years ago · Author has 4.1K answers and 18.4M answer views
The rules of the Senate require a majority vote for a measure to pass; and so if no majority can be attained, the motion fails.
It's interesting that this hasn't come up more often in US history, because prior to the 25th Amendment, entire presidential terms passed when there was no Vice President. That's because there was no Constitutional mechanism outside of an election to name someone Vice President in the event of a vacancy.
Harry Truman, for example, didn't have a Vice President from his assuming the office in April 1945 until his inauguration in January 1949. That followed from John Tyler, who took over from William Henry Harrison, and did not have a Vice President for the duration of his presidency (1841-45), nor did Andrew Johnson after taking over from Lincoln (1865-69). Franklin Pierce did not get a replacement Vice President after his died only a few months into the term (1853-57).
However, the 25th Amendment makes it mandatory for a President to nominate a Vice President when there is a vacancy, thus ensuring continuity of government.
But the latter examples of extended veep vacancies are particularly interesting, because ties in the Senate were fairly common during that era of American history (ie, on either side of the Civil War).
The most notable example of when the absence of a Vice President could have resulted in a rather significant failure in the US Senate was in the last days of the Tyler administration and the 28th United States Congress.
Tyler was trying to secure the annexation of Texas by joint resolution of Congress. The Whigs, which controlled the Senate, were balking - having defeated the first attempt to annex Texas in 1844. It looked as though the question would come down to a tie vote; and, given that there was no Vice President, the resolution would have failed.
Fortunately for Tyler and Texas, in 1837 an Indiana farmer named Jamison Shoemaker cast the deciding vote in an election for a state legislator who went on to cast the deciding vote to name Edward Hannegan to the US Senate who cast the deciding vote in favor of Texas' annexation.
But I'm sure in those days that Tyler really, really wished he had a Vice President.
Douglas Chapel
, B.A. in Political Science, summa cum laude
Answered 4 years ago · Author has 980 answers and 1.9M answer views
If there is no vice president, either because he is not present in the Senate or because the office is actually vacant, then a tied vote in the Senate just fails.
There have only been 244 ties in U.S. history, so this doesn't come up that often, and it's become less and less common over time. (The vice president with the most tie-breaking votes was John Adams, the first holder of the office). Joe Biden, for example, has not cast a single tie-breaking vote. Filibuster rules require most Senate votes to pass with at least 60 members voting in favor, so a vote with the potential to result in a 50-50 tie is actually likely to fail to receive cloture in the first place.
Still, if a tie is anticipated on something, then the vice president will be aware of it and will be sure to be present to vote. If the vice presidency becomes vacant, then the 25th Amendment provides for a new one to be appointed by the president, in part to ensure that this constitutional role can be fulfilled.
#14358522 at 2021-08-15 14:44:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #18165: Morning With Comfefe Edition
So, Joe Biden wants to call us Terrorists? First off,FUCK JOE BIDEN & FUCK DEMOCRATS!They haven't seen terror, they create it! I was on the ramp at Andrews AFB, assigned to the 89th Security Forces Squadron, on 11 September 2001. I was the lead Security element and worked 91 days straight after, and served in our beloved Nation's longest two wars in our history. Again,FUCK JOE BIDEN & FUCK DEMOCRATS!
Do you think it is a coincidence that the Root Word Origin for Demon and Democrats are the same? Just as the words Raptor and Rape?
Ask yourself a simple Quest-ion. Why has thePRELUDE TO EVERY MAJOR WAR OCCURRED FOR EVERY DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATIONsince James Buchanan? Perhaps, more importantly, theEND OF EACH ON OF THESE WARS, MAGICALLY OCCURS DURING A SUCCESSIVEDEMOCRAT PRESIDENT!
Wars are horrible, of which, I have deep personal experience. But the people that craft and create these literalRIVERS OF BLOODareINFINITELY WORSE!
DEMOCRAT HEGELIAN DIALECTIC WAR MODEL
-THE CIVIL WAR (1861 - 1865)- DEMOCRAT - JAMES BUCHANAN JR. (1857-1861 - FREEMASON Never Married - Closet Homo)WAR END:DEMOCRAT - Andrew Johnson
-WORLD WAR I (1914 - 1918)- DEMOCRAT - THOMAS WOODROW WILSON (1913 - 1921 - President of Princeton w/ ties to Rockefellers, and a Leading Architect of the League of Nations predecessor to the United Nations)WAR END:DEMOCRAT - WOODROW WILSON
-WORLD WAR II (1939 - 1945)- DEMOCRAT - FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT (1933 - 1945 - FREEMASON, Too Much to List!)WAR END:DEMOCRAT - HARRY S. TRUMAN
-KOREAN WAR (1950 - 1953)- DEMOCRAT - HARRY S. TRUMAN (1945 - 1953 - 33rd Degree FREEMASON)WAR END:DEMOCRAT - JOHN F. KENNEDY
-VIETNAM WAR (1955 - 1975)- DEMOCRAT - JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY-(1953 - 1963 - Got Smart to the Plans, They Killed Him For It)WAR END:DEMOCRAT== - LYNDON B. Johnson–
-IRAQ / AFGHANISTAN WAR (2003 - 2011)- DEMOCRAT - WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON - (1993 - 2001 - Waco, Ruby Ridge, Sex Scandals, Impeached, &Sabotaged the White House, 8-Months Later... 911)WAR END:DEMOCRAT - –BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA-
-WORLD WAR III(2016 - TBD) - DEMOCRAT - BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA - (2009 - 2017, "Scandal Free!" Too Much to List! FIRE SALE!) WAR END:== DEMOCRAT - JOSEPH R. BIDEN
#14122188 at 2021-07-14 18:04:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #17867: The Winning Will Continue Eternally Edition
>>14122154
>Ask yourself, why wasn't Jefferson Davis tried for treason?
You're kidding, right? Andrew Johnson pardoned fucking Albert Pike! Read about his activities during the war. England almost fucking intervened in the war because of him.
#14110136 at 2021-07-13 00:47:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #17853: The Best Is Yet To Come Edition
>>14110044
Dub, dubs confirm… super weird…
Apophenia?
Future proves past?
Back to the future?
Talk about truth being stranger than fiction!
Coincidences? Decide for yourself…
(Short videos)
https://youtu.be/d1KKaH0ZCv8
JFK references as well…
https://youtu.be/hQRh4NP_E-E
Coincidence or Creepy Connection?
Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846 and John F Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860 and John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.
The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.
Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Their wives both lost a child while living in the White House.
Both Presidents were shot on a Friday and both of them were shot in the head.
Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy and Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.
Both were assassinated by Southerners and were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808. Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839. Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names which are equally composed of fifteen letters.
Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford' while Kennedy was shot in a car called 'Lincoln.'
Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse while Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.
Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland. A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.
#13837574 at 2021-06-05 22:56:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #17517: Idle Hands Ebake Edition
Trump ponders run for Congress - and House speaker - in 2022
By Mary Kay Linge
June 5, 2021 | 4:58pm
(Former President Donald Trump said he's intrigued of running for a congressional seat in Florida in 2022.REUTERS/Win McNamee/Pool)
Former President Trump is mulling a circuitous path back to the presidency: via a stint as speaker of the House.
"That's so, that's so interesting," Trump told conservative radio host Wayne Allyn Root on Friday in an appearance on "Raw and Unfiltered," Root's daily show.
"People have said, run for the Senate, okay?" Trump said. "But you know, your idea might be better."
Trump's comment came after Root floated the notion that the former president could launch a 2022 campaign for a congressional seat in Florida, his new home state - which, thanks to population growth, is getting a new House district ahead of that election.
"Why not run in 2022 for the United States Congress, a House seat in Florida," Root suggested excitedly. "Win big, lead us to a dramatic landslide victory, taking the House by 50 seats."
"And then," Root went on, "you become the speaker of the House, lead the impeachment of Biden."
"That's very funny," Trump said with a chuckle.
"And then you'll be president," Root concluded. "Do it! You'll be a folk hero to conservatives!"
The speaker of the House is third in the line of presidential succession - so Root's plan would also necessitate the removal of Vice President Kamala Harris, a roadblock he did not mention.
(Former President Donald Trump could potentially replace House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Getty Images)
Root's presidential pathway echoed one floated by Steve Bannon, Trump's former White House adviser, earlier this year.
Trump has made no secret of his wish to return to political power - although he has stopped short of announcing a third White House bid.
He is addressing North Carolina's GOP convention on Saturday night and will hit the road for campaign-style rallies this summer in Ohio. Florida, and other battlegrounds.
A stint in Congress would be a historical anomaly: not since John Quincy Adams in 1831 has a former commander-in-chief taken a seat in the House, and Andrew Johnson in 1874 was the last ex-president to serve in the Senate.
https://nypost.com/2021/06/05/trump-ponders-run-for-congress-and-house-speaker-in-2022/
#13627204 at 2021-05-10 14:24:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #17257: Ebaked Again Because Edition
KEK. Comms – GET OUT! NOW! Suicide weekend…?
'We May Not Have a Full Two Years': Democrats' Plans Hinge on Good Health
On March 21, 1950, an Illinois congressman named Ralph Church suddenly slumped in his seat while testifying before a House committee. His colleagues rushed to administer aid, but he was pronounced dead of a heart attack at 66.
He was neither the first nor the last member of Congress to die in office.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
"You look back in history, nearly 1 in 10 members of Congress have," said Jane L. Campbell, president of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society.
That history has some Democrats worried that deaths or illnesses could derail President Joe Biden's efforts to pass ambitious bills through Congress, which his party controls by the narrowest margins in decades.
"Our ability to make good on Biden's agenda is pretty much dangling by a thread," said Brian Fallon, a former aide to Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the majority leader. "I don't think it's uncouth to talk about it. I think it's a reality that has to inform the urgency with which we approach those issues."
More than 1,160 sitting members and members-elect have died from accidents, disease and violence since the first Congress met in 1789, according to a New York Times analysis of House and Senate records. They include multiple House speakers, famed senators and two former presidents: John Quincy Adams and Andrew Johnson, who both returned to Congress after leaving the White House.
The pandemic and the Jan. 6 Capitol uprising fueled fears that this Congress was particularly vulnerable to such deaths. But with most members vaccinated and security tightened, old age may be a bigger threat. The average age of a sitting senator is 64, and for a representative it is 58, making this Congress one of the oldest.
"Heart disease and cancer are really the two most common causes of mortality, and they are both things that increase with age," said Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a professor of medical ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, who served on Biden's pandemic task force before he took office.
On average, 10 lawmakers have died in each two-year Congress: seven House members and three senators. Deaths peaked in the 1940s, and have slowed in recent decades. But every Congress except two has lost at least one member.
In the House this term, deaths have already affected the parties' close margins. Three members - Ron Wright of Texas and Rep.-elect Luke Letlow of Louisiana, both Republicans; and Democrat Alcee Hastings of Florida - have died, the most in a Congress in its first three months since the early 1980s. (Wright and Letlow died from COVID-19.)
Health problems have also dogged the Senate. Patrick Leahy, 81, D-Vt., was briefly hospitalized in January. Thom Tillis, 60, a North Carolina Republican, underwent cancer treatment. Questions have been raised about the health of Dianne Feinstein, 87, a Democrat who has represented California since 1992. Vermont's other senator, Bernie Sanders, 79, had a heart attack in 2019.
In the most extreme case, deaths could end Democrats' ability to pass legislation without Republican support - or even flip control of either chamber. That is more likely in the evenly divided Senate, where a single Democratic vacancy could hand Republicans committee gavels and the power to schedule votes until a Democratic successor was appointed or elected.
A serious illness could also upset the party's delicate legislative arithmetic.
"Schumer needs all 50 votes," said Fallon, now the executive director of Demand Justice, a progressive advocacy group focused on the federal judiciary. "If somebody is laid up or is hospitalized for a long period of time and their vote's not there, then having the majority is somewhat meaningless."
House vacancies are filled by special election, and relatively few seats are competitive, lowering the chances that deaths could alter partisan control. No special election to Congress so far this year has flipped a seat.
But special elections take time to organize; delays could further shrink Democrats' single-digit margin for error. Though House control has never changed mid-session, Republicans could push to elect a new speaker and take over committees if vacancies forced Democrats below a majority of seats, said Sarah Binder, a George Washington University political scientist who has studied congressional deaths.
more
https://www.yahoo.com/news/may-not-full-two-years-121420637.html
#13376337 at 2021-04-07 07:06:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16945: Dates Change, But Shills Remain The Same.
>>13375776
>17
Jacqueline, was 17
She was, sexy and 17
She was just 17, if you know, what I mean
On the edge of, 17
You are the dancing queen, young and sweet, only 17
'Cause we were barely 17 and we were barely dressed
Andrew Johnson was 17th President.
Apollo 17 was last Apollo mission.
17th Amendment gave us the bogus direct election of Senators.
Haikus usually consist of 17 syllables.
187 is two 17s, if you work the 8 backwards (i.e., add a 9) to a 17; or really a stutter, 1177.
8 is the number of completion, also works backwards to 17.
88 is timelines crossing (Back to the Future); also, 1717.
What happened in 1717, I wonder?
#13334481 at 2021-03-31 03:43:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16892: Patriots Are In It For the Long Haul Edition
>>13334405
However, experts on presidential power told Newsweek that it's unlikely any pardons granted by Trump before he leaves the White House could be successfully challenged and overturned.
Jeffrey Crouch is assistant professor of American politics at American University and author of The Presidential Pardon Power. He believes Trump has the power to pardon himself but since the move would be unprecedented, the Supreme Court may have to weigh in.
"Generally speaking, a presidential pardon cannot be overturned by Congress or the courts. Congress could impeach the president as punishment for a particular clemency decision," Crouch told Newsweek.
"A president almost never tries to take back a pardon, although an old court case called In Re De Puy describes how President Ulysses Grant successfully cancelled a conditional pardon granted by his predecessor, Andrew Johnson, before it was delivered."
The circumstances of Grant withdrawing a pardon are complex and took place in 1869. In that case, the pardon was not delivered to the recipient and a court ruled in Grant's favor on that basis.
"More recently, George W. Bush took back a pardon from Isaac Robert Toussie and claimed he did so before it was delivered. I argued in a journal article that Toussie's pardon was actually complete and couldn't be taken back," Crouch went on.
Bush reversed Toussie's pardon in 2008 one day after issuing it when it emerged that his father had donated $30,000 to the Republican Party.
"[A]s long as a pardon is delivered, it is recognized as valid. The Flynn situation does not appear to involve a question about whether his pardon was adequately delivered, so it would likely stand," Crouch said.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-presidential-pardons-overturned-1552068
#13165291 at 2021-03-07 02:04:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16707: The 'Take A Ghost, Leave A Ghost' Edition
>>13164748 (lb)
>>13164751 (lb)
>>13164763 (lb)
>UK's Government Office for Science has no record of a "COVID-19 virus" isolated from an unadulterated sample, anywhere on Earth, by anyone, ever
>https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/uks-government-office-for-science-has-no-record-of-a-covid-19-virus-isolated-from-an-unadulterated-sample-anywhere-on-earth-by-anyone-ever/
Some of us anon's have been beating our keyboard for almost a year knowing the witch doctors neither have isolated nor purified the, so called, 'corona' that causes CV-19 disease.
Ask yourself an honest question: Then what the fuck is in the VACCINE???
UK's Government Office for Science has no record of a "COVID-19 virus" isolated from an unadulterated sample, anywhere on Earth, by anyone, ever
A colleague in New Zealand and I have been submitting Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to various institutions in Canada, NZ, Australia, Germany, the U.K., England, Ireland and the U.S., seeking any records that describe the isolation of a "COVID-19 virus" aka "SARS-COV-2" from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased human patient.
Our requests have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institutions, or limited to records authored by the respective institutions, rather they have been open to any records held by the institutions describing "COVID-19 virus" isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, any time.
We are also collecting responses to FOI requests on the topic of "SARS-COV-2" isolation/purification that were submitted by other people.
As of today (October 4, 2020) 16 institutions have provided their responses, and each has indicated the same: that they have no records in their possession, authored by anyone anywhere ever, describing the isolation of a "SARS-COV-2 virus" from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient. All 16 of these FOIs responses can be accessed from this page: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/health-canada-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/
My colleague in NZ was recently prompted to submit such a request to the UK's Government Office for Science ("Go-Science") after the UK's Department of Health and Social Care advised that they have no such records but "Go-Science" or Public Health England might.
Public Health England had by that time already advised Andrew Johnson, a Technology Tutor at a UK University, that they also had no such records. (My colleague had also submitted the same request to Public Health England and eventually received an identical "no records" response.)
A few days ago my colleague (who prefers to remain anonymous) received a formal response from UK's Government Office for Science. A cropped screenshot is provided below and the entire letter can be accessed/downloaded here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GOSCIENCE-Government-Office-of-Science-Response-scrubbed.pdf
and….
HAS COVID19 BEEN ISOLATED? WITH DR. Andrew KAUFMAN AND DR. THOMAS COWAN
January 14, 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mjtTWO7yUqbN/
[KNOWINGLY] [WILLINGLY] [PLANNED] -
Sedition
Treason
Crimes Against Humanity.
Yes, it's that fucking bad!!!
#12658823 at 2021-01-22 01:31:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16162: Night Shift Is The Best Shift Edition
>>12657851 lb
>Why would Trump be the first president to NOT attend his successor's inauguration?
he's not:
John Adams
John Quincy Adams
Andrew Johnson
Martin Van Buren
#12583562 at 2021-01-18 15:07:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16066: Who's Financing The Caravan? Edition
Who's attending Biden's inauguration? Who to Fuck Cares
Guest list scaled back due to pandemic and post-riot security measure By Danielle Wallace | Fox News
Remember the old adage by Obama: "Don't ever underestimate how Joe can Fuck Things Up"
The guest list for the presidential inauguration scheduled to take place in Washington, D.C. this Wednesday will be scaled back amid both the coronavirus pandemic, as well as beefed-up security measures put in place two weeks after rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol.
Like in past ceremonies, President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris are expected to be sworn in on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol, where they will both take their oaths of office.
This year, members of the 117th Congress will be given only a plus-one.
"I'm not afraid of taking the oath outside," Biden told reporters on Jan. 11, speaking from a hospital in Newark, Del., where he received his second dose of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.
President Trump will be the first incumbent president since Andrew Johnson not to attend his successor's inauguration.
Traditionally, the incoming and outgoing presidents ride to the U.S. Capitol together on Inauguration Day for the ceremony to symbolize a peaceful transition of power.
"To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th," Trump said in a tweet on Jan. 8, just hours before Twitter permanently suspended his account.
Biden said he was just fine with that, calling Trump's decision to sit-out the inauguration "one of the few things we have ever agreed on." Calling the president an "embarrassment" to the nation and unworthy of the office, Biden added, "It's a good thing him not showing up."
once an asshole, always an asshole Joe
In a phone call first reported by the New York Times, Vice President Mike Pence spoke with his soon-to-be successor Harris Thursday, offering his congratulations and expressing that he planned to attend the inauguration. Pence defied Trump on Jan. 6 when he refused to intervene in the congressional process to certify Biden's win.
Biden has said Pence was "welcome to come," and he'd be honored to have him.
Former Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are expected to attend the inauguration in person. The only other living president, 96-year-old Jimmy Carter, who has spent the pandemic largely at home in Plains, Ga., will not attend but has extended "best wishes" to Biden, according to a spokeswoman at The Carter Center in Atlanta.
Ivanka Trump is not expected to attend, NBC News reported, citing a White House official.
Lady Gaga is expected to sing the National Anthem. Jennifer Lopez will also deliver a musical performance in person at the West Front of the Capitol when Biden is sworn in.
Cruz's decision is a bit unexpected, as he and other GOP senators led a fight to reject the certification of the presidential election results in Arizona unless an emergency voter fraud audit was conducted. Sens. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., and Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala. who supported Cruz's fight have also said they would attend. Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., who voted to reject Biden's electors in the state of Pennsylvania, said he would come to the inauguration - and even urged Trump to join him.
The closure has been ordered to ensure safety and security within the area of the National Special Security Event designated by the Department of Homeland Security for the 59th presidential inauguration, according to a statement from the National Park Service, which has been working with D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's office, Metropolitan Police Department and the United States Secret Service.
Biden's inaugural committee announced the lineup Sunday for "Celebrating America," a multi-network broadcast that will be televised Wednesday night after Biden is inaugurated as the 46th president. The broadcast will be held in lieu of traditional inaugural balls.
Lin-Manuel Miranda, who wrote and starred in Broadway's "Hamilton," will appear for a classical recitation. Musicians Jon Bon Jovi, Bruce Springsteen, John Legend, Demi Lovato and Justin Timberlake, among others, will also highlight the primetime event billed by the committee as a mix of stars and everyday citizens. Actor Tom Hanks, as well as actresses Kerry Washington and Eva Longoria, will host the event, with former NBA star Kareem Abdul-Jabbar also scheduled to appear. The segments will include tributes to a UPS driver, a kindergarten teacher and Sandra Lindsey, the first American to receive the COVID-19 vaccine outside a clinical trial.
Instead of a traditional inaugural parade, Joe and Jill Biden will arrive at the White House with a presidential escort consisting of representatives from every branch of the military, according to a D.C. press release.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-inauguration-who-is-attending
#12560334 at 2021-01-17 04:18:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16036: Suicide Weekend
Edwin McMasters Stanton(Steubenville, Ohio, U.S. December 19, 1814 - December 24, 1869) was an American lawyer and politician who served as Secretary of War under the Lincoln Administration during most of the American Civil War.
Stanton's management helped organize the massive military resources of the North and guide the Union to victory. However, he was criticized by many Union generals, who perceived him as overcautious and micromanaging.[2]
He also organized the manhunt for Abraham Lincoln's assassin, John Wilkes Booth.
After Lincoln's assassination, Stanton remained as the Secretary of War under the new US president, Andrew Johnson, during the first years of Reconstruction. He opposed the lenient policies of Johnson towards the former Confederate States.
Johnson's attempt to dismiss Stanton ultimately led to Johnson being impeached by the Radical Republicans in the House of Representatives.
Stanton returned to law after he retired as Secretary of War. In 1869, he was nominated as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court by Johnson's successor, Ulysses S. Grant, but Stanton died four days after his nomination was confirmed by the Senate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Stanton
#12553249 at 2021-01-16 20:27:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #16027: The Long And Winding Road To National Popcorn Day Edition
>>12553197
Grant was the first President to preside over the United States Corporation.
Andrew Johnson, who preceded Grant was the 17th and last President to preside over the Republic of the United States.
#12520519 at 2021-01-14 21:05:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15985: Anons Own The Kitchen Edition
If 1871 was the year United States Corporation was illegally enacted, then Andrew Johnson was the last President whose term ended before then. His term ended March 4th 1869. He was the 17th President of the Republic of the United States.
#12516236 at 2021-01-14 16:02:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15980: Hollywood Witch Will Sing At Biden Inauguration Edition
>>12516226
>Why Remove Trump Now? A Guide to Trump's Impeachment - cont
Mr. McConnell said on Wednesday that he would not agree to do so, meaning that the article could not be taken up until the day before Mr. Biden is sworn in. Since time is needed for the Senate to set the rules for an impeachment trial, that means the proceeding probably would not start until after Mr. Biden was president, and Democrats had operational control of the Senate.
"Given the rules, procedures, and Senate precedents that govern presidential impeachment trials, there is simply no chance that a fair or serious trial could conclude before President-elect Biden is sworn in next week," Mr. McConnell said. "In light of this reality, I believe it will best serve our nation if Congress and the executive branch spend the next seven days completely focused on facilitating a safe inauguration and an orderly transfer of power to the incoming Biden administration."
The trial could consume the Senate during Biden's first days in office.
Once the Senate receives the impeachment charge, it must immediately take up the issue, as articles of impeachment carry the highest privilege. Under rules in place for decades, impeachment is the only issue the Senate can consider while a trial is underway; it cannot simultaneously consider other legislative business.
But Mr. Biden has asked Mr. McConnell whether it would be possible to alter that rule, allowing the Senate to conduct Mr. Trump's impeachment trial on a parallel track to consideration of his cabinet nominees, splitting its days between the two. Mr. McConnell told Mr. Biden he would consult with the Senate parliamentarian on whether that would be possible.
If such a bifurcated process were not possible, House Democrats might choose to hold back the article to allow Mr. Biden time to win confirmation of his team before a trial got underway.
The Senate could hold a trial for Mr. Trump even after he has left office, though there is no precedent for a president being tried after his term is over. Other government officials who were impeached have been tried after they departed.
Only two presidents other than Mr. Trump have been impeached - Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998 - and both were ultimately acquitted and completed their terms in office.
Nicholas Fandos contributed reporting.
#12516173 at 2021-01-14 15:56:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15979: Through the Dark our light will Shine Edition
>>12516167
>Why Remove Trump Now? A Guide to Trump's Impeachment cont
Mr. McConnell said on Wednesday that he would not agree to do so, meaning that the article could not be taken up until the day before Mr. Biden is sworn in. Since time is needed for the Senate to set the rules for an impeachment trial, that means the proceeding probably would not start until after Mr. Biden was president, and Democrats had operational control of the Senate.
"Given the rules, procedures, and Senate precedents that govern presidential impeachment trials, there is simply no chance that a fair or serious trial could conclude before President-elect Biden is sworn in next week," Mr. McConnell said. "In light of this reality, I believe it will best serve our nation if Congress and the executive branch spend the next seven days completely focused on facilitating a safe inauguration and an orderly transfer of power to the incoming Biden administration."
The trial could consume the Senate during Biden's first days in office.
Once the Senate receives the impeachment charge, it must immediately take up the issue, as articles of impeachment carry the highest privilege. Under rules in place for decades, impeachment is the only issue the Senate can consider while a trial is underway; it cannot simultaneously consider other legislative business.
But Mr. Biden has asked Mr. McConnell whether it would be possible to alter that rule, allowing the Senate to conduct Mr. Trump's impeachment trial on a parallel track to consideration of his cabinet nominees, splitting its days between the two. Mr. McConnell told Mr. Biden he would consult with the Senate parliamentarian on whether that would be possible.
If such a bifurcated process were not possible, House Democrats might choose to hold back the article to allow Mr. Biden time to win confirmation of his team before a trial got underway.
The Senate could hold a trial for Mr. Trump even after he has left office, though there is no precedent for a president being tried after his term is over. Other government officials who were impeached have been tried after they departed.
Only two presidents other than Mr. Trump have been impeached - Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998 - and both were ultimately acquitted and completed their terms in office.
Nicholas Fandos contributed reporting.
#12450874 at 2021-01-10 22:06:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15895: In God We Trust Edition
This impeached, one-term president refused to go to his successor's inauguration. Now Trump will do the same.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/01/08/Andrew-Johnson-inauguration-trump-biden/?utm_source=pocket-newtab
#12408457 at 2021-01-08 23:09:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15840: For Faith For Family For Liberty Edition
Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., is urging President Donald Trump to reconsider his decision not to attend Joe Biden's inauguration.
Scott made his comments in a statement posted on his Twitter account.
"I am urging the president to reconsider his decision to skip the inauguration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris," he said. "He is, of course, not constitutionally required to attend and I can imagine losing an election is very hard, but I believe he should attend.
"I plan to attend and believe it is an important tradition that demonstrates the peaceful transfer of power to our people and to the world."
Earlier on Friday, Trump had announced on Twitter that he won't attend the Jan. 20 inauguration of the president-elect.
If so, it would make Trump the first incumbent president since Andrew Johnson to skip his successor's inauguration.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/rick-scott-inauguration-trump-biden/2021/01/08/id/1004826/
#12136887 at 2020-12-22 22:25:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15496: AIPAC Does Not Like My Baking Edition
Trump should 'probably' attend Biden's inauguration, says Newt Gingrich
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich on Tuesday said that President Donald Trump should "probably" attend the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden on January 20. Since the November 3 general election, a variety of reports have been circulating that Trump will skip his successor's inauguration, possibly holding some sort of political rally on the same day.
Trump would be the fourth president in U.S. history to not attend his successor's inauguration. The last time that happened was in 1869, when outgoing President Andrew Johnson, who was also the first president to be impeached, decided not to attend the swearing-in ceremony of Civil War general-turned-president Ulysses S. Grant.
In an early Tuesday interview on the "Hugh Hewitt Show" radio program, Gingrich said, "I think that we've only had a couple of presidents in history who didn't" attend their successors' inauguration. "John Quincy Adams didn't. And the Republican in1868 didn't. But other than those two, it's a routine."
It should be noted that John Quincy Adams' father, founding father and second U.S. president John Adams, did not attend the inauguration of his successor, Thomas Jefferson, after the bitter and divisive election of 1800.
"If [Trump] does not go, I think he has to explain why," Gingrich added. "So I think Trump's got to decide, you know, what best communicates his message. I think his instinct is not to go, because he's convinced the election was stolen."
Since the 2020 presidential election, Trump has hinted, and reports have stated, that the outgoing president is considering a 2024 bid for a seat in the Oval Office, with some reports saying that Trump is contemplating announcing such a bid on Inauguration Day.
Hewitt also asked Gingrich if he thinks Trump's refusal to accept the result of the 2020 election could damage a potential 2024 bid.
"No. I think in 2024, if Biden has done an amazing job, and everything's working, Biden will be hard to beat," Gingrich answered. "In 2024, if, as I suspect will happen, all of the various left-wing policies fail, and we're in a total mess, nobody's going to look back and worry about this period."
Trump himself has hinted that he might forgo the inauguration.
Earlier this month, the president told Brian Kilmeade of "Fox & Friends" that he "[didn't] want to talk about" if he would attend Biden's inauguration, while continuing to allege that Biden "lost and lost badly."
Monday last week, the Electoral College confirmed Biden's victory and, following which, a large number of Republicans congratulated Biden on his victory. Since November 3, and also after the Electoral College vote, dozens of world leaders have publicly congratulated Biden too, such as British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Trump still refuses to concede the election, claiming that it was "rigged" and "stolen" from him, despite his dozens of legal challenges against the results falling flat in federal and state courts, as well as in the U.S. Supreme Court.
https://saraacarter.com/trump-should-probably-attend-bidens-inauguration-says-newt-gingrich/
#12120227 at 2020-12-21 20:36:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15474: Patriots In Oregon Arresting The Governor? Edition
SCAMDEMIC
"Richplanet TV has received nearly 1,000 emails from concerned citizens about many different aspects of this frustrating and highly concerning situation, which humanity has been plunged into. With help from campaigner and Richplanet stalwart Andrew Johnson, Richard explores areas including germ theory, evidence of pre-planning, evidence of fraudulent statistics, legal challenges, vaccination, propaganda, censorship, Bill Gates, Geopolitics and the new monetary and technocratic systems which are being planned as a result of a blatantly engineered "crisis". Humanity is being dehumanised in a number of ways, the population of the world must protest harder if freedom is to be re-gained."
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=286&part=1&gen=99
#12077419 at 2020-12-18 11:33:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15419: Pastebin SmartFiltered Edition
SCAMDEMIC
"Richplanet TV has received nearly 1,000 emails from concerned citizens about many different aspects of this frustrating and highly concerning situation, which humanity has been plunged into. With help from campaigner and Richplanet stalwart Andrew Johnson, Richard explores areas including germ theory, evidence of pre-planning, evidence of fraudulent statistics, legal challenges, vaccination, propaganda, censorship, Bill Gates, Geopolitics and the new monetary and technocratic systems which are being planned as a result of a blatantly engineered "crisis". Humanity is being dehumanised in a number of ways, the population of the world must protest harder if freedom is to be re-gained."
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=286&part=1&gen=99
#12053602 at 2020-12-16 18:20:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15389: Globals Formatted Edition
SCAMDEMIC
"Richplanet TV has received nearly 1,000 emails from concerned citizens about many different aspects of this frustrating and highly concerning situation, which humanity has been plunged into. With help from campaigner and Richplanet stalwart Andrew Johnson, Richard explores areas including germ theory, evidence of pre-planning, evidence of fraudulent statistics, legal challenges, vaccination, propaganda, censorship, Bill Gates, Geopolitics and the new monetary and technocratic systems which are being planned as a result of a blatantly engineered "crisis". Humanity is being dehumanised in a number of ways, the population of the world must protest harder if freedom is to be re-gained."
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=286&part=1&gen=99
#12040401 at 2020-12-15 19:42:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15371: The Story Unfolds Edition
SCAMDEMIC
"Richplanet TV has received nearly 1,000 emails from concerned citizens about many different aspects of this frustrating and highly concerning situation, which humanity has been plunged into. With help from campaigner and Richplanet stalwart Andrew Johnson, Richard explores areas including germ theory, evidence of pre-planning, evidence of fraudulent statistics, legal challenges, vaccination, propaganda, censorship, Bill Gates, Geopolitics and the new monetary and technocratic systems which are being planned as a result of a blatantly engineered "crisis". Humanity is being dehumanised in a number of ways, the population of the world must protest harder if freedom is to be re-gained."
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=286&part=1&gen=99
#12039943 at 2020-12-15 19:04:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15370: Trump Wins Brace For Impact Edition
SCAMDEMIC
"Richplanet has received nearly 1,000 emails from concerned citizens about many different aspects of this frustrating and highly concerning situation, which humanity has been plunged into. With help from campaigner and Richplanet stalwart Andrew Johnson, Richard explores areas including germ theory, evidence of pre-planning, evidence of fraudulent statistics, legal challenges, vaccination, propaganda, censorship, Bill Gates, Geopolitics and the new monetary and technocratic systems which are being planned as a result of a blatantly engineered "crisis". Humanity is being dehumanised in a number of ways, the population of the world must protest harder if freedom is to be re-gained."
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=286&part=1&gen=99
#12039862 at 2020-12-15 18:58:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15370: Trump Wins Brace For Impact Edition
"Richplanet has received nearly 1,000 emails from concerned citizens about many different aspects of this frustrating and highly concerning situation, which humanity has been plunged into. With help from campaigner and Richplanet stalwart Andrew Johnson, Richard explores areas including germ theory, evidence of pre-planning, evidence of fraudulent statistics, legal challenges, vaccination, propaganda, censorship, Bill Gates, Geopolitics and the new monetary and technocratic systems which are being planned as a result of a blatantly engineered "crisis". Humanity is being dehumanised in a number of ways, the population of the world must protest harder if freedom is to be re-gained."
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=286&part=1&gen=99
#11792749 at 2020-11-26 07:45:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #15052: The Kraken ROARS Edition
>>11792698
I am thinking more along the line of what Kanye said.. "abolish the 13th" . If the 13th is determined unconstitutional which it is if you read your history then everything else afterwards is unconstitutional also I imagine. (((they))) the radical republicans were the usurpers who tried to impeach Andrew Johnson.
Sounds impossible right ?
President Grant was not good and the wrong guys lost the war.
Did into the population census during those years.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/26/trump-calls-robert-e-lee-a-great-general-as-biden-attacks-charlottesville-response.html
#11544778 at 2020-11-08 19:59:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research 14741 : Vote Totals are Mathematically impossible Edition
You guys are missing the plan. Ground Zero of infiltration was the "Radical Republicans"
-The movie we are watching is the recreation of the 1865 to 1879 passing of the reconstruction acts.
-Start with Samuel Chase, read what you can find about the unconstitutional passing of the 13th (slavery-probably "the cover"), 14th (birthright citizenship) and 15th (voter Rights) amendments, thus invalidating any amendment passed since.
-Learn about how they packed the court.
Why do you think 17 is the number. Trump — Andrew Johnson the 17th president.
read:
Pence Is Right: Trump Is a Lot Like Andrew Johnson
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/mike-pence-trump-Andrew-Johnson.html
#11537687 at 2020-11-08 06:21:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #14732: Dominion Gets The HAMMER Edition
The passing of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendment was unconstitutional. Vetoed by the 17th President "Grant appointed justices who unanimously ruled to uphold the unconstitutional Reconstruction Acts. " (packed the court)
I am not a lawfag but I am getting the feeling the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments were all passed illegally by the Radical Republicans during the 17th Presidency of Andrew Johnson. The Reconstruction Acts were patently unconstitutional. They tried to impeach President Johnson but lost by 1 vote.
Page103, 104, 105
The state of martial law under which these three amendments to the Constitution were ratified was authorized by the First Reconstruction Act, dated March 2, 1867: "Whereas no legal State governments or adequate protection of life or property now exists in the rebel states," the ten Southern states were thereby divided into five military districts. President Johnson vetoed the bill on the same day, noting that "The bill places the people of the ten States therein named under the absolute domination of military rule but each State does have an actual government." Johnson further noted that the commanding officer is "an absolute monarch," which was a clear violation of the provisions of the Constitution. He also
said, "This is a bill passed by Congress in time of peace [the war had been over for two years]." He further noted the absence of "either war or insurrection" and that laws were
already in harmonious operation in the Southern states. Johnson concluded his veto message as follows: "The Constitution forbids the exercise of judicial power in any way
but one-that is, by the ordained and Established courts." Thus Johnson excluded the exercise of military courts in the Southern states.
The Second Reconstruction Act, dated March 23, 1867, established military control over voting in the Southern states. Free elections, anyone? President Johnson again vetoed it the same day. "No consideration could induce me to give my approval to such an election law for any purpose, and especially for the great purpose of framing the Constitution of a State." The bill was passed over his veto. The Third Reconstruction Act, dated July 19, 1867, extended even greater powers to the military commanders of the Southern states. It provided that no military officer in any district shall be bound by any civil officer of the United States. By giving absolute power to the commanding officer, the Third Reconstruction Act confirmed that the Southern states were under absolute martial law, an important point to be brought up in a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth,
and Fifteenth Amendments. There is also the legal point to be made that if these amendments were and are illegal, having been enacted under martial law, all of the subsequent amendments to the Constitution are also invalid, since they not only are not numbered correctly, but they also must be considered as having been enacted according to the provisions of these three amendments, which changed the requirements for citizenship and voting rights! The Fourth Reconstruction Act imposed even greater voting restrictions on the militarily occupied Southern states.
Court Packing…
Because he opposed the four Reconstruction Acts, which were patently unconstitutional, the Radical Republicans moved to impeach President Johnson and remove him from office. This has been a favorite tactic of those who have been defeated at the polls, as Presidents Nixon and Reagan were later to discover. The move to impeach Johnson lost by only one vote. The Radical Republicans had passed the four Reconstruction Acts only because they had previously taken the precaution in July of 1866 to reduce the number of justices on the Supreme Court from ten to seven, fearing that President Johnson might appoint justices who would uphold his opinion of the Reconstruction Acts. Such is the "law of the land."
In April, 1869, after Grant had been elected President, the Congress again increased the number of justices to nine, which remains the number today. Congress subsequently
denounced Presidents for their attempts to "pack" the Supreme Court, a privilege which seems to be reserved for themselves.
#11536362 at 2020-11-08 04:47:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #14730: Fours Seasons BURN all year round Edition
>>11535794 (You) pb
what are you saying?
Exactly. First remove ego and fear of racism. I know "the plan" and my ego wants everyone to know it was me. NOT GOOD of me. need to suppress my ego. . None of you will ever know who this is. Yes I am shaking a bit and yes I am a woman and a bit emotional. Let me try to explain.
1.) I have been here for 3 years.
2.) I am a white wasp who "stands on the shoulders of her ancestor's" puritans east coast and all. Farmers..
3. The west of Michigan is all white wasps. Trumps last rallies both in west Michigan.
4. Trump is no doubt pointing a finger to the mostly white wasps and telling them they have big shoes to fill. HE TELLS us exactly who he is talking to. Us who have ancestors who crossed the ocean and built the railroads. Go listen to absolutely every single rally the last 4 years.
5. Someone has been dropping the "The Curse of Canaan" for 2 months on this board and I finally gave in and read it last week. At first I though I was one of the "children of shem" and the rest of the people voting for Trump were the Canaanites. It did not feel right in my heart but I knew Trump is speaking to us and have not been able to break the puzzle for 3 years. The premise of the book is weird but has good info on the free mason's . But the last Grand Rapids Rally when he mentioned 401k's and one got excited made me determined to figure this out. I love this man TRUMP and I don't know why. But I also know these people have some serious hatred for him because of the boastful attitude. The last month I have been getting a feeling it was all fake.
6. I remembered in he book on page 107 about the 13th, 14th and 15th amendment not being legal. I am not a lawfag.
7. I remembered a Johnson as President did not want to pass it. Daahh.. Andrew Johnson the 17th president..
8. I remembered last week Trump said he was the greatest president as "Great" (or "Gross") as Abe Lincoln.
9. I started to feel sorry for the young kids who are going to lose it when they find out the election was fraud and I know vengeance is not right. Plus my niece in college told me this country was built on the backs of the "blacks" "slaves" and you can imagine what my first reaction was.
10. Trump in his tweet said Kavanaugh will someday be recognized as a truly great justice.
cont…..
#11535794 at 2020-11-08 04:11:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #14729 : What if a Group planned the overthrow of POTUS?
:SUPRESS YOUR EGOS FOR A MOMENT"Stop thinking only about yourself. Especially those who have American Anestors Don't you see it?
1. We have this paragraph in the book being dropped on this board the last month.
page 107
It is a fact of law that legislation enacted during periods of martial law is valid only during the period for which martial law is declared and sustained. Amazingly enough, the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments have never been challenged on this basic premise of law. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, even though President Johnson informed Congress that they had no power to
interfere with slavery; the Fourteenth Amendment changed the requirements for citizenship, even though Congress had no power to act on this question. Johnson urged the Southern states to reject the Fourteenth Amendment; he vetoed the four Reconstruction Acts, showing that the executive branch of the government was unalterably opposed to the excesses of the Radical Republicans in Congress.
2. Trump is singling out mostly white protestants / puritans with American Ancestors at every single rally for 4 years and laying responsibility on our shoulders. Yes, I am one in Michigan.. Trumps last rallies…. Most of the West Side of Michigan is Dutch and German Settlers.
He is asking us to open our hearts and become one people. He is reminding us ALL people bleed red, white and blue when it comes time to pass the 13th, 14th, and 15 Amendments.
"Tomorrow, you have the power, with the power of your vote, but you have a power to save America, for this country will never be a socialist nation. We will never allow that to happen. Together we can finish the job and drain the Washington swamp once and for all. Nobody knew it was so deep and so vicious, but we have done some job. So get your friends, get your family, get your neighbors, get your coworkers and get out and vote. Most important election perhaps in the history of our country. I never thought I'd say that. After what we went through four years ago, I said, "There'll never be anything like that. Never be anything like what we went through." And this is the most important election, maybe in the history of our country, from Midland to Mackinac, from Pontiac to Battle Creek and from Detroit to right here in Grand Rapids, I love Grand Rapids.
We inherit the legacy of American patriots who gave their blood, sweat, and tears to defend our country, our families, and our freedom. We stand on the shoulders of American heroes who crossed the ocean, settled the continent, tamed the wilderness, laid down the railroads, raised up the great skyscrapers, won two world wars, defeated fascism and communism, and made America into the single greatest nation in the history of the world. And the best is yet to come. The best is yet to come."
3. Andrew Johnson is the 17th President.
4. Kavanaugh and Lindsay and the 3 cases .. Martial Law
START PUTTING THIS TOGETHER and forget about who is our President. Put your egos and self esteem aside..
#11535147 at 2020-11-08 03:32:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #14728: Hammer Time in DC
GUYS SERIOUSLY
LISTEN..
Andrew Johnson 17th president of the USA.
'''"Johnson urged the Southern states to reject the Fourteenth Amendment; he vetoed the four
Reconstruction Acts, showing that the executive branch of the government was unalterably opposed to the excesses of the Radical Republicans in Congress."'''
It is a fact of law that legislation enacted during periods of martial law is valid only during the period for which martial law is declared and sustained.
Amazingly enough, the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments have never
been challenged on this basic premise of law. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished
slavery, even though President Johnson informed Congress that they had no power to
interfere with slavery; the Fourteenth Amendment changed the requirements for
citizenship, even though Congress had no power to act on this question. Johnson urged
the Southern states to reject the Fourteenth Amendment; he vetoed the four
Reconstruction Acts, showing that the executive branch of the government was
unalterably opposed to the excesses of the Radical Republicans in Congress.
#11535059 at 2020-11-08 03:27:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #14728: Hammer Time in DC
>>11534902
YOU GUYS ARE NOT Listening I FOUND IT
HOW IS TRUMP going to win the love of everyone in this country?
He is going to legally "Free the Slaves"
ARE the 13th, 14th and 15th not legal?
TRUMP LOVES Andrew Johnson 17th president of the United States
#11534902 at 2020-11-08 03:19:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #14728: Hammer Time in DC
HELP!! 13th, 14th, 15th Amendments
Andrew Johnson DONALD TRUMP
What's the tweet about
Brett Kavanaugh and Red October?
What cases again regarding Martial Law Lindsay Graham asked Brett Kavanaugh? the military ct one is ex parte Quirin
1. Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942), is a case of the United States Supreme Court during World War II that upheld the jurisdiction of a United States military tribunal over the trial of eight German saboteurs in the United States.
What were the other 2?
Who has been dropping this hint?
page 107 "The curse of Canaan"
It is a fact of law that legislation enacted during periods of martial law is valid only during the period for which martial law is declared and sustained. Amazingly enough, the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments have never been challenged on this basic premise of law. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, even though President Johnson informed Congress that they had no power to interfere with slavery; the Fourteenth Amendment changed the requirements for
citizenship, even though Congress had no power to act on this question. Johnson urged the Southern states to reject the Fourteenth Amendment; he vetoed the four Reconstruction Acts, showing that the executive branch of the government was unalterably opposed to the excesses of the Radical Republicans in Congress.
#10643772 at 2020-09-14 15:17:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #13621: Monday Is Already Hot Edition
Re: Speed reference in Trump tweet.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Speed
James Speed was Lincoln AG. Argued that the conspirators that killed Lincoln should be tried by a military commission.
https://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/the_conspirators_tried_by_military_commision
The hanging of four conspirators, convicted in the assassination of Lincoln, on July 7, 1865. Photo by Alexander Gardner (Library of Congress)
From May 12 until June 29, 1865, a military commission sitting in Washington City (as Washington, D.C., was then known) heard evidence against seven men and one woman. All were charged with conspiring to murder President Abraham Lincoln. All were found guilty. Four were sentenced to hang (and were executed on July 7) and three were sentenced to life imprisonment; only one defendant received a relatively light punishment-six years in jail.
But while there was sufficient evidence to find them guilty-and almost all historians today believe that the eight defendants were guilty of conspiring to harm the president, albeit to varying degrees-the legal significance of their trial by military commission was that the proceedings were unfair.
Trial by military commission-rather than in a civilian court-was assured after U.S. Attorney General James Speed issued a legal opinion stating that the conspirators not only could be, but must be, tried by a military commission. This is what Secretary of War Edwin Stanton and the Army's judge advocate general, Brig. Gen. Joseph Holt, wanted because of the many advantages that a commission offered the prosecution.
First, and most importantly, there was no right to appeal the verdict of the military commission. President Andrew Johnson appointed the members of the commission and directed them to try the case. Johnson then approved the findings and the sentence.
Since the Supreme Court had ruled in 1864 in Ex parte Vallandigham that federal courts had no jurisdiction over military commissions (because they were not "courts"), there was no danger that the conspirators could escape justice by appealing to an Article III judge.
Second, a majority vote was all that was needed to convict the defendants (as opposed to a unanimous verdict in civilian court). Additionally, only two-thirds of the commission members had to vote yes for the death penalty to be imposed.
Third, there was no presumption of innocence and very relaxed rules of evidence. Generally, the prosecution was permitted to introduce any evidence that it determined was relevant and probative to the guilt of the eight conspirators-including hearsay testimony.
Fourth, Judge Advocate General Holt and his assistant prosecutor, John A. Bingham, participated in deliberations with the nine Union officers who sat as the fact-finders in the case. While these two prosecutors did not vote, they did argue for findings of guilty for all the defendants and suggested that hanging was the only proper sentence for all the conspirators. And since only one of the nine Union officers voting was a lawyer or had any legal training, what Holt and Bingham said during these deliberations almost certainly carried considerable weight. The defense counsel, of course, were excluded from participating in the commission's deliberations.
Fifth, Holt (probably in concert with Stanton) personally selected the nine Union officers-seven generals and two colonels-who served as jurors. All were "shooting" officers who had seen combat and had little sympathy for the South or the Confederacy. As Lincoln had approved their commissions, they almost certainly felt a strong sense of loyalty to him and the Union.
A final important point: There was little doubt that the government could not achieve the results it wanted-a swift verdict of guilty and hanging for the defendants-if it tried them in civilian court. There were few Union men in Washington City; they were in the Army. The white men who would have heard the evidence against the conspirators would almost certainly have been Southerners and had Confederate sympathies. The possibility of jury nullification was too high to take the risk.
Today, the unfairness of the military commission proceedings continues to overshadow the question of guilt or innocence-demonstrating once again that the process is as important as the results in a criminal trial.
Retired Army Col. Fred L. Borch III is regimental historian
#10321243 at 2020-08-17 20:55:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #13207: Deep State Cheesey Steps Requires Potus Intervention Edition
7 Arrested For Toppling George Washington Statue Near L.A. City Hall
Six suspects were arrested after a statue of George Washington was toppled over and vandalized in Grand Park.
On August 13, 2020, around 6:40 p.m., a group of protesters had assembled in the downtown area near the Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration building. As officers from the Los Angeles Police Department were in the area due to the protest, they saw numerous people pulling on red 'bands' that were tied around the neck portion of the George Washington Statue in Grand Park. The group appeared to be attempting to remove the statue from its' platform. Ultimately, the George Washington Statue broke from the base and fell to the ground. The group, including the six people arrested, cheered and celebrated as others vandalized and spray painted the statue.
The suspects hid nearby to change the clothes they had been wearing and conceal items in their backpacks in an attempt to avoid detection and apprehension. As they left the protest, they were immediately detained and arrested by Los Angeles Police Department officers at Spring Street and Temple Street.
During the arrest and booking process, officers recovered evidence from the suspects which included a gas mask, laser pointer, helmet, goggles, arm protectors, and change of clothing to conceal identity.
Suspect-1: Elizabeth Brookey, Female, White, DOB: 09/14/2000, Booking #5991496,
from Burbank, CA
Suspect-2: Christopher Woodard, Male, White, DOB: 11/13/1986, Booking #5991504,
from Los Angeles, CA
Suspect-3: Anna Asher, Female, White, DOB: 09/24/1991, Booking #5991507,
from North Hollywood, CA
Suspect-4: Emma Juncosa, Female, White, DOB: 08/24/1996, Booking #5991500,
from Los Angeles, CA
Suspect-5: Andrew Johnson, Male, White, DOB: 11/07/1997, Booking #5991481,
from Glendale, CA
Suspect-6: Barham Lashley, Male, White, DOB: 07/19/1990, Booking #5991482,
from North Hollywood, CA
This case will be presented to the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office for felony filing consideration.
https://breaking911.com/7-arrested-for-toppling-george-washington-statue-near-l-a-city-hall/
#9889194 at 2020-07-08 00:15:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12655: Baker calls Night Shift, Shills Beware! 9888888! Edition
Clyburn: Trump Is Trying to 'Deconstruct' Liberty and Justice for All
Tuesday on MSNBC, House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-SC) accused President Donald Trump of attempting to deconstruct "what Barack Obama and others before him did," referring to "liberty and justice for all."
On Confederate statues, Clyburn said, "The fact of the matter is we know history is history. Nobody is trying to change history. We're trying to remove the honor that these people, who have dishonored our country and our history, remove them to a place where it's proper. They should not be in Statuary Hall. The flag should not be flying over public buildings. So we'll see what the Senate will do, but I'll tell you, the Senate is now in play. It's in play, in large measure, because most Americans have decided that it's time for us to make the greatest of this country accessible and affordable for all of its citizens."
He continued, "We see a total commitment more than 70% of the American people are now believing that black lives do matter, not just with law enforcement, but health care, education, with the environment. Black lives matter when you put poisonous air in black neighborhoods, you're killing black people. When you have these challenged environment issues in black neighborhoods, their lives don't matter to you. So this is a much broader thing than just law enforcement. So I'm so proud of the Black Lives Matter movement, but I'm also proud of the fact that it looks like the majority of people who are not black now believe it's something to be pursued."
Host Katy Tur asked, "Let me ask you this, why do you think the president is running on protecting Confederate statues, Why is he running against the phrase "Black Lives Matter"? What do you think he's doing?"
Clyburn said, "I think he's mimicking Ronald Reagan, who made his first speech after being nominated for the presidency in Philadelphia, Mississippi which was known for only one thing and that was the murder of three -and they were not all black, one black, the other two white people who are trying to register people to vote. He made a states' rights speech at the moment, but Ron Reagan had a sophistication that this president doesn't have. He's mimicking Woodrow Wilson, who had 'Birth of a Nation,' The first showing of 'Birth of a Nation' in the White House. He was an intellectual that this president is not. This president is a throwback to Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Abraham Lincoln, and who started us to dismantling the Reconstruction-era programs that held such great promise for America. So what he's trying to do is deconstruct so much of what Barack Obama and others before him did, to try to live out the meaning of this country liberty and justice for all."
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/07/07/clyburn-trump-is-trying-to-deconstruct-liberty-and-justice-for-all/
Projection 101
#9768160 at 2020-06-27 18:54:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12502: At The Ready; FF Watch
>>9767549 (lb)
Nice, anon. So perhaps they are trying to avoid a super majority, then ?
United States
Federal government
The Constitution of the United States requires supermajorities in order for certain significant actions to occur.[33]
Amendments to the Constitution may be proposed in one of two ways: a two-thirds supermajority votes of each house of United States Congress or a convention called by Congress on application of two thirds (currently 34) of the states. Once proposed, the amendment must be ratified by three quarters (currently 38) of the states (either through the State legislatures, or ratification conventions, whichever "mode of ratification" Congress selects).
Congress may pass bills by simple majority votes. If the president vetoes a bill, Congress may override the veto by a two-thirds supermajority of both houses.
A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds supermajority of the Senate to enter into force and effect.
Section 4 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution gives Congress a role to play in the event of a presidential disability. If the vice president and a majority of the president's cabinet declare that the president is unable to serve in that role, the vice president becomes acting president. Within 21 days of such a declaration (or, if Congress is in recess when a president is disabled, 21 days after Congress reconvenes), Congress must vote by two-thirds supermajorities to continue the disability declaration; otherwise, such declaration expires after the 21 days and the president would at that time "resume" discharging all the powers and duties of the office. (Section 4 has been invoked - the president himself declaring an inability - only three times.)
The House may, by a simple majority vote, impeach a federal official (such as, but not limited to, the president, vice president, or a federal judge). Removal from office (and optional disqualification from any Federal, State or local office) requires a two-thirds supermajority of the Senate. In 1842, the House failed to impeach president John Tyler. In 1868, the Senate fell one vote short of removing president Andrew Johnson following his impeachment. In 1999, efforts to remove Bill Clinton following his impeachment in 1998 fell just short of a simple majority, and 17 votes short of the two-thirds supermajority. The impeachment procedure was last used in 2019-20, when president Donald Trump was impeached and subsequently acquitted. Each chamber may expel one of its own members by a two-thirds supermajority vote; this last happened when the House expelled James Traficant in 2002.
The 14th Amendment (section 3) bars a person from Federal or State office if, after having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution as a Federal or State officer, "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof". However, both the House and Senate may jointly override this restriction with a two-thirds supermajority vote each.
A two-thirds supermajority in the Senate is 67 out of 100 senators, while a two-thirds supermajority in the House is 290 out of 435 representatives. However, since many votes take place without every seat in the House filled and representative participating, it does not often require 67 senators or 290 representatives to achieve this supermajority.
Apart from these constitutional requirements, a Senate rule (except in cases covered by the nuclear option, or of a rule change) requires an absolute supermajority of three fifths to move to a vote through a cloture motion, which closes debate on a bill or nomination, thus ending a filibuster by a minority of members. In current practice, the mere threat of a filibuster prevents passing almost any measure that has less than three-fifths agreement in the Senate, 60 of the 100 senators if every seat is filled.
#9633365 at 2020-06-16 15:53:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12330: The Trump Econmy Is Taking Off! Edition
LurkerFag looking for help from OldFag...
Won't detail how I got here, but was searching on Houston area crime map and noticed a house that had 8 registered sex offenders at one single family home. Decided to look into one because his photo looked off - John Rob Palmer, below....
Highly suspect Google searches for John Robert Palmer, and when you dig into John "Ross" Palmer (the Artist)... very interesting coincidences:
clustermaps, returns "John R Palmer" which could match either "Ross" or "Robert" @ 1218 Heights (JohnPalmerArt Studio - nice vans)
couchsurfing.com... Not currently accepting guests, last login over 8 years ago.. 38 years old, massage therapist and lots of martial arts... and what the fuck is an "angel room".
JohnPalmerArt.com - philanthropist, lots of interesting artwork (masonic at least), traveled to Trinidad & Tobago, Cuba, New Zealand in 2015, 2016 and 2017 on his annual "art trip". Met with DIGNITARIES OF STATE in these countries. The 2015 "art trip" to T&T was sponsored by T&T based corporations to travel there (Jan Spin CEO Southern Chemical Corporation - methane logistics & Dennis Patrick CEO Methanol Holdings [MHTL]). Dennis Patrick now deceased from leukaemia ~8/9/2019 (5 weeks diagnosis to death). Interestingly didn't take a trip in 2019, based his 2019 annual series on his 2006 trip to Tokyo, Japan.
Art... Vans.. Difficult to find people... Have looked into a few of the others briefly and the properties they own (highly suspect), but want to connect John Robert Palmer to John Ross Palmer if possible. Any ideas?
9 Bucan Street, Houston, TX 77076
Registered Sex Offenders:
Steven Romine Brown 08/03/1988
POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
Larry Joseph Clark 10/23/1955 (Many Aliases: Larry Joseph Anderson, Rachel Clark, Larry Joseph Rachel)
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT
William Anthony Frank (Anthony Andrew Johnson) 11/30/1961
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT
David Garcia 8/26/1973
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD
Charles Edward Martinez 11/19/1949
(3) LEWD AND LASCIVIOUS ACTS INVOLVING CHILDREN/CONTACT AND THE VICTIM IS UNDER 14 YEARS OF AGE
---—
John Rob Palmer (John Robert Palmer, John Palmer, Rob Palmer) 4/11/1982
SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD
---—
David Wayne Pruett 7/1/1961
INDECENCY WITH A CHILD SEXUAL CONTACT
Robert Fleming Wooten 5/9/1967
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD
#9577127 at 2020-06-11 19:41:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12258: Board Under Attack, The Hole Runs Deep Edition
https://spectator.org/43179_democrats-missing-years/
Missing: 52 years of history.
Ignored: The other 113 years that take the Democrats from their birth in 1800 to 1965.
As Democrats prepare to nominate Senator Barack Obama to be the first black president, the Democratic National Committee and its chairman Howard Dean have whitewashed the party's horrific and lengthy record of racism. The omission is in the section of the DNC website that describes the party's history. The missing history raises the obvious question of whether the Democrats, unable or simply unwilling to put their party on record as taking direct responsibility for one of the worst racial crimes of the ages, will be able to run a campaign free of the racial animosities it has regularly brought both to American presidential campaigns and American political and social life in general.
What else to make of the official party history as presented by the DNC on its website? It is a history so sanitized of historical reality it makes Stalin look like historian David McCullough.
The DNC website section labeled "Party History," linked here, is in fact scrubbed clean of the not-so-little dirty secret that fueled Democrats' political successes for over a century and a half and made American life a hell on earth for black Americans. Literally, the DNC official history, which begins with the creation of the party in 1800, gets to the creation of the DNC itself in 1848 and then...poof!...the next sentence says: "As the 19th Century came to a close, the American electorate changed more and more rapidly." It quickly heads into a riff on poor immigrants coming to America.
In a stroke, 52 years of Democrat history vanishes. Disappeared faster than the truth in the Clinton administration. Why would this be? Allow me to sketch in a few facts from those missing 52 years. For that matter, lets add in the facts from the party history before and after those 52 years, since they aren't mentioned by the Democrats' National Committee either.
So what's missing?
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were 6 from 1840-1860.
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were 7 from 1800-1861
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868-1948.
* There is no reference to "Jim Crow" as in "Jim Crow laws," nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC's missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Civil Rights heroine Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the front of a "whites only" bus, the "whites only" designation the direct result of Democrats.
* There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner became "a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party." Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease's description of the Klan as the "terrorist arm of the Democratic Party."
* There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth banned slavery. The Fourteenth effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Supreme Court Dred Scott decision (made by Democrat pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The Fifteenth gave black Americans the right to vote.
* There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of Democratic President Andrew Johnson. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.
* There is no reference to the Democrats' opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.
#9577009 at 2020-06-11 19:31:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12257: Protect The Dough Edition
https://spectator.org/43179_democrats-missing-years/
i posted this 20 min ago now its gone
Missing: 52 years of history.
Ignored: The other 113 years that take the Democrats from their birth in 1800 to 1965.
As Democrats prepare to nominate Senator Barack Obama to be the first black president, the Democratic National Committee and its chairman Howard Dean have whitewashed the party's horrific and lengthy record of racism. The omission is in the section of the DNC website that describes the party's history. The missing history raises the obvious question of whether the Democrats, unable or simply unwilling to put their party on record as taking direct responsibility for one of the worst racial crimes of the ages, will be able to run a campaign free of the racial animosities it has regularly brought both to American presidential campaigns and American political and social life in general.
What else to make of the official party history as presented by the DNC on its website? It is a history so sanitized of historical reality it makes Stalin look like historian David McCullough.
The DNC website section labeled "Party History," linked here, is in fact scrubbed clean of the not-so-little dirty secret that fueled Democrats' political successes for over a century and a half and made American life a hell on earth for black Americans. Literally, the DNC official history, which begins with the creation of the party in 1800, gets to the creation of the DNC itself in 1848 and then...poof!...the next sentence says: "As the 19th Century came to a close, the American electorate changed more and more rapidly." It quickly heads into a riff on poor immigrants coming to America.
In a stroke, 52 years of Democrat history vanishes. Disappeared faster than the truth in the Clinton administration. Why would this be? Allow me to sketch in a few facts from those missing 52 years. For that matter, lets add in the facts from the party history before and after those 52 years, since they aren't mentioned by the Democrats' National Committee either.
So what's missing?
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were 6 from 1840-1860.
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were 7 from 1800-1861
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868-1948.
* There is no reference to "Jim Crow" as in "Jim Crow laws," nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC's missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Civil Rights heroine Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the front of a "whites only" bus, the "whites only" designation the direct result of Democrats.
* There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner became "a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party." Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease's description of the Klan as the "terrorist arm of the Democratic Party."
* There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth banned slavery. The Fourteenth effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Supreme Court Dred Scott decision (made by Democrat pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The Fifteenth gave black Americans the right to vote.
* There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of Democratic President Andrew Johnson. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.
* There is no reference to the DNC-sponsored Democrat Convention of 1924, known to history as the "Klanbake." The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan so powerful that a plank condemning Klan violence was defeated outright. To celebrate the Klan staged a rally with 10,000 hooded Klansmen in a field in New Jersey directly across the Hudson from the site of the Convention. Attended by hundreds of cheering Convention delegates, the rally featured burning crosses and calls for violence against African Americans and Catholics.
#9576701 at 2020-06-11 19:03:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12257: Protect The Dough Edition
https://spectator.org/43179_democrats-missing-years/
Missing: 52 years of history.
Ignored: The other 113 years that take the Democrats from their birth in 1800 to 1965.
As Democrats prepare to nominate Senator Barack Obama to be the first black president, the Democratic National Committee and its chairman Howard Dean have whitewashed the party's horrific and lengthy record of racism. The omission is in the section of the DNC website that describes the party's history. The missing history raises the obvious question of whether the Democrats, unable or simply unwilling to put their party on record as taking direct responsibility for one of the worst racial crimes of the ages, will be able to run a campaign free of the racial animosities it has regularly brought both to American presidential campaigns and American political and social life in general.
What else to make of the official party history as presented by the DNC on its website? It is a history so sanitized of historical reality it makes Stalin look like historian David McCullough.
The DNC website section labeled "Party History," linked here, is in fact scrubbed clean of the not-so-little dirty secret that fueled Democrats' political successes for over a century and a half and made American life a hell on earth for black Americans. Literally, the DNC official history, which begins with the creation of the party in 1800, gets to the creation of the DNC itself in 1848 and then...poof!...the next sentence says: "As the 19th Century came to a close, the American electorate changed more and more rapidly." It quickly heads into a riff on poor immigrants coming to America.
In a stroke, 52 years of Democrat history vanishes. Disappeared faster than the truth in the Clinton administration. Why would this be? Allow me to sketch in a few facts from those missing 52 years. For that matter, lets add in the facts from the party history before and after those 52 years, since they aren't mentioned by the Democrats' National Committee either.
So what's missing?
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were 6 from 1840-1860.
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were 7 from 1800-1861
* There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868-1948.
* There is no reference to "Jim Crow" as in "Jim Crow laws," nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC's missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Civil Rights heroine Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the front of a "whites only" bus, the "whites only" designation the direct result of Democrats.
* There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner became "a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party." Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease's description of the Klan as the "terrorist arm of the Democratic Party."
* There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth banned slavery. The Fourteenth effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Supreme Court Dred Scott decision (made by Democrat pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The Fifteenth gave black Americans the right to vote.
* There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of Democratic President Andrew Johnson. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.
* There is no reference to the Democrats' opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.
* There is no reference to the Democrats' 1904 platform, which devotes a section to "Sectional and Racial Agitation," claiming the GOP's protests against segregation and the denial of voting rights to blacks sought to "revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country," which in turn "means confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed."
to long to post but gud info
#9521476 at 2020-06-07 17:57:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12186: The Enemy Relies On Your Silence, Shout Them Down! Edition
>>9521409
> Ahmed Hirsi, the husband of state Rep. Ilhan Omar,
Between April and Aug. 6, Hirsi worked for St. Paul College as a One Stop Associate, helping students who have questions about financial aid or registrations. Previously, he worked as a banker for Wells Fargo for 11 years.
Since May 2016, Hirsi has been running his own business, New American Financial Literacy, which advises immigrant communities about homebuying, banking, entrepreneurship and taxes.
Ahmed brings a wealth of professional experience working with immigrant families and youth, business and community development, homeownership initiatives for diverse communities, and grassroots efforts to address crime and improve safety in our neighborhoods, Cano said in the email. I look forward to having you all get to know him better over the next months.
Hirsi, who declined to comment Wednesday because he said he didnt sign official documents, is expected to start his new job in September. The salary for senior policy aides for council members range from $73,000 to $81,000, city records show.
Hirsis foray into city politics will coincide with his wifes campaigning ahead of the general election in November.
Omar worked as a senior policy aide for Minneapolis City Council Member Andrew Johnson before she ran for the state Legislature.
Cano has endorsed Omars run for the congressional seat, while Omar supported Cano when she was seeking a second term as a council member.
#9521007 at 2020-06-07 17:11:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12185: Q Drops Bricks for Anon Wall O' Faith in the Plan Edition
Minneapolis city Council
all of these people would be worth digging into
Ward 1 - Kevin Reich
Ward 2 - Cam Gordon
Ward 3 - Steve Fletcher
Ward 4 - Phillipe Cunningham
Ward 5 - Jeremiah Ellison
Ward 6 - Abdi Warsame
Ward 7 - Lisa Goodman
Ward 8 - Andrea Jenkins
Ward 9 - Alondra Cano
Ward 10 - Lisa Bender
Ward 11 - Jeremy Schroeder
Ward 12 - Andrew Johnson
Ward 13 - Linea Palmisano
The Council is the legislative branch of the City of Minneapolis. Its thirteen members-each elected from separate wards-work collectively, and in partnership with the Mayor, to enact local laws and public policies that strengthen and preserve the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
As an extension of representational duties, each Council Member serves on a number of outside organizations, associations, and groups. These additional duties enable the City Council to participate in metropolitan, regional, statewide, and national matters that impact Minneapolis and the quality of life for its residents.
City Council Leadership
Council President Lisa Bender
Council President is elected by Council Members and is responsible for setting Council policies and priorities, managing the Council schedule, referring matters to the appropriate standing committees, and appointing the chairs, vice-chairs, and members to the various standing committees.
Council Vice-President Andrea Jenkins
Council Members also elects a Vice-President. The Vice-President acts as Council President whenever he or she is unable.
Majority Leader Andrew Johnson (DFL)
Minority Leader Cam Gordon (Green Party)
http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/council/
#9377961 at 2020-05-30 15:50:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12002 National Guard Incoming Edition
>>9376857 (You), Specator: Can we believe Ilhan's Biography
3rd part of article
Omar accomplished all this without producing a single piece of legislation. She never mentions that the FBI consider her district to be America's biggest exporter of terrorists in the country, though she does claim credit for convincing Andrew Johnson to drop a historic law against 'spitting and loitering
She is a self-conscious symbol of what she believes Somali Americans and Muslim Americans should be: 'Since I was tough on my reasoning, I felt justified to interact in whatever way I wanted to.'
'Living authentically is the best form of resistance,' she writes when discussing her reaction to the 9/11 attacks when, as Omar immortally said, 'some people did something'. The resistance here is not to what Omar, or more probably her ghostwriter, calls 'Islamic terrorism', but to the incorrigible bigotry and ignorance of her ever-disappointing fellow Americans. When a legislator in the Minnesota House points to her hijab and says, 'I don't get this,' Omar responds by wearing 'a full black abaya [baggy robe], complemented by a black hijab' to the rest of that week's session. 'I wanted to subtly shift the narrative simply by acting as a positive ambassador,' she says.
?This being America and not Somalia, it is nobody's business that, shortly before conducting a highly dubious second marriage, Omar chose to cover her hair in 2005 as a symbol of her 'purity in the presence of the world'. It is, however, of public interest when the hair is on the head of the first hijabi in the House of Representatives, who tells us, 'I wanted to wear the abaya with a niqab to Trump's State of the Union, but my staff worried I would be arrested by the Secret Service.' Apart from the absurdity of suggesting she would have been arrested, a 'positive ambassador' would have saluted the uniform, not the man.
Omar wanted to wear a niqab in bad faith. Her shuffling of costumes as political tokens uses religion as a mask for trolling. She denounces 'identity politics', but she is their quintessence. She talks of truth, but erases the traces of lies and bigotry. This is not what an American politician should look like.
Omar and Paley may have contrived a third genre of political memoir. Omar is not running for higher office or burnishing her record for posterity: she is trying to get ahead of the inevitable moment when her past catches up with her. The only people who need to buy this book are the see-no-evil journalists who will quote it to endorse Omar's implausible claim that the allegations against her are 'conspiracy theories and propaganda'. In the meantime, for another perspective on Ilhan Omar, see the credible and well-sourced researches of Preya Samsundar, Ben Weingarten, David Steinberg and Scott Johnson's Powerline site, who have done the work that the Minneapolis Star-Tribune has failed to do.
https://spectator.us/believe-ilhan-omar-autobiography/
#9377934 at 2020-05-30 15:48:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12002 National Guard Incoming Edition
>>9376857 (You), Specator: Can we believe Ilhan's Biography?
2nd our 3, part of article What to hell us this creature doing in congress of the USA?
This being America and not Somalia, it is nobody's business that, shortly before conducting a highly dubious second marriage, Omar chose to cover her hair in 2005 as a symbol of her 'purity in the presence of the world'. It is, however, of public interest when the hair is on the head of the first hijabi in the House of Representatives, who tells us, 'I wanted to wear the abaya with a niqab to Trump's State of the Union, but my staff worried I would be arrested by the Secret Service.' Apart from the absurdity of suggesting she would have been arrested, a 'positive ambassador' would have saluted the uniform, not the man.
Omar wanted to wear a niqab in bad faith. Her shuffling of costumes as political tokens uses religion as a mask for trolling. She denounces 'identity politics', but she is their quintessence. She talks of truth, but erases the traces of lies and bigotry. This is not what an American politician should look like.
Omar and Paley may have contrived a third genre of political memoir. Omar is not running for higher office or burnishing her record for posterity: she is trying to get ahead of the inevitable moment when her past catches up with her. The only people who need to buy this book are the see-no-evil journalists who will quote it to endorse Omar's implausible claim that the allegations against her are 'conspiracy theories and propaganda'. In the meantime, for another perspective on Ilhan Omar, see the credible and well-sourced researches of Preya Samsundar, Ben Weingarten, David Steinberg and Scott Johnson's Powerline site, who have done the work that the Minneapolis Star-Tribune has failed to do.
When Somalia collapsed into civil war, Omar's family might have supported the Salvation Democratic Front, but we aren't told who they are or what they were fighting for. Anyway, what happened there was 'no different to what happened in Nazi Germany'. After the family compound was shot up by a militia, the family fled to a refugee camp in Kenya. It took four years, until 1992, for her father to obtain visas to the United States.
America was 'disappointing'. Omar, like most first-time visitors, was shocked by New York City: 'graffiti, trash and, to my greatest horror, homeless people'. 'This isn't our America,' her father said. 'We'll get to our America.' After a few years in Arlington, Virginia, her father moved to Minneapolis, to join his father and America's largest concentration of Somali immigrants. 'Our America' was not much different to their Somalia: clannish and patriarchal, with her grandfather prominent in community politics. But Omar's America, like that of almost all immigrant children, was the real thing, or as much of it as her father could tolerate.
'I learned English from watching Baywatch,' she writes. As a teenager, Omar accompanied her grandfather to political meetings, but she also dyed her hair and had a boyfriend, Ahmed Hirsi. Her father, apparently a man of 'inherent liberalism', agreed with Hirsi's family that Ahmed and Omar should marry when she finished high school. 'I wasn't there, just as I wasn't there for the religious ceremony to marry Ahmed and me, a ceremony traditionally attended only by the male members of the family.' Two children followed.
Working it out for herself, Omar realized that education was the way up and out. Indeed, there is nothing more American than taking a two-year associate degree in evening classes at a college in the Mall of America, then returning to university to upgrade your qualifications, as Omar did at North Dakota State. By then, Omar had graduated from Baywatch to the higher gibberish. At North Dakota State, she joined a Democratic group called Unity in Diversity.
From there, Omar's American journey fell rapidly into the familiar Democratic groove of machine politics, ethnic bloc-voting and affirmative action. In 2014, aged 22, she started work as a 'senior policy aide' to Andrew Johnson, head of Minneapolis City Council, even though she had 'never been a paid staff member of any organization'. In 2016, she won a seat in the Minnesota House by mobilizing her fellow Somalis.
In 2018, she inherited the House seat for Minnesota's 5th Congressional District when it was vacated by Keith Ellison, whose history with the Nation of Islam and Louis Farrakhan of course goes unmentioned here
https://spectator.us/believe-ilhan-omar-autobiography/
#9202649 at 2020-05-16 20:43:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11778: Potus Echo Thank You To Our Armed Forces Edition
>>9202293
May 16 1868
"US Senate fails to impeach President Andrew Johnson by one vote"
https://books.google.com/books?id=_Tld3CpYawwC&lpg=PA201&vq=may%2016&pg=PA201#v=onepage&q&f=true
p 201
The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson
By Chester G. Hearn
#8789789 at 2020-04-14 16:05:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11253: Who's Got Your Wallet? Edition
April 14, 1865: President Lincoln is shot by an assassin in Washington
By mid-April 1865, the American Civil War, the bloodiest conflict in our nation's history, was nearly over. Richmond, the Confederate capital had fallen. Robert E. Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia, the bane of the Union Army for nearly four years, had surrendered the week before. President Abraham Lincoln had already visited the former Confederate capital. Although Confederates continued to resist in certain places, the Confederacy was finished.
Actor John Wilkes Booth was one of the ringleaders of a scheme to assassinate or kidnap the President and several other members of his cabinet. And on the night of April 14, 1865, Booth snuck into the presidential box at Ford's Theater and shot the president in the back of the head as he watched a play. Lincoln would linger for a few hours but die early the next morning. Booth's conspiracy soon fell apart and his co-conspirators arrested.
Booth thought that by removing Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson and Secretary of State William Seward, he could breathe life into a dead cause. Booth was a famous actor from a family of famous actors. However, although his brother was a staunch supporter of the Union, he was a Confederate sympathizer. And with the family being from Maryland, it wasn't rare to have family members on opposite sides of the conflict.
https://sofrep.com/news/aapril-14-1865-president-lincoln-is-shot-by-an-assassin-in-washington/
#8697547 at 2020-04-05 23:54:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #11136: POTUS Press Conference Bread Edition
>>8697447
Sometimes I wonder if you are the real shills here?
Sure hatred against them is retarded and counterproductive, but you cannot ignore the issue and pretend like everyone who brings it up is a shill. That we we will be stuck in this hamster wheel forever.
- Napoleon
- Caesar
- King Edward II
- JFK
- Abraham Lincoln
- Andrew Johnson
- Tsar Nikolas II
Are some people that you should look closer at, especially their views on banking and their destiny.
#8447502 at 2020-03-17 09:13:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10815: Graveyard Bake Boring Title Edition
>>8447469
I may do exactly that
>>8447446
>>8447467
>Maybe they are much much older than we think?
Totally convinced there's something to this.
I'm kind of convinced Gene Hackman is an ancient creature…possibly President Andrew Johnson. I know that sounds nuts, but I was observing oddities related to those 2 a little while back, and there's something very strange going on. And seriously, see thru the "name spell"
gene-hack man? In plain sight?
I don't rule out the idea of a long-entrenched system of disembodied spiritual being (Nephilim or whatever) body hoping down thru the centuries into technology most of us never imagined exists or children so mind-erased at a young age (MKUltra and such) that they become blank slates for infestation.
Gene. Hack. Man.
Not even Bart Simpson would try anything so undisguised when calling Moe the bartender.
#8239480 at 2020-02-25 02:22:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10549 The "Listen Carefully" Edition
Global Announcements
>>8227327 Iwo Jima flag on YouTube for TOR posting
Anons, plz no jpegs, tx
Notables
are not endorsements
#10548
>>8239426 Nunes tweet: Kash in India
>>8239417 Obama groomed by ultra-zionist Chicago Jews?
>>8239382 Fresh POTUS on FB
>>8239318 Sauce for the 'Bearded Builders' lb digs
>>8239313 Nunes tweet: Omar & the progressive Islamist takeover of the Dem Party
>>8239303 , >>8239404 Planefag Watch
>>8239275 Lindsey Graham on Hannity tonight
>>8239255 Other Q Posts with 'package'. Connected?
>>8239244 On Q's PDF
>>8239225 On "[assumptions correct - package well rec [known]]"
>>8239182 Weinstein taken to Bellvue Hospital after alleged heart palpitations
>>8239100 Eric Trump on Hannity at 9pm ET and Lara on Bream at 11pm ET
>>8238987 Over 3,600 LE agencies across the US were given ICE detainers
>>8238947 Developing: Judge sets 2 PM Tuesday hearing in Roger Stone case
>>8238857 That viral Trump 'Dow Joans' cannon tweet is a fake
>>8238843 The View 2/24/20 FULL | The View ABC February 24, 2020
>>8238769 The arrogance of Rep Omar
>>8238768 Dasting tweet from @DEFCON: "if we showed you the breadcrumbs"
>>8239464 #10548
#10547
>>8238670 Possible Mueller Team charges: Dig call
>>8238596 Idaho and concealed carry law
>>8238557 Mardi Gras 'Epstein didn't kill himself' float depicts gigantic Hillary strangling him
>>8238471 , >>8238509 'Bearded Builders' grooming products feature the masonic compass. Dig
>>8238477 Former Holyoke kindergarten teacher pleads guilty to possessing child pornography
>>8238348 , >>8238443 Appeals court upholds Trump ban on abortion referrals by family planning clinics
>>8238355 , >>8238540, >>8238614 House Rep's consider filing charges against Muller prosecutors
>>8238351 Assange's lawyers plan to bring in new evidence involving Richard Grenell
>>8238227 Limbaugh: Coronavirus being 'weaponized' to bring down Trump
>>8238315 Phillip Haney: Previous digg on Amador County Sheriff & incident details
>>8238166 New statement on Philip Haney: Investigation ongoing, no conclusion of suicide yet
>>8238162 Impeachment & Dems' socialist agenda drove historic Republican candidate recruitment
>>8237977 'India-US no longer just any partnership, it's far closer'
>>8238701 #10547
#10546
>>8237170 Potus twat cap
>>8237192, >>8237266, >>8237278, >>8237346, >>8237350 Stephen A. Somma, a counterintelligence investigator who works out of the bureau's New York field office, as "Case Agent 1" from the inspector general's (IG) report.
>>8237202 Anons analyze MSM fear pron
>>8237203 Coronavirus eliminating globalism? What do you think?
>>8237355 Reports that Iranian Brigadier General in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and commander of the Quds Force infected with #COVID19
>>8237454 On this day in history Andrew Johnson first Potus to be peach minted
>>8237547 Set of Pro-Trump memes some aimed at Black female voters bun
>>8237568, >>8237689 Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney Set to Depart Trump Administration After Immigration Defection
>>8237611 World leaders and Oprah @ the Taj Mahal pics
>>8237644 Zillow Group, Inc Chairman/CEO sold: $12.18m: Feb 20-21
>>8237658, >>8237677 Louis Freeh/Romania diggs
>>8237660 JOHN SOLOMON: Newly Declassified FBI Memos Directly Conflict with Mueller Team Claims in Papadopoulos Sentencing Memo
>>8237750 DPS makes largest meth seizure in department history
>>8238358 #10546
Previously Collected Notables
>>8237091 #10545,
>>8233912 #10541, >>8234704 #10542, >>8235514 #10543, >>8236258 #10544
>>8230886 #10537, >>8231624 #10538, >>8232419 #10539, >>8233182 #10540
>>8227754 #10533, >>8228532 #10534, >>8229318 #10535, >>8230119 #10536
Notables Thread #1, #8960-present: >>7003045
Notables Aggregator: https://wearethene.ws
Notables also archived here: >>>/comms/3396 (#740~#6384), https://8kun.top
#8238713 at 2020-02-25 01:24:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10548: Mueller Team BOOM Edition
Global Announcements
>>8227327 Iwo Jima flag on YouTube for TOR posting
Anons, plz no jpegs, tx
Notables
are not endorsements
#10547
>>8238670 Possible Mueller Team charges: Dig call
>>8238596 Idaho and concealed carry law
>>8238557 Mardi Gras 'Epstein didn't kill himself' float depicts gigantic Hillary strangling him
>>8238471 , >>8238509 'Bearded Builders' grooming products feature the masonic compass. Dig
>>8238477 Former Holyoke kindergarten teacher pleads guilty to possessing child pornography
>>8238348 , >>8238443 Appeals court upholds Trump ban on abortion referrals by family planning clinics
>>8238355 , >>8238540, >>8238614 House Rep's consider filing charges against Muller prosecutors
>>8238351 Assange's lawyers plan to bring in new evidence involving Richard Grenell
>>8238227 Limbaugh: Coronavirus being 'weaponized' to bring down Trump
>>8238315 Phillip Haney: Previous digg on Amador County Sheriff & incident details
>>8238166 New statement on Philip Haney: Investigation ongoing, no conclusion of suicide yet
>>8238162 Impeachment & Dems' socialist agenda drove historic Republican candidate recruitment
>>8237977 'India-US no longer just any partnership, it's far closer'
>>8238701 #10547
#10546
>>8237170 Potus twat cap
>>8237192, >>8237266, >>8237278, >>8237346, >>8237350 Stephen A. Somma, a counterintelligence investigator who works out of the bureau's New York field office, as "Case Agent 1" from the inspector general's (IG) report.
>>8237202 Anons analyze MSM fear pron
>>8237203 Coronavirus eliminating globalism? What do you think?
>>8237355 Reports that Iranian Brigadier General in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and commander of the Quds Force infected with #COVID19
>>8237454 On this day in history Andrew Johnson first Potus to be peach minted
>>8237547 Set of Pro-Trump memes some aimed at Black female voters bun
>>8237568, >>8237689 Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney Set to Depart Trump Administration After Immigration Defection
>>8237611 World leaders and Oprah @ the Taj Mahal pics
>>8237644 Zillow Group, Inc Chairman/CEO sold: $12.18m: Feb 20-21
>>8237658, >>8237677 Louis Freeh/Romania diggs
>>8237660 JOHN SOLOMON: Newly Declassified FBI Memos Directly Conflict with Mueller Team Claims in Papadopoulos Sentencing Memo
>>8237750 DPS makes largest meth seizure in department history
>>8238358 #10546
#10545
>>8236381, >>8236384, >>8236412, >>8236467 1MDB Scandal involving Thailand and Malaysia
>>8236400 POTUS Schedule for Tuesday, February 25, 2020
>>8236620 Doctor Described as 'Candy Man' and 'El Chapo Of Opioids' Admits Distributing Opioids to Patients
>>8236945 New DJT - coronovirus under control in USA
>>8236957 Margin Calls
>>8236857, >>8236858 New DJT rt Jim Jordn rt CNN article
notetakerss
>>8236381, >>8236384, >>8236412, >>8236467 1MDB Scandal involving Thailand and Malaysia
>>8236400 POTUS Schedule for Tuesday Feb 25th, 2020
>>8236405 Kobe Bryant's widow sues helicopter owner as memorial service takes place in LA-sky news
>>8236421, >>8236492 CIA responds to FOIA request on QAnon. Will not confirm or deny existence of relevant documents
>>8236431 Vice President Pence Participates in a Fireside Chat at Hoover Institution Board of Overseers-live feed
>>8236455, >>8236477, >>8236493, >>8236532, >>8236569, >>8236714, >>8236769, >>8236799, >>8236919, >>8236984, >>8237044, >>8237131 Planefags
>>8236476 President Trump on a Warpath with a "Deep State" Hit List to Oust 'Never-Trumpers'-gateway pundit
>>8236499 IDF chief warns Gaza clash may not be over, could spiral into greater conflict
>>8236519 Supreme Court to Decide If Faith-Based Foster Care Must Work With Gay Couples-freebeacon.com
>>8236548 DJT Jr. Twat
>>8236575 CIA "Glomar Response" on QANON Documents-blackvault.com
>>8236595 Bannon vid on CCCP/Corona virus
>>8236670, >>8236834, >>8236877 Louis Freeh/Romania digs
>>8236768 US weighs expelling Chinese journalists after American reporters banned in 'egregious act'-washexaminer
>>8236775 Ingersoll Rand, Plc Chairman/CEO sold: $9.11m: Feb 20
>>8236857 New POTUS tweet
>>8236898 US intelligence briefer appears to have overstated assessment of 2020 Russian interference-cnn
>>8236945 New POTUS Tweet
>>8236953 Sanders comes under fire for Castro comments
>>8237091 #10545
Previously Collected Notables
>>8233912 #10541, >>8234704 #10542, >>8235514 #10543, >>8236258 #10544
>>8230886 #10537, >>8231624 #10538, >>8232419 #10539, >>8233182 #10540
>>8227754 #10533, >>8228532 #10534, >>8229318 #10535, >>8230119 #10536
Notables Thread #1, #8960-present: >>7003045
Notables Aggregator: https://wearethene.ws
Notables also archived here: >>>/comms/3396 (#740~#6384), https://8kun.top
#8238358 at 2020-02-25 00:41:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10547: World War Q Edition
#10546
>>8237170 Potus twat cap
>>8237192, >>8237266, >>8237278, >>8237346, >>8237350 Stephen A. Somma, a counterintelligence investigator who works out of the bureau's New York field office, as "Case Agent 1" from the inspector general's (IG) report.
>>8237202 Anons analyze MSM fear pron
>>8237203 Coronavirus eliminating globalism? What do you think?
>>8237355 Reports that Iranian Brigadier General in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and commander of the Quds Force infected with #COVID19
>>8237454 On this day in history Andrew Johnson first Potus to be peach minted
>>8237547 Set of Pro-Trump memes some aimed at Black female voters bun
>>8237568, >>8237689 Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney Set to Depart Trump Administration After Immigration Defection
>>8237611 World leaders and Oprah @ the Taj Mahal pics
>>8237644 Zillow Group, Inc Chairman/CEO sold: $12.18m: Feb 20-21
>>8237658, >>8237677 Louis Freeh/Romania diggs
>>8237660 JOHN SOLOMON: Newly Declassified FBI Memos Directly Conflict with Mueller Team Claims in Papadopoulos Sentencing Memo
>>8237750 DPS makes largest meth seizure in department history
#10546
#8238314 at 2020-02-25 00:38:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10547: World War Q Edition
#10546
Posted in #10547
>>8237170 Potus twat cap
>>8237192, >>8237266, >>8237278, >>8237346, >>8237350 Stephen A. Somma, a counterintelligence investigator who works out of the bureau's New York field office, as "Case Agent 1" from the inspector general's (IG) report.
>>8237202 Anons analyze MSM fear pron
>>8237203 Coronavirus eliminating globalism? What do you think?
>>8237355 Reports that Iranian Brigadier General in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and commander of the Quds Force infected with #COVID19
>>8237454 On this day in history Andrew Johnson first Potus to be peach minted
>>8237547 Set of Pro-Trump memes some aimed at Black female voters bun
>>8237568, >>8237689 Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney Set to Depart Trump Administration After Immigration Defection
>>8237611 World leaders and Oprah @ the Taj Mahal pics
>>8237644 Zillow Group, Inc Chairman/CEO sold: $12.18m: Feb 20-21
>>8237658, >>8237677 Louis Freeh/Romania diggs
>>8237660 JOHN SOLOMON: Newly Declassified FBI Memos Directly Conflict with Mueller Team Claims in Papadopoulos Sentencing Memo
>>8237750 DPS makes largest meth seizure in department history
#8238279 at 2020-02-25 00:34:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10547: World War Q Edition
attn baker
slight typo in notables from last bread. Should be Andrew Johnson
>>8237454 On this day in history Andrew Jackson first Potus to be peach minted
#8237454 at 2020-02-24 22:44:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10546: C_A Ghosts in The Machine Edition
OnThisDay 152 years ago-2/24/1868-Andrew Johnson became first POTUS to be impeached.
House of Representatives passed articles of impeachment related to Johnson violating Tenure of Office Act.
Rep. James Garfield was away from Washington, missed impeachment vote.
https://twitter.com/GarfieldNPS/status/1231977748018683904
#8158319 at 2020-02-16 23:32:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10443: #17 In The Lead Edition
>>8158274
Some of us know a little History
George Washington becomes a Master Mason
George Washington, a young Virginia planter, becomes a Master Mason, the highest basic rank in the secret fraternity of Freemasonry. The ceremony was held at the Masonic Lodge No. 4 in Fredericksburg, Virginia. Washington was 21 years old and would soon command his first military operation as a major in the Virginia colonial militia.
Freemasonry evolved from the practices and rituals of the stonemasons' guilds in the Middle Ages. With the decline of European cathedral building, "lodges" decided to admit non-stonemasons to maintain membership, and the secret fraternal order grew in popularity in Europe. In 1717, the first Grand Lodge, an association of lodges, was founded in England, and Freemasonry was soon disseminated throughout the British Empire. The first American Mason lodge was established in Philadelphia in 1730, and future revolutionary leader Benjamin Franklin was a founding member.
There is no central Masonic authority, and Freemasons are governed locally by the order's many customs and rites. Members trace the origins of Masonry back to the erecting of King Solomon's Temple in biblical times and are expected to believe in the "Supreme Being," follow specific religious rites, and maintain a vow of secrecy concerning the order's ceremonies. The Masons of the 18th century adhered to liberal democratic principles that included religious toleration, loyalty to local government, and the importance of charity. From its inception, Freemasonry encountered considerable opposition from organized religion, especially from the Roman Catholic Church.
For George Washington, joining the Masons was a rite of passage and an expression of his civic responsibility. After becoming a Master Mason, Washington had the option of passing through a series of additional rites that would take him to higher "degrees." In 1788, shortly before becoming the first president of the United States, Washington was elected the first Worshipful Master of Alexandria Lodge No. 22.
Many other leaders of the American Revolution, including Paul Revere, John Hancock, the Marquis de Lafayette, and the Boston Tea Party saboteurs, were also Freemasons, and Masonic rites were witnessed at such events as Washington's presidential inauguration and the laying of the cornerstone of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C.-a city supposedly designed with Masonic symbols in mind. Masonic symbols, approved by Washington in the design of the Great Seal of the United States, can be seen on the one-dollar bill. The All-Seeing Eye above an unfinished pyramid is unmistakably Masonic, and the scroll beneath, which proclaims the advent of a "New Secular Order" in Latin, is one of Freemasonry's long-standing goals. The Great Seal appeared on the dollar bill during the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, also a Mason.
Freemasonry has continued to be important in U.S. politics, and at least 15 presidents, five Supreme Court chief justices, and numerous members of Congress have been Masons. Presidents known to be Masons include Washington, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, James Garfield, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Warren Harding, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, and Gerald Ford. Today there are an estimated two million Masons in the United States.
Citation Information
Article Title
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/washington-becomes-master-mason
Access Date
.
#8040973 at 2020-02-05 22:37:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10292: 53-47! Senate was the Target Edition
>>8040898
Left is going batshit crazy with "Trump is the only president whom a member of his own party in the Senate voted to remove!"
That's not the story.
The story is that GOP don't like removing presidents.
On May 16, 1868, the Senate voted 35 to 19 to remove President Andrew Johnson from office-one vote short of the necessary two-thirds. For many of these 54 senators, this was unquestionably the single most difficult vote of their congressional careers. Seven Republican senators-William Pitt Fessenden, James Grimes, Edmund Ross, Peter Van Winkle, John B. Henderson, Joseph Fowler, and Lyman Trumbull-courageously defied their party's leadership and voted with the 12 Democratic senators to acquit the president-thereby saving him and, possibly, the institution of the presidency.
10 R Senators voted to acquit Clinton.
So in both Johnson and Clinton, tried and acquitted, it was the GOP who refused to remove the President from office.
#7985529 at 2020-02-01 02:20:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10220: 17 Deep At The Brexit Bar Edition
>>7985505
>>7985201
Chuck Schumer (D-NY) hopefully asked presiding officer Chief Justice John Roberts Friday evening if he was aware of a precedent for him casting tie-breaking votes as the Senate prepared to cast more votes to table several Schumer resolutions on witnesses and evidence.
Schumer cited the 1868 Senate impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson presided over by Chief Justice Salmon Chase in which he cast two tie-breaking votes.
Roberts was ready for the question and carefully read his reply:
I am, Mr. Leader. Uh, the one concerned a motion to adjourn, the other concerned a motion to close deliberations. Uh, I do not regard those isolated episodes a-hundred-and-fifty years ago as sufficient to support a general authority to break ties. If the members of this body, elected by the People and accountable to them, divide equally on a motion, the normal rule is that the motion fails. I think it would be inappropriate for me, an unelected official from a different branch of government, to assert the power to change that result so that the motion would succeed.
#7985201 at 2020-02-01 01:54:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10220: 17 Deep At The Brexit Bar Edition
Roberts Dashes Democrats' Hopes, Tells Schumer He Will Not Cast Tie-Breaking Votes in Impeachment Trial (Video)
When it rains it pours. Having lost the main vote for new witnesses and documents Friday afternoon during the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump on a narrow, near party line vote of 51-49, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) hopefully asked presiding officer Chief Justice John Roberts Friday evening if he was aware of a precedent for him casting tie-breaking votes as the Senate prepared to cast more votes to table several Schumer resolutions on witnesses and evidence.
Roberts Dashes Democrats' Hopes, Tells Schumer He Will Not Cast Tie-Breaking Votes in Impeachment Trial (Video)
Avatar by Kristinn Taylor January 31, 2020
When it rains it pours. Having lost the main vote for new witnesses and documents Friday afternoon during the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump on a narrow, near party line vote of 51-49, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) hopefully asked presiding officer Chief Justice John Roberts Friday evening if he was aware of a precedent for him casting tie-breaking votes as the Senate prepared to cast more votes to table several Schumer resolutions on witnesses and evidence.
Schumer cited the 1868 Senate impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson presided over by Chief Justice Salmon Chase in which he cast two tie-breaking votes.
Roberts was ready for the question and carefully read his reply:
I am, Mr. Leader. Uh, the one concerned a motion to adjourn, the other concerned a motion to close deliberations. Uh, I do not regard those isolated episodes a-hundred-and-fifty years ago as sufficient to support a general authority to break ties. If the members of this body, elected by the People and accountable to them, divide equally on a motion, the normal rule is that the motion fails. I think it would be inappropriate for me, an unelected official from a different branch of government, to assert the power to change that result so that the motion would succeed.
.@SenSchumer's parliamentary inquiry and Chief Justice John Roberts' response
Watch live on C-SPAN2 - https://t.co/6orLpAxTYm pic.twitter.com/Rie1V99sFN
- CSPAN (@cspan) February 1, 2020
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/roberts-dashes-democrats-hopes-tells-schumer-he-will-not-cast-tie-breaking-votes-in-impeachment-trial-video/
#7984419 at 2020-02-01 00:49:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10219: Brexit Bar Now Serving! Edition
Chief Justice John Roberts tells Chuck Schumer that the impeachment of Andrew Johnson is not "sufficient precedent" to break ties, says "it would be inappropriate for me, an unelected official at a different branch of government to change the rules."
twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/1223399965646622720
#7981920 at 2020-01-31 21:58:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10216: CORONA_OFFLINE_Deac[0000]. The Games R FUN! Edition
Congressional Research Service
Provides Information to Congress
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46185
Page 19
Voting on Articles of Impeachment
Conviction requires a guilty vote on at least one article of impeachment by two-thirds of Senators
present. Assuming 100 Senators present, the support of 67 Senators is needed to convict on an
article. If fewer Senators are present, the threshold to convict will accordingly be reduced as well
(e.g., 97 Senators present would require 65 votes to convict). A response of "present" effectively
supports acquittal, as it counts in the denominator against which the threshold to convict is
calculated.78
Following closed door deliberations on the final question of whether to convict or acquit an
impeached officer, the Senate reconvenes in open session to vote on the articles of impeachment.
Articles are typically voted on in the order they were exhibited by House Managers.
79 It is not in
order to further divide an article.
80
Pursuant to Impeachment Rule XXIII, the Presiding Officer puts the question on each article
separately, and each vote is required to be by roll call. The legislative clerk is directed to read the
article of impeachment aloud and then the roll is called, to which Senators must rise from their
seats and answer "guilty" or "not guilty" on the question of impeachment.
81 Voting on the articles
of impeachment is to continue without interruption, pursuant to Rule XXII, unless the Senate
adjourns the trial. After voting has commenced, adjournments of the trial can be for only one day,
or sine die, that is, without a specific date to return, if ever.
82 Under the rule, a motion to
reconsider a vote on an article of impeachment is not in order.
Under Senate Standing Rule XII, Senators are required to vote upon call of their name unless
excused by the Senate or due to a conflict of interest. The question of excusing a Senator from
voting is disposed of after the call of the roll is completed but before the result is announced.83
77 Congressional Record, daily edition, (February 9, 1999) pp. S1386-S1387.
78 Riddick's Senate Procedure, p. 879.
79 During the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson, the Senate agreed to a motion directing that the eleventh
article of impeachment be read and voted on first.
80 Rule XXIII was amended in 1986 to include its current language about articles not being divisible. Earlier, an article
of impeachment had been divided into three parts by motion, each of which received a separate vote during the 1862
impeachment trial of Judge West Humphreys.
81 During voting on the two articles of impeachment in the Senate trial of President William J. Clinton, Senator Arlen
Specter responded "not proven, therefore, not guilty" reportedly in a reference to a third verdict of "not proved"
provided for under Scottish law. Senator Specter explained his vote in remarks inserted into the Congressional Record
that "I consulted with the Parliamentarian and examined the Senate precedents and found that if I voted simply 'not
proven,' that I would be marked on the voting roles as 'present.' I also found that a response of 'present,' and
inferentially the equivalent of 'present,' could be challenged and that I could be forced to cast a vote of 'yea' or 'nay.'"
Congressional Record daily edition, vol. 145 (March 2, 1999), p. S2140.
82 During the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson, the Senate only voted on three of eleven articles of
impeachment before adjourning sine die. The eight remaining articles resulted in acquittals in the absence of a twothirds affirmative vote to convict. Hinds' Precedents, vol. 3, ch. 76, §2443, pp. 900-901.
83 U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, Procedure and Guidelines for Impeachment Trials
The Impeachment Process in the Senate
Congressional Research Service 20
Senators have been excused from voting on articles of impeachment in past trials due to their
absences from arguments or owing to their participation as a witness in the trial. (Senators have
also been excused from participating in the trial at all; see above "Organizing for the Trial.")
If an officer is convicted by two-thirds of Senators present, "such a vote operates automatically
and instantaneously to separate the person impeached from office."
84 The Senate may then choose
to take the additional action to move to disqualify a convicted officer from holding further office,
although this step is not required. The Senate has established that a vote to disqualify requires a
simple majority voting affirmatively, and not two-thirds as with conviction.85
#7979486 at 2020-01-31 18:31:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10212: Q~ The Great Awakening Edition
>>7979204
>>7979410
In the end, they punted, omitting a reference to the issue in the standing rules. These proposed rules later formed the basis for the current standing rules, which were passed in 1986. They remain silent on that issue.
Don't the standing rules actually give the Chief Justice the right to subpoena witnesses on his own?
That view was advanced in a New York Times op-ed by a former Acting Solicitor General, a Georgetown Law professor, and a former Republican Congressman. The authors focused on Rule V of the standing rules, which says the presiding officer-the chief justice during a presidential impeachment-has the power "by himself" to issue "all orders … authorized by these rules or by the Senate."
Goldman contends that the op-ed authors are misreading the rules. "Rule V is subject to Rule VI," he says, and Rule VI explains that it's only "the Senate" that has the power to "compel the attendance of witnesses." Any other reading makes little sense, he argues. The "presiding officer" in a non-presidential impeachment could be any senator filling in as President of the Senate pro tempore-even a lowly freshman, he observes. The rules could not have contemplated giving that one person, acting on his own, the power to issue subpoenas.
The Senate report for the 1986 standing rules seems to lend some support for Goldman's view. It says that Rule V simply authorizes the presiding officer "to issue Senate processes and to enforce Senate regulation and orders"-making it sound as thought he'd be carrying out the will of the Senate rather than substituting his for theirs.
If Chief Justice does choose to vote, can the Senate overrule him?
Yes, but that's when things could get really, really strange. That's because the outcome of the vote-likely to be 50-50, again-can depend on how the question is phrased.
"Say the chief justice breaks a tie," voting for witnesses to be subpoenaed, Goldman says, playing out the first scenario. (Remember, the general rule is that a majority vote is required, so ties lose.) "Someone can make a point of order: '[The chief justice] has no right to do that,'" Goldman says. The chief justice rules on the point of order, finding that he does have the right to vote. Someone appeals the chief justice's ruling to the Senate. The question is then posed: "Shall the ruling of the [chief justice]"-i.e., that he has the right to vote-"be sustained as the position of the Senate?" On a 50-50 vote, the chief justice's ruling would not be sustained-i.e., he has no right to cast the vote-and so no witnesses would be called.
But under another scenario, with the same 50-50 vote, the witnesses could be called. That scenario plays out this way: When a senator objects to the chief's casting of a vote, the chief makes no ruling and, instead, immediately submits the appeal to the Senate. "Then the question is: Is the point of order well taken?" Goldman explains. Now, on a 50-50 vote, the point of order fails, so the chief justice's vote counts.
Theoretically, we could even find ourselves in an infinite regress situation. For instance, in the first scenario, after the Senate votes 50-50 on whether to sustain chief justice Roberts' ruling on the point of order, what if the chief justice votes to break that tie, too-bootstrapping himself into being able to vote? And on it goes. But given what we know of Roberts, that scenario is virtually inconceivable.
Is it absolutely clear that the Vice President has no vote?
This brings up the last scenario, the wackiest of all. It's not an "absurd" possibility, Goldman says, though it might be "absurdist."
Remember that during the Andrew Johnson impeachment, there was no sitting vice president. (Johnson had been vice president and ascended to the presidency upon Lincoln's assassination, leaving the vice presidency vacant.) So this issue did not arise.
As the Bill Clinton impeachment trial approached, Goldman says, Vice President Al Gore raised the possibility of participating in some manner. But Sen. Byrd told him not to.
Still, what if President Trump sent Vice President Pence to the Senate floor? In the case of a 50-50 vote on witnesses, Pence could cast the tie-breaking vote-citing Article I, Section 3, Clause 6-preempting the possibility of the chief justice casting the critical vote. Then the outcome would depend on whether the chief justice permitted Pence's vote, and on the phrasing of the ensuing points of orders.
Given the uncertainties in the rules, and the level of partisanship in play, this last scenario would be "wild, but not outrageous," says Goldman.
Page 3
https://www.newsweek.com/chief-justice-john-roberts-tiebreaker-if-senate-ties-50-50-whether-call-impeachment-witnesses-1484971
#7979410 at 2020-01-31 18:26:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10212: Q~ The Great Awakening Edition
>>7979204
Not a law fag but here's something I found;
IS CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS THE TIEBREAKER IF THE SENATE TIES 50-50 ON WHETHER TO CALL IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES?
BY ROGER PARLOFF ON 1/31/20 AT 6:00 AM EST
Will John Roberts cast the deciding vote in the impeachment trials? In this screengrab taken from a Senate Television webcast, Chief Justice John Roberts reads a question from a senator during impeachment proceedings against U.S. President Donald Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol on January 29, 2020 in Washington, DC. Senators have 16 hours to submit written questions to the House managers and the President's defense team.
The House managers' hopes of winning 51 votes in favor of calling witnesses at the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump seem all but dashed.
But what if they eke out a bare 50-50 tie? In that case, they would retain a reed-thin chance of prevailing. But the prospects are uncertain, and some possible scenarios are downright bizarre.
"To be honest, I just don't know how a tie would play out," impeachment historian Frank O. Bowman told Newsweek in an email. Bowman, a professor at the University of Missouri School of Law, is the author of High Crimes and Misdemeanors: A History of Impeachment for the Age of Trump.
On a tie vote, the House managers' last-gasp hope would be for Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., to cast a tie-breaking vote in their favor. But can he? Would he? And what if he even did?
Here's are the relevant questions-and experts' best guess at the answers. The short answer is: it's complicated.
Can Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., cast a vote in the event of a tie?
It's possible. But while some scholars-like Bowman and former Acting Solicitor General Walter Dellinger-believe he may or even probably has that power, others, like Garrett Epps of the University of Baltimore, doubt that he does. And unless Roberts thinks his role leaves him no choice but to cast such a vote, he seems temperamentally unlikely to thrust himself voluntarily into this partisan mess.
Here's the ambiguity. What the Constitution says explicitly (Article I, Section 3, Clause 4) is that the vice president, when sitting as president of the Senate, can cast a vote when the chamber is "equally divided." It also says (Article I, Section 3, Clause 6) that when the Senate is sitting in an impeachment trial concerning the president of the United States-as opposed to, say, a lesser federal officer or federal judge-the chief justice of the United States "shall preside." Most people assume the Framers of the Constitution substituted the chief justice for the vice president in that situation because the vice president-being next in line to assume the Presidency if the impeachment is successful-would have a colossal conflict of interest.
But those sparse sentences leave room for confusion. To some readers, it only stands to reason that the chief justice, when presiding over the Senate, should have the same powers that the vice president can exercise when the Senate sits in legislative session, including the power to cast a tie-breaking vote. But the Constitution never explicitly says that. And since the Constitution also says (Article I, Section 2) that the Senate "shall have the sole power to try all impeachments," it's possible that the Framers would not have wanted to give the chief justice-who is not a senator-such decisive power. So it's unresolved.
But didn't Chief Justice Salmon Chase cast several tie-breaking votes in the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson in 1868?
He did. So there is that historical precedent, if Chief Justice Roberts chooses to avail himself of it. But, according to Ira Goldman, who has schooled himself in the arcana of Senate Parliamentary rules (he was counsel to former Republican Senator Pete Wilson of California from 1983 to 1991), the Senate itself does not regard the Chase case as an institutional precedent. That's because no Senator challenged Chase's votes with a formal "point of order."
Page 1
https://www.newsweek.com/chief-justice-john-roberts-tiebreaker-if-senate-ties-50-50-whether-call-impeachment-witnesses-1484971
Page 1
#7976650 at 2020-01-31 13:21:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10209: Nigel Farage, Happy Brexit Day! Edition
>>7976630
i hear what you are saying, but some have said that he could make a judgement, like a previous justice did in Andrew Johnson peachmint.
said it would be unprecedented and that the Rs would probably band together to vote to overturn him.
I am just saying that he could try to render a judgement just to cause chaos.
#7970058 at 2020-01-30 22:50:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10200: Kangaroo Congress Edition
READ THIS
TODAY IS
55,400 DAYS Since Andrew Johnson Impeachment Failed (Mirrored "45" twice??)
AND… Gene Hackman's (spitting image of President Johnson) 90th Birthday. What The Heck!?!?
Gene Hack-man (AKA President Andrew Johnson) 90th birthday today. ALSO IMPEACHED (Johnson that is…who was Abe Lincoln's Dem VP)
What and appropriate name?
Gene Hack-man???
Numbers written in tweet are "two four one two"
Time of tweet is "one two two fours"
Twitter trending with 10.2K tweets
What eXactly might they trying to tell us?
Why 2 images (nearly identical) in tweet?
Why B/W?
What's that "straw" or "reed" coming down from above intersecting his head?
Re: President Andrew Johnson Impeachment:
on February 24, 1868 (really???…also 55th day of year), the House impeached the President for intentionally violating the Tenure of Office Act, by a vote of 128 to 47.
On 3-5 the senate trial began.
May 16th AND May 26th (2 articles votes) yielded same exact results:
35 (lotta "35" going on here) Senators voted "guilty" and 19 "not guilty", thus falling short by a single vote of the two-thirds majority required for conviction under the Constitution.
His name if "Fucked up the ass" if you think about it.
An[us]drew (draw in) Penis/Johnson (or toilet AI on)
Senator Wade from Ohio (a "radical" in favor of women voting) would have taken over if Andrew Johnson had been impeached.
Gene Hackman played Republican "Coalition for Moral Order" Ohio Senator Kevin Keeley in "The Birdcage" (speaking of butt-sex)
Drag Queen's in Birdcages also heavy Saturnalia/Christmas symbolism (gif related from Philadelphia parade).
Most of you think I'm crazy drawing these connections, but I think it's that crazy of a reality in which we live.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Johnson#Impeachment
https://twitter.com/HGAFilms/status/1222757353348423680
#7960289 at 2020-01-30 02:00:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10188: Night Shift On Approach Edition
>>7960264
The Role of Chief Justice in an Impeachment Trial
Part 2
The Senate's standing rules for impeachment trials make no distinction between the powers of the chief justice presiding in an impeachment and those of any other officer in the same role. The job is referred to throughout as "Presiding Officer" and its authority is the same regardless of who holds it. The rules nominally give the presiding officer considerable power, including the power to issue "orders, mandates, writs, and precepts" (Rule V), to "direct all the forms of proceedings while the Senate is sitting for the purpose of trying and impeachment" (Rule VII), and to "rule on all questions of evidence including, but not limited to, questions of relevancy, materiality, and redundancy of evidence" (Rule VII). But in every case, this apparent authority is subject to the critical limitation that the presiding officer may only act in accordance with the will of the Senate.
For example, if the presiding officer makes a ruling on the relevance of evidence proffered by either the House managers or counsel for the president, that ruling can be questioned by any senator and overruled by a simple majority vote (Rule VII). Unlike in an ordinary trial, there is no higher court to which such a senatorial judgment can be appealed. The Senate itself is the final authority on every procedural or evidentiary question.
The essential impotence of the presiding officer is exacerbated by the fact that the Senate impeachment rules are very general and contain no provisions similar to the Federal Rules of Evidence regulating the admission or exclusion of witnesses, exhibits or particular testimony. If such rules existed, the presiding officer could base his or her rulings on their text, which would make votes to overturn such rulings at least politically or psychologically difficult so long as the presiding officer's interpretation of the rules seemed logically sound. But as matters stand, every question ultimately rests in the unguided, and inevitably politically driven, discretion of a majority of senators.
Despite the formal powerlessness of the role, one could imagine a chief justice thrust into the presiding officer seat who wanted to make a principled statement about the constitutional merits of the case against the president, even if that statement flew in the face of the preferences of a senatorial majority. Such a chief justice might take every available opportunity to rule in favor of, for example, the issuance of subpoenas or the production of witnesses and documents by the president. It seems improbable that Roberts would take this course. Whatever his personal views about Trump, his most likely priority will be to avoid any appearance of partiality, which might imperil his own posture of judicial neutrality and with it the Supreme Court's institutional legitimacy.
Happily for the chief justice, the Senate rules give him an easy way of avoiding any expression of view on any difficult issue. Whenever presented with a question on the admissibility of evidence, the presiding officer need not even make a provisional ruling but instead can immediately "submit any such question to a vote of the Members of the Senate" (Rule VII).
What little precedent we have in such cases suggests that chief justices keep their heads down and, so far as possible, defer assiduously to the will of the Senate majority. In the 1868 trial of President Andrew Johnson (which was a real trial, with extensive witness testimony and presentation of exhibits), Chief Justice Salmon Chase was consistently deferential to the Senate, often making provisional rulings and immediately inviting senators to register dissent. Chief Justice William Rehnquist was similarly meek during the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, although he was called upon to do less because the case was effectively submitted to the Senate on stipulated facts. The exceptional degree of partisanship that has characterized the Trump impeachment may counsel even greater caution from Roberts.
I can foresee only two circumstances in which Roberts' judgment on any important question would have a dispositive effect.
First, if he were to render a provisional ruling on a procedural or evidentiary point - say admitting contested evidence - under the rules, his ruling would stand unless a majority of the Senate voted to the contrary. Thus, on a 50-50 split, Roberts' ruling would prevail. However, before this situation could arise, Roberts would have to have made a ruling himself, rather than immediately deferring to a Senate vote.
#7932095 at 2020-01-27 20:36:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10151: Big Things Coming! Hold the Line! Edition
Ken Starr Accuses House Democrats Of Delivering Impeachment Articles 'Dripping With Process Violations'
Ken Starr took the Senate floor Monday and ripped into House Democrats for turning over articles of impeachment that he claimed were "dripping with process violations."
Starr, who once led the prosecution against former President Bill Clinton, delivered his remarks in defense of President Donald Trump as his impeachment trial continued in the Senate.
Starr made several comparisons to prior impeachments, criticizing the House for moving forward despite having no Republican support whatsoever. He then took aim at the House for changing the process in a lopsided fashion. (RELATED: 'It's Over': Ken Starr Says No Doubt Schiff Will Move On Articles Of Impeachment After Sondland Testimony)
"But then again, the House members took no oath to be impartial," Starr said. "The Constitution didn't require them to say by oath or affirmation like an impartial justice. They were oathless. They could toss out their own rule book. Raw power."
Starr went on to argue that the articles of impeachment against President Trump were indicative of a "runaway House" that had run from its own processes and even the Constitution in order to reach a desired conclusion. Instead, he suggested, they provided the Senate with an "exit ramp," adding, "House Democrats chose to conduct an unprecedented process in this case, and they were warned at every turn, don't do it, don't do it that way."
"The president is being denied the basic rights that have been afforded to every single accused president in the history of the republic, even to the racist Andrew Johnson, seeking to undo Mr. Lincoln's great legacy. He got those rights, but not here," Starr continued. "Due Process could have been honored. Basic rights could have been honored. The House rules, the House's traditions could have been honored, but what is done is done. These two articles come before this court, this high court of impeachment, dripping with fundamental process violations."
Starr concluded by addressing the Senate and demanding that they apply the standards written into the Constitution's preamble.
"The very first order of our government after to form a more perfect union is to establish justice, to establish justice, even before getting to the words to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare, to ensure domestic tranquility, the Constitution works to establish justice," he said.
"Courts would not allow this. They would not allow this because why?" Starr added. "They knew and they know that the purpose of our founding instrument is to protect our liberties. To safeguard us, but to safeguard us as individuals against the powers of government ... to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. Liberty under law."
https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/27/ken-starr-house-democrats-impeachment-process-violations/
#7931259 at 2020-01-27 19:20:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10150: "Now Playing" The Hunters are Now the Hunted Edition
>>7931252
Republican Peach Mint Defense Mon Jan 27 2020
PAGE 2
Ken Starr
talks about impartiality & the process of impeachment
we're living in the "age of impeachment"
House has discussed for months
How did we get here?
Story begins 42 years ago after Watergate
Ethics in Govt Act 1978 - Independent Counsel provision
Justice Dept: IC is unconstitutional bc it interferes with executive branch
SCOTUS disagreed, upheld the statute
But Scalia dissented: "statute is acrid with the small of threatened impeachment"
Why? Because it directed the IC to become an agent of the House of Reps; very low threshold to impeachment
Clinton signed reauthorized measure into law–and Whitewater inquiry commenced
After Clinton's acquittal: end of IC Era ("enough was enough")
21 year IC experiment ended: Congress allowed the law to expire in 1999
Replaced by Justice Dept regs by Janet Reno; there is no reference to impeachment; poison pill provisions were gone
Impeachment would not longer be embedded in the law of the land
Dawn of 21st century: impeachment habit proved to be hard to kick
UK: impeachment process disappeared; Parliament said it was obsolete bc it does not meet modern proc. stds of fairness 10:30 PSD
But in US, impeachment became a weapon; Peggy Noonan: "impeachment has now been normalized"
Of 63 impeachment inquiries authorized by the House, only 8 have been convicted–all were Federal judges
[discusses historical impeachment proceedings, including Andrew Johnson]
Wasn't til a century later that impeachment was used again: Nixon
But it was bipartisan.
"Like war, impeachment is hell. Or at least, Presidental is hell." It's like domestic warfare.
[What Senate should ask:] Was there a crime alleged?
Re impeachment: Constitution uses the "language of crimes"
Framers wanted to limit the power of impeachment
Has the House, with these 2 articles of impeachment, charged a crime or not?
Johnson, Clinton, Nixon impeachments charged crimes
No crimes are alleged in Trump impeachment
Here there is no national consensus [not bipartisan]
[Starr's whole presentation seems more designed to educate the public than the Senators]
Alternative to impeachment = oversight.
Example: Iran-Contra [but even then a measure to impeach Reagan was introduced]
Starr: "Let the people decide"
Factors counseling restraint:
* articles don't charge a crime
* no bipartisan support
* [issue of] process & [interference with] executive privilege
On due process & executive privilege:
[VERY IMPORTANT to protect executive privilege, to avoid "injuring the Presidency"]
All subpoenas issued before House 660 [when House voted for impeachment] are INVALID
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/660/all-info [passed 10/31/19]
[Re obstruction: cannot be supported]
It's not an impeachable offense for POTUS to defend constitutional prerogatives of the Presidency
This House turned its back on its own established procedures
"All those procedures were torn asunder" over the objections of the [repub] minority
But they were under no oligation to be non-partison; "they were oathless"
This was a runaway House, despite being warned "don't do it that way"
Due process could have been honored…but what's done is done"
This procedure is "dripping with fundamental process violations"
Justice: Constitutional priority; thus courts would not allow this [House procedure]
Why? "To secure the blessings of liberty….liberty under law 11:11am pst
Sekulow/Purpura next
con't
#7800707 at 2020-01-13 15:33:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9984: Q+ Bringin The Heat This Mornin Edition
Who published the first Book of Constitutions in America?
Ben Franklin was a Master Mason in Philadelphia when he published the first Masonic publication in the New World, The Book of Constitutions, in 1734.
Did Masons participate in the Revolutionary War?
Masons played an important part in the formation of the United States and especially in the Revolutionary War and the events that led up to this war. It is commonly believed that the lodge rooms of a Boston Masonic Lodge served as the dressing room for the so-called Indians who threw the Boston Tea Party. Paul Revere, who later went on to be Grand Master of Massachusetts, was thought to be one of those Indians.
What part did Masons play in the formation of the new government?
Because of incomplete records, authorities differ on such matters as: How many Masons signed the Declaration of Independence? The Constitution? How many Presidents of the United States were Masons? Of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, the number eight is usually accepted as the absolute minimum of Masons who signed the document. Though some evidence exists to show another 24 were Masons, it is not regularly accepted that they were Masons. Clearly, 13 of the 39 who signed the Constitution were members of Masonic lodges. Of the others, absolute proof has not been found.
How much influence did the Masonic fraternity have on the creation of our system of government?
In 1717, in England, local Masonic lodges created a system whereby they sent representatives to a body called the Grand Lodge, which governed them all. The Grand Lodge then elected its own Grand Master. The experiment, which began in this country in 1788, is one in which states send their representatives to a Congress. And if Brother Alexander Hamilton had prevailed, the Congress would be electing the President of the United States. Sound familiar?
A number of authorities report that General George Washington's staff looked like a Masonic convention. The list of American Masons in Washington's service included many of his Generals. Other revolutionary heroes included Patrick Henry, Nathan Hale, and John Paul Jones, just to name a few. The record shows that by 1800 there were 347 lodges in the United States.
Who were/are some famous American Masons?
The history of Masonry and the history of this country are very clearly interwoven although there is no way in this short space to go into any great detail. The following is a short list of some well known Masons.
Masonic Presidents include George Washington, James Munroe, Andrew Jackson, James K. Polk, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, James A. Garfield, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Warren G. Harding, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, and Gerald Ford. Evidence exists to suggest that James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were also Masons.
It wasn't only the successful presidential candidates who were Masons, but some of those who lost as well. Men like Thomas E. Dewey, Alf Landon, Hubert H. Humphrey, Robert Dole, George McGovern, Barry Goldwater, Estes Kefauver, George Wallace, Earl Warren, and John Sparkman as well as Wendell Wilke and Adlai Stevenson (not the governor of Illinois, but his father, the Vice President in 1892 - and a native son from Bloomington, Illinois).
#7791431 at 2020-01-12 14:19:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9972: Comfy In Thy Morning Bread Edition
George Conway and Neal Katyal advise Pelosi on how to trip up McConnell's impeachment plans
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/george-conway-and-neal-katyal-advise-pelosi-on-how-to-trip-up-mcconnells-impeachment-plans/
On Friday, conservative attorney George Conway and law professor Neal Katyal wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post suggesting a key way that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) could get the upper hand on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).
Specifically, they argued, Pelosi should "split up" the articles of impeachment - submitting the article of obstruction of Congress, but holding onto the article of abuse of power for further investigation.
"Separating the two articles - our preferred approach - would make perfect sense," they wrote. "When it comes to the second article, all the evidence about Trump's obstruction is a matter of public record. There's nothing more to add, so the second article is ripe for trial. But as to the first, although there is plenty of evidence demonstrating Trump's guilt, his obstruction has prevented all of the evidence from coming to light."
"Since the House voted to approve the articles of impeachment last month, new revelations of Trump's involvement have emerged, including emails showing that aid was ordered withheld from Ukraine 91 minutes after Trump's supposedly 'perfect' phone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky," they wrote. "Trump's former national security adviser, John Bolton, has said he is willing to testify before the Senate if subpoenaed, and Bolton's lawyer has said he has new information, yet McConnell has balked at assurances that Bolton would be called."
"How can one conduct a 'trial' without knowing this evidence?" they continued. "As lawyers, we have never heard of a trial without witnesses. Both past impeachment trials of presidents featured witnesses - including 41 in the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson. And the lack of witnesses is particularly striking given the shell game Trump and his Republican colleagues have played. In the House, Trump prevented executive branch employees from testifying, but said some of them would be able to testify in the Senate. Now that we are in the Senate, Republicans say these folks should have testified in the House. Lewis Carroll would be pleased."
"McConnell claims he is adhering to the rules in the impeachment of President Bill Clinton," they said. "But there's one big difference: Clinton didn't gag all the witnesses and documents in the House and the predecessor investigation; as a result, there was a full record before the Senate. And there were, in fact, witnesses who were deposed as part of the Senate trial nonetheless. This time, the reason this evidence wasn't generated in the House has everything to do with the defendant in the impeachment case itself. That is the case for sending up the second article now, to put the spotlight on Trump's obstructionism."
"Holding the first article back and letting the second go forward would be a powerful and precise response to McConnell's unprecedented attempts to avoid committing to a real trial," they concluded. "It makes practical sense but also highlights what's at stake here. Trump would be forced to undergo two impeachment trials instead of one - but that's a fair price for him to pay for his attempts to hide evidence from the American people."
#7757483 at 2020-01-09 01:47:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9928: Butthurt Senators Edition
>>7757297
>>7757312
http://www.civilwarshades.org/document/Andrew-Johnson-in-masonic-regalia/
#7757297 at 2020-01-09 01:33:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9928: Butthurt Senators Edition
Andrew Johnson
NOT Gene Hackman
unless President Andrew Johnson WAS a gene-hack man?
Wikipedia pic 1875 age 66
They didn't have Bart Simpson calling the bartender (Moe, MO, modus operandi) with "funny" names all the time for no reason.
#7749212 at 2020-01-08 07:19:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9917: Gonna See His Pic On The Cover of the RS! Edition
>>7748789
C at was 2 in tents when he would reed and smoke fags while consuming B ear. Plane wit m at ches is know gaym..
Andrew Johnson was the first POTUS to be impeached.
And looks like Gene Hackman in his 1875 (age 66) Wikipedia pic.
gene-hack
man
Siriusly W-hats going ON?
Gene. Hack. Man.
Oy vey.
#7608195 at 2019-12-24 12:22:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9733: Almost Ebake Edition
>>7608139
Found a couple of interesting Christmas items in the countries history. There were a couple more but I stuck with these two. The first everyone knows. The second is interesting mentioning the role Speed played in amnesty after the civil war.
https://www.businessinsider.com/christmas-day-military-battles-2017-12#1776-george-washington-crosses-the-delaware-river-1
1776 - George Washington crosses the Delaware
Washington led his troops across a 300-yard stretch of the Delaware River in the dead of night between December 25 and 26, 1776.
The surprise move would put Washington's men a 19-mile march away from a garrison of Hessians (German mercenaries hired by the British to help them in their effort to retain a hold on the rebelling colonies) that the Continental Army took completely by surprise.
The Hessians' quick surrender at the Battle of Trenton would be the first of two rebel victories in New Jersey (the other being the Battle of Princeton a week later) as the Continental Army regained control of the colony. This effectively reversed the British drive that had pushed the rebels across New Jersey in the previous months. The daring crossing of the Delaware ended up being one of the turning points of the war.
1868 - US President Andrew Johnson pardons former Confederate soldiers
Andrew Johnson pardons rebels at white house
President Andrew Johnson Pardoning Rebels at the White House en.wikipedia.org
Nearly a century later, on Christmas Day of 1868, US president Andrew Johnson extended a full pardon and amnesty "to all and to every person who, directly or indirectly, participated in the late insurrection or rebellion."
The internecine war had ended more than three years earlier, taking more American lives than any other conflict in history. But Union General Ulysses S. Grant's scorched earth tactics late in the war left much of the South in ruins, and the country emerged from the war in a state of deep division.
Johnson had been a Tennessee congressman, senator, and governor before joining Abraham Lincoln's presidential ticket. He was tipped in part to attract southern votes. Yet at war's end he seemed bent on imposing harsh conditions on the defeated half of the country.
The day after being sworn in as the nation's president, he asserted that "treason must be made infamous, and traitors must be impoverished."
But according to the History Department at North Carolina State University, Attorney General James Speed tempered Johnson's punitive intentions: "Mercy must be largely extended. Some of the great leaders and offenders only must be made to feel the extreme rigor of the law," Speed advised.
Southerners enjoyed only conditional and limited pardoning (depending on their station during the war) - at least until this blanket amnesty on "the 25th day of December, A. D. 1868."
#7604285 at 2019-12-24 01:15:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9728: Your Voice And Your Vote Matters Edition
>>7604274
>>7604268
>>7604262
>>7604231
ONE CHAMBER CHECKS THE OTHER
Schiff, Pelosi and Nadler wielded their authority with a hammer. Their abusive impeachment inquiry broke from historical precedent. They cracked the whip with stealth force. And the framers knew such abuses would occur. The majority opinion in Nixon quotes Federalist Paper No. 66 in discussing that the framers intended each chamber of Congress be a check on the other, whenever one might abuse its sole power regarding impeachment:
"Nixon fears that if the Senate is given unreviewable authority to interpret the Impeachment Trial Clause, there is a grave risk that the Senate will usurp judicial power. The Framers anticipated this objection and created two constitutional safeguards to keep the Senate in check. The first safeguard is that the whole of the impeachment power is divided between the two legislative bodies, with the House given the right to accuse and the Senate given the right to judge. Id., No. 66, p. 446. This split of authority 'avoids the inconvenience of making the same persons both accusers and judges; and guards against the danger of persecution from the prevalency of a factious spirit in either of those branches.'" (Emphasis added.)
A "factious spirit" in the House is exactly what the nation just witnessed as Schiff ran his impeachment inquiry from a bunker with an iron fist; exposed phone numbers of House members and journalists; lied to the American people about his staff meeting with the whistleblower; and read an egregiously prejudicial fictitious bilateral call transcript on the House floor as if it were real.
According to the Supreme Court's holding in Nixon, the Senate has no legal duty to give the House impeachment a trial. And there is certainly no moral reason for the Senate to respect the pain and suffering Schiff has caused by violating every chance for decency and mutual Congressional respect. In the face of such a factious spirit, the Senate has every moral right and reason to end the Congressional abuse by acquitting the President immediately. Impeachment is a political event. The GOP needs to play hardball politics now. The people will vote again in November. Leave it to us.
In 1974, the Duke Law Journal published a comprehensive article about impeachment and removal of the President. The following passage elucidates a simple truth:
"If impeachment, conviction, and removal are to accomplish a therapeutic effect upon the country, it is essential that the public be convinced of the President's guilt in the commission of impeachable offenses and thereby be persuaded that his removal is in the constitutional interest of the country. The citizenry must not only be convinced of this but must also be convinced in bipartisan numbers if impeachment is to be dominantly therapeutic rather than divisive."
There is no bipartisan support for impeachment in the citizenry. Removal of the President will not be therapeutic. It will be divisive on a level we have not seen since the Civil War. The Senate should just end it now.
The Republican Senate majority must rely on the Supreme Court's 9-0 decision in Nixon. It's up to the Senate alone whether they "try" the President. They don't have to. Nothing in the Constitution requires a trial to acquit. The Senate could simply acquit the President, dismiss the impeachment, or adjourn sine die, which is what they did when Andrew Johnson was impeached.
#7583436 at 2019-12-21 21:48:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9701: Learn to Bake! Be a notetaker! Edition
Putin: Russia to Mirror US Sanctions
MOSCOW/WASHINGTON, D.C. - Moscow will reciprocate Washington's new sanctions that are introduced against the country, Russian President Vladimir Putin said at his traditional annual news conference on Thursday, when commenting on reports that US Congress approved a large package of anti-Russian sanctions on December 18.
"Of course, this will affect the level of our interstate relations, of course," Putin stated, according to TASS.
"We know their approach, which is that the United States will work with us where it is interesting and profitable, and at the same time will hold back Russia with the help of decisions of this kind. But, knowing this too, we will mirror their actions that is all," he noted.
"There is nothing good about it, these are absolutely unfriendly acts against Russia," the Russian president added.
Russia wants to improve its relations with Washington regardless of who is in power in the United States, according to Putin.
"Nevertheless, we are interested in cultivating and maintaining relations with the US and we will do this regardless of who is in the White House and who controls both houses of the US Congress," Putin said. "Do we have any prospects here?" he said, adding, "I believe, yes."
The political struggle in the United States exacerbated after Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election. On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives, controlled by the Democratic Party, voted to approve two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
The first vote accusing the Republican president of abuse of power was 230-197 in favor, with one vote of 'present' in abstention. Later, the second vote on accusing Trump of obstruction of Congress was 229-198 in favor, with one vote of 'present' in abstention.
Trump has become the fourth US commander-in-chief to face impeachment proceedings, after Andrew Johnson in 1868, Richard Nixon in 1974 and Bill Clinton in 1998-1999. Johnson and Clinton were acquitted, while Nixon stepped down before the start of the hearings.
https://www.fort-russ.com/2019/12/putin-russia-to-mirror-us-sanctions/
#7578114 at 2019-12-21 04:13:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9694: WITCH HUNT. No deals. Edition
The Fed Gets Blindsided… Again
The big news this week was that the House of Representatives impeached President Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
Trump now joins Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton as the only U.S. presidents to be impeached (Nixon resigned before he could be impeached).
Now it goes to the Senate for trial. But there's virtually no chance the Senate will convict Trump on the charges, given the Republican majority.
The market has completely shrugged off the news. The stock market is up today, which tells you it doesn't fear political instability or expect anything to come of the impeachment process.
But the real market story right now on Wall Street has to do with the Fed, and it's not getting anywhere near the attention it deserves.
Since September, the Fed's been pumping in massive amounts of liquidity into the "repo" markets to keep the machinery of the financial system lubricated.
So far, the figure stands at about $400 billion. But it's showing no signs of slowing down.
The Fed has now announced it will provide an additional $425 billion of cash injections into the repo market as the year draws to a close on concerns that funding could fall short into year's end.
And Jerome Powell has admitted these injections will continue "at least into the second quarter" of 2020.
What does all this bailout money say about the health of the money markets?
And that's really what it is - a bailout. Without Fed intervention, liquidity in these markets would have dried up.
But the Fed's massive liquidity injections are basically a Band-Aid on the real problem.
There's plenty of liquidity in the market right now. The real problem is that the big banks, the 24 "primary dealers" who have direct access to the Fed's liquidity, aren't lending the money out like they're supposed to. They're sitting on it, which is depriving other banks and financial institutions of the short-term funding they need.
Part of it has to do with regulations that require these banks to hold a certain amount of reserves, so they're reluctant to lend them. But it's also because these banks can earn more on their money by parking their reserves at the Fed than they can lending it out, which pays very little interest.
The big banks are just hoarding cash. They told the Fed they have more than enough cash in excess reserves to meet regulatory issues, but they prefer having money at the Fed where they can still earn 1.55%, rather than in the repo market.
So, until that situation changes, there's no reason to expect that the Fed's support will go away anytime soon.
But if you ask New York Fed head John Williams, everything's just hunky-dory.
He says it's all "working really well." But the Fed is having to expand its balance sheet at the fastest pace since the first round of QE began in December 2008.
It's gone from $3.8 trillion in September to over $4.07 trillion today. And it's going higher.
Would all this be necessary if the system were working well?
The Federal Reserve's Board of Governors recently published its annual Supervision and Regulation Report, which measures the financial condition of major U.S. banks, including loan growth and liquidity in the banking system.
How did the banks grade?
Overall, the board concluded that 45% of U.S. banks with more than $100 billion in assets merited a rating of "less than satisfactory."
Tellingly, the report did not say which banks have these less-than-satisfactory ratings. It doesn't want to make any real waves, after all. The entire system depends on confidence. Of course, the Fed didn't see problems in the repo market coming at all. They never do. All they ever do is react and pretend that they have everything under control.
Basically, the Fed was blindsided... Again.
But they don't have everything under control or they would have seen the problems coming and maybe done something about it.
Continued problems in the repo market may mean the Fed could launch another round of official quantitative easing in the very near future, possibly as soon as early January. The good news for the markets is that the Fed's liquidity injections have helped boost stocks to record levels again.
The Fed is basically handing investors a Christmas present. Unfortunately, most people on Main Street don't realize it. The present's being put under the tree this year (and maybe next) won't last. They can't.
https://dailyreckoning.com/federeal-reserve-blindsided/
NP has been pretty based with the things I've read over the years of her's.
#7564758 at 2019-12-19 23:29:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9677: +++Adm R+++ Edition
>>7564689
>Are you fucking retarded?
KEk Thanks …Dummy so was BillyBoy Clinton officially impeached …Just how stupid are you kek…READ a BOOK
Was Bill Clinton Impeached?
History » Ask HON » Was Bill Clinton Impeached?
Loading…
Bill Clinton was indeed impeached by the House of Representatives, but the senate did not come to the necessary 2/3 majority agreement to fully process it, so he was acquitted.
Initially, four impeachment articles were brought against president Clinton: two perjury charges, one charge of abuse of power and one of obstruction of justice. Only the one perjury impeachment article and that of obstruction of justice passed, and he had to stand trial in front of the Senate on these two charges. This made him only the second U.S. president after Andrew Johnson (in 1868) to be impeached….DO yo have any idea WHO CAST the deciding VOTE.. As Q would say Think Hawaii kek…FKing idiot
https://www.historyonthenet.com/was-bill-clinton-impeached
#7558669 at 2019-12-19 09:40:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9669: Late Q Bread Edition
In 1868, Andrew Johnson was impeached for breaching the Tenure of Office Act, but the Senate narrowly acquitted him by one vote. In 1974, Richard Nixon faced an impeachment inquiry, but he quit before he could be impeached. In 1998, Bill Clinton was impeached, but he was acquitted by the Senate.
Only 11 days had passed after a whistleblower complaint before Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, Axios reported. For Nixon, it took 599 days from the Watergate break-in to an inquiry, while for Clinton it took 260 days from the first news report of an affair to an inquiry.
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/nixon-clinton-Johnson-impeachment-timelines-history-2019-9?r=US&IR=T
#7556146 at 2019-12-19 04:27:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9666: LOCKED AND LOADED Edition
Anons aren't thinking big enough.
> It's going to be historic.
Impeachment in the house is a political process.
> think optics
Has a POTUS ever been impeached in the house & not the Senate?
Andrew Johnson - Bill Clinton
Has any of this been about simply impeaching POTUS?
It's been about removing him from office.
> Senate was the target
(((their))) base truly believes he will be removed from office.
He won't.
Sound historic yet?
Not so much.
What happens in 2020 when all these democrats are voted out of office?
Will it still be political?
It's all or nothing.
It goes to the Senate.
> The World is Watching
Don't quit yet, faggots.
It's gonna be gud
#7555323 at 2019-12-19 03:44:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9665: 12/18/18: [D]Day, Patriots Edition
>>7555229
Part 1
Do the charges against Trump pass constitutional muster? The justices should decide before the Senate does.
In the present overheated state of official Washington, there may be no alternative to charging into an impeachment trial whose outcome is a foregone conclusion. There is no allegation of treason, bribery, a high crime, or a misdemeanor, the four categories of offense the Constitution identifies as justifying the removal of a president, and no evidence of any such offense. The Democrats tried bribery for a couple of weeks after their focus groups were stirred by it, but gave it up as too implausible. The only bribe that has been unearthed was of the Biden family, and not even this rabid ragtag of bloodless assassins has tried treason, though that wicked act was much bandied about in the piping days of the previous Democratic putsch attempt over collusion between Trump and Russia in the 2016 election. The preferable next step would be for the Senate to ask the Supreme Court to determine whether the four grounds cited by the Constitution for removal of a president are exclusive, and accordingly this impeachment bill need not be tried, or those categories are merely illustrative, and Gerald Ford was correct when he said impeachment can be for any reason the majority in the House of Representatives determines.
I believe it is clear that the authors of the Constitution did not want a president removed for anything less than a high crime, and that none of the impeachment efforts in history would qualify. Andrew Johnson had fired the war secretary, which was his right, and he was narrowly acquitted in 1868 in the intense post-Civil War Reconstruction atmosphere. Richard Nixon was charged by the Judiciary Committee with having "made it his policy" to "obstruct," and having "through his close subordinates and agents" obstructed, the Watergate investigation; and of having "endeavored" to misuse the IRS (not having actually done so, as Franklin Roosevelt, Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Obama, and others have done); and of impeding the impeachment proceedings by temporary noncompliance with House committee subpoenas. The last was an obviously absurd charge, but even the first two were not high crimes, and there has never been any conclusive evidence that Nixon was guilty of them anyway. But his impeachment case was a model of fairness compared with the present nonsense. President Clinton may have lied to a grand jury about his extramarital sex life, but that was not a high crime either, in constitutional terms, and was rightly judged insufficient to justify his removal.
#7554477 at 2019-12-19 02:48:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9664: Impeachment Requires 2/3 's Of The Senate Edition
>>7554412
you are correct
POTUS has been impeached.
now the matter is passed to the Senate where his punishment will be decided on, he can be removed from office with a 2/3 vote.
or like Bill Clinton be aquitted and remain in office
>On December 19, 1998, Clinton became the second American president to be impeached (the first being Andrew Johnson, who was impeached in 1868)[a] when the House formally adopted articles of impeachment and forwarded them to the United States Senate for adjudication. A trial in the Senate began in January 1999, with Chief Justice William Rehnquist presiding. On February 12, Clinton was acquitted on both counts as neither received the necessary two-thirds majority vote of the senators present for conviction and removal from office - in this instance 67. On Article One, 45 senators voted to convict while 55 voted for acquittal. On Article Two, 50 senators voted to convict while 50 voted for acquittal.[3] Clinton remained in office for the balance of his second term.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
#7540433 at 2019-12-18 01:05:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9645: FISA Court Demands Answers Edition
>>7540399
Thinking about this the other day.
They killed Lincoln, and then impeached his VP Andrew Johnson.
When a POTUS gets in (((their))) way, they get serious.
#7502328 at 2019-12-14 04:29:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9596: The So. Much. Winning. Edition
>>7502219
Apophenia?
Future proves past?
Back to the future?
Talk about truth being stranger than fiction!
Coincidences? Decide for yourself…
(Short videos)
https://youtu.be/d1KKaH0ZCv8
"The Walk" trailer
https://youtu.be/GR1EmTKAWIw
JFK references as well…
https://youtu.be/hQRh4NP_E-E
Coincidence or Creepy Connection?
Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846 and John F Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860 and John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.
The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.
Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Their wives both lost a child while living in the White House.
Both Presidents were shot on a Friday and both of them were shot in the head.
Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy and Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.
Both were assassinated by Southerners and were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808. Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839. Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names which are equally composed of fifteen letters.
Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford' while Kennedy was shot in a car called 'Lincoln.'
Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse while Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.
Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland. A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.
#7498303 at 2019-12-13 19:04:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9591: Born in the USA! Edition
DOJ releases memos backing Trump immunity claims ahead of impeachment vote
The Justice Department on Thursday made public a series of internal memos that the Trump administration has relied on to justify its defiance of congressional subpoenas related to the impeachment inquiry.
The memos, written by legal advisers in the department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), date as far back as the Nixon administration and supply legal arguments for a broad reading of presidential power in the face of congressional oversight.
The documents may provide clues to the defense strategy for President Trump in a Senate impeachment trial that is all but certain. Democrats have sought administration witnesses and documents to make their case for removing Trump from office.
The memos were released a day before the House Judiciary Committee voted along party lines to advance two articles of impeachment. The House is slated pass the articles next week in a floor vote, a move that would make Trump just the third president in U.S. history to be impeached.
The OLC reportedly published the opinions in response to a request from House Democrats, who are suing to compel testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn. The OLC cited the memos in a May OLC opinion that gave legal justifications for blocking the congressional subpoena against McGahn.
The release of the memos comes as the Justice Department appeals a ruling by a federal district judge last month ordering McGahn to testify before Congress. In that ruling, the judge rejected the department's argument that McGahn has "absolute immunity" from the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee's subpoena.
"As a matter of law, such aides do not have absolute testimonial immunity," U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, an Obama appointee, wrote.
One of the newly released OLC memos, written in 1982 by Assistant Attorney General Ted Olson, is titled "History of Refusals by Executive Branch Officials to Provide Information Demanded by Congress."
The opinion from Olson traces historical examples since the country's founding where presidents ordered the withholding of information in the name of executive privilege. It cites instances from George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, through the Civil War and Reconstruction-era administrations of Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson, and continues through the early years of the Reagan administration.
"The memorandum seeks to show that presidentially mandated refusals to disclose information to Congress - though infrequent - are by no means unprecedented acts of this or any other administration," the opinion states.
Another OLC opinion from 1982 was requested by then-Associate Attorney General Rudy Giuliani, who is now Trump's personal attorney. That memo, also written by Olson, explained how executive privilege applies when Congress requests testimony from close presidential advisers.
OLC opinions are generally considered binding on the executive branch, but courts are not required to treat them as legal authorities.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/474462-doj-releases-memos-backing-trump-immunity-claims-ahead-of-impeachment
#7491070 at 2019-12-12 21:46:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9581: Peach mints not your flavor? Think Keebler!! Edition
hot off the presses (about 40 mins ago)
good recap of (crap) proceedings today
Proposed amendment in articles of impeachment says Ukraine received aid - live updates
WASHINGTON - The House Judiciary Committee reconvened Thursday at 9 a.m. to decide whether articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump should be forwarded to the full chamber for a vote as early as next week.
With a heavy Democratic advantage, the panel is expected to approve both articles - abuse of power and obstruction of congress - which relate to Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating political rival Joe Biden. But Republicans are expected to offer a number of amendments that could take most of the day to sort through.
If the panel adopts one or both articles, Trump would join Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton as the only presidents who faced specific charges over alleged misconduct. Johnson and Clinton were impeached while Nixon resigned before the House held a vote….
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/12/12/trump-impeachment-house-judiciary-begin-voting-articles/4398725002/
#7455393 at 2019-12-08 15:37:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9535: Those Who Scream The Loudest... Edition
Part 2, rest of the phony reasons they will impeach our President
5. The report invents an absurdly broad "abuse of power" standard. Sunstein wrote in 2017 that "abuse of power" was, by itself, too vague: "Almost every American president has, on more than one occasion, passed the bounds of his power, in the sense that his administration has done something that it is not lawfully entitled to do." (They cite his book on impeachment, but ignore that point.) Notably, "abuse of power" is not in the Constitution.
6. The report actually defends the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson and cites it as precedent. The Johnson impeachment is almost universally regarded as an error. Yet the report, after conceding that a president "cannot be removed" simply because of "unpopular policies," argues that Johnson should have been removed for exactly that, because he had "illegitimate motives." This astonishing claim, citing Tribe, is worth quoting in full:
Rather than directly target President Johnson's faithless execution of the laws, and his illegitimate motives in wielding power, the House resorted to charges based on the Tenure of Office Act. But in reality, "the shaky claims prosecuted by [the House] obscured a far more compelling basis for removal: that Johnson's virulent use of executive power to sabotage Reconstruction posed a mortal threat to the nation-and to civil and political rights-as reconstituted after the Civil War ... [T]he country was in the throes of a second founding. Yet Johnson abused the powers of his office and violated the Constitution to preserve institutions and practices that had nearly killed the Union. He could not be allowed to salt the earth as the Republic made itself anew." Viewed from that perspective, the case for impeaching President Johnson rested on his use of power with illegitimate motives.
7. The report bends over backwards to justify impeachment without any crime being committed. The report spends a great deal of space arguing that a president does not have to commit an actual crime to be impeached - a claim hotly debated among scholars. It notes that previous impeachments have included charges of "non-criminal" acts, but ignores the fact that no presidential impeachment has ever proceeded without any criminal acts alleged.
8. After saying crimes are not necessary, the report cites the criminal grand jury process. Immediately after arguing that impeachment is not a criminal process (see above), the report cites the criminal grand jury, in which the accused has few legal rights or protections, in an attempt to justify the House's bizarre impeachment process, in which President Trump - unlike Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton - has been denied basic legal rights.
9. The report claims that Trump has more rights than Nixon and Clinton did. That false claim ignores the fact that unlike his predecessors, Trump has not been allowed legal representation in the key fact-finding stage of the process, which Democrats - for the first time - moved to the secretive Intelligence Committee. Moreover, it ignores that Republicans have been denied the ability to object to witnesses called by the Democrat majority.
10. The report claims that hearsay evidence is sufficient to impeach the president. After noting that the usual rules of evidence do not apply in the House, the report ignores that the only witnesses with direct knowledge of the president's intentions testified that there was no "quid pro quo" regarding aid to Ukraine. One, Gordon Sondland, said he believed Trump wanted a "quid pro quo" for a White House meeting but had no direct knowledge to show it.
11. The report claims the president is "obstructing" Congress by appealing to the courts. The report claims that Trump can be impeached for denying requests for witnesses and documents, ignoring the fact that the president is raising constitutionally permissible defenses that await adjudication by the courts. Notably, the House itself has decided not to pursue key witnesses, apparently because it wants to rush to impeachment before election season.
The report states its conclusions "do not necessarily reflect those of the Committee on the Judiciary or any of its members." The committee will hold its first evidentiary hearing toward articles of impeachment on Monday.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/07/house-judiciary-committee-report-president-can-be-impeached-for-motives-without-breaking-law/
#7437628 at 2019-12-06 05:14:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9512:Check'em Faggots! Bread # is 17! We Win! Edition
>>7437627
Apophenia?
Future proves past?
Back to the future?
Talk about truth being stranger than fiction!
Coincidences? Decide for yourself…
(Short videos)
https://youtu.be/d1KKaH0ZCv8
"The Walk" trailer
https://youtu.be/GR1EmTKAWIw
JFK references as well…
https://youtu.be/hQRh4NP_E-E
Coincidence or Creepy Connection?
Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846 and John F Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860 and John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.
The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.
Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Their wives both lost a child while living in the White House.
Both Presidents were shot on a Friday and both of them were shot in the head.
Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy and Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.
Both were assassinated by Southerners and were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808. Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839. Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names which are equally composed of fifteen letters.
Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford' while Kennedy was shot in a car called 'Lincoln.'
Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse while Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.
Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland. A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.
#7423922 at 2019-12-04 07:14:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9494: Nader n Buck goin down! (no homo?) NS Edition
>>7423846
>>7423872
Serious Lee tho…
That with this, what are the odds?
Coincidence or Creepy Connection?
Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846 and John F Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860 and John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.
The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.
Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Their wives both lost a child while living in the White House.
Both Presidents were shot on a Friday and both of them were shot in the head.
Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy and Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.
Both were assassinated by Southerners and were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808. Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839. Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names which are equally composed of fifteen letters.
Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford' while Kennedy was shot in a car called 'Lincoln.'
Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse while Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.
Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland. A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.
#7167387 at 2019-07-24 19:30:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9170: Shills playin in the dough, Muckin up the board! Rain Kek Anons!!Edition
NOTABLE
>>7167194 (lb)
>Deer Park water.
>Est. in the year 1873.
>Supreme Court rulings that year regarding Treason and property confiscation.
>No coincidence.
The Chase Court, 1864-1873
"What a potato hole of a place, this!" A western lawyer, seeing the Court's first-floor room in the Capitol in 1859, had exclaimed. He thought the Justices should be "got up above ground" for some fresh air and daylight. Once they moved to their new courtroom, the old Senate Chamber, in December 1860, they had more space than ever before, with 12 rooms for their officials and records.
Congress added a tenth seat to the more spacious Court in 1863, and Lincoln appointed Stephen J. Field of California. In 1864, to succeed Taney as Chief Justice, he chose Salmon P. Chase of Ohio.
Ambitious and able, Chase had won fame for defending runaway slaves, served one term in the Senate and two as Governor of Ohio when Lincoln named him Secretary of the Treasury in 1861. Inexperienced in finance, Chase grappled with war costs-more than $1,000,000 a day. He planned a radical new tax on income, a new system of national banks. But plans for legal tender notes, the famous "greenbacks," upset him. War or no war, he thought, the Constitution forbade such paper money.
Lincoln sent Chase a message "not to bother himself about the Constitution . . . I have that sacred instrument here at the White House, and I am guarding it with great care." Reluctantly, Chase agreed.
Gossip described him addressing a mirror: "President Chase." His own hopeful publicity described his qualifications for Lincoln's place in 1864; the people declined his offer, and in June Lincoln accepted his resignation from the Treasury. Then Chase found himself named Chief Justice by the Chief Executive he had tried to supplant.
In the autumn of 1864, Lambdin P. Milligan of Indiana, a civilian, had been tried before a military commission. He was convicted of conspiring to overthrow the government, and sentenced to hang. With Milligan's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Chase considered the problem of military power over civilians.
During "the late wicked Rebellion," Lincoln had authorized such military tribunals. But, said the Justices, the federal courts in Indiana were always open to try cases like Milligan's. Therefore, under the Constitution, no military courts could try them; and, however shocking the charges, the defendants kept their rights under law.
At liberty again, Milligan sued the military for false imprisonment, and a jury awarded him damages-five dollars.
Under Radical Republican leaders, the postwar Congress seemed determined to reconstruct the whole American government. One Representative talked of an amendment to abolish the Supreme Court; another warned President Andrew Johnson "that as Congress shall order he must obey."
Striking at Johnson, Congress lowered the number of Justices from ten to eight; and to protect the Reconstruction laws, it limited the Court's jurisdiction on appeals.
It was the Senate, not the Court, that tried the most dangerous cases of those bitter years, the impeachment of the President.
More
https://supremecourthistory.org/timeline_court_chase.html
#7033307 at 2019-07-14 02:53:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8999: Darkness. Silence. Hunted. Edition
>>7032999
Or 42 (Clinton) and 44 (Obama) are signaling that soon we will see a repeat of President 17 (Andrew Johnson, the President after Lincoln was assasinated)
#6895025 at 2019-07-02 08:25:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8819: We Stand Ready To Deploy, Engage, & Destroy The Enemies Edition
kek, july 7 1865
hangings…
About this Item
The hanging of the Lincoln assassination conspirators. Within two weeks of Lincoln s death, eight accused conspirators were in custody. President Andrew Johnson ordered a trial by military commission. After a seven-week trial in May and June, the commission retired to deliberate. On July 5 Johnson approved the verdicts and sentences including four death sentences. On July 6 the verdicts were revealed, and the very next day the four executions were carried out simultaneously. The convicted conspirators were stunned to learn that they were to be executed immediately. Alexander Gardner, the leading photographer in Washington, secured permission to document the carefully orchestrated event for which tickets were hotly contested. He made a series of ten images documenting the execution. This dramatic photograph shows the preparation for the hanging of the conspirators (from left to right): Mary Surratt (at whose boarding house the conspirators met) Lewis Powell (who attempted to assassinate Secretary of State William Seward) David Herold (who assisted John Wilkes Booth in his flight from Washington) George Atzerodt (who conspired to assassinate Vice-President Andrew Johnson) This photograph was the sole Alexander Gardner view used as a double-page spread in the standard work on the subject, which observed: Adjusting the Ropes. The conspirators are bound, hooded, and fitted with nooses. On the right, Atzerodt, the last to be bound, recoils at what he sees (Swanson and Weinberg, Lincoln s Assassins: Their Trial and Execution, plate 190). Officials hold umbrellas to block the sun while preparations are made for the hanging. Men below the platform await the order to knock away the posts holding the trapdoors in place. This momentous image is one of the first news photographs. Albumen print (8 3/4 x 6 3/4 in.), mounted. Some chipping to mount. Manuscript caption on mount preparing for the Execution of President Lincoln s Conspirat[ors], Jail yard Washington, D.C. July 7th, 1865. Some fading, but generally in good condition. Bookseller Inventory # ABE-15971286647
https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=15971286647&searchurl=kn%3Dthe%2Blast%2Bpresident%26sortby%3D1&cm_sp=snippet-_-srp2-_-image29
#6802820 at 2019-06-21 01:02:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8701: United We Stand Edition
Mueller report hearing goes off the rails as Gaetz denounces 'farce'
No one raised their hands when Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., asked a panel of witnesses to acknowledge if they personally knew whether anything in the Mueller report was true or false, during a Thursday hearing in the House Judiciary Committee.
"If you have personal knowledge regarding the truth or falsity of a single material fact [from the Mueller report], just raise your hand," Gaetz said. "So, the record can reflect no witnesses have raised their hand. No witnesses have any personal knowledge regarding a single fact in the report. No witnesses last week had personal knowledge … This hearing should not be entitled 'Lessons from the Mueller Report,' it should be entitled 'Hot Takes from the Mueller Report,' because what we're getting are people who have no knowledge of the facts, no information as to the underlying information. They're just reading it and offering their analysis, their hot takes."
Gaetz vented his frustration with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., for not calling Mueller himself to testify in front of Congress, instead calling people like John Dean from the Nixon administration. Gaetz joked that perhaps the committee would call someone from the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson. Nadler tried to argue that the White House was asserting executive privilege over witnesses, preventing them from testifying, but Gaetz argued that Mueller, who authored the report, was the one person the White House couldn't do that with. Gaetz then attempted to steer the conversation from the Mueller report to reforming asylum laws, much to the chagrin of his fellow committee members. One representative interrupted, saying the questions about the border crisis had nothing to do with the Mueller report, leading to Gaetz raising his voice and emphasize the lack of knowledge from the witnesses.
"I wish it was about the Mueller report. I really wish it was," Gaetz said. "But they don't know anything about the Mueller report. This is a total farce, and it's no wonder witnesses don't want to come here and testify for this committee." Members of the committee questioned the panel of witnesses for approximately three hours about the Mueller report and the Russia investigation.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mueller-report-hearing-goes-off-the-rails-as-gaetz-denounces-as-farce
#6775454 at 2019-06-18 00:39:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8666: 17 States Edition
Frank Rainieri
Businessman
DescriptionFrank Rafael Rainieri Marranzini is a businessman from the Dominican Republic. He is the chairman and founder of Puntacana Group. According to Forbes, Rainieri has one of the ten largest fortunes in the Dominican Republic, with a net worth near the billion-dollar mark. Wikipedia
Born: 1944 (age 75 years), Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic
Net worth: Near US$ 1.0 billion
Children: Paola, Francesca, and Frank Elías
Alma mater: Saint Joseph's University
Awards: Order of Merit of Duarte, Sánchez and Mella, Order of Christopher Columbus
im the twitter fag who first copy pasta comey q
and 56 cory kamala twats havent posted since 2nd comp got hacked so on new chromebook with no id yet
was doxxed and blocked on twitter by some dems i was following anyway just watched a tucker from 5 days ago and frank rainieri shows up at 58 second mark. saying just some people partying to hard nothing to see here after pres of DR refused interview.
new comp wont let me save until i log on
google him and bill clinton
this guy owns many resorts
Search Results
Story image for frank rainieri bill clinton from arecoa.com
Former President Bill Clinton vacation in Punta Cana with the Rainieri …
arecoa.com - Feb 6, 2018
The former president of the United States, Bill Clinton , is in … in the company of the Puntacana Group CEO, Frank Rainieiri, of his …
Former President Bill Clinton Visits Punta Cana
Listin Diario (Press Release) - Feb 6, 2018
View all
Story image for frank rainieri bill clinton from Vibe
Join The #ImpeachTrumpNow Campaign To Dump Trump
Vibe - Jan 25, 2017
Out of the 45 presidents in United States history, only two of them have ever been impeached: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton . Johnson was …
Story image for frank rainieri bill clinton from arecoa.com
Clinton family receives 2016 with the Rainieri in Punta Cana
arecoa.com - Jan 4, 2016
Once again the former US president Bill Clinton and his wife … the executives of Puntacana Resort & Club, Frank Rainieri and his family.
Story image for frank rainieri bill clinton from Listín Diario (Press release)
Clinton Family in Punta Cana
Listín Diario (Press release) - Jan 14, 2016
Once again the former US President Bill Clinton and his … daughter Chelsea and his granddaughter, shared with businessman Frank Rainieri and …
#6679063 at 2019-06-05 19:23:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8541: Tremendous Success Edition
>>6678995
>>6679022
The populist election and policies of Andrew Jackson so terrified the Rothschilds that they immediately seized control of the Democratic Party after he left. From that moment on, the Democratic Party was repurposed solely to destroy the United States from within. This all began about 190 years ago, and it is thanks to their efforts that we lived under the panicked lie that democracies expire after about 250 years. The U.S. could last a thousand if not for the people of the hexagram.
President Andrew Johnson was Lincoln's VP and he pardoned Albert Pike for treason. Think about that. Never ever trust your VP.
#6539694 at 2019-05-20 01:39:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8362: Truth Is Its Own Defense Edition
>>6539640
"Occurring near the end of the American Civil War, the assassination was part of a larger conspiracy intended by Booth to revive the Confederate cause by eliminating the three most important officials of the United States government. Conspirators Lewis Powell and David Herold were assigned to kill Secretary of State William H. Seward, and George Atzerodt was tasked with killing Vice President Andrew Johnson."
#6438797 at 2019-05-07 18:57:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8233: The Storm Is Here, Nowhere to Hide Edition
9th May 1865:
End of The American Civil War
President Andrew Johnson issues a proclamation declaring armed resistance in the South is virtually at an end; this is the commonly accepted end date of the American Civil War
9th May 2019:
IG report about Comey
'Kick-off' 'start' 'offense'
#6359283 at 2019-04-29 16:55:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8131: Monday Forecast: Shaliday with a Chance of PAIN Edition
Joe Biden voted to give Robert E. Lee his US citizenship
Joe Biden voted to give Robert E. Lee his US citizenship
by Julio Rosas
| April 29, 2019 12:42 PM
Print this article
Sign up for Examiner Today
Joe Biden, who recently blasted President Trump for backing supporters of Robert E. Lee, voted to restore the Confederate general's citizenship early in his Senate career. Biden in 1975 joined a unanimous Senate in the citizenship restoration for Lee, 110 years after the Virginian surrendered his Army of the Potomac to the Union general and future President Ulysses S. Grant. Lee's legacy recently became a fraught political issue when the former vice-president, a leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, slammed Trump over his remarks after the violent August 2017 rally in Charlottesville, Va.
The 1975 vote came in response to a discovery in the National Archives that Lee's post-Civil War citizenship request had never reached President Andrew Johnson. When Lee first wrote to Johnson, Grant noted Lee did not include the oath of allegiance to the U.S., which was necessary for a pardon and his citizenship. Later in the fall, Lee included the oath, which read: "I, Robert E. Lee, of Lexington, Virginia, do solemnly swear, in the presence of Almighty God, that I will henceforth faithfully support, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the union of the states thereunder, and that I will, in like manner, abide by and falthfully support all laws and proclamations which have been made during the existing rebellion with reference to the emancipation of slaves, so help me. God." Lee died in 1870 without getting his citizenship.
In July 1975, Biden was two-and-a-half years into his Senate career, which would last for 36 years, before an additional eight as vice president under President Barack Obama. While all senators backed the Robert E. Lee citizen resolution, ten House members opposed it, compared to 407 in favor.
Debate about Lee's legacy has festered since the summer 2017 Charlottesville episode. Trump told reporters on Friday Lee was a "great general" as he defended his response to the "Unite the Right" rally, which left activist Heather Heyer dead after one rally attendee drove his car into a crowd of counterprotesters. "If you look at what I said, you will see that question was answered perfectly. And I was talking about people that went because they felt very strongly about the monument to Robert E. Lee, a great general," said Trump. "Whether you like it or not he was one of the great generals. I've spoken to many generals right here at the White House, and many people thought of the generals they think he was maybe their favorite general. People were there protesting the taking down of the monument of Robert E. Lee. Everybody knows that."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/joe-biden-voted-to-give-robert-e-lee-his-us-citizenship
#6111693 at 2019-04-09 20:59:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7816: I Thought FISA Dealt With Espionage Edition
>>6111650
History lesson about ALBERT PIKE
>. It should be noted that Albert Pike after the Civil War was indicted and sent to prison for treason by the United States government. After Abraham Lincoln's assassination, Andrew Johnson Vice President became the United States President and pardoned Albert Pike. Albert Pike awarded Andrew Johnson for this pardon the thirty-third degree rite of passage.
Pic included of the goofy motherfucker LARPing about ruling the world or something. He couldn't be reached for comment, something about being thirsty and hot.
#6107066 at 2019-04-09 12:25:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7810: Lotsa Green Notes Edition
If the US Constitution had had a "no bat ears" amendment we would not have had Bathhouse and we would not have this low flying elephant running US Secret Service.
The SS was conceived by Abe Lincoln and Alan Pinkerton. Pinkerton had run a spies throughout the confederacy during the civil war, but when Lincoln was assassinated the choice director for the new agency belonged to Andrew Johnson, who did not appoint Lincoln's choice for the job.
Instead he hired a counterfeiter named William Wood ex of the DC prison.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_the_United_States_Secret_Service
The rationale was the same then as now; "only a criminal would be smart enough to catch other criminals. "
Wood introduced a number of confederates to the SS, and they arrested a number of big counterfeiters. Having eliminated their competition, Wood and his confederates set up operations for themselves making a market in fraudulent USG securities , banknotes and bonds letters of credit and confidential documents.
Alan Pinkerton objected to Woods, a convicted criminal heading the Treasuries enforcement division but shills soon convinced all concerned Pinkerton's motives for the accusation were suspect; born of resentment as having lost the patronage plum of the US Treasuries elite anti-counterfeiting unit.
Regrettably the SS has been comp'd from the beginning, long before they were necessarily complicit in JFK's assassination.
#5881870 at 2019-03-25 16:28:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7524: Redwoods and Beach Frens Edition
https://www.breitbart.com/news/slavery-reparations-debate-resurfaces-in-white-house-race-2/
Slavery reparations debate resurfaces in White House race
In January 1865, as the US Civil War was drawing to a close, some freed slaves were promised "40 acres and a mule" to begin new lives.
The audacious experiment was fleeting - repudiated within months by president Andrew Johnson, successor to the assassinated Abraham Lincoln, and the land returned to its former owners.
More than 150 years later, the question of whether the United States should provide compensation to African-Americans for past wrongs is still on the table.
#5575798 at 2019-03-08 17:21:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7130: Finland's Government Resigns Edition
>>5575673 LB
NOT HER but imo worth posting.
another keystone: colombia and florida.
CHECK OUT THE PASSWORD ACCESS SECTION KEK
THE COMPANY
Keystone International Group, Inc. "Keystone International" is a business corporation founded in the United States.
>>>Our corporate headquarters are located in Miami, Florida
>>>with operations in Bogota, Colombia.
We offer Turnkey Design-Build projects for the following International Services:
- Design-Build
- Architecture & Engineering
- Interior Design
>>>- Construction & Funding for development projects.
->>>> Import & Export
In these International Services, we offer >>>>expert assistance to our clients in >>>>Financing Plans with various U.S. >>>>>and International Financial >>>>Institutions interested in our project.
As part of our experience, our team has successfully completed projects in the
(TRAFFICKERS DREAM ROUTES HERE)
USA and international projects in France, Italy, Switzerland, Spain, England, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Canada, Puerto Rico, Curacao, Panamá, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Peru.
At Keystone International we help our clients concentrate their efforts on what they do best (their product or service) leaving us to do what we do best (improving your business).
Our experience enables us to guarantee effective work of impeccable quality, with the ability to transport our clients to an exclusive, select and unique world designed especially for them.
PRESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
Our Team has been assigned as General Contractor the rehabilitation of some of America's most prestigious public and private architectural treasurers. These treasures entrusted to Our Team by demanding clients, best defines our reputation. Among these significant architectural treasures, are the following US Presidential Projects:
- President Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Museum, Hodgenville, Kentucky
- President Andrew Johnson Home in Greeneville, Tennessee.
- President Richard Nixon's Winter White House, Key Biscayne, Florida
http://keystoneinternational.us/en/
PASSWORD SECTION: VELLY INTELESTING
>>5575673 LB
#5485124 at 2019-03-03 20:02:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7013: Umbrella Surv Edition
On stage? Kavanaugh?
Yet unsealed files, Clinton tactics ~
https://www.libertyheadlines.com/bob-bare-open-clinton-impeachment-files-to-prevent-kavanaugh-smears/
BOB BARR: Open Clinton Impeachment Files to Prevent Kavanaugh Smears
July 13, 2018
SCOTUS nominee worked on investigation of former president with Kenneth Starr in the 1990s...
(Michael Barnes, Liberty Headlines) President Bill Clinton's 1998 impeachment may seem like old news, but it's about to be thrust back into the mainstream of American politics and media.
Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's recent pick to replace retiring U.S. Supreme Court "swing-vote" Justice Anthony Kennedy, participated in the investigation that led to Clinton's impeachment 20 years ago.
Kavanaugh worked as an attorney for Independent Special Counsel Kenneth Starr, who compiled the famous "Starr Report" that served as the basis for the House of Representatives to successfully impeach the 42ndpresident of the United States.
It was the first and only time an elected U.S. president has been impeached (Andrew Johnson was impeached, but never elected by American voters), although the Senate declined to convict President Clinton.
With Democrats hell-bent on stopping Kavanaugh and his likely rightward shifting of the high court, Senate Democrats who are tasked with confirming Trump's nominee are almost certain to attack him for his role in the Starr investigation - which many elder Democrats and liberal media members still harbor bitter resentments.
Kavanaugh could be their whipping-boy in an unfair fight over old grievances. But there's a twist. The Starr Report had two parts.
The first was the report itself, and the second part was boxes upon boxes of documentary evidence that the public report came from.
All of that information was sealed by a House Resolution and has never seen the light day.
Now, former congressman Bob Barr is calling for the sealed impeachment documents to be made public.
"In the coming confirmation maelstrom, it is a virtual certainty that Kavanaugh's detractors will claim evidence was manufactured, manipulated, and misapplied in order to secure the President's impeachment," Barr wrote in a Breitbart News editorial on Wednesday.
Barr would know. He was a House Republican from Georgia at the time, and is more than a little familiar with Clinton political tactics and character.
"Unless the evidence in the sealed files is made available to defend against such charges, Judge Kavanaugh and those defending his nomination will be at a severe disadvantage," Barr said.
"He may become the latest victim of a process of secrecy and caution that permitted a sexual predator and perjurer to escape justice two decades ago," he continued…
Unsealing the boxes of supporting impeachment evidence would open a treasure trove of new information that could substantiate actions taken by investigators and attorneys, like Kavanaugh, at the time.
"There simply is no reason for the Republican leadership not to unseal those files; and there is every good reason to do so. Now," said Barr.
#5481181 at 2019-03-03 15:23:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7007: Baked
Q Post 2912
POTUS twats 1 MAR 2019
Regarding Cohen testimony and the book proposal / manuscript.
Oh I see! ~ O.I.C. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation?
https://twitter.com/OIC_OCI
gee ~ G.E. ~ government of Georgia?
https://twitter.com/oic_oci/status/969298623682015237
Connection with Secretary of State HRC?
See Q Post 2915 and 2917 (and others)
Also Q Post 1287
Cohen raid by FBI? What other docs were collected?
Purpose?
Q Post 1024
Jared Cohen. Coming to a theater near you.
Author on presidents and vice-presidents.
Comments on impeachment, John Tyler, Andrew Johnson
https://twitter.com/JaredCohen/status/1099801112700346373
Comment on Cohen testimony, attack on Donald J. Trump
https://twitter.com/JaredCohen/status/1102064664249356288
Cohen's proposed manuscript?
Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6757251/Michael-Cohen-pitched-book-claiming-Trump-not-liar.html
Politico
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/01/trump-michael-cohen-book-1197243
The Daily Beast
https://www.thedailybeast.com/michael-cohen-kills-his-own-book-on-the-trump-revolution-amid-legal-woes
The Daily Beast - last year
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-lawyer-michael-cohen-is-shopping-a-book-about-the-first-family-stormy-daniels-and-russia
New York Post
https://nypost.com/2019/03/01/trump-says-michael-cohen-wrote-him-a-love-letter-as-he-blasts-former-fixer/
Tucker Carlson on Cohen Testimony - Four Lies
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-michael-cohen-demolishes-the-russia-collusion-conspiracy-will-anyone-be-fired-for-lies
Cuomo and Lemon on Cohen Testimony
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/02/28/michael-cohen-testimony-congress-cuomo-lemon-handoff-cpt-sot-vpx.cnn
Elija Cummings
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/02/27/elijah-cummings-closing-michael-cohen-testimony-sot-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/michael-cohen-testimony/
Lanny Davis: The scandal machine: Will we ever learn?
https://thehill.com/opinion/lanny-davis/237000-lanny-davis-the-scandal-machine-will-we-ever-learn
Lanny Davis, The HIll, 25 MAR 2015
Here is what I wrote at the end of my book acknowledging how unfortunately bipartisan this awful media-political-legal destructive scandal complex had become:
"So, it was now clear to me, the disease in today's scandal culture is systemic. It is not about one particular party being more partisan or more willing to misuse congressional investigations than the other. It is not about an ideological press corps out to get one political party or the other. The political and journalistic focus on scandal, and the willingness of politicians to take advantage of the destructive power of that focus for their political advantage, are now deeply embedded within the body politic. All of us in the process - Democrats and Republicans, journalists and lawyers, not to mention a public ready to assume the worst about politicians - have combined to produce rot, horrible rot.
There are no clean hands here - certainly not mine."
Michael Cohen's attorney Lanny Davis opens up about Mueller investigation
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/396477-full-interview-michael-cohens-attorney-lanny-davis-talks-about-his-client-and
Rising, The HIll, Full Interview, 7 NOV 2018
Michael Cohen Admits to Coordinating Scripted Testimony With Lanny Davis, Adam Schiff and Elijah Cummings...
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/02/27/michael-cohen-admits-to-coordinating-scripted-testimony-with-lanny-davis-adam-schiff-and-elijah-cummings/
Within the answer Cohen admits his handler, democrat operative Lanny Davis, coordinated with key congressional leadership to include Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings and HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff.
Q Post 1115
Read carefully. (Cohen).
Fire at Trump Tower Kills One, Police Say
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/07/nyregion/trump-tower-fire.html
New York Times, 7 APR 2018
Dennis Shields, a resident who said he lived on the 42nd floor, described the scene. "You could smell the smoke and you could hear things falling like through the vents," he said. "It just smelled like sulfur." He said there were no orders to evacuate but he received a text message from Mr. Trump's lawyer, Michael D. Cohen. Mr. Shields, who said he grew up with Mr. Cohen, continued: "He said, 'Are you in the building?' I said, 'Yes.' He said, 'You better get out ASAP.' That's how I knew to get out, otherwise I'd still be in there."
Also re-read Q Post 1287
Re: Cohen raid by FBI? How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
All pic related.
#5363182 at 2019-02-24 19:02:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6855: Those Who Are The Loudest Edition
https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/feb-24-1868-house-votes-to-impeach-president-Andrew-Johnson/
#5344409 at 2019-02-23 13:58:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6830: The Table is Set - Let's Eat! Edition
>>5344338
List of Vice Presidents
Adams
Thomas Jefferson
Aaron Burr
George Clinton
George Clinton
Elbridge Gerry
Daniel Tompkins
John C. Calhoun
Richard M. Johnson
John Tyler
George M. Dallas
Millard Fillmore
William R. King
John C. Breckinridge
Hannibal Hamlin
Andrew Johnson
Schuyler Colfax
Henry Wilson
William Wheeler
Chester Arthur
Thomas A. Hendricks
Levi P. Morton
Adlai E. Stevenson
Garret A. Hobart
Theodore Roosevelt
Charles Fairbanks
James Sherman
Thomas R. Marshall
Calvin Coolidge
Charles Dawes
Charles Curtis
John Nance Garner
Henry A. Wallace
Harry S. Truman
Alben Barkley
Richard Nixon
Lyndon B. Johnson
Hubert Humphrey
Spiro Agnew
Gerald Ford
Nelson Rockefeller
Walter Mondale
George Bush
Dan Quayle
Al Gore
Dick Cheney
Joe Biden
Mike Pence
#5224523 at 2019-02-17 17:55:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6675: eBake
>>5224490
They impeached Andrew Johnson for nothing.
#5079804 at 2019-02-08 16:57:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6487: Long Recess And Rabbit Chase Edition
>>5079312 lb
>>5079348 lb
>>5079321 lb
Looks like the Trump-haters are worried about his health again. The info below is rather comforting.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/washington-watch/77876?xid=nl_popmed_2019-02-07&eun=g1185334d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=PopMedicine_020719&utm_content=B&utm_term=NL_Gen_Int_PopMedicine_Active
Trump's Health: Excellent or 'Ticking Bomb'?
-Zero publicly reported medical events in first 2 years in office
by Randy Dotinga, Contributing Writer, MedPage Today
February 07, 2019
Donald Trump, of all people, might make presidential health great again. As he faces another White House physical examination on Friday, Trump remains on track to become the nation's first senior-citizen president in more than 150 years to avoid suffering a medical crisis in office.
The odds may not be in this sedentary teetotaler's favor, however, and not just because he faces an estimated 1 in 50 chance of dying of natural causes over the next year. He has unhealthy habits, cardiologists and psychiatrists fret over the state of his heart and mind, and history is not on his side. Most presidents over the last century suffered from significant health scares or died while in office, and only one – an often-ailing Ronald Reagan – was older than Trump.
A medical briefing after Trump's White House physical in January 2018 revealed that he was taking three drugs: 10 mg/day of rosuvastatin (Crestor), low-dose aspirin for his cardiac health, and finasteride (Propecia) to prevent male pattern baldness.
Statistics released at that time included Trump's weight (239 lbs), height (6'3"), total cholesterol (223 mg/dL), triglycerides (129 mg/dL), HDL (67 mg/dL), LDL (143 mg/dL), and hemoglobin A1c (5%).
So-called "girthers" scoffed at the reported weight, which they believed was too low, and cardiologists interviewed by the New York Times warned that his LDL level seemed too high in light of his treatment with rosuvastatin. Meanwhile, a Brigham and Women's Hospital cardiologist plugged Trump's numbers into a risk calculator for MedPage Today and determined he had a "pretty high" 17% chance of a heart attack or other atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event over the next 10 years.
"He's a ticking time bomb," internist Patricia Hale, MD, PhD, former associate medical director at New York's Albany Medical Center, told MedPage Today this week. "I never had a male patient live to their 90s with that lifestyle, no way. And certainly bad stuff started happening in their 70s. Usually, they died before they were 80."
But others aren't surprised by the president's apparent good health. "It's not unusual for a person in their 70s to go for 4 or more years without need of medical care," said cardiologist and presidential medical historian John Sotos, MD. "His threats, statistically, are atherosclerotic disease and cancer. But he takes a statin and certainly has his blood pressure followed, while his lifetime abstinence from tobacco and alcohol is a great benefit on the cancer side."
Sotos said finasteride would protect the presidential prostate (although the recommended dose of 1 mg is much less than that normally prescribed for prostate enlargement), and Trump is "not going to have activity-related problems, because he's not very active." However, he wondered if the president may have obstructive sleep apnea.
Presidents have suffered from a long list of medical challenges while in office, even in the modern era. Four died of apparent natural causes and four others were assassinated. And they've suffered a wide variety of serious ailments in the White House:
.Pneumonia (Washington)
.Stroke (Wilson)
.Depression (Pierce)
.Kidney disease (Arthur)
.Addison's disease and severe back pain (Kennedy)
.Gallbladder disease (Lyndon Johnson)
.Kidney stones (Andrew Johnson)
.Possible lead poisoning from an unremoved bullet (Jackson).
Hale, the New York internist, said medical threats facing Trump in light of his condition include dementia, diabetes, and cardiovascular and kidney problems.
"You can't take two statins and eat a cheeseburger and think you come out even," she said. "I wonder about mini-strokes. You slowly get dim-witted, and you end up with heart failure because you have microvascular disease."
With the sole exception of Trump, all six presidents since 1861 who were over the age of 64 in office suffered from notable medical problems during their terms. These include Harry Truman's breathing difficulties (Harry Truman) and George H.W. Bush's atrial fibrillation that required two days of hospitalization. Most seriously, a stroke debilitated Woodrow Wilson, and Dwight Eisenhower endured a heart attack, stroke, and intestinal surgery. More recently, Ronald Reagan not only survived a serious bullet wound but also underwent a colectomy for cancer as well as prostate surgery.
Go to part 2]
#5022818 at 2019-02-04 06:29:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6413: Godspeed, Patriot(s) Edition
Got another 17 "coincidence"
The 17th president of the united states is Andrew Johnson who served as vp around the time of Abraham Lincoln's assassination. That is the main reason why he became the 17th president
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Johnson
#4927348 at 2019-01-27 14:12:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6291: Tip Of The Iceberg Edition
Notables
are not endorsements
Global
>>4887360 , >>4887417 , >>4887496 Update from MemeFarmer
>>4727722 Graphic guide to posting on 8chan
>>4727758 Reminder for newfags: this is a free speech board
>>4687795 If you don't like it here there are plenty of other places to get Q's drops
>>4680938 , >>4681274 POTUS: "Call Congress, ask your reps to fund wall". Numbers to call
#6290
>>4926683, >>4926696 Stone he helped engineer Manafort's hiring on the campaign
>>4926702 Schultz the former Starbucks CEO, says he is thinking very seriously about a presidential run
>>4926723 John McCallum, Canada's ambassador to China has resigned at the request of the prime minister
>>4926804, >>4926815, >>4926827, >>4926907 maggie h retweeted this long article "12 boys from a Thai cave"
>>4926820 Is this for real? I'd love to see the odds of this "coincidence"
>>4926829, >>4926848 Tucker is correct Mueller commands his own armed forces.
>>4926897, >>4926959 The reporter outside Stone's House when it got raided, used to work for the FBI
>>4926924, >>4926956 The plan is working!
>>4927043, >>4927145, >>4927137, >>4927159, >>4927290 New DJT Tweet Non-Citizens Voted Just The Tip Of The Iceberg
>>4927052 Watch The Rejected Medical Marijuana Super Bowl Commercial
>>4927060 US and Taliban finalize details of draft peace deal reports
>>4927193 Permanent War Congress Forbids NATO Withdrawal
>>4927266 Oklahoma looks to be doing it right...cannabis solves a ton of health issues
>>4927283 How Rep. Yvette Clarke dodged scrutiny for $120K disappearing act
>>4927251 think this NOTAM needs to be reviewed for irregularities or hidden info
>>4927340 #6290
#6289
>>4926536 The Telegraph agreed to pay U.S. First Lady Melania Trump "substantial" damages after running an article
>>4926475 Myths VS Facts The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson
>>4926466 Thought To Do A Little Digg On Current Events At He SSCI
>>4926412 China's Top Steel making City Issues 'Orange' Smog Alert
>>4926397 Scientists Figured How To Use A Laser To Transmit Audio Across A Room Without Any Receiver Equipment
>>4926361 How CNN captured video of the Roger Stone raid
>>4925948 Some Worthy Digging Suggestions
>>4925913, >>4925968, >>4926503, >>4926525 More On The 4chan Trolling Media Trolling 4chan
baker change
>>4925912 Interesting Numbers In DJT'S First Tweet Timestamp. Coincidence?
>>4926080 Digs On NYC Prison Barge
>>4926603 #6289
#6288
>>4925129, >>4925132, >>4925135 Resignations in the news
>>4925158, >>4925161, >>4925165 Mapping Muh Russia and Election Meddling connections Version 1/27/19
>>4925160 California Election Watchdog Hopes to Set Up Town Hall With President Trump
>>4925240 Kellyanne Conway's husband launches attack on Trump
>>4925533 Anon notices 21-year-olds popping up a lot in the news..code?
>>4925413, >>4925427, >>4925438 Study Nazism Cont'd: Documentary on Hitler and the Third Reich
>>4925309, >>4925420, >>4925595 Moar on Muh Russian & Election Meddling
>>4925820 Extramarital affair with Kamala Harris? Former San Francisco mayor, 84, admits it happened
>>4925837, >>4925847 19 killed, dozens injured in twin blast targeting Catholic cathedral in the Philippines
>>4925865 #6288
#6287
>>4924330 WorkAnon on /qresearch/
>>4924381 Attorney Robert Barnes Lists Members of Media, Hollywood Elites Who Will be Sued by Covington Students
>>4924428 Chaffetz: Short-Term Spending Bill Was a 'Pretty Savvy Move' By Trump
>>4924453, >>4924918 Russiagate Map
>>4924483 Graphics of compiled digs on Pelosi's wine tunnels
>>4924506, >>4924549, >>4924747 Roger Stone connection to NXIVM
>>4924560 European Commission takes legal action against Slovenia over central bank raid
>>4924703 Donald Trump Donates Third Quarter Salary to Alcoholism Research
>>4924910 ISIS WILL be defeated in Syria within a month
>>4924930 Diane Feinstein tweet about Roger Stone from yesterday
>>4925055 #6287
Previously Collected Notables
>>4923531 #6285, >>4924290 #6286
>>4921177 #6282, >>4921965 #6283, >>4922739 #6284
>>4918854 #6279, >>4919639 #6280, >>4920659 #6281
>>4916530 #6276, >>4917245 #6277, >>4918051 #6278
>>4914166 #6273, >>4914952 #6274, >>4915730 #6275
>>4912407 #6270, >>4912631 #6271, >>4913398 #6272
Notables Archive by BO: https://8ch.net/qresearch/notables.html
Notables Archive at /comms/: >>>/comms/225, >>>/comms/3207 (#740~#6003)
#4926612 at 2019-01-27 12:10:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6290: Media Trolling 4chan? Edition
Notables
are not endorsements
Global
>>4887360 , >>4887417 , >>4887496 Update from MemeFarmer
>>4727722 Graphic guide to posting on 8chan
>>4727758 Reminder for newfags: this is a free speech board
>>4687795 If you don't like it here there are plenty of other places to get Q's drops
>>4680938 , >>4681274 POTUS: "Call Congress, ask your reps to fund wall". Numbers to call
#6289
>>4926536 The Telegraph agreed to pay U.S. First Lady Melania Trump "substantial" damages after running an article
>>4926475 Myths VS Facts The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson
>>4926466 Thought To Do A Little Digg On Current Events At He SSCI
>>4926412 China's Top Steel making City Issues 'Orange' Smog Alert
>>4926397 Scientists Figured How To Use A Laser To Transmit Audio Across A Room Without Any Receiver Equipment
>>4926361 How CNN captured video of the Roger Stone raid
>>4925948 Some Worthy Digging Suggestions
>>4925913, >>4925968, >>4926503, >>4926525 More On The 4chan Trolling Media Trolling 4chan
baker change
>>4925912 Interesting Numbers In DJT'S First Tweet Timestamp. Coincidence?
>>4926080 Digs On NYC Prison Barge
>>4926603 #6289
#6288
>>4925129, >>4925132, >>4925135 Resignations in the news
>>4925158, >>4925161, >>4925165 Mapping Muh Russia and Election Meddling connections Version 1/27/19
>>4925160 California Election Watchdog Hopes to Set Up Town Hall With President Trump
>>4925240 Kellyanne Conway's husband launches attack on Trump
>>4925533 Anon notices 21-year-olds popping up a lot in the news..code?
>>4925413, >>4925427, >>4925438 Study Nazism Cont'd: Documentary on Hitler and the Third Reich
>>4925309, >>4925420, >>4925595 Moar on Muh Russian & Election Meddling
>>4925820 Extramarital affair with Kamala Harris? Former San Francisco mayor, 84, admits it happened
>>4925837, >>4925847 19 killed, dozens injured in twin blast targeting Catholic cathedral in the Philippines
>>4925865 #6288
#6287
>>4924330 WorkAnon on /qresearch/
>>4924381 Attorney Robert Barnes Lists Members of Media, Hollywood Elites Who Will be Sued by Covington Students
>>4924428 Chaffetz: Short-Term Spending Bill Was a 'Pretty Savvy Move' By Trump
>>4924453, >>4924918 Russiagate Map
>>4924483 Graphics of compiled digs on Pelosi's wine tunnels
>>4924506, >>4924549, >>4924747 Roger Stone connection to NXIVM
>>4924560 European Commission takes legal action against Slovenia over central bank raid
>>4924703 Donald Trump Donates Third Quarter Salary to Alcoholism Research
>>4924910 ISIS WILL be defeated in Syria within a month
>>4924930 Diane Feinstein tweet about Roger Stone from yesterday
>>4925055 #6287
#6286
>>4923919 Pelosi Accuses Trump of Being Blackmailed by Putin
>>4923900 AntarticaAnon checking in
>>4923940, >>4924032 Tear Gas, Fires, and Riot Police at Paris Yellow Vest Protest
>>4923942 DC police looking for suspects after triple shooting
>>4923980 CIA, Mossad coordinated September 11 attacks: Scholar
>>4924052 Until recently Josh Campbell was an FBI special agent
>>4924084 Viktor Orban attacks George Soros, who "is open about wanting to take over European institutions"
>>4924116 Model Decides To Stop Hiding Her Support For Trump From Anti-Trump Fashion Industry: "I think Trump is great for women"
>>4923843, >>4924142 Bloomberg calls POTUS a "fake CEO" (projection?)
>>4924150 Police Are Now Seeking The Removal Of Nancy Pelosi
>>4924167, >>4924218 Buzzfeed claims "4chan to be Shutdown"
>>4924195 U.S. calls on world to 'pick a side' on Venezuela; Europeans set to recognize Guaido
>>4924203 Leaked tapes allege Russian oligarch planned arrest of escort claiming she had dirt on Trump
>>4924263 Young Catholics grill Pope Francis on church sex abuse
>>4924290 #6286
Previously Collected Notables
>>4923531 #6285
>>4921177 #6282, >>4921965 #6283, >>4922739 #6284
>>4918854 #6279, >>4919639 #6280, >>4920659 #6281
>>4916530 #6276, >>4917245 #6277, >>4918051 #6278
>>4914166 #6273, >>4914952 #6274, >>4915730 #6275
>>4912407 #6270, >>4912631 #6271, >>4913398 #6272
Notables Archive by BO: https://8ch.net/qresearch/notables.html
Notables Archive at /comms/: >>>/comms/225, >>>/comms/3207 (#740~#6003)
#4926603 at 2019-01-27 12:08:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6289: Spoopy 21 Year Olds Edition
#6289
>>4926536 The Telegraph agreed to pay U.S. First Lady Melania Trump "substantial" damages after running an article
>>4926475 Myths VS Facts The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson
>>4926466 Thought To Do A Little Digg On Current Events At He SSCI
>>4926412 China's Top Steel making City Issues 'Orange' Smog Alert
>>4926397 Scientists Figured How To Use A Laser To Transmit Audio Across A Room Without Any Receiver Equipment
>>4926361 How CNN captured video of the Roger Stone raid
>>4925948 Some Worthy Digging Suggestions
>>4925913, >>4925968, >>4926503, >>4926525 More On The 4chan Trolling Media Trolling 4chan
baker change
>>4925912 Interesting Numbers In DJT'S First Tweet Timestamp. Coincidence?
>>4926080 Digs On NYC Prison Barge
#4926475 at 2019-01-27 11:37:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6289: Spoopy 21 Year Olds Edition
Myths VS Facts | The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson
https://youtu.be/ufNMPJ8Rf68
#4802309 at 2019-01-18 07:19:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6129: Why Is Pelosi’s Memory Going? Edition
>>4802273
Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, but acquitted by the Senate. Richard Nixon resigned before he could be impeached.
#4702389 at 2019-01-11 01:30:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6000: THE 6QQQ EDITION
>>4702286
you don't contribute shit
LIST OF PRESIDENTS IN SECRET SOCIETIES (any name not clarified is just a Freemason):
1. George Washington (Freemason AND Rosicrucian)
3. Thomas Jefferson (Rosicrucian)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Polk
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (Rosicrucian)
17. Andrew Johnson
18. Ulysses Grant (Odd Fellows)
19. Rutherford Hayes (Odd Fellows)
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley (Freemason AND Odd Fellows)
26. Theodore Roosevelt (Freemason AND Bohemian Club)
27. William Taft (Freemason AND Skull and Bones)
29. Warren Harding (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
30. Calvin Coolidge (Bohemian Club)
31. Herbert Hoover (Bohemian Club)
32. Franklin Roosevelt (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
33. Harry Truman (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
34. Dwight Eisenhower (Bohemian Club)
35. John F Kennedy (Order of the Elks)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
37. Richard Nixon (Order of Red Friars)
38. Gerald Ford (Freemason, BIlderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
39. Jimmy Carter (Trilateral Commission)
40. Ronald Reagan (Bohemian Club AND William F. Buckley, Jr.)
41. George HW Bush (Skull and Bones, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Knights of Malta, AND Bohemian Club)
42. Bill Clinton (Knights of Malta AND Bilderberg Group)
43. George W Bush (Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, AND Trilateral Commission)
http://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/famous-american-members-of-the-knights-of-malta/
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/us-presidents-who-were-in-secret-societies-2017-4?r=US&IR=T
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/secret-societies-presidents-joined-including-donald-trump.html/?a=viewall
#4695682 at 2019-01-10 17:23:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #5992: Patriot Party Edition
This is by far one of the best 911 videos that shows the evidence.
You decide from the evidence.
Watch on hd big screen with slo-mo and rewind capabilities.
Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson @ Awakened State, Cabaret Voltaire, Edinburgh 20/11/12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbmX8rbI3AY
#4449315 at 2018-12-24 11:18:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #5673: Signal to Noise Ratio Edition
>>4449298
End of the world Revelation stuff?
Maybe the last episode of MASH?
or the time Al Bundy won by scoring four touchdowns in a single game while playing for the Polk High School Panthers in the 1966 city championship game versus Andrew Johnson High School, including the game-winning touchdown in the final seconds against his old nemesis, "Spare Tire" Dixon?
Maybe a different thing they wanted to track?
Obama's legacy?
#4327210 at 2018-12-16 00:15:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #5514: Ship By Barge Edition
>>4327111
Senate Seal
The seal of the Senate, based on the Great Seal of the United States, includes a scroll inscribed with E Pluribus Unum floating across a shield with thirteen stars on top and thirteen vertical stripes on the bottom. Olive and oak branches symbolizing peace and strength grace the sides of the shield, and a red liberty cap and crossed fasces represent freedom and authority. Blue beams of light emanate from the shield. Surrounding the seal is the legend, "United States Senate." The seal is affixed to impeachment documents and resolutions of consent to international treaties. It also appears on presentation copies of Senate resolutions recognizing appointments, commendations, and notable achievements.
This current seal represents the third design since 1789. The first seal showed an eagle with a shield on its breast, olive branches in its left talon, and arrows in its right. Above the eagle were rays of light emanating from clouds, representing the emergence of the new nation. Encircling the design was the legend "Senate of the United States." The first known use of this seal was on the March 1798 impeachment summons of Tennessee Senator William Blount. The seal authenticated the summons and asserted the right of the Senate to try Blount. Six years later, the seal appeared on another impeachment summons, this time for Federal Judge John Pickering.
By 1830, the first Senate seal was either lost or unserviceable. A new seal was commissioned from Robert Lanphier, Jr., a Washington D.C. engraver and jeweler. This second design was inspired by Greek and Roman models, depicting three female figures that symbolized freedom, justice, and power. An eagle perched atop the figures, and twenty-four links of a chain bordering the seal represented the twenty-four states then in the Union. During the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson, the seal authenticated both the presidential summons and copies of documents submitted in evidence. The second seal was used until 1880.
When the nation celebrated its one hundred years of independence in 1876, a new Great Seal of the United States was created and put into use in 1885, prompting the Senate to revise its own seal. The old seal had been discovered in the Capitol basement in 1880, worn down from age and perhaps last used in an impeachment trial in 1876. Louis Dreka, an engraver and stationer from Philadelphia, received $35 to produce a new seal, measuring one-and-a-half inches in diameter. The 1885 design is still in use today.
The seal is kept in the custody of the Secretary of the Senate, in accordance with a resolution adopted in 1886 which mandates that it be used to authenticate transcripts, copies, and certificates as directed by the Senate. In the twentieth century, the Secretary of the Senate has authorized official use of the seal by the majority and minority leaders.
https://www.cop.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Seal.htm
Still looking for reference to the red cap.
Funny how the seal of the Navy and the Senate were redesigned at times in history.
Cabal?
#3796440 at 2018-11-08 08:30:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #4824: TEXT 'SHAKING' IF ORANGE MAN BAD Edition
>>3796416
There is law and precedent for this:
The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act, 12 Stat. 755 (1863), entitled An Act relating to Habeas Corpus, and regulating Judicial Proceedings in Certain Cases, was an Act of Congress that authorized the president of the United States to suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in response to the American Civil War and provided for the release of political prisoners. It began in the House of Representatives as an indemnity bill, introduced on December 5, 1862, releasing the president and his subordinates from any liability for having suspended habeas corpus without congressional approval. The Senate amended the House's bill, and the compromise reported out of the conference committee altered it to qualify the indemnity and to suspend habeas corpus on Congress's own authority. Abraham Lincoln signed the bill into law on March 3, 1863, and suspended habeas corpus under the authority it granted him six months later. The suspension was partially lifted with the issuance of Proclamation 148 by Andrew Johnson, and the Act became inoperative with the end of the Civil War. The exceptions to his Proclamation 148 were the States of Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Texas, the District of Columbia, and the Territories of New Mexico and Arizona.
#3776858 at 2018-11-07 08:58:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #4798: "DECLAS overrides all potential House blockades" Edition
>>3776831
Phonefagging but yes. Happened only twice in history. Andrew Johnson and Clinton. House starts impeachment investigations and procedure and Senate squashed it.
#3776843 at 2018-11-07 08:57:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #4798: "DECLAS overrides all potential House blockades" Edition
>>3776820
Ummm learn about your government before you attempt to make stupid comments.
Senate can overturn an impeachment.
LIke they did with Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton.
Learn more before you post.
#3775151 at 2018-11-07 07:05:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #4796: "Team is stronger [PRO]" Edition
Negro slavery had already been established by the Southern states before the nation was
even founded. In fact, the question of whether slaves were people or property was
the most intractable problem at the constitutional convention in Philadelphia.
Which U.S. Presidents Owned Slaves?
By Rob Lopresti; Edited by Rudolph Lewis
Of the first five presidents, four owned slaves [Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe]. All four of these owned slaves while they were president. [The exception was John Adams]
Of the next five presidents (#6-10), four owned slaves. Only two of them owned slaves while they were president [Andrew Jackson and John Tyler]
Of the next five presidents (#11-15), two owned slaves. Both of these two owned slaves while they were president. [James K. Polk and Zachary Taylor]
Of the next three presidents (#16-18) two owned slaves. Neither of them owned slaves while serving as president. [Andrew Johnson and Ulysses S. Grant]
The last president to own slaves while in office was the twelfth president, Zachary Taylor (1849-1850).
The last president to own slaves at all was the eighteenth president, Ulysses S. Grant (1869-1877).
So twelve of our presidents owned slaves and eight of them owned slaves while serving as president.
* * * * *
1. George Washington [February 22, 1732 - December 14, 1799]
1789-1797 Virginia
When George Washington took over Mount Vernon at age 22 there were 18 slaves. When he married he gained control of 200 more which technically belonged to the estate of his wife's first husband. By 1786 he owned 216 slaves. (Flexner, James Thomas. George Washington: Anguish and Farewell. Boston: Little, Brown,1969, p.114)
While GW was serving as president in Philadelphia a Pennsylvania law was passed freeing slaves whose owners had been citizens of the state for six months. GW sent his two most valuable slaves home, telling them it was for his wife's convenience.(Wilkins, Roger. Jefferson's Pillow: The Founding Fathers and the Dilemma of Black Patriotism. New York: Beacon Press, 2001, p.76)
http://www.nathanielturner.com/whichpresidentsownedslaves.htm
IMAGE 4: NEGRO INTERPRETATION OF COMMONLY USED WORDS
#3729396 at 2018-11-04 19:33:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #4736: ALL HANDS ON DECK Edition
Ken Starr: No evidence Trump 'has committed high crimes and misdemeanors'
Ken Starr, the independent counsel who investigated former President Bill Clinton and his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky in the 1990s, isn't aware of any evidence that could lead to President Trump's impeachment. "Not even close. I know of no evidence that would suggest that he has committed high crimes and misdemeanors," Starr said during an interview with "The Cats Roundtable" radio host John Catsimatidis.
Starr, however, qualified his comments, saying he isn't abreast of all that special counsel Robert Mueller has found over the course of his federal Russia inquiry. Star also warned Democrats to "be very careful before you move the country toward impeachment," saying that he preferred political differences to be settled at the ballot box. "It's inherently divisive and, essentially, you need a consensus among 'we the people,'" Starr said. "We had that with Richard Nixon. We did not have it with Bill Clinton. We didn't even have it a century and a half ago with Andrew Johnson right after the Civil War. And we certainly don't have it with Donald Trump." "Let's not try to overturn a presidential election, except for the most compelling reasons," he added. "Let's rely on the democratic process." Starr is promoting his memoir, Contempt, which relives his work as part of the Whitewater probe into Clinton.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ken-starr-no-evidence-trump-has-committed-high-crimes-and-misdemeanors
#3663644 at 2018-10-30 15:09:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #4651
>>3663565
Its about orginalism. This Amendment was written by senator who had written the Civil Rights Act of 1866. That act was vetoed by Andrew Johnson. This Amendment was to force states to accept the recently freed Blacks as equal citizens and not use state law to abridge that freedom.
That was what it was about; making former slaves true citizens. Every other use of it by activist judges (birthright citizenship included) will and should be brought into question. Those things were and are not the intent of the 14th Amendment as written in its time.
#3089770 at 2018-09-19 19:12:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3909: Cozy Afternoon Edition
Establishment of US in 1776 as a democratic country with Constitution caused intense targeting of USA for destruction.
- Secret Treaty Of Verona (1822) - "Three Secret (and very important) Congress" (
- Vienna 1814-15,
- Verona 1822,
- Chieri 1825) http://calltodecision.com/hout9.htm
- America would be the target of Jesuit emissaries and that America was to be destroyed at all costs. Every principle of the [U.S.] Constitution was to be dissolved and new Jesuitical principles were to be put into place in order to exalt the Papacy to dominion in America. And fund set up to defeat all democratic govts.
- History of US from 1820's to Lincoln's assassination is missing - Jesuits destroyed the record
-5 Presidents Assassinated by Jesuits In 25 Years:
- Pres. Andrew Jackson (no central bank),
- Wm. H. Harrison (no Divine Right. - arsenic),
- Zachary Taylor (preservation of Union - arsenic),
- James Buchanan (slavery - arsenic survived [Natl Hotel 35 died]), Lincoln (slavery/banks - shot in head)
- PLUS William Seward SecState, Ulysses S. Grant, Andrew Johnson VP.
- Civil War (Jesuits) - Lincoln, Russian Tsar, southern states/British/Jesuits (Mobile, AL, Baltimore, Halifax, French Canada)
- Jesuit Assassination of Pres. John F. Kennedy
#2920034 at 2018-09-07 15:22:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3693: The Trump of Brazil is Badass Edition
"Someone has created this "Ad" for a local US paper. Maybe you can reuse it too!" - Andrew Johnson
checktheevidence.com
#2732541 at 2018-08-25 15:59:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3451 Will the Highest Ranking Anon Please Step Up Edition
Trump Tweet "Michaels"
Michaels Cohen's attorney clarified the record, saying his client does not know if President Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting (out of which came nothing!). The answer is that I did NOT know about the meeting. Just another phony story by the Fake News Media!
Digging Trump and Michaels turns up UCLA law professor, John D. Michaels who teaches:
Law 561A/B - Law and Lawlessness in the Age of Trump
Interesting course description - note #5.
Specifically, this seminar will zero in on:
(1) Independent Counsels, Special Prosecutors, and Impeachment, with consideration of Watergate, the Starr Investigation, and the impeachment of Andrew Johnson
(2) Resistance, with special emphasis on the acts and expressions of defiance from within the Executive Branch.
(3) Constitutional esoterica, with deep dives into the Emoluments Clause and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, coupled with broader discussions of government ethics and professional competence.
(4) "Bully" Pulpit, with a focus on domestic and foreign case studies involving governmental campaigns to belittle, delegitimize, and demonize political and legal critics and rivals.
(5) Martialization, with study of how military culture, military might, and military expertise may take on greater or lesser importance in a given presidential administration.
Definitely relevant to what's going on right now, but maybe just a coincidence.
https://curriculum.law.ucla.edu/guide/InstructorCourse/77?i=9
#2709169 at 2018-08-23 04:06:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3421: South Africa, Asia and Bourdain Edition
>>2709159
Andrew Johnson
#2644679 at 2018-08-17 16:37:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3338: Fresh Bread Served Daily Edition
>>2644672
made this during the mason digs:
LIST OF PRESIDENTS IN SECRET SOCIETIES:
1. George Washington (Freemason AND Rosicrucian)
3. Thomas Jefferson (Rosicrucian)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Polk
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (Rosicrucian)
17. Andrew Johnson
18. Ulysses Grant (Odd Fellows)
19. Rutherford Hayes (Odd Fellows)
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley (Freemason AND Odd Fellows)
26. Theodore Roosevelt (Freemason AND Bohemian Club)
27. William Taft (Freemason AND Skull and Bones)
29. Warren Harding (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
30. Calvin Coolidge (Bohemian Club)
31. Herbert Hoover (Bohemian Club)
32. Franklin Roosevelt (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
33. Harry Truman (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
34. Dwight Eisenhower (Bohemian Club)
35. John F Kennedy (Order of the Elks)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
37. Richard Nixon (Order of Red Friars)
38. Gerald Ford (Freemason, BIlderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
39. Jimmy Carter (Trilateral Commission)
40. Ronald Reagan (Bohemian Club AND William F. Buckley, Jr.)
41. George HW Bush (Skull and Bones, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Knights of Malta, AND Bohemian Club)
42. Bill Clinton (Knights of Malta AND Bilderberg Group)
43. George W Bush (Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, AND Trilateral Commission)
https://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/famous-american-members-of-the-knights-of-malta/
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
https://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/us-presidents-who-were-in-secret-societies-2017-4?r=US&IR=T
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/secret-societies-presidents-joined-including-donald-trump.html/?a=viewall
#2518019 at 2018-08-09 01:20:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3176: Red Wavy Bread
FUN FACT:
The 17th POTUS was Andrew Johnson.
Why?
Because Abraham Lincoln was shot. Johnson was the VP & stepped in and POTUS
#2398109 at 2018-08-01 22:04:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3022 Mainstream Madness Edition
>>2398018
>Andrew Johnson (died July 31st, 1875)
>AJ survived an assassination attempt and became president after Lincoln was killed.
>AJ announced state of emergency.
>"They" call AJ the 'worst' president in US history, so what do you think he /really/ is?
>July 31st rally.
>17th POTUS.
>"Swing Around the Circle".
>Roots.
>Q has been preparing for longer than we might have ever thought.
#2398018 at 2018-08-01 22:00:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3022 Mainstream Madness Edition
Andrew Johnson (died July 31st, 1875).
AJ survived an assassination attempt and became president after Lincoln was killed.
AJ announced state of emergency.
"They" call AJ the 'worst' president in US history, so what do you think he /really/ is?
July 31st rally.
17th POTUS.
"Swing Around the Circle".
Roots.
Q has been preparing for longer than we might have ever thought.
#2382474 at 2018-08-01 02:37:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #3002 Thanks Boss for Congratulating Our 3000th Bread Edition
Andrew Johnson.
July 31.
17th POTUS.
"Swing Around the Circle".
Message.
Origin.
#2380896 at 2018-08-01 01:24:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research Edition #3000 A NEW MILLENIUM and THE WORLD IS ABOUT TO CHANGE EDITION
Today = July 31st.
Andrew Johnson (December 29, 1808 - July 31, 1875)
AJ = 17th president of the US
Preceded Lincoln after his assassination
Trump mentions 17, Abe Lincoln, and its July 31st.
#2380562 at 2018-08-01 01:08:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research Edition #3000 A NEW MILLENIUM and THE WORLD IS ABOUT TO CHANGE EDITION
Today = July 31st.
Andrew Johnson (December 29, 1808 - July 31, 1875)
AJ = 17th president of the US
Preceded Lincoln after his assassination
Trump mentions 17, Abe Lincoln, and its July 31st.
#2378889 at 2018-07-31 23:57:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research Edition #2998: TAMPA RALLY: SUPER HIGH ENERGY EDITION
>>2378843
Andrew Johnson
mirrored JA
#2378843 at 2018-07-31 23:55:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research Edition #2998: TAMPA RALLY: SUPER HIGH ENERGY EDITION
>>2378833
Andrew Johnson
#2177199 at 2018-07-16 19:28:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2744: Pursuit Of Peace Edition
>>2177169
from the freemason digs:
LIST OF PRESIDENTS IN SECRET SOCIETIES:
1. George Washington (Freemason AND Rosicrucian)
3. Thomas Jefferson (Rosicrucian)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Polk
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (Rosicrucian)
17. Andrew Johnson
18. Ulysses Grant (Odd Fellows)
19. Rutherford Hayes (Odd Fellows)
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley (Freemason AND Odd Fellows)
26. Theodore Roosevelt (Freemason AND Bohemian Club)
27. William Taft (Freemason AND Skull and Bones)
29. Warren Harding (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
30. Calvin Coolidge (Bohemian Club)
31. Herbert Hoover (Bohemian Club)
32. Franklin Roosevelt (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
33. Harry Truman (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
34. Dwight Eisenhower (Bohemian Club)
35. John F Kennedy (Order of the Elks)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
37. Richard Nixon (Order of Red Friars)
38. Gerald Ford (Freemason, BIlderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
39. Jimmy Carter (Trilateral Commission)
40. Ronald Reagan (Bohemian Club AND William F. Buckley, Jr.)
41. George HW Bush (Skull and Bones, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Knights of Malta, AND Bohemian Club)
42. Bill Clinton (Knights of Malta AND Bilderberg Group)
43. George W Bush (Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, AND Trilateral Commission)
https://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/famous-american-members-of-the-knights-of-malta/
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
https://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/us-presidents-who-were-in-secret-societies-2017-4?r=US&IR=T
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/secret-societies-presidents-joined-including-donald-trump.html/?a=viewall
#2094396 at 2018-07-09 19:23:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2641: His Name Was Seth Rich Edition
>>2094376
Over time the US Supreme Court has had various numbers of judges. 9 judges is not a constant.
There haven't always been nine justices on the court.
"The U.S. Constitution established the Supreme Court but left it to Congress to decide how many justices should make up the court. The Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number at six: a chief justice and five associate justices. In 1807, Congress increased the number of justices to seven; in 1837, the number was bumped up to nine; and in 1863, it rose to 10. In 1866, Congress passed the Judicial Circuits Act, which shrank the number of justices back down to seven and prevented President Andrew Johnson from appointing anyone new to the court. Three years later, in 1869, Congress raised the number of justices to nine, where it has stood ever since. In 1937, in an effort to create a court more friendly to his New Deal programs, President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to convince Congress to pass legislation that would allow a new justice to be added to the court-for a total of up to 15 members-for every justice over 70 who opted not to retire. Congress didn't go for FDR's plan."
https://www.history.com/news/7-things-you-might-not-know-about-the-u-s-supreme-court
More could be said but that's enough to make my point.
#2057131 at 2018-07-06 18:04:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2595: Feel Good Friday Edition
>>2056891
Well said.
Richard Gage and other Liars for 9/11 Truth - Andrew Johnson
http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=397&Itemid=60
#2033605 at 2018-07-04 23:14:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2565 Happy Windependence Day Anons Edition
>>2033537
>>2033537
that's a very good video to introduce anons to free energy technology.
this video is also a good intro video also.
Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson @ Awakened State, Cabaret Voltaire, Edinburgh 20/11/12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbmX8rbI3AY
#1997045 at 2018-07-02 09:51:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2518: Night Moves Best Moves Edition
>>1996690
Steven Greer Confirms his Support for the Cover Up of 911 Evidence.
"On 21st November at the end of a 3 hour + talk, Steven Greer faced a question from a seemingly informed member of the audience. Greer's response seemed to clearly underline his support for the cover up of what happened on 911. He did not discuss any real evidence - nor did he wish to. Instead, he said very little of note. One might even perceive what he said as a warning - to NOT look at the available evidence…." - Andrew Johnson
http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=422&Itemid=60
#1995946 at 2018-07-02 06:06:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2517: We Need to be heard. How can we achieve this? Edition
The Top of the Pyramid - The Babylonian Cartel
Freemasons < Jesuits < Illuminati < Jews
+
++
+++
Freemasonry is a continuation of the ancient ```BABYLONIAN MYSTERY RELIGION``` which worships Lucifer (they call him GAOTU - "Great Architect Of The Universe" to deceive and make it compatible with their base's existing monotheistic beliefs).
> http://www.hourofthetime.com/wordpresstest/milton-william-bill-cooper-mp3-collection/part-2-episodes-201-through-400-complete-bill-cooper-hour-of-the-time-mp3-collection/ (see mystery babylon series - this is TOP INTEL)
The biblical pharisees while living in captivity in babylon ALSO adopted this religion, and they wrote the mysteries down in their series of books called TALMUD. Today they call themselves (((jews))), and the bible calls them the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN.
If one digs into masonic lecture such as the famous books of Albert Pike (Morals and Dogma) and Manly P. Hall (Secret Teachings of All Ages), the hebrew/caballic/talmudic influence is striking. The same can be said about the books of Aleister Crowley which deal with occult magick.
Jews and Freemasons view outsiders as worthless animals (goyim/profanes) and their only loyalty is to members of their own group. They are the real racists.
> https://youtu.be/tVSZV0BtmPo
(((Masons))) take an oath to swear allegiance and loyalty ONLY to their kind and higher ups. Most of them have no clue what this really is about and are deceived into believing that they're joining a charitable organisation with obvious benefits such as fellow police officers and judges giving them a free ride.
Only the top of the pyramid is initated into the true purpose and the satanic babylonian mysteries.
According to the "Protocols of the Elders of (((Zion)))", freemasonry has been successfully infiltrated by the zionistic elite and is now a tool in their hands.
> http://www.hourofthetime.com/wordpresstest/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/William_Cooper-Behold_a_Pale_Horse1991A.pdf (contains the protocols)
And indeed there's evidence suggesting that the British (((Royals))) who are on top of international freemasonry are in fact crypto-jews (they practice circumcision of their newborn done by a rabbi); and the founders of the Order of (((Jesuits))) who successfully infiltrated the catholic church (Pope Francis = jesuit) were crypto-jews too, as can be judged by them giving the secret hand sign of the marrano on their portraits:
> http://www.marcovuyet.com/alarma%20signum.htm
The (((saudis))) are probably crypto-jews too (Dönmeh).
> https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/10/25/the-doenmeh-the-middle-easts-most-whispered-secret-part-i.html
> https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/10/25/the-doenmeh-the-middle-easts-most-whispered-secret-part-ii.html
The jews hate the christians just like the pharisees hated Jesus Christ and openly admit their hostility.
To subvert christianity, the "Scofield Bible" was produced, featuring numerous comments that promote pro-jewish sentiments. Corrupt priests successfully spread propaganda about a non-existing judeo-christian culture, which resulted in christianity accepting the jews as the "chosen people", even though they are in reality the offspring of cain.
> https://youtu.be/typ2pl2L47k
They have been expelled&prosecuted during all ages due to their subversive activities and child sacrifice practices.
> https://youtu.be/-nZ6mWuGzXw
BONUS RED PILL MATERIAL
Bill Cooper about DOPE, INC (Anti Defamation League), B'naih Brith, Bronfman+the jewish Mafia https://youtu.be/eyQVTJG9Xo8
BURIED BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA - The True Story of Madeleine McCANN (relates to Podestas) http://www.madeleinefilms.net
WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO ? Dr. JUDY WOODS presents evidence you've never seen before on 9/11 https://youtu.be/ermHx3akejc (did you know there was a HURRICANE near the coast of N.Y. on 9/11? hurricane (static field) + microwaves = hutchison effect)
MAKING OF the 9/11 PLANE HOAX - https://youtu.be/YJU55FzcM2A , https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds (the other parts of the series are a PSYOP to discredit Dr. Judy Wood's evidence)
HEAVY WATER GATE - how the DOE covered up a 1989 free energy invention - https://youtu.be/htgV7fNO-2k (the same guy Steven E. Jones was also involved in 9/11 disinfo psyops)
The CURE FOR CANCER - The Story of Vitamin B17 - https://youtu.be/JGsSEqsGLWM
Neil Sanders on MIND CONTROL - https://youtu.be/_F-S0YA347Y
BONUS SPECULATIVE MATERIAL
The ALDEBARAN PROJECT - Very interesting hypothesis about the BLACK KNIGHT satellite https://youtu.be/TdAq1ukr9JI
Alien PSYOP agent (Useful Idiot) Linda Moulton Howe talks about interesting symbolic Alien Programming Language/Drones https://youtu.be/KgFDkSuk_6Y
big thanks to the TRUTH CHAMPIONS Bill Cooper, Ronald Bernard, Fritz Springmeier, Lloyd Pye, Richard D. Hall, Andrew Johnson, Dr. Judy Woods, Timothy Alberino, Steve Quayle, Kevin Shipp
#1967053 at 2018-06-30 05:17:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2480 Enjoy the Night Fags Happy to Have Willing Baker Ready to Step Up Edition
from the other night:
LIST OF PRESIDENTS IN SECRET SOCIETIES:
1. George Washington (Freemason AND Rosicrucian)
3. Thomas Jefferson (Rosicrucian)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Polk
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (Rosicrucian)
17. Andrew Johnson
18. Ulysses Grant (Odd Fellows)
19. Rutherford Hayes (Odd Fellows)
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley (Freemason AND Odd Fellows)
26. Theodore Roosevelt (Freemason AND Bohemian Club)
27. William Taft (Freemason AND Skull and Bones)
29. Warren Harding (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
30. Calvin Coolidge (Bohemian Club)
31. Herbert Hoover (Bohemian Club)
32. Franklin Roosevelt (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
33. Harry Truman (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
34. Dwight Eisenhower (Bohemian Club)
35. John F Kennedy (Order of the Elks)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
37. Richard Nixon (Order of Red Friars)
38. Gerald Ford (Freemason, BIlderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
39. Jimmy Carter (Trilateral Commission)
40. Ronald Reagan (Bohemian Club AND William F. Buckley, Jr.)
41. George HW Bush (Skull and Bones, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Knights of Malta, AND Bohemian Club)
42. Bill Clinton (Knights of Malta AND Bilderberg Group)
43. George W Bush (Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, AND Trilateral Commission)
http://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/famous-american-members-of-the-knights-of-malta/
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/us-presidents-who-were-in-secret-societies-2017-4?r=US&IR=T
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/secret-societies-presidents-joined-including-donald-trump.html/?a=viewall
#1957845 at 2018-06-29 16:03:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2468: If They Ask, They Self-Destruct Edition
from yesterday, in case you're digging on this:
LIST OF PRESIDENTS IN SECRET SOCIETIES:
1. George Washington (Freemason AND Rosicrucian)
3. Thomas Jefferson (Rosicrucian)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Pol
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (Rosicrucian)
17. Andrew Johnson
18. Ulysses Grant (Odd Fellows)
19. Rutherford Hayes (Odd Fellows)
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley (Freemason AND Odd Fellows)
26. Theodore Roosevelt (Freemason AND Bohemian Club)
27. William Taft (Freemason AND Skull and Bones)
29. Warren Harding (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
30. Calvin Coolidge (Bohemian Club)
31. Herbert Hoover (Bohemian Club)
32. Franklin Roosevelt (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
33. Harry Truman (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
34. Dwight Eisenhower (Bohemian Club)
35. John F Kennedy (Order of the Elks)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
37. Richard Nixon (Order of Red Friars)
38. Gerald Ford (Freemason, BIlderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
39. Jimmy Carter (Trilateral Commission)
40. Ronald Reagan (Bohemian Club AND William F. Buckley, Jr.)
41. George HW Bush (Skull and Bones, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Knights of Malta, AND Bohemian Club)
42. Bill Clinton (Knights of Malta AND Bilderberg Group)
43. George W Bush (Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, AND Trilateral Commission)
http://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/famous-american-members-of-the-knights-of-malta/
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/us-presidents-who-were-in-secret-societies-2017-4?r=US&IR=T
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/secret-societies-presidents-joined-including-donald-trump.html/?a=viewall
#1949920 at 2018-06-29 01:35:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2458: EverythinQ Stated Has MeaninQ
>>1949852
wrong:
ACTUALLY SAUCED:
LIST OF PRESIDENTS IN SECRET SOCIETIES:
1. George Washington (Freemason AND Rosicrucian)
3. Thomas Jefferson (Rosicrucian)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Pol
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (Rosicrucian)
17. Andrew Johnson
18. Ulysses Grant (Odd Fellows)
19. Rutherford Hayes (Odd Fellows)
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley (Freemason AND Odd Fellows)
26. Theodore Roosevelt (Freemason AND Bohemian Club)
27. William Taft (Freemason AND Skull and Bones)
29. Warren Harding (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
30. Calvin Coolidge (Bohemian Club)
31. Herbert Hoover (Bohemian Club)
32. Franklin Roosevelt (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
33. Harry Truman (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
34. Dwight Eisenhower (Bohemian Club)
35. John F Kennedy (Order of the Elks)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
37. Richard Nixon (Order of Red Friars)
38. Gerald Ford (Freemason, BIlderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
39. Jimmy Carter (Trilateral Commission)
40. Ronald Reagan (Bohemian Club AND William F. Buckley, Jr.)
41. George HW Bush (Skull and Bones, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Knights of Malta, AND Bohemian Club)
42. Bill Clinton (Knights of Malta AND Bilderberg Group)
43. George W Bush (Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, AND Trilateral Commission)
http://www.jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/famous-american-members-of-the-knights-of-malta/
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/us-presidents-who-were-in-secret-societies-2017-4?r=US&IR=T
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/secret-societies-presidents-joined-including-donald-trump.html/?a=viewall
#1949106 at 2018-06-29 00:43:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2457: PQ'ing Bad Apples
UPDATED LIST (please let me know if you have anything, must sauce it):
LIST OF PRESIDENTS IN SECRET SOCIETIES:
1. George Washington (Freemason AND Rosicrucian)
3. Thomas Jefferson (Rosicrucian)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Pol
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (Rosicrucian)
17. Andrew Johnson
18. Ulysses Grant (Odd Fellows)
19. Rutherford Hayes (Odd Fellows)
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley (Freemason AND Odd Fellows)
26. Theodore Roosevelt (Freemason AND Bohemian Club)
27. William Taft (Freemason AND Skull and Bones)
29. Warren Harding (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
30. Calvin Coolidge (Bohemian Club)
31. Herbert Hoover (Bohemian Club)
32. Franklin Roosevelt (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
33. Harry Truman (Freemason, Order of the Elks, and Odd Fellows)
34. Dwight Eisenhower (Bohemian Club)
35. John F Kennedy (Order of the Elks)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
37. Richard Nixon (Order of Red Friars)
38. Gerald Ford (Freemason, BIlderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
39. Jimmy Carter (Trilateral Commission)
40. Ronald Reagan (Bohemian Club)
41. George HW Bush (Skull and Bones, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, AND Bohemian Club)
42. Bill Clinton (Bilderberg Group)
43. George W Bush (Skull and Bones AND Trilateral Commission)
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/us-presidents-who-were-in-secret-societies-2017-4?r=US&IR=T
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/secret-societies-presidents-joined-including-donald-trump.html/?a=viewall
(ROSICRUCIANS WERE DISTINCTLY NON-SATANISTS, FREEMASONS WERE NOT SATANIC IN THEIR BEGINNINGS, BUT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED BY HIGH RANKING, SINISTER, AND SATANIC PEOPLE; OTHER SOCIETIES HAD DIFFERING DEGREES OF SATANISM, don't know much about some of the others)
#1948383 at 2018-06-29 00:08:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2456: The sQuall Is Coming
LIST OF FREEMASON PRESIDENTS:
1. George Washington (ROSICRUCIAN)
3. Thomas Jefferson (ROSICRUCIAN)
5. James Monroe
7. Andrew Jackson
11. James Pol
15. James Buchanan
16. Abraham Lincoln (ROSICRUCIAN)
17. Andrew Johnson
20. James Garfield
25. William McKinley
26. Theodore Roosevelt
27. William Taft
29. Warren Harding
32. Franklin Roosevelt
33. Harry Truman (masonic # too)
36. Lyndon Johnson (says never completed degrees)
38. Gerald Ford
https://www.historicmysteries.com/rosicrucians/
http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/united-states-masonic-presidents/
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
(ROSICRUCIANS WERE/ARE DISTINCTLY NON-SATANISTS, FREEMASONS WERE NOT SATANIC IN THEIR BEGINNINGS, BUT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED BY HIGH RANKING, SINISTER, AND SATANIC PEOPLE)
#1946925 at 2018-06-28 22:53:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2454: Dream To Reality
SOME MASONS
OCCULT:
Theodor Reuss (Founded OTO)
Carl Kellner (Founded OTO)
Aleister Crowley
ASTRONAUTS:
Buzz Aldrin
John Glenn
AUTHORS:
Mark Twain
John Steinbach
PRESIDENTS:
George Washington
James Monroe
Andrew Jackson
James Polk
James Buchanan
Andrew Johnson
James Garfield
William McKinley
Theodore Roosevelt
Howard Taft
Warren Harding
Franklin Roosevelt
Harry Truman
Gerald Ford
FOUNDING FATHERS:
HISTORY:
ANTI-MASON:
William Morgan (9/11 "Remember this date")
#1899903 at 2018-06-25 17:50:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2393: Deadlines
Andrew Johnson was the 17th President.
Took over when Linkin got wacked.
Was impeached by Congress for firing War Cheif.
#1881138 at 2018-06-24 01:11:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2369: "Beam Of Light ACTIVATED!" Edition
>>1880654
Daniel 11:20 Then shall stand up in his estate a raiser of taxes in the glory of the kingdom: but within few days he shall be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in battle.
I believe this raiser of taxes was President William Jefferson Clinton. Clinton signed the Omnibus (omnibus is a latin word meaning for all) Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 in August of that year, which passed Congress without a Republican vote. It cut taxes for fifteen million low-income families, made tax cuts available to 90% of small businesses, and raised taxes on the wealthiest 1.2% of taxpayers. Keep in mind that The wealthiest 1 percent of households own 34.6 percent of all privately held wealth, and 42.7 percent of all financial wealth. Additionally, through the implementation of spending restraints, it mandated the budget be balanced over a number of years.
In a lame-duck session of Congress after the 1998 elections, the House voted to impeach Clinton, based on the results of the Lewinsky scandal. This made Clinton only the second U.S. president to be impeached (the first being Andrew Johnson). Impeachment proceedings were based on allegations that Clinton had lied about his relationship with 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky in a sworn deposition in the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr Report was submitted to the House providing what it termed "substantial and credible information that President Clinton Committed Acts that May Constitute Grounds for an Impeachment", the House began impeachment hearings against Clinton before the mid-term elections. To hold impeachment proceedings, the Republican leadership called a lame-duck session in December 1998.
The impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton in 1999, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist presiding
While the House Judiciary Committee hearings ended in a straight party-line vote, there was lively debate on the House floor. The two charges passed in the House (largely with Republican support, but with a handful of Democratic votes as well) were for perjury and obstruction of justice. The perjury charge arose from Clinton's testimony about his relationship to Lewinsky during a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by former Arkansas state employee Paula Jones. The obstruction charge was based on his actions during the subsequent investigation of that testimony.
The Senate later voted to acquit Clinton on both charges. The Senate refused to meet to hold an impeachment trial before the end of the old term, so the trial was held over until the next Congress. Clinton was represented by Washington law firm Williams & Connolly. The Senate finished a twenty-one-day trial on February 12, 1999, with the vote (55 Not Guilty/45 Guilty) on both counts falling short of the Constitutional two-thirds majority requirement to convict and remove an officeholder. The final vote was generally along party lines, with no Democrats voting guilty, and only a handful of Republicans voting not guilty.
#1703109 at 2018-06-11 20:46:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #2142: Punisher Time
>>1702960
Yes. He is a major player in the cover-up, along with Jim Fetzer and Richard Gage.
Study Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson for the irrefutable evidence of what happened on 9/11 and how the cover-up works. Andrew's site is:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/
#1236459 at 2018-04-29 18:50:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #1549: Forces Of Nature
>>1236172 (previous bread)
Well said.
Video: Alex Jones CAUGHT in the Crossfire ~ Re: Dr. Judy Wood !
In description: "Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson have a reply for this weekend's rant by Alex Jones triggered by a caller who asked the question: "Why hasn't Dr. Judy Wood been a guest on your show?"
#1209323 at 2018-04-27 15:10:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #1514: Refined Learning
>>1209296
Not all masons are bad. Just a reminder. George Washington was a mason as were James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, James K. Polk, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, James Garfield, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, Warren G. Harding, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Lyndon Johnson and Gerald Ford.
#1006605 at 2018-04-12 02:46:26 (UTC+1)
Qresearch General #1254
Andrew Johnson 17th president. Took over after Lincoln assassination
17th Congress term was officially March 4, 1821, to March 4, 1823; Passed Tariff of Abominations that led directly to Civil War (see previous 17)
17th Amendment made Senators a popular choice instead of a State's choice; effectively disenfranchised States of any Federal power, adopted 1913
All of the 17s above deal directly with US going to war with itself and loss of State power. (Civil War was really about State v Federal power)
#1006381 at 2018-04-12 02:32:06 (UTC+1)
Qresearch General #1254
>>1005902
Andrew Johnson was the #17th President of the United States, serving from 1865 to 1869. Johnson became president as he was vice president at the time of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
A Democrat who ran with Lincoln on the National Union ticket, Johnson came to office as the Civil War concluded. The new president favored quick restoration of the seceded states to the Union. His plans did not give protection to the former slaves, and he came into conflict with the Republican-dominated Congress, culminating in his impeachment by the House of Representatives. He was acquitted in the Senate by one vote
#902144 at 2018-04-05 04:53:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #1120: All Together Now Edition
These timestamps look like they contain info. This one in particular caught my attention because of the double 17s. But it might not have the same impact to those outside of central time zone. So, I just looked at the minutes and seconds.
43 - 43rd President of the US, George W Bush
17 - 17th President of the US, Andrew Johnson, Lincoln's VP when he was assassinated.
#846605 at 2018-03-31 03:01:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #1050: Good Friday. Great Awakening Edition
>>846531
Hillary and Obama will not be convicted of anything but procedural crimes. The idea of treason and sedition is a pipe dream. Was Jefferson Davis hung for treason? No. He was imprisoned but eventually pardoned by Andrew Johnson. It would be best to stop wasting resources and energy on charging people for crimes and demanding justice when we know what the outcome will be. Everyone in politics is guilty of crimes. Until we remove politics, the crimes will continue long after we are all dead and buried.
#701456 at 2018-03-17 23:42:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #869: MOAR Digging Please Edition
>>701334
Andrew Johnson
James Garfield
William McKinley
Theodore Roosevelt
Howard Taft
Warren Harding
Franklin Roosevelt
Harry Truman
Gerald Ford
others after Ford get foggy as they began hiding it
#666435 at 2018-03-14 22:48:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #824: Ready For the Future Edition
>>665908
Possible insult.
Andrew Johnson was the 17th president of the United States and he was impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors". I wouldn't put it past Astros owner liberal Jim Crane to pull that type of stunt.
#568647 at 2018-03-06 17:42:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #700: Remmington Model 700 Edition
i get a kick out of people who claim that others are dupes about 911, but fail to recognize the hidden technology demonstrated to the world that day. some are gatekeepers and others are dupes. it's called DEW (Directed Energy Weapon). actually, this technology is hidden in plain sight because there is much published info that can be found on the internet. atoms and molecules are what we perceive to be solids because they are attracted to each other.
some one has figured out how to make them repel each other.
people should be able to see the towers turn to dust in mid air. watch the 2012 judy wood edinburgh presentation on a large screen in hd and you'll see what is thought to be impossible!
here's the link to a video that will walk you through the info in an easy to understand way:
Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson @ Awakened State, Cabaret Voltaire, Edinburgh 20/11/12
https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbmX8rbI3AY
it may take watching the video more than one time and rewinding it, but i can guarantee you'll see magic.
magic is new technology that tricks the masses. think how a person from long ago would react to a glass of water put into a box and come out boiling without fire or other heat source. >>> it's called a microwave oven nowadays.
if you think this is bs, just ask yourself; on 911, why there was virtually no seismic record, engine blocks disappeared from vehicles, paper fused with iron, people and objects levitated, firemen on the 4th floor stairway felt the building's demise and then saw daylight above them, there was only 3 stories of debris instead what should have been 30 stories, etc?
think
#537215 at 2018-03-03 06:25:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #661: Untitled
President Andrew Johnson pardoned the Confederate soldiers using Proclamation 179, so there is a precedent for a President using the power of pardon in military justice.
#483326 at 2018-02-24 16:29:32 (UTC+1)
Q-Research #595: Holy Guacamole Edition: 649 pages & 27 Videos (CD Available), attached.
APRIL 2nd Significant Events
1792 - The U.S. Congress passed the Coinage Act to regulate the coins of the United States. The act authorized $10 Eagles, $5 Half Eagles, $2.50 Quarter Eagle gold coins, silver dollars, dollars, quarters, dimes and half-dimes to be minted.
1866 - US President Andrew Johnson ends civil war in Alalama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee & Virginia
1914 - The U.S. Federal Reserve Board announced plans to divide the country into 12 districts.
1917 - US President Woodrow Wilson asks Congress to declare war against Germany
1932 - Charles Lindbergh turns over $50,000 as ransom for his kidnapped son
1954 - Plans to build Disneyland 1st announced
1958 - The National Advisory Council on Aeronautics was renamed NASA.
1966 - Soviet Union's Luna 10 becomes 1st spacecraft to orbit Moon
1968 - "2001 A Space Odyssey" directed by Stanley Kubrick and starring Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood, premieres at the Uptown Theater in Washington, D.C.
1973 - CBS radio begins on the hour news, 24 hours a day
1973 - ITT admits to asking CIA to influence Chilean presidential election
1985 - US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
1986 - On a TWA airliner flying from Rome to Athens a bomb exploded under a seat killing four Americans.
1989 - An editorial in the "New York Times" declared that the Cold War was over.
2013 - The United Nations General Assembly adopted the Arms Trade Treaty to regulate the international trade of conventional weapons.
2014 - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that limits on the total amount of money individuals can give political candidates and political action committees were unconstitutional.
#294703 at 2018-02-07 16:08:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #360: New Strzok & Page Texts Released Edition
George Washington
James Monroe
Andrew Jackson
James Polk
James Buchanan
Andrew Johnson
James Garfield
William McKinley
Theodore Roosevelt
Howard Taft
Warren Harding
Franklin Roosevelt
Harry Truman
Gerald Ford
Bush 1&2
many more
All masons. The question is, did the bavarian illuminati succesfully infiltrate and subvert the masons from the inside out by abusing their compartmentalized nature (just as the deep state has our IC)?
"It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.
The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a seperation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned."
#258692 at 2018-02-03 18:39:34 (UTC+1)
Research General #315: Trump Their Sacred Cows Edition
Rasmussen poll
According to a Rasmussen poll conducted in 2007, six presidents-George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy-were rated favorably by at least 80% of Americans.[35]
President Favorable Unfavorable Net favorable
George Washington 94 2 92
Abraham Lincoln 92 4 88
Thomas Jefferson 89 4 85
Theodore Roosevelt 84 8 76
Franklin D. Roosevelt 81 12 69
John F. Kennedy 80 13 67
John Adams 74 9 65
James Madison 73 8 65
Ronald Reagan 72 22 50
Dwight D. Eisenhower 72 15 57
Harry S. Truman 70 14 56
Andrew Jackson 69 14 55
Gerald Ford 62 26 36
John Quincy Adams 59 7 52
Ulysses S. Grant 58 24 34
George H. W. Bush 57 41 16
Jimmy Carter 57 34 23
William Howard Taft 57 15 42
Woodrow Wilson 56 19 37
Bill Clinton 55 41 14
James Monroe 49 10 39
Herbert Hoover 48 34 14
Lyndon B. Johnson 45 42 3
Andrew Johnson 45 26 19
Chester A. Arthur 43 17 26
James A. Garfield 42 16 26
William McKinley 42 24 18
George W. Bush 41 59 ?18
Grover Cleveland 40 26 14
Calvin Coolidge 38 31 7
Rutherford B. Hayes 38 19 19
Richard Nixon 32 60 ?28
Benjamin Harrison 30 35 ?5
Warren G. Harding 29 33 ?4
James Buchanan 28 32 ?4
James K. Polk 27 21 6
Zachary Taylor 26 18 8
Martin Van Buren 23 19 4
William Henry Harrison 21 16 5
Franklin Pierce 17 25 ?8
Millard Fillmore 17 25 ?8
John Tyler 9 15 ?6
Looks like George W Bush has lower approval rating then Trump.
8kun Midnight Riders Posts (1)
#22282 at 2020-12-12 02:04:10 (UTC+1)
QR Midnight Riders #101: Binary Palindrome "We In Here Edition"
We are going bigger…
1.) At first I thought like Kanye we would be abolishing the reconstruction amendments because they are unconstitutional, but now I think we are looking at abolishing the whole constitution and revert back to The Articles of Confederation or the Constitution of the Confederate States.
why unconstitutional? (Article I, Section 2, Clause 3. The second prohibition was not given an expiration date and remains in effect. It expressly provides that no amendment shall deprive a state of its equal suffrage (representation) in the Senate, as described in Article I, Section 3, Clause 1, without that state's consent.)->
Abraham Lincoln (deep state puppet) waived habeas corpus and later Andrew Johnson wanted to bring the southern states back into the union fast and clean, but the radical republican's (deep state) tried to impeach Johnson and past some stupid laws anyway the south had its rights waived and put under Martial Law. The 13th, 14th, and 15th were ratified at gunpoint and not by elected senators, in fact most the states did not attend.
--------
I think if we could match all the "Alice in Wonderland" and "through the looking glass" markers with news articles about SCOTUS decisions we could figure how. There are tons of news articles where the author complains about the "Alice in Wonderland Reading of the 14th Amendment" or "Alice in Wonderland reading of the due process clause" for example.
Anyway we have the power to make disappear the corrupt supreme court and corrupt constitution just like Maverick says below at the end of his article..
from -> http://maverickamerican.blogspot.com/2007/03/xxxviii-alice-in-judicial-wonderland.html
(we are Alice here)
"Such is our judicial wonderland. But like Alice's Wonderland, sometimes it loses the appearance of reality. You remember the scene when Alice awoke from her dream.
She was sitting in the court room at the trial of the Knave of Hearts, and the Queen screamed at her, "Off with her head!" once too often.
"Who cares for you?" said Alice (she had grown to her full size by this time). "You're nothing but a pack of cards!" And so they were-and the whole court flew up in a gust of wind and was scattered about like dry leaves."
8chan/8kun QRB Posts (3)
#52173 at 2021-05-10 14:30:12 (UTC+1)
QRB General #170: United In The Face Of Tyranny Edition
Warning Warning, They Are Desperate
KEK. Comms - GET OUT! NOW! Suicide weekend...?
'We May Not Have a Full Two Years': Democrats' Plans Hinge on Good Health
On March 21, 1950, an Illinois congressman named Ralph Church suddenly slumped in his seat while testifying before a House committee. His colleagues rushed to administer aid, but he was pronounced dead of a heart attack at 66.
He was neither the first nor the last member of Congress to die in office.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
"You look back in history, nearly 1 in 10 members of Congress have," said Jane L. Campbell, president of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society.
That history has some Democrats worried that deaths or illnesses could derail President Joe Biden's efforts to pass ambitious bills through Congress, which his party controls by the narrowest margins in decades.
"Our ability to make good on Biden's agenda is pretty much dangling by a thread," said Brian Fallon, a former aide to Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the majority leader. "I don't think it's uncouth to talk about it. I think it's a reality that has to inform the urgency with which we approach those issues."
More than 1,160 sitting members and members-elect have died from accidents, disease and violence since the first Congress met in 1789, according to a New York Times analysis of House and Senate records. They include multiple House speakers, famed senators and two former presidents: John Quincy Adams and Andrew Johnson, who both returned to Congress after leaving the White House.
The pandemic and the Jan. 6 Capitol uprising fueled fears that this Congress was particularly vulnerable to such deaths. But with most members vaccinated and security tightened, old age may be a bigger threat. The average age of a sitting senator is 64, and for a representative it is 58, making this Congress one of the oldest.
"Heart disease and cancer are really the two most common causes of mortality, and they are both things that increase with age," said Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a professor of medical ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, who served on Biden's pandemic task force before he took office.
On average, 10 lawmakers have died in each two-year Congress: seven House members and three senators. Deaths peaked in the 1940s, and have slowed in recent decades. But every Congress except two has lost at least one member.
In the House this term, deaths have already affected the parties' close margins. Three members - Ron Wright of Texas and Rep.-elect Luke Letlow of Louisiana, both Republicans; and Democrat Alcee Hastings of Florida - have died, the most in a Congress in its first three months since the early 1980s. (Wright and Letlow died from COVID-19.)
Health problems have also dogged the Senate. Patrick Leahy, 81, D-Vt., was briefly hospitalized in January. Thom Tillis, 60, a North Carolina Republican, underwent cancer treatment. Questions have been raised about the health of Dianne Feinstein, 87, a Democrat who has represented California since 1992. Vermont's other senator, Bernie Sanders, 79, had a heart attack in 2019.
In the most extreme case, deaths could end Democrats' ability to pass legislation without Republican support - or even flip control of either chamber. That is more likely in the evenly divided Senate, where a single Democratic vacancy could hand Republicans committee gavels and the power to schedule votes until a Democratic successor was appointed or elected.
A serious illness could also upset the party's delicate legislative arithmetic.
"Schumer needs all 50 votes," said Fallon, now the executive director of Demand Justice, a progressive advocacy group focused on the federal judiciary. "If somebody is laid up or is hospitalized for a long period of time and their vote's not there, then having the majority is somewhat meaningless."
House vacancies are filled by special election, and relatively few seats are competitive, lowering the chances that deaths could alter partisan control. No special election to Congress so far this year has flipped a seat.
But special elections take time to organize; delays could further shrink Democrats' single-digit margin for error. Though House control has never changed mid-session, Republicans could push to elect a new speaker and take over committees if vacancies forced Democrats below a majority of seats, said Sarah Binder, a George Washington University political scientist who has studied congressional deaths.
more
https://www.yahoo.com/news/may-not-full-two-years-121420637.html
#48815 at 2021-04-28 01:02:38 (UTC+1)
QRB General #131: Of Frogs And Kun Edition
"The people have spoken," said former New York City Mayor Ed Koch after the Democratic mayoral primary of 1989, "and they must be punished."
The understandably bitter Koch had just been defeated by David Dinkins and was bidding his farewell to politics. And in fact, the people were punished: The one-term Dinkins, who defeated Rudy Giuliani in the general election that year to become the city's first black mayor, saw crime soar on his impeccably tailored watch, with murders hitting a high of 2,605 the following year.
Four years later, even the Upper West Side had had enough and called the cops, in the form of Giuliani and his police chief, Bill Bratton.
Still, there was a hidden grain of truth in Koch's famous crack: There is a vindictive element to Democrat electoral politics, especially in the 30 years since Hizzoner left Gracie Mansion. As the parties have polarized, a destructive element has entered our politics, and with malice aforethought. This will not end well.
There's always been a certain amount of pendulum swing in the peculiar version of "democracy" known as our republican form of government. Everyone runs against the "other guy," the party in power, the Swamp, and yet too often-as with Mark Twain's famous crack about the weather-nobody really does anything about it.
For all the talk, the comfortable middle of Eisenhower, Kennedy, Nixon, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush-drifting ever leftward, to be sure-was where the country seemed to want to be.
Civil War
But sometimes not. In the run-up to the Civil War, polarization over the issues of slavery and secession saw the death of one party (the Whigs), the birth of another (the Republicans), and the complete radicalization of a third (the Democrats, led in part by the spirit of the traitor and murderer Aaron Burr, who gained political advantage through Tammany Hall a decade after its founding).
The result was four years of the bloodiest armed conflict in American history. Peace was finally restored at Appomattox, but the causes still linger-in particular, the Democrats' fondness for brute force.
Despite their loss in the War Between the States, the Democrats never gave up. Talk about the "resistance"-they fought the Reconstruction amendments tooth and nail, and gave birth to the Ku Klux Klan, which attacked not only blacks but Jews and Catholics as well.
So unyielding were they in their fanaticism that the election of 1876 wasn't finally decided until the GOP agreed to the withdrawal of the remaining federal troops in the old Confederacy, thus instantly erasing black political progress and ushering in nearly a century of Jim Crow.
"The South will rise again!" became the rallying cry of what is, in effect, a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.
That never happened-not, at least, in terms of regional revolution. But the Democrats, who should have been disbanded and outlawed in 1865 after their armed insurrection against the lawfully constituted government of the United States, in fact, did rise again. A Maryland Democrat assassinated Abraham Lincoln, thus putting a Democrat, Andrew Johnson, into the White House.
As the Old South gradually became more populous and prosperous, the Democrats moved north, where their innate, Jeffersonian radicalism found fresh new soil. New England, which had led the fight against slavery, maintained its revolutionary inclinations as it shifted from rock-ribbed Republican to urban, immigrant Democrat, easy emotional prey for the anarcho-socialists.
continue the article
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/with-parties-polarized-desire-for-revenge-calls-the-tune_3792332.html?v=ul
https://parler.com/profile/GenFlynn/posts
#39607 at 2019-12-12 22:17:55 (UTC+1)
QRB General #51: Nancy Pelosi Will Never Be President of the United States Edition
hot off the presses, good recap of (crap) proceedings today
Proposed amendment in articles of impeachment says Ukraine received aid - live updates
WASHINGTON - The House Judiciary Committee reconvened Thursday at 9 a.m. to decide whether articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump should be forwarded to the full chamber for a vote as early as next week.
With a heavy Democratic advantage, the panel is expected to approve both articles - abuse of power and obstruction of congress - which relate to Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating political rival Joe Biden. But Republicans are expected to offer a number of amendments that could take most of the day to sort through.
If the panel adopts one or both articles, Trump would join Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton as the only presidents who faced specific charges over alleged misconduct. Johnson and Clinton were impeached while Nixon resigned before the House held a vote....
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/12/12/trump-impeachment-house-judiciary-begin-voting-articles/4398725002/