Q-Posts

  • Q-Post #368

    previous Post share: next Post
    #368 at 2017-12-19 04:53:53 (UTC+1)

    >>121501
    We would not 'intentionally' harm a person in the pursuit of a TARGET.
    This was retaliatory re: ATL.
    Q
    Answers & Decodings - source: spreadheet
    RESPONDING TO: >>121501 https://8ch.net/cbts/res/120902.html#121501 https://archive.fo/KurGP#selection-42173.0-42179.0

    12/18/17 (Mon) 23:51:20 fc4520
    We would not 'intentionally' harm a person in the pursuit of a TARGET. Q is quick to clarify that their operations will never be as sloppy as "crash a train" to capture someone. If we see casualties, it is the bad actors, not the /ourguys/. Q knows that ends don't justify the means.
    This was retaliatory re: ATL. The train crash in Washington was retaliation for taking a target into custody at Atlanta Airport earlier. Train crash was an intentional act by bad actors. (domestic terrorism)

    INCORRECT ANON - ANTIFA POST RE: TRAIN CRASH WAS MONTHS EARLIER, AND WAS DELETED AFTER PRESENT TRAIN CRASH, BUT ANTIFA DID NOT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CRASH IN WA. - TY SA
    [ARE THE FISA REDACTIONS LEGAL? SIDE-BY-SIDE GRAPHIC] filename: DpAd_R_W4AEJntk.jpg-large.jpg

    original image: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/089785b6358522342b2a8bd64c42d9873b29e8d1bd7a15be9e259e1298396820.jpg direct link: https://postimg.cc/rKGvtZpY