8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (1)
#9110893 at 2020-05-10 18:16:46 (UTC+1)
Q Reearch General #11661: Happy Mothers Day, Q Team! Edition
Open Borders: Supreme Court Says Criminal Can't Be Deported to Country with Worse Healthcare than UK
Britain's Supreme Court has thrown the country's deportation policies into chaos by ruling that a foreign criminal cannot be deported to a country with poorer free healthcare than the United Kingdom.
Justices including the top court's infamous former president, Lady Hale, and two colleagues who also serve as ad hoc members of the European Court of Human Rights, agreed with a Zimbabwean migrant who should have been deported more than a decade ago that his removal would breach Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which states that "No-one shall be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".
The migrant's lawyers cleverly reinterpreted this European article, understood by most to be a prohibition against physical torture and holding people in unsanitary conditions, as a right for his client to remain in Britain so long as his home country could not provide him with the same expensive, taxpayer-funded HIV medication as the British National Health Service (NHS) free of charge - and the Supreme Court concurred.
The court also "ordered that no one shall publish or reveal the name or address" of the Zimbabwean, restricting the freedom of the press to provide the public with the full facts of the case - although it did reveal that he was "convicted of battery" before the government ordered his deportation and further convicted of "offences including possession of a firearm and ammunition" after the order was given but not carried out.
The government, already deporting ever-fewer migrants amid ever-rising levels of illegal migration, now fears the precedent set by the judgment will jeopardise many more deportations, including that of ISIS fighter-linked gang rapist Yaqub Ahmed - who was on the verge of finally being flown out of the country in October 2018 before a mutiny by passengers, who were seemingly never punished, allowed him to stay and lodge more appeals.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/05/10/open-borders-judges-supreme-court-says-criminals-cant-be-deported-if-homeland-worse-healthcare-uk/
8chan/8kun QResearch UK Posts (1)
#7642364 at 2019-12-28 15:37:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research UK #10: United We Stand Edition
Former Tory leader Michael Howard has said judges sometimes "distort" the law they are interpreting "to reach the result they want to achieve".
Lord Howard, a former barrister, criticised the Supreme Court for ruling that Boris Johnson's suspension of Parliament was unlawful.
On Friday, outgoing Supreme Court President Lady Hale insisted judges were not "politically motivated".
But Lord Howard questioned whether unelected judges should make the law.
The Conservative manifesto pledged to review the "relationship between the government, Parliament and the courts" and the Queen's Speech included plans for a "constitution, democracy and rights commission".
In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lord Howard said there had been "a significant increase in the power of the judges at the expense of Parliament and indeed government".
He said this was partly because of the expansion of judicial review - where a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision made by a government or other public body.
It was also because "they were invited by Parliament, under the Human Rights Act, to enter the political arena by considering, for example, whether the measures that Parliament had taken to deal with a particular problem were proportionate to the objectives they wanted to achieve", he said.
"Sometimes in order to reach the result they want to achieve, they… distort the meaning of the Act of Parliament of which they are interpreting," he added.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-50933535#