Q-Posts

  • Q-Post #2943

    previous Post share: next Post
    #5488382 at 2019-03-04 00:17:55 (UTC+1)

    https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102265163107971077
    More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.
    If 'evidence' exists(ed), under 'broad' scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?
    https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
    The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
    (i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
    (ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
    (iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. 600.4(a).
    Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the 'intended engagement'?
    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html
    Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?
    If 'evidence' exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS ..............?
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536
    If 'evidence' exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R's + D's) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?
    When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?
    Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.
    Group-Think.
    Control of the Narrative.
    If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?
    NATIONAL CRISIS.
    Q