8chan/8kun QResearch Posts (4)
#15541358 at 2022-02-04 04:46:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #19653: Space Trucking Edition
https://gab.com/KHorlor/posts/107736402180426836
Ken Horlor
@KHorlor
6h
?
?
New Zealand Gab
?
It's time to reflect on how Jabcinda Ardern came to power. This is not a good story, it illustrates perfectly the role MMP played and its complete failure as a system.
?? Arden became a list MP. She could not win the Auckland Central electorate seat despite trying more than once. The Labour party chose her, the people rejected her, but she stayed on nonetheless;
?? She gained an electorate when David Shearer stepped down. This is a safe Labour seat previously held by likes of Helen Clark and Warren Freer.
?? She became Labour leader in a surprise move in the runup to the 2017 General Election. Andrew Little stepped aside rather surprisingly, catapulting Ardern into the limelight;
?? Despite that, she came second, a distant second at that.
?? In post election coalition negotiations, Winston Peters of NZ First chose Ardern and anointed her as prime minister. The resulting Labour/NZ First coalition was a true minority government as it had fewer votes than the Opposition. The cowardly Greens propped up the government by becoming a 'support partner', which meant they avoided being in government with the all the responsibilities that that entails, but with all the perks.
?? After a series of crises, Ardern developed her cult of personality, culminating in her emergency measures as the result of a shamdemic.
?? She then rigged the 2020 General Election. The party vote is paramount and this had to be rigged. How do we know this? Across the country, rural and regional seats party voted Labour, but we are expected to believe these same voters chose to split their two votes, party vote Labour and electorate vote National. In the South Island 100% of rural seats voted Labour, but with the exception of Rangitata where National fielded no candidate, all these seats chose a National party person for their local MP. There should be a Tui billboard…Yeah right. Strangely, National capitulated, which makes them look complicit.
?? Ardern then became a rampaging genocidal maniac.
Jabcinda Ardern was parachuted in, elevated without reason, placed in charge and then set about destroying New Zealand. This is so obvious that you don't even need to be hit by a feather duster to see it.
Remove her from office. Then start the arrests.
#5768832 at 2019-03-19 08:34:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7378: to 'KILL' a Mocking Bird Edition
>>5768742
Don't forget, Helen Clark -> Phil Goff -> David Shearer -> David Cunliffe -> Andrew Little -> Jacinda in 9 years. Not as bad as Australia, but major fuggery going on there.
If they don't get what they want, they can move these people about like pawns.
#670713 at 2018-03-15 06:17:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #830: OIG Report Expected? Edition
Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill and the
companion Telecommunications (lnterception Capability and Security) Billwere
proposed in the wake of an illegal spying scandal. It emeiged that the bureau had
illegally snooped on internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom and dozens of Kiwis.
The Government argued it was necessary to tighten up the legislation to allow the
GCSB to carry out surveillance on behalf of domestic agencies. However, critics say
the legislation goes far beyond clarifying the law and actually grants the spy agency
new functions and much broader powers. Almost 30 per cent of those polled said
they were "very concerned" about a law change that would allow the GCSB to
intercept New Zealanders' communications, not just foreign ones. Just under a
quarter were not at al! concerned.
However, just over half of respondents (53.6 per cent) said they trusted the
Government to protect their right to privacy whilst maintaining national security.
Almost 40 per cent disagreed. Disquiet over the legislation is fuelled by spying
revelations about mass surveillance by the United States National Security Agency.
Mr Key yesterday said he would resign if the GCSB was found to engage in
pervasive snooping. He also came under pressure to explicitly write into law
protections around the content of communications.
He argued this was already provided by the interaction of three clauses. He will spell
this out in a speech to Parliament today which he says will give judges interpreting
the law in future a clear steer on the Government's intentions. Disagreement over the
legislation spilled over into an extradrdinary exchange during question time yesterday.
Mr Key accused Labour leader David Shearer of creeping up Beehive stairs to his
office to keep secret a meeting about the law change.
'We sat down and had about a 3O-minute discussion where Mr Shearer said 'keep
this confidential. lf you come out and say we've done it that won't look good and I
don't want you shouting it about the House'." Mr Shearer does not deny the meeting,
or trying to hush it up, but he insisted that it was not initiated by Mr Key. This is the
Government's bill, the Government did not do anything to try and initiate a sit-down
with other parties in order to get broader consensus across the House," he said
Dotcom's lawyers, Paul Davison, QC, and William Akel, from Simpson Grierson,
described a chain of evidence taken from court actions since the raid. Among the
actions was a finding at the High Court that the search warrant used for the raid was
unlawful and the raid illegal. The claim accused police of "unne@ssary force and
aggressive intimidatory tactics" by using armed anti-terrorist police in an airborne
assault on the north Auckland mansion. The claim highlighted doors being kicked in
and Dotcom's wife Mona, pregnant with twins at the time, being kept forcibly from her
three young children.
It also targets the GCSB in the legal action for illegal spying - and then attempting to
legally cover it up. Prime Minister John Key was forced to apologise last September
after Dotcom's legal team told the High Court it was illegal by law for the GCSB to
spy on New Zealand residents. Dotcom and co-defendant Bram van der Kolk were
residents and protected by law at the time. The claim says the GCSB should have
known they were not to be spied on - and should have done its own checks instead
of relying-on the police's flawed evidence.
It accused GCSB boss lan Fletcher of acting unlawfully by giving "incomplete" and
"misleading" information to Mr English, who ln Mr Key's absence signed a once-in-a-
decade certificate legally ordering the GCSB's involvement to be kept obscured. The
certificate turned out to be worthless when the illegality was raised. The claim
specifies sums ranging from $1 million to $50,000 for a range of points. An additional
case is made for the cost of repairing damage, including kicking in doors and ruining
expensive computer systems, caused by police in the raid. The case is set to be
heard in March, just before the likely date of the long-delayed extradition hearing
So Where's Key'sresignation?
#670640 at 2018-03-15 06:01:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #830: OIG Report Expected? Edition
Prime Minister John Key says he and the head of GCSB would resign if the spy agency were found to have
conducted mass suryeillance. He made the comment to reporters at Parliament in the light of assurances that
the changes to the GCSB Act2003 would not mean mass surveillance of New Zealanders. Asked if he and
GCSB chief Ian Fletcher would resign if there were maris surveillance, he said yes. "But the facts of life are
it won't happen." For that to happen, the GCSB would have to undertake illegal activity.
The Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill and the
companion Telecommunications (lnterception Capability and Security) Billwere
proposed in the wake of an illegal spying scandal. It emeiged that the bureau had
illegally snooped on internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom and dozens of Kiwis.
The Government argued it was necessary to tighten up the legislation to allow the
GCSB to carry out surveillance on behalf of domestic agencies. However, critics say
the legislation goes far beyond clarifying the law and actually grants the spy agency
new functions and much broader powers. Almost 30 per cent of those polled said
they were "very concerned" about a law change that would allow the GCSB to
intercept New Zealanders' communications, not just foreign ones. Just under a
quarter were not at al! concerned.
However, just over half of respondents (53.6 per cent) said they trusted the
Government to protect their right to privacy whilst maintaining national security.
Almost 40 per cent disagreed. Disquiet over the legislation is fuelled by spying
revelations about mass surveillance by the United States National Security Agency.
Mr Key yesterday said he would resign if the GCSB was found to engage in
pervasive snooping. He also came under pressure to explicitly write into law
protections around the content of communications.
He argued this was already provided by the interaction of three clauses. He will spell
this out in a speech to Parliament today which he says will give judges interpreting
the law in future a clear steer on the Government's intentions. Disagreement over the
legislation spilled over into an extradrdinary exchange during question time yesterday.
Mr Key accused Labour leader David Shearer of creeping up Beehive stairs to his
office to keep secret a meeting about the law change.
'We sat down and had about a 3O-minute discussion where Mr Shearer said 'keep
this confidential. lf you come out and say we've done it that won't look good and I
don't want you shouting it about the House'." Mr Shearer does not deny the meeting,
or trying to hush it up, but he insisted that it was not initiated by Mr Key. This is the
Government's bill, the Government did not do anything to try and initiate a sit-down
with other parties in order to get broader consensus across the House," he said