Q-Posts

  • Q-Post #4535

    previous Post share: next Post
    #4535 at 2020-06-28 21:56:10 (UTC+1)

    A person(s) value:
    1. vote
    2. monetary value (tax contribution)
    3.
    Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?
    [2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')
    [1] remains a variable
    [1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination
    What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
    What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
    What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
    What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
    What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
    What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
    Fact becomes fiction?
    Fiction becomes fact?
    When does news become propaganda?
    Identity creation?
    How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
    Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand 'news' name?
    Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the 'majority/mainstream viewpoint' in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
    'Mainstream' is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
    [If majority of people believe 'x' then 'x' must be validated / true]
    Why do 'mainstream' media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
    Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
    Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different 'trusted' sources?
    Do 'echo chamber' tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
    Threat to intellectual freedom?
    Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
    Read again - digest.
    Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
    THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS.
    Logical thinking.
    Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]'s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other 'ism'?
    How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz?
    No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why?
    Pre/post 2016 election?
    Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]?
    Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
    Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
    Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
    When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
    Control of the narrative = power
    When you are blind, what do you see?
    They want you divided.
    Divided by religion.
    Divided by race.
    Divided by sex.
    Divided by political affiliation.
    Divided by class.
    When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers].
    Divided you are weak.
    Divided you pose no threat to their control.
    When 'non-dogmatic' information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept - sheep].
    When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable ('group-think' collective), and have 'free thought'.
    "Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
    THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
    Q
    Answers & Decodings - source: spreadheet
    >9778955 https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/9778677.html#q9778955 https://archive.fo/1A6TT#selection-29685.0-29693.12

    Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/28/20 (Sun) 20:18:28208ed4
    https://twitter.com/TheSpunQ/status/1277331318389592065 If the news is untrustworthy, corrupt, controlled, and simply an extension [arm] of the [D] party… How do you circumvent? [controlled lines of comm [propaganda]] How do you communicate directly with the people? Backchannels are important. Information warfare. Knowledge is >power< TheSpunQ tweet: https://archive.fo/HKKtN Part 7... Featuring @EricTrump ...! #qanon #wwg1wga https://twitter.com/TheSpunQ/status/1277331318389592065/photo/1 4:01 PM · Jun 28, 2020

    SCREENSHOT: https://postimg.cc/QKKK7tYK