Q-Posts

  • Q-Post #2369

    previous Post share: next Post
    #2369 at 2018-10-08 17:39:07 (UTC+1)

    https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-redactions-protected-political-embarrassment-not
    [Why not?] [if true] D's do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?
    Why are D's opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?
    DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT - why the block?
    Define 'Projection'.
    See article above - redactions made to 'protect' exposing the REAL TRUTH?
    Logical thinking.
    McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] 'wear a wire'
    Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House
    Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]
    [Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House
    Locked & Loaded.
    Q
    Answers & Decodings - source: spreadheet