|
Why is the information re: BO important re: U1 and export approval to Canada to EU? |
-It was illegal and against US interests/national security
- Collusion and intent at the very highest level. Sitting president committed treason.
SCREENSHOT: https://postimg.cc/vckFnRM6
He approved an illegal sale through a company that was under investigation by the FBI. |
|
Where is BO today? |
Finding BHO is impossible using standard internet.
11/8 in Chicago-jury duty |
|
Did BO and/or his admin ever make false statements that U1 would never be exported from the US? |
Not in the Administration, but Oilprice.com reported the US NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) had not granted Russia licesnces to export uranium from the US (https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Does-Russia-Really-Own-20-Of-The-US-Uranium-Reserves.html). Apparently Senator John Barrasso (R-WY, where most of U1 is) tried to warn Obama that the Russians did not have or request the correct licenses but that uranium had been shipped to Canada. He said he was ignored. (http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/417425/barrasso-uranium-has-left-united-states-i-worry-about-iran-getting-uranium-jim) |
|
Who made those statements? |
NRC told WY Sen. John Barasso that the uranium would not be exported. After John Christensen saw uranium leaving Uranium One on his property, Donna Wichers (Uranium One spokeswoman) said the uranium was taken to Canada for processing and 75% returned to the US, the rest to Japan & Western Europe. (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html) |
|
Who did they report to? |
Chairman of NRC is appointed by the President and serves at his pleasure. (NUREG-0980 Vol 1 No 10 "Nuclear Regulatory Legislation" Section 23 Footnote 24.) https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1327/ML13274A489.pdf#page=241 |
|
Why is this relevant? |
President Obama probably had some idea what was going on with Uranium 1
Chairman of the NRC lied to Sen. John Barasso upon BHO's orders. |
|
The public has been given a select taste (i.e. sampling) - rest assured others have it all (100% verifiable and impossible to refute). Why is this relevant? |
Raise suspicion, prepare them to receive what's coming.
Gives POTUS leverage over bad actors |
|
Who controls the narrative? |
The newswires (AP, Thompson-Reuters, Gannett)
- Deep state
- CIA
on behalf of the cabal
Muckety Map of Gannett direct link to image:
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/bcb2624b65d81971f57b05d375526ca1f610dc87ef4952180da8dcdf3f2435c6.png |
|
Why are left wing organizations beginning to report on DNC/D corruption? |
1) Critical mass of civilian-reporting/journalism +Wikileaks info forces them to acknowledge it.
2) Protection for some has been removed, so certain information can now be stated without personal threat.
-HRC is being hung out to dry
-Donna Brazile's book being published.
-The strings that control the left wing organizations are being cut.
- If those "above you" are taken down, you have more freedom. |
|
Does the CIA have operators inside the MSM? |
Definitely |
|
What happens if exposed? |
It will weaken the MSM's message, though not all will believe it
MSM goes down. Shock and awe will affect the public at large. Proves POTUS is right about fake news. FCC could shut them down. Rise of internet related news continues exponentially. |
|
What happens if tied back as 'knowing' to execs? |
They'll never control the narrative again
Trump Tweet 10/11/17: "With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!"
If the executives knowingly disseminated false information, would they lose their licenses and/or open themselves up to criminal and/or civil prosecution? On a larger scale, treason? |
|
What does this have to do with 'leaking'? |
"Leaking" is a form of control; you have some newbie reporter hot to make a mark in journalism; you set him/her up with a deep state operative and leak some information;info turns out to be legit; he/she is now lauded for great journalism, gets a raise, goes into debt; deep state now owns the journalist. Journalist has to keep getting the leaks to keep being an "insider"; deep state can now slant stories, ask for "favors" to help massage the narrative and occasionally just lie. But journalist has to accept the lie because otherwise, they receive no more leaks.
Knowingly committed crime
Perfectly illustrated in the television series "House of Cards." President uses reporter Zoe Barnes this way. |
|
What if it can be verified no sourced stories (made up) were in fact (and approved) to be published? |
The leaks are real the news is fake.
Proves propaganda, Operation Mockingbird.
The public will have a mass panic and not know what is real.
Distrust. Anger. Guilt.
Loss of broadcast license, Potential for civil or criminal charges.
It then becomes who created the stories and by what orders and from whom. Yes, FCC revokes license. |
|
SUMMARY |
The information regarding Obama is important regarding Uranium 1 and his export approval to Canada to EU. Find Obama today. Obama and/or his administration made false statements that Uranium 1 would never be exported from the US. Someone made those statements. Someone they report to. The public has been given a select taste - rest assured others have it all.
The CIA controls the narrative. Left wing organizations are beginning to report on DNC/Democrat corruption. The CIA has operators inside the MSM. What happens if tied back as 'knowing' to execs.? This has to do with with 'leaking'. It can be verified no sourced stories were in fact approved to be published.
The wormhole goes deep. |