QResear.ch

#7394334 at 2019-11-29 17:13:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9456: I see a cold Moon rising . . . Edition

>>7394279

Right. It is very weird that sather goes from solid investigation with good sauce to absolutely believing hearsay with very weak sauce.

#7381046 at 2019-11-27 04:03:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9439: The Best Is Yet To Come Edition

>>7381014
What is the deal with sather?
Is he controlled op?

#7381024 at 2019-11-27 04:00:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9439: The Best Is Yet To Come Edition

>>7381020
Don't forget to slather it sather

#7381023 at 2019-11-27 04:00:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9439: The Best Is Yet To Come Edition

>>7381014
>Jordan sather secretly suns his butt hole...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

some people have it way too easy

#7381014 at 2019-11-27 03:59:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9439: The Best Is Yet To Come Edition

Jordan sather secretly suns his butt hole…

https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/1199495532017639424?s=20

#7380719 at 2019-11-27 03:06:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9439: The Best Is Yet To Come Edition

>>7380694

sather would know hes being a fame fag by pulling this

#7380694 at 2019-11-27 03:02:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9439: The Best Is Yet To Come Edition

>>7380681
could be ets but i'm leaning towards sather

#7378224 at 2019-11-26 21:00:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9436: Moar Memes,Diggs n Bewbs for the cause! Less Whine! Edition

Jordan sather
@Jordan_sather_
11m11 minutes ago

"The White House was briefly put on lockdown this morning after a possible unidentified aircraft or other "anomaly" violated restricted airspace."

I can only assume its President Trump's new antigravity saucer to travel in, courtesy of the Space Force

https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/1199430350729957376

#7366646 at 2019-11-25 00:12:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9421: What is and what should never be? D5 Bitches! DJT got you buried! Edition

I was so bored when the board was down I ……….
1) Watched a Jordan sather video
2) ………

#7332133 at 2019-08-04 04:13:32 (UTC+1)
Q RESEARCH GENERAL: #9381 EBAKE I'VE NEVER DONE THIS SORRY EDITION

>>7332115
You become agitated and mention this Jordan sather every time I post that image. Why is that?

#7332115 at 2019-08-04 04:12:27 (UTC+1)
Q RESEARCH GENERAL: #9381 EBAKE I'VE NEVER DONE THIS SORRY EDITION

>>7331974
>>7332010
Bullshit. Jordan sather pusher bullshit. No proof it works. Everything is man made In acrylic. Not Organic. California get sprayed almost daily. They changed patterns because we the people caught on an Are exposing this bullshit. Anyone connected to Jordan is to now bring in the BS Alien Agenda which keeps getting nasa funded daily with 45billion of tax payers money!!!

#7317746 at 2019-08-03 02:57:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9363: QQQ Comms Good? The Ticker Talks Edition

>>7317720
You are reaching again sather.

#7309330 at 2019-08-02 14:58:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9352: Friday is Soooo Shadilay Edition

>>7309216

Highly suspicious that sather, considering his pedigree, broke and continues to blather on the subject.

#7305252 at 2019-08-02 04:27:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9347: We Are the Deplorable Domestic Terrorists! We Are Q! Edition

Jordan sather
@Jordan_sather_
·
7m
If Donald Trump Jr. is retweeting articles about QAnon, it's only a matter of time before President Trump will be publicly asked about it.

force the Q

#7300949 at 2019-08-01 23:39:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9341: Rally Bread Edition

>>7300938
put your dick away sather.

#7297769 at 2019-08-01 20:36:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9337: Placeholder Population Start August 2019 Edition

>>7297644
But, but, but sather is very concerned.

#7297070 at 2019-08-01 19:46:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9336: Placeholder Thread Deleted : Enter New Phase Edition

>>7296945
spot-on
spot-on
spot-on

every time you come here and larp sather
you say spot-on

kinda gives it away

#7297004 at 2019-08-01 19:40:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9336: Placeholder Thread Deleted : Enter New Phase Edition

>>7296945
Nah.
You're a joke here, sather.

#7294078 at 2019-08-01 16:43:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9332: White Robots Are Raycis Edition

Donald Trump directed his followers to a straight-up QAnon account on Tuesday, and invited some of his Reddit meme-makers to the White House in July. But if you want the ultimate sign of the Trump administration's merger with the right-wing fringe, you need look no further than the next round of the American Priority Conference, where at least one former top Trump administration official will mingle with the pro-Trump internet's craziest characters at a Trump hotel.

American Priority Conference was a confab started last year by pro-Trump Internet personalities who felt snubbed by the more establishment and higher profile Conservative Political Action Conference. Its 2018 outing in D.C. was, to put it mildly, a disaster. One speaker refused to even take the stage because the crowd was so small.

This year, they're giving the conference another shot, this time at Trump's Miami hotel with a surprisingly robust line-up of top speakers. The list includes former White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Florida congressman and Trump favorite Matt Gaetz (R-FL), and Turning Point USA chief and frequent White House visitor Charlie Kirk.

Sanders and the other bigwigs will be joined by the usual crew of more marginal right-wing characters, including Trump pardon recipient Dinesh D'Souza, Pizzagate promoter Jack Posobiec, and "media personality" Joshua Feuerstein, whose claim to fame is that he starred in a viral rant four years ago about Starbucks offering generic red holiday cups instead of Christmas-themed ones.
So far, the 2019 conference looks basically like an alternative CPAC. Once you start going down the list of speakers, however, things start getting weirder.

QAnon booster Tracy Beanz is on the agenda, a year after she organized hundred QAnon believers to march around downtown D.C. chanting: "Where we go one, we go all." Proposed conference topics include curiously phrased items like "Voter Fraud, What's the deal?" and "Artificial Intelligence, why I should be concerned about it?"
The most interesting speaker might be David "Avocado" Wolfe, an alternative medicine guru who's offering three days of yoga classes for attendees. But Wolfe isn't just a yoga instructor. He also believes the earth is flat, that vaccines are harmful, and that the air is being poisoned with chemtrails delivered by airplanes. Wolfe's ideas somehow get even more esoteric from there. According to The Outline, Wolfe has claimed that "mushrooms arrived on our planet via the cosmic wind."

When you find out the Earth really is flat. https://t.co/7ddjFjVLNE #FlatEarth pic.twitter.com/a6gwnFrBlj
- David Wolfe (@DavidWolfe) December 3, 2015

Wolfe's ideas, in other words, are a melange of some of the craziest ideas the internet has to offer. That he's one of the top speakers at a conference that also features a former White House official and a sitting congressman gives you a sense of the bizarre moment the pro-Trump right is living in, in which the conspiracy theory internet has been legitimized by the office of the president.
Believers in the QAnon conspiracy theory will head to Washington on September 11th for a rally at the foot of the Washington Monument under the ominous tagline "Q Sent Us." While the rally's agenda is thin so far, you can expect QAnon believers to call for Trump to make QAnon's prophecies come true and carry out the arrest and execution of top Democrats.

The Q Rally is officially scheduled for 9/11/19 in DC. Get organized. Be heard. #QANON #QRALLY #WWG1WGA pic.twitter.com/2uKTjMcDbG
- An0n66 (@An0n661) July 21, 2019

The rally organizers say they've obtained a permit from the Park Service, and two major QAnon promoters are on board: Jordan sather, who advocates for drinking bleach, among other things, and a pro-Trump rapper named "Educating Liberals," because he's constantly educating liberals.

But all is not well with the rally. The problem with holding a QAnon event in Washington is that many QAnon believers are convinced that the entire capital is riddled with Masonic symbols, especially on the Mall. That makes it difficult for organizers to find a place that has both patriotic significance and isn't considered a symbol of a demonic cabal, and they haven't succeeded this time.
Much of the reaction to the rally's location near the Washington Monument within the QAnon community has focused on concern about any satanic power inherent in the landmark. One QAnon supporter on Twitter fumed that the event was being held in one of the "most dangerous" locations in the country.

"9/11 at Baal's shaft?" wrote another. "No thanks."
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-ultimate-fringe-trumpworld-conference

#7287795 at 2019-08-01 03:43:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9324: Not Tired of Winning Yet! Edition

>>7287640
paytriot sather is another one pushing his space ship crap, what a fraud

#7287416 at 2019-08-01 03:15:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9324: Not Tired of Winning Yet! Edition

>>7287388
sather has GREAT perspective! He's one of the undiluted and toxic children from our generation! Fear him not and give less benefit to YOUR judgement!

#7287359 at 2019-08-01 03:11:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9324: Not Tired of Winning Yet! Edition

>>7287323
sather is a trekkiefag, needs to grow up and get into reality

#7287323 at 2019-08-01 03:09:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9324: Not Tired of Winning Yet! Edition

>>7287296
I watch sather all the time. Like I said, I like the kid. He red pills the normies and has some interesting thoughts on many things like free energy.

#7279166 at 2019-07-31 18:25:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9313: Reread Crumbs Anons! SHTF SOON! Edition

The Ultimate Fringe Trumpworld Conference
Donald Trump directed his followers to a straight-up QAnon account on Tuesday, and invited some of his Reddit meme-makers to the White House in July. But if you want the ultimate sign of the Trump administration's merger with the right-wing fringe, you need look no further than the next round of the American Priority Conference, where at least one former top Trump administration official will mingle with the pro-Trump internet's craziest characters at a Trump hotel.

American Priority Conference was a confab started last year by pro-Trump Internet personalities who felt snubbed by the more establishment and higher profile Conservative Political Action Conference. Its 2018 outing in D.C. was, to put it mildly, a disaster. One speaker refused to even take the stage because the crowd was so small.

This year, they're giving the conference another shot, this time at Trump's Miami hotel with a surprisingly robust line-up of top speakers. The list includes former White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Florida congressman and Trump favorite Matt Gaetz (R-FL), and Turning Point USA chief and frequent White House visitor Charlie Kirk.

Sanders and the other bigwigs will be joined by the usual crew of more marginal right-wing characters, including Trump pardon recipient Dinesh D'Souza, Pizzagate promoter Jack Posobiec, and "media personality" Joshua Feuerstein, whose claim to fame is that he starred in a viral rant four years ago about Starbucks offering generic red holiday cups instead of Christmas-themed ones.

So far, the 2019 conference looks basically like an alternative CPAC. Once you start going down the list of speakers, however, things start getting weirder.

QAnon booster Tracy Beanz is on the agenda, a year after she organized hundred QAnon believers to march around downtown D.C. chanting: "Where we go one, we go all." Proposed conference topics include curiously phrased items like "Voter Fraud, What's the deal?" and "Artificial Intelligence, why I should be concerned about it?"

The most interesting speaker might be David "Avocado" Wolfe, an alternative medicine guru who's offering three days of yoga classes for attendees. But Wolfe isn't just a yoga instructor. He also believes the earth is flat, that vaccines are harmful, and that the air is being poisoned with chemtrails delivered by airplanes. Wolfe's ideas somehow get even more esoteric from there. According to The Outline, Wolfe has claimed that "mushrooms arrived on our planet via the cosmic wind.

Wolfe's ideas, in other words, are a melange of some of the craziest ideas the internet has to offer. That he's one of the top speakers at a conference that also features a former White House official and a sitting congressman gives you a sense of the bizarre moment the pro-Trump right is living in, in which the conspiracy theory internet has been legitimized by the office of the president.

QAnoners to Rally in DC, but not Without Controversy
Believers in the QAnon conspiracy theory will head to Washington on September 11th for a rally at the foot of the Washington Monument under the ominous tagline "Q Sent Us." While the rally's agenda is thin so far, you can expect QAnon believers to call for Trump to make QAnon's prophecies come true and carry out the arrest and execution of top Democrats.

The rally organizers say they've obtained a permit from the Park Service, and two major QAnon promoters are on board: Jordan sather, who advocates for drinking bleach, among other things, and a pro-Trump rapper named "Educating Liberals," because he's constantly educating liberals.

But all is not well with the rally. The problem with holding a QAnon event in Washington is that many QAnon believers are convinced that the entire capital is riddled with Masonic symbols, especially on the Mall. That makes it difficult for organizers to find a place that has both patriotic significance and isn't considered a symbol of a demonic cabal, and they haven't succeeded this time.

Much of the reaction to the rally's location near the Washington Monument within the QAnon community has focused on concern about any satanic power inherent in the landmark. One QAnon supporter on Twitter fumed that the event was being held in one of the "most dangerous" locations in the country.

"9/11 at Baal's shaft?" wrote another. "No thanks."

A Podcast That's Worth Checking Out
Yahoo News's Michael Isikoff has a great new podcast, "Conspiracyland," on the origins of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory. It's an interesting look at how Russian intelligence operatives, Fox News, internet trolls, and a variety of rival right-wing hucksters collided to create one of the 2016 election's most enduring hoaxes - and terrorize Rich's family.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-ultimate-fringe-trumpworld-conference?

#7278157 at 2019-07-31 17:22:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9312: [24hrs] Are We There Yet? Edition

>>7277985


Thanks anon.

bottom 2 statue's are at sather hotel.
pics for proofs.

#7262190 at 2019-07-30 18:59:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9291: Logical Q Edition

>>7261632

Since Q mentioned time travel-

Maybe I will present some info from the Ufology community for your consideration. Keep your minds open. Remember Q posted 1 month to the minute before No Name died. How is that possible without time travel?

A whistleblower from the secret space programs named Corey Goode talked a lot about the Cabal. He said for a long time they were impossible to beat because they had "probable futures technology" that allowed them to see into the future. This technology was given them by evil ET races, that can appear during satanic rituals.

Q's uninterrupted success since they started indicates that this technology has been countered in some way. Goode said that some ET races had become directly involved in human affairs to level the playing field. It seems it would require some mastery over time travel to counter the probable futures technology. I suspect these benevolent ET fields are helping POTUS.

FWIW according to Goode time travel is common in the secret space programs and there are battles over "manicuring" the timeline to lead to what is supposed to happen. There are powerful ET races who prevent too much mucking about in the timeline.

Also of note, Jordan sather, who has been Q'd, is an associate of Corey Goode.

Also remember Q drop 14:

"How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead?
Who is helping POTUS?"

Unfortunately this is even harder to believe for the average normie than the Deep State. But once Q is shown to be right, the minds of many will be open to all sorts of things.

This blog post has some info by Corey Goode on the probable futures technology and the Cabal. https://spherebeingalliance.com/blog/the-lt-col-gonzales-ssp-council-delegation-briefings-part-2.html

This is only my 2nd post so hopefully I haven't made any horrible faux pas.

#7256328 at 2019-07-30 09:00:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9284: Spotlight on the Red Cross Edition

>>7256290
Having a difficult time getting it up, sather?

#7247319 at 2019-07-29 20:35:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9272: Good crop this season? DECLAS COMIN! Edition

>>7247237
fuck off sather

#7238966 at 2019-07-29 05:27:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9261: FF triggered the shills! Anons looking for sauce! Edition

>>7238859
NXVIM is that connected to Epstein, Disney , Marvel (PUNISHER ( (( skull 💀)) and isn't Ramtha connected Both NXVIM / Ramtha and connected to Goode, Wilcock and sather? Wonder who's exactly running the psyop? [them]

#7231249 at 2019-07-28 19:13:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9251: Feelin the Need for Speed on Trials of Treason! Edition

>>7231210
Posting your show notes here, sather?

#7227045 at 2019-07-28 10:02:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9246: [Corney] Edition

The deception is endless.

I was hoping maybe the Edge of Wonder guys were on our side. After seeing them interview Jordan sather and Corey Goode one too many times, I realized that was pretty unlikely.

This latest video really just cemented their duplicity in my mind. It's subtle, but I just can't believe they don't notice the logo for their guest's ECETI ranch includes a sun, a heart a lion – all three of those are Luciferian symbols. If these guys are really compromised, I wish they'd just get exposed once and for all.

I'm just sick of the relentless deception. "Come to EdgeOfWonder.tv for the truth!" they shout. Building a new platform to trap the unwary int heir deceptions, and make money at the same time. Here's the link if you want to throw up in your mouth.

https://youtu.be/LVQryZqdQB0

#7226541 at 2019-07-28 07:36:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9245: The Q+ Edition

>>7226537
Is that sather? No question he's getting it in right now.

#7226475 at 2019-07-28 07:24:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9245: The Q+ Edition

>>7226472
please.
Go hang around power and communication towers dropping those things off.

When you get cancer, drink bleach.
That's how sather would want you to die.

#7226414 at 2019-07-28 07:11:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9245: The Q+ Edition

>>7226403
Feel free to fuck off and give sather our spiciest disregards.

#7206029 at 2019-07-26 21:33:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9219: Pedos Perplexed and Panicking Edition

>>7205907
Re-read all of your minutes sather/Icke carp and replace the words et/alien/reptilian with the word demon … Extraterrestrials are fallen angels.

#7196631 at 2019-07-26 06:28:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9207: Disney twist n turns! Moar G. Maxwell Save the Children! Edition

>>7193412
All in for Flynn = RAMTHA, NXVIM, JTWILDE, Joe Flynn, James Comey ( check the IG Accounts) Corey Goode , David Wilcock and Elisabeth, Jordan sather, JoeM and crew…. 369 said CULT Bishop it was from The Secret Service…

#7195832 at 2019-07-26 05:05:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9206: Q Cast of Characters are known! Vid Games? We Are Q! Edition

Q, seriously no disrespect to you, but you just posted a bunch of cartoons, quite like Those that push the Blue Avians…sather, Goode, Wilcock, contact in the desert people…crafted stuff like "TheCraft" I said something awhile back…

#7143790 at 2019-07-23 09:19:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9140: EBake Edition

>>7143704

As for [Jordan sather], eat your heart out, loser.

#7143172 at 2019-07-23 06:34:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9139: Q's pic of flags out house has been found! Edition

>>7143137
Proof? Other than space cartoons from the Rothschilds? Aka Goode, wilcock and sather? Because even after …all the years I've followed them…nothing but cartoon avatars. They are nothing but snake oil salesmen…grasping on to the Q Movement Like ramtha That Loves the FLYNN family and promotes his defense fund!

#7127692 at 2019-07-22 03:08:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9119: Bro, Do You Even NightShift Edition

>>7127653
No, but sather does.

#7064385 at 2019-07-17 01:23:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9039: TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG Edition

>>7064359
Guessing Q team has it archived. BO is a fucking glowstick. BO makes sather look like a rocket scientist.

#7057693 at 2019-07-16 12:18:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9030: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Edition

Is Jordan sather going to the Area 51 thing? Cuz I'm totally down if sather is going.

#7041288 at 2019-07-14 21:31:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9009: God Wins Edition

>>7041210
Prove it. PayPal sather.

#7037728 at 2019-07-14 16:30:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9005: Still and Always Over 9000 Edition

Looks like the author of the Q map pdf is in the famefag club with Ramtha/inthematrixx sather, prayingmedic and anyone else he can get to promote his piss poor patreon

I WONDER WHY ALL THE PAYTRIOTS WANT BO TO LEAVE? HMMMMM…

#7036533 at 2019-07-14 13:36:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9003: Shills Have Never Been More Confused Edition!

#8999 consolidated from 2 in notables thread posted in 9002
>>7033005, 7033093 NYC blackout w/ Q Post (etc)
>>7033029 Sadie Roberts-Joseph found dead in the trunk of a car
>>7033043 Rumors swirling that underage Epstein victim has provided new info
>>7033093 Flag stays lit in NYC blackout
>>7033053 NY Times Square blackout vid (live)
>>7033071, >>7033080 Clinton, Epstein, Virgin Island Governor's wife connection
>>7033075 sather on NY power outage survey (for KEKS)
>>7033156, >>7033156 Bronfman Rothschild investment firm merger in June
>>7033216, >>7033083 Today is the anniversary of the 1977 NYC power outage (Wikipedia sauce)
>>7033298 Drone video footage from Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit)
>>7033337 Cures are coming...AI's are digging
>>7033486 Possible MOSSAD-Epstein connection (vid)
>>7033511 Armed man reportedly shot after throwing incendiary devices at ICE detection center
>>7033550, >>7033580 Nat'l Guard to direct traffic in NYC & Q22
>>7033591 Blackout necessary? Q posts
>>7033021, >>7033067 watermelon is a pedo symbol for kids groomed to suck dick.
>>7033233 OPUS 167 Mossad Epstein Connection
>>7033262 flashback to Haiti and Jean Max Bellerive and Clinton

#7035288 at 2019-07-14 06:49:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9002: Still Over 9000 Edition

>>7029830, >>7029847, >>7035254, >>7029856

Global Board Anon Announcements:

Notables
are not endorsements

#9001
>>7034656 BO twat
>>7034730 Founded in 1997 as Virchow Krause Management, Bronfman Rothschild was acquired by the Bronfman and E.L. Rothschild families in 2015
>>7034819, >>7035052, >>7035070 Manhattan Blackout EBS, map, Epstein house
>>7034758, >>7034763 Attacker on Tacoma ICE Detention Center identified as "anarchist and antifascist"
>>7034741 Rothchild / NXIVM / Bronfman / CEMEX / Clinton / Epstein anon spreadsheet
>>7034794 Epstein Island Flight log graph 1
>>7034795 Epstein Island Flight log graph 2
>>7034800 Epstein Island Flight log graph 3
>>7034987 Epstein Island Flight log graphs 1-4
>>7035108 Epstein Island Flight log outliers
>>7034872, >>7034874, >>7034878 Resignations in the news today
>>7034895, >>7034964, >>7035163 Past Q Bridge posts, anons breaks em down
>>7034890 Gov. Andrew Cuomo swipes at NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio for being absent when power outage hits
>>7034914 Epstein has Questionable Ties with Former Israeli Prime Minister EHUD BARAK and the WEXNER Foundation
>>7034940 Anon breaks down/questions 4 Manhattan blackouts, today was mild summer day 84 degrees
>>7034966 6.4 EQ West Coast Australia
>>7035015, >>7035103, >>7035162 Information showing Epstein's Little St. James has underground buildings. Found on a designer's online portfolio
>>7035049, >>7035069, >>7035090 Sarah Kellen listed a lot in 2003 (flight logs)
>>7035074, >>7035087, >>7034953 John Travolta digs (pilot, plane, etc)
>>7035092, >>7033840 (pb) more Manhattan digs 666 Fifth ave, Cornelius Vanderbilt House
>>7035159 Wheels Up owns the planes, but Gama Aviation operates.
>>7035209 New Jersey Mag with Trump - BOOM Times
>>7035234 #9001

#9000
>>7033768 Reagan on immigration
>>7033827 Dark to light happening in bread 9000.
>>7033829 anon on blackout "The power outage timed as an anniversary implies well planned foreknowledge..."-watch NYC!
>>7033840 Cornelius Vanderbilt House and map
>>7034202, >>7033871, >>7034018, >>7034085 Jumaane Williams digs
>>7034151 Standard Hotel drop
>>7034130, >>7034324 Q post 647 - day of days, Flag Stayed light (blackout)
>>7034335 Spektr-RG observatory separates from Blok DM-03 stage in deployment orbit - Roscosmos
>>7034409, >>7034360 Gerry was keen to enforce child labor laws regarding performance. NY Society Prevention of Cruelty to Children dig
>>7034485 #9000

#8999 in #9000 crowd collecting
>>7033005, 7033093 NYC blackout w/ Q Post (etc)
>>7033029 Sadie Roberts-Joseph found dead in the trunk of a car
>>7033043 Rumors swirling that underage Epstein victim has provided new info
>>7033093 Flag stays lit in NYC blackout
>>7033053 NY Times Square blackout vid (live)
>>7033071, >>7033080 Clinton, Epstein, Virgin Island Governor's wife connection
>>7033075 sather on NY power outage survey (for KEKS)
>>7033156, >>7033156 Bronfman Rothschild investment firm merger in June
>>7033216, >>7033083 Today is the anniversary of the 1977 NYC power outage (Wikipedia sauce)
>>7033298 Drone video footage from Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit)
>>7033337 Cures are coming...AI's are digging
>>7033486 Possible MOSSAD-Epstein connection (vid)
>>7033511 Armed man reportedly shot after throwing incendiary devices at ICE detection center
>>7033550, >>7033580 Nat'l Guard to direct traffic in NYC & Q22
>>7033591 Blackout necessary? Q posts
>>7034057 #8999

Previously Collected Notables
>>7031396 #8996, >>7032457 #8997, >>7033089 #8998
>>7029069 #8993, >>7029871 #8994, >>7030790 #8995
>>7027251 #8990, >>7028829 #8991, >>7028401 #8992
>>7024520 #8987, >>7025566 #8988, >>7025955 #8989

Notables Archive by BV's (no longer updated?): https://8ch.net/qresearch/notables.html
Notables also archived here: >>>/comms/3396 (#740~#6384)

Notes-in-the-Dough Pastebin
https://pastebin.com/A7Es5X14

#7035254 at 2019-07-14 06:41:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9002: Still Over 9000 Edition

Notables
by anons, for anons

#9001
>>7034656 BO twat
>>7034730 Founded in 1997 as Virchow Krause Management, Bronfman Rothschild was acquired by the Bronfman and E.L. Rothschild families in 2015
>>7034819, >>7035052, >>7035070 Manhattan Blackout EBS, map, Epstein house
>>7034758, >>7034763 Attacker on Tacoma ICE Detention Center identified as "anarchist and antifascist"
>>7034741 Rothchild / NXIVM / Bronfman / CEMEX / Clinton / Epstein anon spreadsheet
>>7034794 Epstein Island Flight log graph 1
>>7034795 Epstein Island Flight log graph 2
>>7034800 Epstein Island Flight log graph 3
>>7034987 Epstein Island Flight log graphs 1-4
>>7035108 Epstein Island Flight log outliers
>>7034872, >>7034874, >>7034878 Resignations in the news today
>>7034895, >>7034964, >>7035163 Past Q Bridge posts, anons breaks em down
>>7034890 Gov. Andrew Cuomo swipes at NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio for being absent when power outage hits
>>7034914 Epstein has Questionable Ties with Former Israeli Prime Minister EHUD BARAK and the WEXNER Foundation
>>7034940 Anon breaks down/questions 4 Manhattan blackouts, today was mild summer day 84 degrees
>>7034966 6.4 EQ West Coast Australia
>>7035015, >>7035103, >>7035162 Information showing Epstein's Little St. James has underground buildings. Found on a designer's online portfolio
>>7035049, >>7035069, >>7035090 Sarah Kellen listed a lot in 2003 (flight logs)
>>7035074, >>7035087, >>7034953 John Travolta digs (pilot, plane, etc)
>>7035092, >>7033840 (pb) more Manhattan digs 666 Fifth ave, Cornelius Vanderbilt House
>>7035159 Wheels Up owns the planes, but Gama Aviation operates.
>>7035209 New Jersey Mag with Trump - BOOM Times
>>7035234 #9001

#9000
>>7033768 Reagan on immigration
>>7033827 Dark to light happening in bread 9000.
>>7033829 anon on blackout "The power outage timed as an anniversary implies well planned foreknowledge..."-watch NYC!
>>7033840 Cornelius Vanderbilt House and map
>>7034202, >>7033871, >>7034018, >>7034085 Jumaane Williams digs
>>7034151 Standard Hotel drop
>>7034130, >>7034324 Q post 647 - day of days, Flag Stayed light (blackout)
>>7034335 Spektr-RG observatory separates from Blok DM-03 stage in deployment orbit - Roscosmos
>>7034409, >>7034360 Gerry was keen to enforce child labor laws regarding performance. NY Society Prevention of Cruelty to Children dig
>>7034350, >>7034257, >>7034382 Gold Fringe Missing in Flags for WH pics
>>7034607 #9000

#8999 in #9000 crowd collecting
>>7033005, 7033093 NYC blackout w/ Q Post (etc)
>>7033029 Sadie Roberts-Joseph found dead in the trunk of a car
>>7033043 Rumors swirling that underage Epstein victim has provided new info
>>7033093 Flag stays lit in NYC blackout
>>7033053 NY Times Square blackout vid (live)
>>7033071, >>7033080 Clinton, Epstein, Virgin Island Governor's wife connection
>>7033075 sather on NY power outage survey (for KEKS)
>>7033156, >>7033156 Bronfman Rothschild investment firm merger in June
>>7033216, >>7033083 Today is the anniversary of the 1977 NYC power outage (Wikipedia sauce)
>>7033298 Drone video footage from Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit)
>>7033337 Cures are coming...AI's are digging
>>7033486 Possible MOSSAD-Epstein connection (vid)
>>7033511 Armed man reportedly shot after throwing incendiary devices at ICE detection center
>>7033550, >>7033580 Nat'l Guard to direct traffic in NYC & Q22
>>7033591 Blackout necessary? Q posts
>>7034057 #8999

#8998 in #8999
>>7032272 Manhattan transformer fire knocks out power to thousands in Midtown, Upper West Side
>>7032280, >>7032295, >>7032297 , >>7032309, >>7032350, >>7032352 More on NYC power outages, emph. on Epstein's jail
>>7032284 Revealed: This Is Palantir's Top-Secret User Manual for Cops
>>7032291 US Army Tweet Punching the gun!
>>7032307 With '45' on their backs, Angels honor Tyler Skaggs
>>7032312 UK must help immediate release of Iran tanker: Zarif
>>7032344 US Marines tweet Ridin' the Wave
>>7032371 who are these men with Bill Clinton at punta cana? (Do we really know?)
>>7032554, >>7032699 ICE Fails to Make Arrests in Early New York City Raids
>>7032586 Devin Nunes Gives a Sneak Preview of What GOP Lawmakers Will be Grilling Robert Mueller About During Hearing
>>7032689 Scientists unveil the first-ever image of quantum entanglement.
>>7032925 Top Puerto Rico officials resign in group chat scandal
>>7033089 #8998

Previously Collected Notables
>>7031396 #8996, >>7032457 #8997
>>7029069 #8993, >>7029871 #8994, >>7030790 #8995
>>7027251 #8990, >>7028829 #8991, >>7028401 #8992
>>7024520 #8987, >>7025566 #8988, >>7025955 #8989

PASTEBIN for this
https://pastebin.com/cZ42x538

=previous Note collector going GHOST=

>>7029830
>>7029859

#7034504 at 2019-07-14 04:43:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9001: Over 9000 Edition

Global Board Anon Announcements:

Notables

are not endorsements

#8999 in #9000 crowd collecting

>>7033005, 7033093 NYC blackout w/ Q Post (etc)
>>7033029 Sadie Roberts-Joseph found dead in the trunk of a car
>>7033043 Rumors swirling that underage Epstein victim has provided new info
>>7033093 Flag stays lit in NYC blackout
>>7033053 NY Times Square blackout vid (live)
>>7033071, >>7033080 Clinton, Epstein, Virgin Island Governor's wife connection
>>7033075 sather on NY power outage survey (for KEKS)
>>7033156, >>7033156 Bronfman Rothschild investment firm merger in June
>>7033216, >>7033083 Today is the anniversary of the 1977 NYC power outage (Wikipedia sauce)
>>7033298 Drone video footage from Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit)
>>7033337 Cures are coming...AI's are digging
>>7033486 Possible MOSSAD-Epstein connection (vid)
>>7033511 Armed man reportedly shot after throwing incendiary devices at ICE detection center
>>7033550, >>7033580 Nat'l Guard to direct traffic in NYC & Q22
>>7033591 Blackout necessary? Q posts
>>7034057 #8999

#8998 in #8999

>>7032272 Manhattan transformer fire knocks out power to thousands in Midtown, Upper West Side
>>7032280, >>7032295, >>7032297 , >>7032309, >>7032350, >>7032352 More on NYC power outages, emph. on Epstein's jail
>>7032284 Revealed: This Is Palantir's Top-Secret User Manual for Cops
>>7032291 US Army Tweet Punching the gun!
>>7032307 With '45' on their backs, Angels honor Tyler Skaggs
>>7032312 UK must help immediate release of Iran tanker: Zarif
>>7032344 US Marines tweet Ridin' the Wave
>>7032371 who are these men with Bill Clinton at punta cana? (Do we really know?)
>>7032554, >>7032699 ICE Fails to Make Arrests in Early New York City Raids
>>7032586 Devin Nunes Gives a Sneak Preview of What GOP Lawmakers Will be Grilling Robert Mueller About During Hearing
>>7032689 Scientists unveil the first-ever image of quantum entanglement.
>>7032925 Top Puerto Rico officials resign in group chat scandal
>>7033089 #8998

#8997 posted in #8998

>>7031493, >>7031521, >>7031623 plane fag updates
>>7031501, >>7031696, >>7031932 "Rebel" anons point of view (rebels against BO directive, not Q team)
>>7031512, >>7031539 Acosta claimed Epstein 'belonged to intelligence; vid by Piezczenik on Epstein honeytrap ring
>>7031567 US Gov't Responds After Over Half a Mil Say They Will Storm Area 51
>>7031668 Board DIGG, con't.
>>7031702 Deadman Switch Tripped After Pedogate Researcher Died! (vid)
>>7031733 Article (2007) with connections between Clintons, Doug Band & others
>>7031734, >>7031890, >>7031913, >>7031935, >>7031941, >>7031959 Major power outage cripples Manhattan
>>7031978 NY outage and Epstein residence/prison
>>7031788 Flight log DIGG re >>7030852 (lb)
>>7031864 Accused chid rapist arrested at AZ border
>>7031879 ABC discovers Epsteins NM ranch
>>7031896, >>7031912 Great Deceptions of Bob Mueller (ltd hangout)
>>7031940 Map of Epstein detention center
>>7031970 Daily News Virgin Islands articles on Epstein May 2019
>>7031971 Stmt by wearethene.ws on notables
>>7032057 Guatemala: Leftist Opposition And Alleged Interference By U.S. State Dept Risk Immigration Agreement
>>7032072 Cemex DIGG, con't.
>>7032105 How to post a request to CodeMonkey
>>7032457 #8997

Previously Collected Notables

>>7031396 #8996
>>7029069 #8993, >>7029871 #8994, >>7030790 #8995
>>7027251 #8990, >>7028829 #8991, >>7028401 #8992
>>7024520 #8987, >>7025566 #8988, >>7025955 #8989
Notables Archive by BV's (no longer updated?): https://8ch.net/qresearch/notables.html
Notables also archived here: >>>/comms/3396 (#740~#6384)

notes-in-the-dough pastebin

https://pastebin.com/XDrVRQpC

BO IS A COMP'D FAGGOT CUNT

#7034502 at 2019-07-14 04:43:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9001: Over 9000 Edition

Notables
aby anons, for anons

#9000
>>7033768 Reagan on immigration
>>7033827 Dark to light happening in bread 9000.
>>7033829 anon on blackout "The power outage timed as an anniversary implies well planned foreknowledge..."-watch NYC!
>>7033840 Cornelius Vanderbilt House and map
>>7034202, >>7033871, >>7034018, >>7034085 Jumaane Williams digs
>>7034151 Standard Hotel drop
>>7034130, >>7034324 Q post 647 - day of days, Flag Stayed light (blackout)
>>7034335 Spektr-RG observatory separates from Blok DM-03 stage in deployment orbit - Roscosmos
>>7034409, >>7034360 Gerry was keen to enforce child labor laws regarding performance. NY Society Prevention of Cruelty to Children dig
>>7034485 #9000

#8999 in #9000 crowd collecting
>>7033005, 7033093 NYC blackout w/ Q Post (etc)
>>7033029 Sadie Roberts-Joseph found dead in the trunk of a car
>>7033043 Rumors swirling that underage Epstein victim has provided new info
>>7033093 Flag stays lit in NYC blackout
>>7033053 NY Times Square blackout vid (live)
>>7033071, >>7033080 Clinton, Epstein, Virgin Island Governor's wife connection
>>7033075 sather on NY power outage survey (for KEKS)
>>7033156, >>7033156 Bronfman Rothschild investment firm merger in June
>>7033216, >>7033083 Today is the anniversary of the 1977 NYC power outage (Wikipedia sauce)
>>7033298 Drone video footage from Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit)
>>7033337 Cures are coming...AI's are digging
>>7033486 Possible MOSSAD-Epstein connection (vid)
>>7033511 Armed man reportedly shot after throwing incendiary devices at ICE detection center
>>7033550, >>7033580 Nat'l Guard to direct traffic in NYC & Q22
>>7033591 Blackout necessary? Q posts
>>7034057 #8999

#8998 in #8999
>>7032272 Manhattan transformer fire knocks out power to thousands in Midtown, Upper West Side
>>7032280, >>7032295, >>7032297 , >>7032309, >>7032350, >>7032352 More on NYC power outages, emph. on Epstein's jail
>>7032284 Revealed: This Is Palantir's Top-Secret User Manual for Cops
>>7032291 US Army Tweet Punching the gun!
>>7032307 With '45' on their backs, Angels honor Tyler Skaggs
>>7032312 UK must help immediate release of Iran tanker: Zarif
>>7032344 US Marines tweet Ridin' the Wave
>>7032371 who are these men with Bill Clinton at punta cana? (Do we really know?)
>>7032554, >>7032699 ICE Fails to Make Arrests in Early New York City Raids
>>7032586 Devin Nunes Gives a Sneak Preview of What GOP Lawmakers Will be Grilling Robert Mueller About During Hearing
>>7032689 Scientists unveil the first-ever image of quantum entanglement.
>>7032925 Top Puerto Rico officials resign in group chat scandal
>>7033089 #8998

#8997 posted in #8998
>>7031493, >>7031521, >>7031623 plane fag updates
>>7031501, >>7031696, >>7031932 "Rebel" anons point of view (rebels against BO directive, not Q team)
>>7031512, >>7031539 Acosta claimed Epstein 'belonged to intelligence; vid by Piezczenik on Epstein honeytrap ring
>>7031567 US Gov't Responds After Over Half a Mil Say They Will Storm Area 51
>>7031668 Board DIGG, con't.
>>7031702 Deadman Switch Tripped After Pedogate Researcher Died! (vid)
>>7031733 Article (2007) with connections between Clintons, Doug Band & others
>>7031734, >>7031890, >>7031913, >>7031935, >>7031941, >>7031959 Major power outage cripples Manhattan
>>7031978 NY outage and Epstein residence/prison
>>7031788 Flight log DIGG re >>7030852 (lb)
>>7031864 Accused chid rapist arrested at AZ border
>>7031879 ABC discovers Epsteins NM ranch
>>7031896, >>7031912 Great Deceptions of Bob Mueller (ltd hangout)
>>7031940 Map of Epstein detention center
>>7031970 Daily News Virgin Islands articles on Epstein May 2019
>>7031971 Stmt by wearethene.ws on notables
>>7032057 Guatemala: Leftist Opposition And Alleged Interference By U.S. State Dept Risk Immigration Agreement
>>7032072 Cemex DIGG, con't.
>>7032105 How to post a request to CodeMonkey
>>7032457 #8997

Previously Collected Notables
>>7031396 #8996
>>7029069 #8993, >>7029871 #8994, >>7030790 #8995
>>7027251 #8990, >>7028829 #8991, >>7028401 #8992
>>7024520 #8987, >>7025566 #8988, >>7025955 #8989

#7034113 at 2019-07-14 04:06:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9000: NYC Dark to Light Edition

>>7033700, >>7033710, >>7034057, >>7033671, >>7033689, >>7033755

Global Board Anon Announcements:

Notables
are not endorsements

#8999 in #9000 crowd collecting
>>7033005, 7033093 NYC blackout w/ Q Post (etc)
>>7033029 Sadie Roberts-Joseph found dead in the trunk of a car
>>7033043 Rumors swirling that underage Epstein victim has provided new info
>>7033093 Flag stays lit in NYC blackout
>>7033053 NY Times Square blackout vid (live)
>>7033071, >>7033080 Clinton, Epstein, Virgin Island Governor's wife connection
>>7033075 sather on NY power outage survey (for KEKS)
>>7033156, >>7033156 Bronfman Rothschild investment firm merger in June
>>7033216, >>7033083 Today is the anniversary of the 1977 NYC power outage (Wikipedia sauce)
>>7033298 Drone video footage from Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit)
>>7033337 Cures are coming...AI's are digging
>>7033486 Possible MOSSAD-Epstein connection (vid)
>>7033511 Armed man reportedly shot after throwing incendiary devices at ICE detection center
>>7033550, >>7033580 Nat'l Guard to direct traffic in NYC & Q22
>>7033591 Blackout necessary? Q posts
>>7034057 #8999

#8998 in #8999
>>7032272 Manhattan transformer fire knocks out power to thousands in Midtown, Upper West Side
>>7032280, >>7032295, >>7032297 , >>7032309, >>7032350, >>7032352 More on NYC power outages, emph. on Epstein's jail
>>7032284 Revealed: This Is Palantir's Top-Secret User Manual for Cops
>>7032291 US Army Tweet Punching the gun!
>>7032307 With '45' on their backs, Angels honor Tyler Skaggs
>>7032312 UK must help immediate release of Iran tanker: Zarif
>>7032344 US Marines tweet Ridin' the Wave
>>7032371 who are these men with Bill Clinton at punta cana? (Do we really know?)
>>7032554, >>7032699 ICE Fails to Make Arrests in Early New York City Raids
>>7032586 Devin Nunes Gives a Sneak Preview of What GOP Lawmakers Will be Grilling Robert Mueller About During Hearing
>>7032689 Scientists unveil the first-ever image of quantum entanglement.
>>7032925 Top Puerto Rico officials resign in group chat scandal
>>7033089 #8998

#8997 posted in #8998
>>7031493, >>7031521, >>7031623 plane fag updates
>>7031501, >>7031696, >>7031932 "Rebel" anons point of view (rebels against BO directive, not Q team)
>>7031512, >>7031539 Acosta claimed Epstein 'belonged to intelligence; vid by Piezczenik on Epstein honeytrap ring
>>7031567 US Gov't Responds After Over Half a Mil Say They Will Storm Area 51
>>7031668 Board DIGG, con't.
>>7031702 Deadman Switch Tripped After Pedogate Researcher Died! (vid)
>>7031733 Article (2007) with connections between Clintons, Doug Band & others
>>7031734, >>7031890, >>7031913, >>7031935, >>7031941, >>7031959 Major power outage cripples Manhattan
>>7031978 NY outage and Epstein residence/prison
>>7031788 Flight log DIGG re >>7030852 (lb)
>>7031864 Accused chid rapist arrested at AZ border
>>7031879 ABC discovers Epsteins NM ranch
>>7031896, >>7031912 Great Deceptions of Bob Mueller (ltd hangout)
>>7031940 Map of Epstein detention center
>>7031970 Daily News Virgin Islands articles on Epstein May 2019
>>7031971 Stmt by wearethene.ws on notables
>>7032057 Guatemala: Leftist Opposition And Alleged Interference By U.S. State Dept Risk Immigration Agreement
>>7032072 Cemex DIGG, con't.
>>7032105 How to post a request to CodeMonkey
>>7032457 #8997

Previously Collected Notables
>>7031396 #8996
>>7029069 #8993, >>7029871 #8994, >>7030790 #8995
>>7027251 #8990, >>7028829 #8991, >>7028401 #8992
>>7024520 #8987, >>7025566 #8988, >>7025955 #8989

Notables Archive by BV's (no longer updated?): https://8ch.net/qresearch/notables.html
Notables also archived here: >>>/comms/3396 (#740~#6384)

notes-in-the-dough pastebin
https://pastebin.com/XDrVRQpC

#7034057 at 2019-07-14 04:01:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9000: NYC Dark to Light Edition

#8999 posted in #9000 eclectic collecting
>>7033005, 7033093 NYC blackout w/ Q Post (etc)
>>7033029 Sadie Roberts-Joseph found dead in the trunk of a car
>>7033043 Rumors swirling that underage Epstein victim has provided new info
>>7033093 Flag stays lit in NYC blackout
>>7033053 NY Times Square blackout vid (live)
>>7033071, >>7033080 Clinton, Epstein, Virgin Island Governor's wife connection
>>7033075 sather on NY power outage survey (for KEKS)
>>7033156, >>7033156 Bronfman Rothschild investment firm merger in June
>>7033216, >>7033083 Today is the anniversary of the 1977 NYC power outage (Wikipedia sauce)
>>7033298 Drone video footage from Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit)
>>7033337 Cures are coming...AI's are digging
>>7033486 Possible MOSSAD-Epstein connection (vid)
>>7033511 Armed man reportedly shot after throwing incendiary devices at ICE detection center
>>7033550, >>7033580 Nat'l Guard to direct traffic in NYC & Q22
>>7033591 Blackout necessary? Q posts

#7018984 at 2019-07-12 23:12:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8980: Namefag Bakers Special No More Edition!

>>7018886
You should ask Jordan sather. He is a true Q believer and is willing to put himself out there to expose the truth. I believe Wapo has already tried to slander him before. Am I right?

#7017724 at 2019-07-12 21:36:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8979: Shills Using Antifa Chants Edition!

>>7017679
sather? I recognize that weirdo from the times he ran his mouth. Thanks for referring to my post about orgonite though.
THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FEARS ORGONITE, WHY?
https://www.wuwuwoman.com/blog/2018/8/30/the-us-nuclear-regulatory-commission-etsy-crack-down-on-scalar-energy

#7012085 at 2019-07-12 15:11:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8972: What are the odds of that? Edition

>>7012074
Truth will conquer.

Question: is Jordan sather a "sheep dog"?

#6971711 at 2019-07-09 21:40:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8919: An Amazing Coincidence Edition

>>6971670
Good! Hopefully sather is leading the charge and they all get shot on sight.

#6968985 at 2019-07-09 18:25:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8916: Q crumbs flying! Keep'em coming! Edition

>>6968955
Stay on target, sather.

#6963096 at 2019-07-09 04:46:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8908: Tom Steyer is not sleeping well these days. The DRAIN THE SWAMP Edition

>>6962929
forgive my ignorance, why did you post sather?

#6923185 at 2019-07-05 10:10:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8856: Party Aftermath Edition

>>6923176
Fuckwits have been projecting shit out of thin air to happen on dates for the past 3 years. And guess what it has never happened once.
Shill/division tactic plain as day. ALWAYS ends up in those fucking lunatic Q articles. JFK JR, blah blah.
Fucking imbeciles.
This is all political. Nothing more. Power games that started thousands of years ago. The Great Awakening sure ain't the Jordan sather version. Hate to break it to everyone.

#6921890 at 2019-07-05 04:36:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8854: Howl at the Moon Saloon Open for shills! Edition

>>6921810
>many deals been made
>You have yet to understand what is really going on
>You have yet to wake up!
Thank you, woke anon.
Are you Jordan sather? Do you care to explain how to understand this wicked 4d-chess game?

#6919737 at 2019-07-04 23:58:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8851: Salute To Freedom Cont'd. The Storm before the Booms Edition

>>6919536
MJ12 is a LARP because they support famefag Paytriots like sather and others. They also push disinfo.

#6906693 at 2019-07-03 18:52:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8834:Census is about representation! Take back our country Edition

Whatever MSM comes up with, it's not going to beat blue chickens. Jordy has a credibility problem that can't be solved by spewing more bullshit. Get lost sather, hop an orb to Mars.

#6899584 at 2019-07-02 20:49:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8825: Trump Curse Strikes Again Edition

>>6899566
I dont agree with any system like that. It is no different than what we already have. Add in the fact that we have no high profile arrests and I call bullshit. Try again, Jordan sather. You are not anon. Your time will come.

#6882648 at 2019-06-30 18:16:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8803: Brunch with Frens. The Bacon and Kimosas Edition

>>6882625
No.
You fuck off sather.

#6882625 at 2019-06-30 18:13:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8803: Brunch with Frens. The Bacon and Kimosas Edition

>>6882616
Fuck off sather.

#6876226 at 2019-06-29 23:10:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8795: DS Shakin' All Over Edition

I've had several friends bring up ET/UFO disclosure this week. One is really into the SSP and sather (asks me for Q updates). One thinks I've lost it, but enjoys conspiracy podcasts. There is apparently a new doc on Netflix about Lazar and element 115. Just saw Ancient Aliens is back…and talking about Lazar and 115. New Navy patent about experimental craft. Etc etc etc

Coordinated rollout by cabal. Disclosure distraction. Its gotta be coming. The normies are flocking.

#6876079 at 2019-06-29 22:43:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8794: Consider Baking For Victory Edition

https://carefreemedium.com/event/conscious-life-expo/

Jordan sather was at this one:
https://www.edhat.com/event/16th-conscious-life-expo-feb-9-12-2018

So now we have a whole slew of connections.

#6875764 at 2019-06-29 21:43:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8794: Consider Baking For Victory Edition

DING DING DING

https://ilovekbmr.wordpress.com/2011/09/01/oprah-a-course-in-miracles-and-jz-knight-ramtha-truth-seekers/


Oprah, "A Course In Miracles", and JZ Knight "Ramtha" - Truth Seekers

https://divinecosmos.com/book/20-the-divine-cosmos/
The Divine Cosmos
Book by David Wilcock

"I finished Part One in a matter of days, which is a first for a nonfiction scientific work. It is outstandingand really enjoyable.

- Jeremy Weiland, Virginia, USA

[Scholar of ACIM / Law of One, Ascension2000 staff member, frequent discussion room participant]"

So…
If Wilcock is in bed with ACIM…
What's that mean for Jordan sather?

#6873806 at 2019-06-29 15:37:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

>>6873730
What lil Davey found out from his attorney is that spending your whole "adult" life prancing around stages makes you a public figure. He also found out that publicly available material is fair game. Unfortunately for all, lying is protected free speech. So lil Davey will continue his charade and we will continue to point and laugh. And sather will continue to sperg out about Q, like his lizard buddy.

#6873622 at 2019-06-29 15:00:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

>>6873586
>>6873586
The whole thing is hilarious. Wilcock is careening around wildly, trying to keep the spin alive. And he and sather are reading this. Hi turds where's our orb rides? You promised.

#6873607 at 2019-06-29 14:56:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

>>6873558

Ya you're a real anon who defends Jordan sather and BurnedSpy34. Sure. That sounds plausible.

#6873600 at 2019-06-29 14:55:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

>>6873568
>So now twitter is banning their own?
umm… Yeah

infowars
krassenfucks
sather

gives them street cred with the tards
that you sather?

>>6873543
>>6873548
>>6873558
>Everyone here knows sather is a shill too
he meant sather is a tard
sauce is self evident

#6873582 at 2019-06-29 14:52:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

>>6873548

You didn't know that BurnedSpy34 and Jordan sather are shills? Is this your first time here? 'Lurk more' has never been a more fitting reply, idiot.

#6873550 at 2019-06-29 14:47:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

>>6873510
>>6873522
>>6873523
sather the college dropout is lecturing us on autism cures. Wilcock is the reincarnation of edgar Cayce. How fucked in the head do you need to be to follow these cons? Pretty fucked.

#6873543 at 2019-06-29 14:45:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

>>6873504

Everyone here knows sather is a shill too. Give it a rest for fuck's sake.

#6873510 at 2019-06-29 14:38:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8791 QR AM Bake Edition

sather drank one too many bleach mojitos?

#6872735 at 2019-06-29 11:22:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8790: The Not Exactly Ghostly Edition

>>6872722
You spelled it wrong.

We're about saving the fucking world'n'shit.

PrayingMuhdic is about PrayingMuhdic.
Just like sather.
Just like InThePaytrixxx.
Just like the rest of the people building a cult of personalities about themselves…

It's supposed to be about the message.
Not the messenger.

(Which is probably why the mass, worldwide, public will never know for certain the answer to: "Who is Q?".)

#6844899 at 2019-06-26 10:26:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8754: Big Things are Afoot! Edition

>>6844512

I think it's notable given the size Wilcock's following, whether you believe he's a paytriot whore or not.

I personally find it 'discouraging' that Wilcock still pimps for Kim Dotcom and X22 Report, both of whom are obviously Cabal players.

So that kind of damns Wilcock too.

I have to say, of any remaining character whose integrity still baffles me, Wilcock is the most confusing. His close association with Cory Goode and (cough, cough) Jordan sather should be enough evidence to damn him right there. But Wilcock has worked so hard, so long, disclosing so much, I still find it hard to believe. (Then again I've been fooled by many like him before.)

Maybe he's the last and the greatest conman in the Cabal's arsenal of controlled assets. They won't set Wilcock off until the very last moment. The Sky Event? That will be a strange day.

#6828821 at 2019-06-24 06:27:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8733: Challenge Every Shill Edition

>>6828814
This whole thing is fake, sather and you are a glowing faggot.

#6792439 at 2019-06-19 22:06:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8688: Hope Prevails Edition

>>6792422
Mr sather.. have you taken out the trash for your grandma yet? You know that was part of the rules for staying w Nana..

Kek

#6769475 at 2019-06-17 06:22:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8658: Marines and Sailors at the ready! Edition

>>6769466
kek. sather and Wilcock followers must be very disappointed.

#6760562 at 2019-06-16 01:18:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8646: Destroying the City of London! Edition

>>6760544
I can taste sather tears from here

#6760232 at 2019-06-16 00:41:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8646: Destroying the City of London! Edition

>>6760137
But muh Trump is lying. Hit the door sather and take your bs with you.

#6739110 at 2019-06-13 04:10:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8619: Sydney Powell, Set General Flynn Free! Edition

The Risen Bill Smith vs. Jordan sather

comments?

#6731175 at 2019-06-12 04:38:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8608: Bleat Bitching Edition

>>6731110
cognitive, readable and relatable collective consciousness
and inside jokes

the anon part is especially helpful, I say anon things of the culture here I would never say on social media cuz somehow it makes sense here and dumb there..

case in point..however you feel about sather I saw some video advertised on you tube where
he named a title "Y u do dis youtube?"
I would laugh and "get it" if anon used that language here, but somehow in the wild it looks super stoopid

we are able to actually communicate with the hive mind of each other …utilizing our great connection(God comms)…it really is beautiful and it IS saving the world because we realize how powerful that is.

Social media just aint the same though it is also a part of the GA…second tier to here imo tho

#6717976 at 2019-06-10 15:50:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8591: Q+ Knockin Em Down Edition

>>6717895
sather and Gorka taking bleach shots → i now take bleach shots too
nurse anon confirms Cl- is needed by the parietal cell to make HCL… I took another shot

Alex Jones told me to buy all his vitamins
So i did
and gave him all my money
i urinated and shit out all the vitamins

#6717895 at 2019-06-10 15:31:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8591: Q+ Knockin Em Down Edition

Nurseanon reporting here,

Its time to get edumacated. Glyphosate the prominent pesticide in the herbicide RoundUp Ready sold by Monsanto now Bayer (stocks took some hits KEK). It does major damage to the body on so many levels. We waiting for the suppressed cures to be released but until then all you have to do is reduce your glyphosate exposure as much as possbile (yes I know its in the water, soil and air) but you have the choice to go on the carnivore diet which our fren Dr. Sebastian Gorka is currently on and may I add you look fantastic Dr. G! Eating meat will reduce your exposure by an insane amount. We are seeing a push to start eating fake meat which contains insanely high levels of Glyphosate. Now step two there is good news, Chlorine Dioxide or MMS which our fren Jordan sather got attacked for promoting Bleach attacks by MSM mean over the target. Chlorine Dioxide neutralizes glyphosate but it also gives the parietal cells in the stomach the chloride it needs to produce HCL which also destroys pathogens, viruses and parasites in the stomach. HEAL THE STOMACH AND THE BODY WILL REGULATE ITSELF.

While your reading this anons start looking into the ENDOCANNABANOID SYSTEM it is the bodys master regulator, Its only now being talked about briefly and taught in medical schools aka our Doctors dont know shit SAD.

My frens there is hope for the pesticides in our food the solutions exist but dont believe me DIGG!!

WWG1WGA

#6716824 at 2019-06-10 09:29:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8590: Silent NIght, Sunday Night Edition

>>6716818
I never said who I was.. sorry if you never actually reached out to Microchip or JB before Trump was even elected in 2016 and you are just on some 2017 after Trump was president Qanon bullshit like Jordan sather or Dustin Nemos or Praying Medic.. fuck those assholes

#6710519 at 2019-06-09 15:55:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8582: Consider the Vastness of Space Edition

The only real person left.

Looks like you're left with sather, Jones, and Hannity.

This wasn't about citizen journalists.

This was about agents and fake Patriots. The real Patriots were completely demolished the by those in power because Q never did his part. Just like Donald.

Just remember: The person that you all stepped on to be on top, is gonna be the same person that you see on your way back down. And all that goes up, must come down.

And when we cross paths, I'll smirk, keep walking, and pretend that I don't see you.

35 would be ashamed of every single one of you. 35 was a real leader of men.
Unlike Q.

Think about how many of you "Super Elites" I just took on… BY MYSELF. A nobody…. Might wanna consider changing what you reference yourself as. In a free world you would be peasants.

KISS MY ASS.

#6709673 at 2019-06-09 13:18:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8580: Gold Diggin in The Graveyard, Last Call at Feelz Bar Edition

THIS FUCKING PISSES ME OFF...

Cant these FUCKERS lay off the $ and show some true interest in HUMANITY...

Fuck you Jordan sather…

#6709282 at 2019-06-09 10:22:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8580: Gold Diggin in The Graveyard, Last Call at Feelz Bar Edition

>>6709253
>>6709271
X22 is Cabal pretty sure. watched them for a little bit about 6mos ago & almost nothing from there came to fruition (other than the obvious things that were to happen anyway). remember a full week of "the financial collapse is about to happen, buckle up" yet that's still not been a habbening. Plus, wasn't sather on there at one point? sather=controlled opposition imo 'money talks'

#6700156 at 2019-06-08 05:08:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8568: Never Forget The Values Of Our Republic Edition

The Cabal is working up to something.

One of the many fake-patriots on YouTube just posted a "pirated" copy of Above Majestic, the Jordan sather-produced documentary about extra-terrestrials. Personally, I think the Cabal wanted this pirated copy posted on YouTube, and in short order they'll fake their outrage and have the video taken down.

In the meantime, watch it while you can. I'm sure it's full of deception and mis-direction, as much as it contains some real truths. You decide for yourself which is which.

#6688039 at 2019-06-06 21:19:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8552: Tiffany Thursday Edition

>>6688023
sather can just get in his time machine and have look see hisself.

#6680102 at 2019-06-05 21:41:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8542 D-Day Incoming

>>6680060
Kek. Thank fuck sather has back up channels.

#6680014 at 2019-06-05 21:24:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8542 D-Day Incoming

>>6679958
sather = R

#6679878 at 2019-06-05 21:04:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8542 D-Day Incoming

>>6679815
Wowzer. Does sather know?

#6677373 at 2019-06-05 15:14:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8539: Division Shills in the Wire. Something BIG This Way Comes Edition

>>6677326
What does that have to do with sather?

#6677326 at 2019-06-05 15:07:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8539: Division Shills in the Wire. Something BIG This Way Comes Edition

>>6677322
Somebody please put sather in the corner.

#6677294 at 2019-06-05 15:01:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8539: Division Shills in the Wire. Something BIG This Way Comes Edition

sather needs to stop bleeding Q for shekels. Jordy, the interwebz are forever.

#6661266 at 2019-06-03 16:06:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8518: Flotus In Full Bloom Edition

>>6661201
This Bruno crowd includes incarnated et (twatter). It's the sather and JFK Jr crowd, always finding clues in numbers. In case you're wondering why it's so lame.

#6657746 at 2019-06-03 03:05:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8513: The "Comb Your Hair" Edition

>>6657582
sather enters the zone with backup posters. Predictable. I call this portrait you take JFK Jr, I'll take space chickens and vaccines.

#6657486 at 2019-06-03 02:40:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8513: The "Comb Your Hair" Edition

Double header. X22 jumps the shark and sather gets trigger finger. Bonus points for pulling in his sockpuppets for praise. Get bent sather, at least the blue chickens were comical.

#6657201 at 2019-06-03 02:09:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8512: God Bless the USA Edition

>>6656625
Fuck sather

#6634982 at 2019-05-31 06:36:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8484: A Tribute to the Free Speech Chans Edition

>>6634958
If these two didn't stalk Q, they wouldn't have shit. Joe M should fuck off and take sather with him. inb4 they've red pilled a lot of people.

#6634972 at 2019-05-31 06:33:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8484: A Tribute to the Free Speech Chans Edition

>>6634958
The fuck?

I just shake my head. Seems like a weird stunt, and why in such a way draw light to Q?

Spoopy as all get out.

Fuck sather too.

#6622837 at 2019-05-30 01:00:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8468: Rough Seas Make Good Sailors Edition

>>6622777
Hurry up, bitches!! I think sather has a live stream going! BAHAHAHHAHAH

#6615234 at 2019-05-29 06:42:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8458: Around About Midnight Edition

>>6614761
I like Jordan sather.
Those of you who say he is a shill, how about YOU make videos weekly and psot and let us see who you are and let us determine what we feel about you…….you won't.

#6614977 at 2019-05-29 05:27:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8458: Around About Midnight Edition

>>6614970
So anyone who speaks against sather and his snake oil is a shill?
K.

#6614960 at 2019-05-29 05:24:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8458: Around About Midnight Edition

>>6614953
For what sin?
Questioning sather and his hippy magic?

>feigns all the woe

#6613800 at 2019-05-29 02:31:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8456: Together We Win Edition

>>6613583
sather explaining why he goes for the low hanging fruit.

#6613765 at 2019-05-29 02:27:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8456: Together We Win Edition

>>6613611
this:
>Got Cult?
>Brought to you by Ramtha
>some pic with a weird face
vs this:
>JZ Knight is the leader of Ramtha, which is a cult that has been around for decades. She has even been on shows like Oprah. They support the democrats and the cult leader met the Obamas. JZ claims she can channel a 35,000 year old alien and conditions cult members at "the farm". This cult leader met sather at the Contact in the Desert event and he is even on the front page of their website.
>InTheGaytrixxx and ShadyGruve are presenting at a Ramtha cult event, where they will be charging people $100 (after qualifying by taking their classes) to have them enlighten people about Q. Other shills that these fags associate with, like JT Wilde, also performed at these cult gatherings. The fags are attempting to discredit Q by pretending to be a part of the movement, while promoting associations with cults.
>https://www.ramtha.com/content/pdf/Genesis_2019.pdf
>https://www.ramtha.com/events/event.aspx?id=1654

thanks for the info
>>6613725
>Didn't Q say there was shilling against the clocks?
No, the watch. Q hasn't acknowledged clockfags' Qclock
inb4 yea huh, still waiting

#6613611 at 2019-05-29 02:07:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8456: Together We Win Edition

>>6613453
I'll break it down a bit for dunces out there:

JZ Knight is the leader of Ramtha, which is a cult that has been around for decades. She has even been on shows like Oprah. They support the democrats and the cult leader met the Obamas. JZ claims she can channel a 35,000 year old alien and conditions cult members at "the farm". This cult leader met sather at the Contact in the Desert event and he is even on the front page of their website.

InTheGaytrixxx and ShadyGruve are presenting at a Ramtha cult event, where they will be charging people $100 (after qualifying by taking their classes) to have them enlighten people about Q. Other shills that these fags associate with, like JT Wilde, also performed at these cult gatherings. The fags are attempting to discredit Q by pretending to be a part of the movement, while promoting associations with cults.

https://www.ramtha.com/content/pdf/Genesis_2019.pdf

https://www.ramtha.com/events/event.aspx?id=1654

#6613423 at 2019-05-29 01:48:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8456: Together We Win Edition

>>6613379
These random faggots are attempting to act as spokesman for Q while connecting the movement to a known cult. sather has been on comedy central, washington post, etc and has a large following. InTheGaytrixxx and his clown crew are also working to make Q followers look like crazy cultists.

#6613359 at 2019-05-29 01:41:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8456: Together We Win Edition

>>6613222
When Jordan sather first appeared on the scene on ytube, he was collating news items and was a good speaker. He had big open eyes.

At some point, he became a Paytriot, and somehow got in tight with Corey Goode and David Wilcock even though Jordan sather was 26 years old and had only worked in a health food store before.
I think he had a hand in making their film "Above Majestic" about the US Secret Space Program.

This year, he now has that SQUINTY LEFT EYE that a lot of Cabal bad actors have…. hmmm wonder what happened to him?

#6613190 at 2019-05-29 01:23:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8456: Together We Win Edition

"So many questions"…

…Like why does sather associate with the known cult, Ramtha, & preach similar topics?

https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/1131399274829307904

#6612642 at 2019-05-29 00:16:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8455: Military Comissions Convening Authority Edition

>>6612428
Case in point. Here we have a sather/Joe M exchange re the vaccine crazy they want to pin on us. Glo niggas. And who else is on the vaccine autism train. Crazy eyes that's who.

#6612428 at 2019-05-28 23:50:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8455: Military Comissions Convening Authority Edition

jz knight with both michelle and barack obama jz knight is the head of ramtha school of enlightenment a cult inthematrixxx is associating q with jordan sather is also associated with jz knight they met at 'contact in the desert'. many q 'personalities' are connected to this cult they are going to try to associate us with this cult

#6612164 at 2019-05-28 23:24:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8454: Baker Hoppin' Melee Continues Edition

>>6612001
Correct except for the sather part

#6612001 at 2019-05-28 23:03:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8454: Baker Hoppin' Melee Continues Edition

>>6611979
Isn't t3 baker the baker that put Angel into the notables? Isn't Angel associated with sather? Does anybody remember that Comedy Central hitpiece on Q?

#6609653 at 2019-05-28 17:44:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8451: Kitchen Collab Edition

>>6609625
>how many enemas are you gonna buy
I for one don't buy any of the shit Jordan sather tries to peddle.
Other than that I regard the backhole as an exit only.
…. but to each their own ….

#6609157 at 2019-05-28 16:34:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8450: God Bless The QRG Edition

Kabamur=Muraqabah

Pleiadians, Kabamur, sather have other agendas

https://archive.fo/hbddp

https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Muraqabah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaaba

https://ascensionglossary.com/index.php/State_of_Merkaba

https://www.gaia.com/video/merkaba-and-angel-ceremony

https://www.gaia.com/article/what-is-a-light-body

#6602331 at 2019-05-27 18:39:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8442: Victory Sounds in UK and Europe Edition

Sebastian Gorka DrG
@SebGorka
Let me translate for you.

"Q is BOLLOX."
Quote Tweet

Jordan sather
@Jordan_sather_
· May 26
Q is an information dissemination operation being conducted by intelligence insiders with close connections to President Trump in order to raise public awareness during this ongoing shadow civil war against the Deep State.

Anyone calling it a cult should instantly lose cred.
1:38 PM · May 27, 2019 · Twitter for iPhone

#6597180 at 2019-05-27 00:45:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8435: UNBELIEVABLE TEAM Edition

PhysicianFag here,

We have major DIVISION in the Great Awakening whether you know it or not. The division is on ALL platforms. It has been a "confusing" distraction for many patriots trying to follow Q. Hopefully this long post can help (some) resolve the confusion so we then can all focus on Q.

Be careful who you are following.
Some are profiting off this movement.
Some are building a big following off this movement only then to retreat and go mainstream.
Patriots make sacrifices.
Some, the ultimate sacrifice.
Patriots are SELFLESS.
Do they ask for monthly payments to remain Patriots?
Think logically.
To some, it's only about the money.
Those who would seek personal gain at the expense of others in this movement has an agenda.
You decide.
Q (1295)

Translation: Psychology 101: EVERYONE has an agenda. Whether it is a bad agenda or a good agenda. EGO 101: From famefagging to fulfilling a specific need to ending corruption and evil. Or = a combination of all the above. In this immoral world, money/power is the biggest agenda for bad actors and patriots. Think Judas Iscariot. A good person overall, but sells out the Lord for a worthless amount of money.

They attempted to infiltrate, repackage & rebrand as their own.
Profit-vehicle.
Destroy through [misinformation].
Absorb the 'confused'.
Re-route traffic to other platforms.
Q (1343)

Translation: Q doesn't need other platforms. Q didn't need a large platform like InfoWars, which this Q post is in reference to. Simple as that. Those (who profit off this movement) are paYtriots. We have seen these paYtriots gain a big following on ALL the platforms and suddenly develop donation buttons. Some started off with good intentions and then used the Great Awakening for their own agenda.

As Q has confirmed from an Anon (1366)

"I don't think it would be fair to say that a journalist can't make money when covering Q. But that's the difference. A journalist covering Q isn't necessarily usurping Q. The paytriots in question were trying to usurp Q. "

Translation: Q gave us a "litmus test" for those who have followers. Are they "trying to usurp Q"? Most are not, they keep Q focused and put out informative digs, but their agenda is STILL to make money off the movement. Is that bad? Good? Is it causing division?

The current "controversy" by Anons and patriots/paYtriots from ALL platforms:

JZ Knight (Ramtha) has an event for her Ramtha's School of Enlightenment and will be hosting IntheMatrixxx, and ShadyGrooove. Q encouraged? They say so. I have heard their arguments and reasoning.

JZ Knight aka Ramtha (who channels a "35,000 old warrior spirit") has many truths in her movement and this is coming from a medically trained physician. We need to be "open" to a lot of the unknowns in the world especially when it comes to medicine. Accepting of the luciferian occult? Never. But JZ has her agenda. Money. She knows this an agenda (for many) so has used it to influence patriots/paYtriots. Is her ultimate goal to co-opt the Great Awakening? Impossible. She would fail; you can't stop truth and enlightenment. You can't stop the greatest military operation ever.

IntheMatrixxx and ShadyGrooove have been great patriots focusing on important truths. But they have their agenda. Money is their agenda while trying to spread the Great Awakening to the "mainstream" and other platforms. Is it worth it? Time will tell.

Neon Revolt has disclosed many truths. But he has an agenda. Money is his agenda and has been vocal against IntheMatrixxx and ShadyGrooove. MAGA Coalition? According to their secretary (McQueen) he is. If not denied by Neon Revolt, DO NOT BUY HIS BOOK! Q has been clear on the MAGA Coalition and anyone associated should be exposed.

PrayingMedic has disclosed many truths. But he has an agenda. Money is his agenda. Book in progress. Bad? Good?

WarDrummer has disclosed many truths. But he has an agenda. Money is his agenda. Denies being associated with the MAGA Coalition. Claims he has give $$$ to IntheMatrixxx. Bad? Good?

Jordan sather has disclosed some truth. But he has an agenda. Money is his agenda. Bad? Good?

Patriots United: RedPill_ / AnonT_ / CropDust_ / jasonwokeup__ that are ALL mixed in with this controversy have agendas. Bad? Good?

Why would Q choose a board when EVERYONE has agendas?

Q (1375)

I would love to see the Anons forget the division and what A,B and C are doing and focus on Q. This Movement isn't going away NO MATTER what. We don't have to be ark steadiers to "protect it". It is in good hands patriots so "follow" who you may, but there is only one Q. Can these named Anons get back to it?

Thank you Trump. Thank you Q. Thank you to the Military and White Hats saving the world.

#6596983 at 2019-05-27 00:24:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8435: UNBELIEVABLE TEAM Edition

>>6596948
You are disproving sather with CDC references?

#6593001 at 2019-05-26 15:38:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8430: 404d Breads Edition

>>6592971
There are no ET's sather. Q is clearly Christian, and consider the vastness of space/heavens is used in the Bible to explain the might and glory of God. Q probably meant God is real when asked the question "are we alone". any Christian would say no to that Question.

#6588185 at 2019-05-25 20:47:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8424: Sumo Security Edition

If not namefAG then who else?

Fox News?

Infowars?

GORKA?

sather?

Other Mossad fags?

Candace gonna cover Q?

#6574010 at 2019-05-24 02:57:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8405: Q is Busy Edition

>>6573999
Not sather. Just asking for some extra on top of the justice news.

#6573999 at 2019-05-24 02:56:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8405: Q is Busy Edition

>>6573982
Don't have enough material for your bullshit vids yet, sather?

#6566068 at 2019-05-23 13:50:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8395: Too late to Run... It's Here Edition

>>6566054
I wouldn't mind if twitter does sather next.

#6566054 at 2019-05-23 13:48:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8395: Too late to Run... It's Here Edition

TRIBUNAL WATCH
@tribunal_watch
1m1 minute ago

TRIBUNAL WATCH Retweeted Jordan sather

HOLD THE LINE TROOPS!!!

SAVE CONTENT OFF-LINE AND FIRE AWAY WHEN WE GO SILENT!

We are the News Now!! #DigitalArmy knows what to do!!

@tribunal_watch @Jordan_sather_ @POTUS

https://twitter.com/tribunal_watch/status/1131556266579566597

#6565845 at 2019-05-23 13:13:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8395: Too late to Run... It's Here Edition

>>6565782
>>6565792
>>6565800
>>6565800
>>6565566
>>6565572

Who is Joe M?

Joe M is a Mossad agent who pretends to be part of the Q movement.

Runs with folks like sather, In The Matrix, War Drummer and other fake and GAY PAYTRIOTS.

Anjel put together this video on the truth about JoeM akak Joe Maseposes Aka StormIsUponUs, but as usual- think for yourself and use your own discernment.


But use your own discernment.

JoeM is a Mossad faggot though. And REAL PATRIOT ANON will tell you that.

#6563661 at 2019-05-23 02:57:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8392: New Dem Catchphrase

>>6563652
aka "The sather".

#6559203 at 2019-05-22 17:27:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8387: Wednesday Winning Edition

Go through one of the threads here and tally up what all of the posts are doing.
What are they doing?
Are there "digs" going on?
Are there actually?
Where are they?
Where are the results of "digs"?
Are there actually any results?
Where are the results?
What are they doing?
Did they get "dug" here, or did a bunch of noise get made, information slipped past, and nobody was the wiser?
Setting aside emulated "digs", what else do you see when you tally up the posts on a thread?
1. TONS of "baker thanking".
2. TONS of generic chan content- emulated /pol/ content
3. LOTS of posted articles, tweets, etc.- very very easy to keep this artificially flowing in. EASY for bots to post.
4. TONS of FILLER of all kinds. Chit chat. Discussions of random issues. Is that organic HERE? What is this board? Do PEOPLE keep this board flying BY USING IT AS A CASUAL CHIT CHAT BOARD, or is that fake?
If people simply LOOK at the threads and THINK, they might realize that ALMOST ALL THE POSTS ARE FAKE
I.e. they are being made by non-human (ai).
If you are waiting for Q to tell you this, then we are doomed.
Q can't tell us.
We must choose FREELY to reject THE FAKE INTERNET.
HUMANS HERE ARE SHEEP, BEING HERDED BY FAKE "ANONS"
Q can't tell us this.
Humans must FIND THEIR BALLS AND FIGHT.

Stop letting this STUPID STUPID FAKE BOARD CONTROL THE MOVEMENT PEOPLE.

Look at it and THINK.
This isn't /pol/.
9000 threads of frenzied activity is FAKE.
WE MUST WAKE UP AND FIGHT IT
STOP BEING MEEK
STOP BEING PASSIVE
STOP BOWING TO "ANONS"
STOP BEING HERDED BY "ANONS"
STOP WAITING FOR "ANONS" TO DO THINGS
WE MUST TAKE CONTROL PEOPLE
"Oh I'm not sure, I'll wait for Q to tell us what to do..." says the human.
NO, DON'T WAIT FOR Q TO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO
Because Q can't.
YOU MUST THINK FOR YOURSELVES
Don't wait for Q to tell you what to think.
Stop letting "anons" think for you.
Stop letting "Jordan sather" think for you.
Stop letting "NeonRevolt" think for you.
ALL FAKE. Q IS WAITING FOR US TO WAKE UP.

#6558397 at 2019-05-22 16:00:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8386: Crown Dossier Edition

Go through one of the threads here and tally up what all of the posts are doing.
What are they doing?
Are there "digs" going on?
Are there actually?
Where are they?
Where are the results of "digs"?
Are there actually any results?
Where are the results?
What are they doing?
Did they get "dug" here, or did a bunch of noise get made, information slipped past, and nobody was the wiser?
Setting aside emulated "digs", what else do you see when you tally up the posts on a thread?
1. TONS of "baker thanking".
2. TONS of generic chan content- emulated /pol/ content
3. LOTS of posted articles, tweets, etc.- very very easy to keep this artificially flowing in. EASY for bots to post.
4. TONS of FILLER of all kinds. Chit chat. Discussions of random issues. Is that organic HERE? What is this board? Do PEOPLE keep this board flying BY USING IT AS A CASUAL CHIT CHAT BOARD, or is that fake?
If people simply LOOK at the threads and THINK, they might realize that ALMOST ALL THE POSTS ARE FAKE
I.e. they are being made by non-human (ai).
If you are waiting for Q to tell you this, then we are doomed.
Q can't tell us.
We must choose FREELY to reject THE FAKE INTERNET.
HUMANS HERE ARE SHEEP, BEING HERDED BY FAKE "ANONS"
Q can't tell us this.
Humans must FIND THEIR BALLS AND FIGHT.

Stop letting this STUPID STUPID FAKE BOARD CONTROL THE MOVEMENT PEOPLE.

Look at it and THINK.
This isn't /pol/.
9000 threads of frenzied activity is FAKE.
WE MUST WAKE UP AND FIGHT IT
STOP BEING MEEK
STOP BEING PASSIVE
STOP BOWING TO "ANONS"
STOP BEING HERDED BY "ANONS"
STOP WAITING FOR "ANONS" TO DO THINGS
WE MUST TAKE CONTROL PEOPLE
"Oh I'm not sure, I'll wait for Q to tell us what to do..." says the human.
NO, DON'T WAIT FOR Q TO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO
Because Q can't.
YOU MUST THINK FOR YOURSELVES
Don't wait for Q to tell you what to think.
Stop letting "anons" think for you.
Stop letting "Jordan sather" think for you.
Stop letting "NeonRevolt" think for you.
ALL FAKE. Q IS WAITING FOR US TO WAKE UP.

#6557421 at 2019-05-22 13:08:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8384: Kabuki has nothing on this movie... Edition

Go through one of the threads here and tally up what all of the posts are doing.
What are they doing?
Are there "digs" going on?
Are there actually?
Where are they?
Where are the results of "digs"?
Are there actually any results?
Where are the results?
What are they doing?
Did they get "dug" here, or did a bunch of noise get made, information slipped past, and nobody was the wiser?

Setting aside emulated "digs", what else do you see when you tally up the posts on a thread?
1. TONS of "baker thanking".
2. TONS of generic chan content– emulated /pol/ content
3. LOTS of posted articles, tweets, etc.– very very easy to keep this artificially flowing in. EASY for bots to post.
4. TONS of FILLER of all kinds. Chit chat. Discussions of random issues. Is that organic HERE? What is this board? Do PEOPLE keep this board flying BY USING IT AS A CASUAL CHIT CHAT BOARD, or is that fake?

If people simply LOOK at the threads and THINK, they might understand that ALMOST ALL THE POSTS ARE FAKE
I.e. they are being made by non-human (ai).

If you are waiting for Q to tell you this, then we are doomed.
Q can't tell us.
We must choose FREELY to reject THE FAKE INTERNET.

HUMANS HERE ARE SHEEP, BEING HERDED BY FAKE "ANONS"

Q can't tell us this.
Humans must FIND THEIR BALLS AND FIGHT.
Stop letting this STUPID STUPID FAKE BOARD CONTROL THE MOVEMENT PEOPLE.

Look at it and THINK.
This isn't /pol/.
9000 threads of frenzied activity is FAKE.
WE MUST WAKE UP AND FIGHT IT
STOP BEING MEEK
STOP BEING PASSIVE
STOP BOWING TO "ANONS"
STOP BEING HERDED BY "ANONS"
STOP WAITING FOR "ANONS" TO DO THINGS
WE MUST TAKE CONTROL PEOPLE

"Oh I'm not sure, I'll wait for Q to tell us what to do…" says the human.
NO, DON'T WAIT FOR Q TO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO
Because Q can't.
YOU MUST THINK FOR YOURSELVES
Don't wait for Q to tell you what to think.
Stop letting "anons" think for you.
Stop letting "Jordan sather" think for you.
Stop letting "NeonRevolt" think for you.
ALL FAKE. Q IS WAITING FOR US TO WAKE UP.

#6552160 at 2019-05-21 19:51:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8378: The Q ickening Edition

Here are some weird connections that make a full circle.

- On the cover of the book Manhattan: Army and the Atomic Bomb, the Red Castle logo is displayed. (Thanks to Jordan sather for showing this in a 2017 video)
- The Manhattan project was under the direction of the Army Crop of Engineers
- Los Alamos, home of the Manhattan project, was originally named Project Y
- Involved in the Manhattan project was a group of Hungarian-born scientists known as the Martians because they jokingly said they were from Mars
- One of the Martians was John von Neumann
- Neumann's achievements included quantum logic, game theory, and artificial intelligence
- Von Neumann is credited with developing the equilibrium strategy of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD)
- On May 19, 2019, POTUS tweeted "Alfred E. Newman will never be President!"
- Alfred E. Neuman is the fictitious mascot and cover boy of the American humor magazine Mad
- POTUS changed the "u" to "w" to read "wman"
- Weatherman was a radical left militant organization active in the late 1960s and 1970s, founded on the Ann Arbor campus of the University of Michigan
- Their purpose was to achieve "the destruction of U.S. imperialism and achieve a classless world: world communism".
- The May 19th Communist Organization was a US-based, self-described revolutionary organization formed by members of the Weather Underground Organization (aka Weatherman)
- One of their goals was to Initiate a series of bombings and terrorist attacks
- Elizabeth Ann Duke, member of May 19th (aka M19CO), remains wanted by the FBI
- On May 19, 2019, news broke about Mary Lee Dalton, 52 and pipe bombs in Grass Valley >>6548372
- One of the articles cited on the M19CO WP page is was published in 2001 by The Oak Ridge Institute for Science
- The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) asset
- The article identified that left-wing radical groups are still active and working with Cuba (pic related)
- On May 20, 2019, POTUS tweets about Cuba and links Cuba to Venezuela
- On May 20, 2019 POTUS held a rally in Pennsylvania, the Keystone State
- Of the 17 DOE labs, the National Energy Technology Lab is located in the Keystone State
- The DOE, although only in existence since 1977, traces its lineage to the Manhattan Project effort to develop the atomic bomb during World War II

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Martians_(scientists)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Y
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_19th_Communist_Organization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Ann_Duke
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/dt/elizabeth-anna-duke
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/780410-SHVVvq/native/780410.PDF
https://fox40.com/2019/05/19/police-find-pipe-bombs-in-grass-valley-womans-home/
https://www.energy.gov/about-us

#6541776 at 2019-05-20 11:21:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8365: Midnight to Almost Dawn Edition

This is somewhat upseting, but how (we) are viewed and made fun of by the paytriots...

WE NEED AN INTERVIEW SCRIPT...and we need to be able to answer these questions and not look like idiots...these folks just let this reporter walk them into ignorant responses. sather the biggest CHOAD of all...wonder if he set it all up...sure he did...

https://youtu.be/VGrfN3v5JL8

#6541091 at 2019-05-20 05:38:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8364: God Bless Each And Every Patriot In The World Edition

>>6541083
Im totally smelling Jordan sather, David Wilcock, Corey goode and JZ Ramtha, NXVIM, SOROS and those all in for FLYNN

#6540770 at 2019-05-20 04:31:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8363: Freedom of Thought Edition

HOW ABOUT I DONT SHARE ANYTHING PUBLICLY AND YOU CAN ALL SUCK EGGS!!!! this bread is named "freedom of thought" I dont think so , I'm pretty sure that George Soros has infiltrated these breads as much as the white house was infiltrated with spies! JZKNIGHT/NXVIM/SOROS via. inthematirx, cordicon, storm, sather and friends have been #ALLINFORFLYNN! Not one person was looking at both sides of information, even with Qs 35 drops and spotlighting an expert in INTELLIGENCE professional for 33 years . YOU people make me sick. No One even on TWITTER is making a STAND except the President. Its completely insane, especially with all of the readily available information out there!!

#6534484 at 2019-05-19 07:54:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8355: The May Blue Moon of Freedom Edition

>>6534435
Apparently JZKnight trying to Hijack our movement by connecting themselves to General Flynn, Brother and family JT Wilde tagging ALL of them and making contributions to them online, In the Matrix, Shady, Ipot, Cordicon, Jordan sather, Storm is upon us. Neon Revolt made the Matrix Shady connections. It's freaking crazy!

#6526852 at 2019-05-18 05:48:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8346: Cindy's Wistful Ukraine Warmongering Edition

>>6526778
I thought it was just where sather went to get pussy

#6522411 at 2019-05-17 18:16:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8340: Some Coffee To Go With Your Tarriffs, Sir?

Now ever moar Clear that JZKnigh is trying to co-op Q for her Cult of Ramtha

Ture Qnons need to block her on social media and denounce any Q affiliation with her
>>6522332
>IntheMatrixxx and ShadyGrooove sell out.
To the
>Cult of Ramtha and JZ Knight.
>>6522370
>Storm, Ipot, Flynn, sather, jt Wilde and many more, it certainly WAS a coup!

#6522370 at 2019-05-17 18:08:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8340: Some Coffee To Go With Your Tarriffs, Sir?

>>6522332
Storm, Ipot, Flynn, sather, jt Wilde and many more, it certainly WAS a coup!

#6519760 at 2019-05-17 09:28:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8337: Big Boom Friday? Edition

>>6519581

sather?
So why then was he Q'd?

#6519657 at 2019-05-17 08:29:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8337: Big Boom Friday? Edition

>>6519581
Hahaha 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 David wilcock is connected, fulford, sather, Goode, to ramtha school connected to jzknight, connected to jt Wilde, connected to gen Flynn, connected to matrix, shady, ipot, Jones, etc, etc…they are all connected to Soros Thanks to Joseph Flynn! Oh, wait… Neon Revolt, connected matrix and shady, someone else connected the rest. Q and Q+ these are bad and Foreign Actors did they file a FARA? Who's paying them. There's always a footprint! Happy hunting! I love that!

#6511394 at 2019-05-16 07:08:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8326: The Eyes On Edition

>>6511374
>>6511363
No sauce for Charlie Kirk because real people can't find anything, kinda like Jordan sather. No homo…I'm a real person. How do we know anymore?

#6511061 at 2019-05-16 05:31:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8326: The Eyes On Edition

So, Neon Revolt connects Matrix, Shady and IPOT, (which Cropduster outed as, Soros funded,) to Jz Knight/Ramtha School to NXIVM, did they also connect it to Jordan sather (Cory Goode's Kid & David Wilcock), Joe M's buddy, SC and FLYNN? Wow this is Batshit Crazy!!

#6492754 at 2019-05-14 02:28:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8302: The John H Durham Edition

>>.6492173
Hey Anjel, how'd the meeting with your handler Jordan sather go today? Were BO and CM there also?
What about sather's handler RDS?

You know, if RDS was there you've crossed the line to liability because he's a very busy man with his ITNJ subversion.

Btw, what does it pay to help subvert a nation these days? I see you are still in a crappy apartment in Buckeye, AZ so, can't be much. Especially for the kind of hours you're putting into it.

#6486392 at 2019-05-13 08:52:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8294: The Almost Late Nite Edition

>>6486386
Q is a gigantic faggit who said midterms were safe and you assholes believed him.
And most of your faggot ass decoders and Qtubers didnt support Tru p during the election either
intheMatrixxx was a Democrat
sather didn't vote
Medic supported Ted Cruz
QNTMPKTS supported Bernie Sanders
Fuck this gay Q shit calling real patroits fake Maga

#6477723 at 2019-05-12 05:18:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8283: Stay The Course Edition

>>6477595
How often do you converse with your Fukken Comedy Central clown LARP buddy sather?
How many other of those PAYfags you follow on Twatter?
GTFOH!

#6469105 at 2019-05-11 04:55:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8272: Friday Nighshift Diggin and Giggin Edition

>>6469076
Victims, obviously. Don't forget: Jordan sather promotes Kabamur all the time.

#6445719 at 2019-05-08 15:27:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8242: The Bell Tolls for the Old Guard Edition

>>6445681
Wtf?! It's all a setup, actors. Fuck sather, fuck YT baker

#6444832 at 2019-05-08 12:40:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8241: Halfway Through the Week Edition

>>6444699

Corey Goode is [MOS]. Joined at the hip with [Jordan sather].

#6442059 at 2019-05-08 01:42:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

>>6441802
This anon thinks you are a C_A shill and need the rope for trying to manipulate a conversation among The People.
Anons know sather is DS, handler is Robert David Steele and his first interview was with AJ.

So, you want to retract that before I claim against your trespass?

#6441911 at 2019-05-08 01:21:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

>>6441742
sather apologists. He's a snake oil salesman. Wake the f up.

#6441815 at 2019-05-08 01:08:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

>>6441786
I have known of sather since he began "Truthing". When he first started with YT Videos. He is not affiliated with Jones or the DS in any form.

#6441802 at 2019-05-08 01:06:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

>>6441745
listen you might think I am being all crazy
but…. sather seems to know so much about the topic that Q says is the highest classification..
how is that possible? have you seen his videos at alien mountain….

I also completely acknowledge Q's drop of we are not alone given the vastness of space…

but how do these people know more about those beings while at the same time they are lagging so far behind with everyday human shit?

#6441786 at 2019-05-08 01:05:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

IMO sather took over for Jones Paytriot buy my Shit from my sponsors.>>6441760

#6441760 at 2019-05-08 01:01:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

>>6441745
so is Jordan sather a deep state plant?

#6441536 at 2019-05-08 00:37:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

>>6441524
sather is fine. Last I checked he wasnt livestreaming a bake while hopping ip's.

#6441524 at 2019-05-08 00:36:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8237: FISAGate Blowing Wide Open Edition

>>6441404
ok so what about the others?
Jordan sather is in there…
u set on him

#6441234 at 2019-05-08 00:03:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8236: Clown Onions Edition

>>6441203
sather must be hitting targets.

#6441203 at 2019-05-08 00:00:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8236: Clown Onions Edition

>>6441143
No idea but I don't think Lil Angel ever hit the big time. Did sather actually do that?

#6421626 at 2019-05-05 17:55:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8211: Chinese Tariffs Edition

>>6421595
Put your dick away sather.

#6415010 at 2019-05-04 22:46:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8203: Trolling The Big Tech Authoritarians Edition

>>6414910
>He ded now.


Interesting how that happens a lot to doctors who buck the trend and start having great success when they take their patients on the naturapatic route…away from all the fake medical research and Big Pharma's poisons.

Jordan sather used to track this, but I haven't watched him in a long time. According to the Georgia Guidestones and to Pike's writings about the NWO, it seems that global population reduction is a major objective. They have to find seemingly innocuous ways to kill us. Whether its stuff they're spraying in the skies, or in the food and water, or in these vaccines that they're forcing everyone to take.

#6351380 at 2019-04-28 22:10:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8121: Bigger Story Yet To Be Discovered Edition

Jordan sather why don't you tell us that your Mom Carol works for Kaiser Permanente a big donor of Democrats?
http://archive.fo/YvUMY

http://archive.fo/TAMpg
Study: No increased risk to infants who get multiple vaccines Kaiser Permanente

http://archive.fo/eTdu7
Childhood Immunization Schedule: Ages 0 to 6 Years at Kaiser Permanente

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000034986&cycle=2018

#6349723 at 2019-04-28 19:34:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8119: Do I Look Like I Know What A JPEG Is Edition

David Christoson ex wife works for Kaiser Permanente

sather's Mom works for Kaiser Permanente…
http://archive.fo/YvUMY

Fake feuds to promote sather? We see everything

#6341600 at 2019-04-28 01:57:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8109: Bakin for the Rally Edition

I found this thread and this dude 3nityalchemy is the admin of the discord anons group
https://twitter.com/Q1295tinman/status/1121211289160708096

http://archive.fo/E2yWM

He has many accounts. He is into ascension. http://archive.fo/nFzLx

Sells monoatomic gold. Hypnotist
http://archive.fo/IJXZ2

Fake feuds with sather. sather promotes monoatomic gold Fake magas
http://archive.fo/xzpWL

#6336241 at 2019-04-27 19:47:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8102: FREE FLYNN Edition

>>6336205
No worries
sather is a tool,but a tool for who i do not know.
He seems benign enough.
However, you should go back to his early videos and watch as he looks beyond his camera for a nod ffom whoever is handling him. Every video he does with the whiteboard. It is obvious as hell.

#6336056 at 2019-04-27 19:31:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8102: FREE FLYNN Edition

Took a break for a couple of days waiting for today's reveal at the rally….

Watching Right Side Broadcasting coverage outside the rally and a woman being interviewed sends out a Kudos to Jordan sather; SpaceForce????
What's that about … Jordan sather?

I was a little off put considering all he does is report information gleaned thru anons digs.
Will it be Patriots that have been 'visible' that will steal the limelight so to speak of the hours and hours of work done here by autists and anons

#6331827 at 2019-04-27 07:53:17 (UTC+1)
Research General #8097: Yellow Vests Still Active Edition

>>6331823
so this is where Jordan sather got his idea from…kek

#6331676 at 2019-04-27 07:15:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8096: Declas Hussein's Birth Certificate Edition

Jeffery Pedersen intheMatrixxx
David Hayes - Praying Medic
Jordan sather - we coming

#6321376 at 2019-04-26 13:31:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8083: Happy Birthday Dear FLOTUS Edition

>>6321358
Fake and sather.

#6315595 at 2019-04-26 00:42:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8076: War-Like Posture Edition

Edge of Wonder… good info / disinfo? This pleb wants to know if I should continue watching. They just interviewed Jordan sather.

#6308758 at 2019-04-25 13:34:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8067: A New Dawn is Upon Us Edition

>>6308728

Get a girlfriend, sather.

#6303098 at 2019-04-25 02:27:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8060: We Will Work, We Will Pray, And We Will Fight Edition

New video by Jordan sather. He discusses fluoride poisoning in Utah and Pakistani resistance to vaccines.

#6301767 at 2019-04-25 00:26:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8058: What Did DS Know and When Did They Know It Edition

>>6301722
Who sold sather weed, again?

#6300240 at 2019-04-24 22:03:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8056: Wednesday Winning Edition

>>6300211
Kabamur is nothing more than a sather circle-jerk buddy.

#6296225 at 2019-04-24 14:37:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8051: United Under One Flag and One God Edition

>>6296095
…and sather grows a massive boner…

#6290865 at 2019-04-24 01:55:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8044: Settled and Comfy Edition

>>6290844
sather must be so triggered right now.

#6283257 at 2019-04-23 11:57:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8034: Just Waiting the the Next Shoe to Drop Edition

Jordan sather is DESTROYING vaccine "fake news"! A recent propaganda piece by MSM used a photoshopped image of a baby to falsely portray that he/she had measles! Plus, media quoted measles case numbers don't seem to match CDC official totals.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E_KWnG6gO8&feature=em-uploademail

#6280858 at 2019-04-23 03:46:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8031: Investigate The Investigators Edition

>>6280336
must be sather

#6274325 at 2019-04-22 17:39:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8023: Egg Pharma Edition

Behold a Pale Horse's Ass

https://www.jtrue.com/blog/behold-a-pale-horses-ass

April 6, 2019 jarue Column, Writing 2 Comments
Alex Jones is no Bill Cooper. Through Bill Cooper's writings and broadcasts, we were told how the system worked. Bill told us they would come for him one day and they did. Bill Cooper was wanted by the Clintons and the IRS. He was named a major fugitive by the United States Marshall Service. Bill Cooper died two months after 9/11 in Eagar, Arizona. Two deputies came for him and Bill Cooper died in a gunfight. Bill was smeared by the law, the courts, the IRS, and the Southern Poverty Law Center. He predicted and conveyed the truth. He warned us of what was to come. He brought home the blueprints to the Death Star and they killed him for it. We helped kill Bill Cooper. Our silver went into the bottomless pockets of a federal meat-chipper who hunted him down and ate him alive. Behold a Pale Horse is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the capabilities and motivations of the federal government. Bill taught me enough to understand that countries aren't what we think they are. Bill taught me the key to control is the illusion of dominance. For any authority, nothing is more important than controlling an illusion. The quest for truth is professional team wrestling. The house wins when everyone buys a ticket and every player is controlled through selection.

Evaluate crumbs: Usama Bin Laden gave CNN a Live TV interview in 1997. ABC in 1998. Time in 1999. UBL was already a high-value "target" by the United States and Mossad yet they missed three opportunities to apprehend him?

On June 28th, 2001, Bill Cooper predicted something big was about to happen. He predicted they would blame whatever it was on Usama Bin Laden. Ten weeks later, on 9/11 something big happened. Two months afterward, Bill Cooper was dead. The pale horse Bill Cooper wrote about was truth in the light of day. Bill Cooper exposed is all in Behold a Pale Horse.

Bill Cooper is a Pale Horse. Alex Jones is a Pale Horse's ass. Alex Jones interviewed Bill Cooper on his show in 1998. Bill Cooper never came back. Bill Cooper would later call Alex Jones a fraud. Bill knew the dangers of Alex Jones. Bill knew the power of archetypes and persuasion. Bill knew what Alex was up to long before Alex did. Bill knew a controlled asset is always the last to know. On New Year's Eve, 1999, Alex Jones claimed Russia had launched inter-continental ballistic missiles at America. He's caught on camera being invited to a pro-gun rally and pretending to crash the event. Alex's narcissism makes him an asset. Assets are programmed by the system from the time we are children. The endocrine system is its own handler. Endorphins are a tax-free paycheck.

Assets like Jones don't lie. Assets are chosen. Assets follow their own biological program. Assets come on both sides. That's why most don't understand Alex Jones. People insist he exposes the truth. But he restricts it like a pinched garden hose. People wouldn't have watched Alex without him feeding us truth. Assets turn truth into tasty salt licks that can be used as cattle fencing. Assets are used for recovery and for sabotage. Assets are the crook and flail of a shepherd at work in the field. David Wilcock is an asset. So is Jordan sather. This doesn't mean they were strapped to a dentist chair for MKUltra. It means they were given a platform to feed because they behave predictably. This is the true definition of a pundit. It's why Trump invites Scott Adams to the White House on Aug 3rd, 2018 and Lionel just three weeks later. These men are polar opposites on Q. A year prior, the same maneuver was performed when Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka were banished from the White House only to go sit stakeout in the inconspicuous Breitbart van across the street. These are separate heads of the same snake. This is how you charm millions of voters.

#6270024 at 2019-04-22 04:34:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8017: Re Read Crumbs The Q Edition

Same with Wilcock and sather.
These guys don't just come out of nowhere.

#6269991 at 2019-04-22 04:30:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8017: Re Read Crumbs The Q Edition

Corey Goode's continued association with the blatant MOS agent, Jordan sather, leads me to only one real conclusion. Ya Corey is a fraud.

Corey's story has too many holes and as incredible as the truth about our friends out in the universe must be, I just don't think these enlightened beings chose Corey as their messenger.

Now there's a small chance Corey has been tricked by Jordan too. But isn't Corey some sort of super-empath? Sure there's a small chance he's a double-agent working for good. But those guys seem few and far between in comparison to the vast number of Cabal infiltrators within the Q-community and ufology.

So ya, he's probably another greedy, greasy con-artist. I bet there's some truth in the stories. The best disinfo artists always deliver truth in order to fool us. But overall, he's designed to misinform, confuse and disparage the rest of us who really want the truth.

My bigger question now remains David Wilcock. I think it's MUCH more likely David has been tricked. Hey, it happens to the best of us. The more influential you are, the more sophisticated [their] psy-ops will be. And I think Corey maybe has fooled David.

Of course, I'm biased because I really hope David is good. But I'm also prepared for David to be revealed as a fraud because it seems like almost everybody is these days. So I'm still hopeful. Right now, I'm betting he just has a lot of lessons to learn, along with the rest of us. It's not always easy.

What a ride.

#6261762 at 2019-04-21 12:14:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8007: Easter Blessings to Q Team & All the Anons Edition

>>6261732
Another one of those sather-following "muh pleiadians" shills. I can't believe why Q would ever associate with someone like this, UNLESS….

#6260597 at 2019-04-21 06:53:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #8005: Lights On, Nightshift, We Got Booms Incoming Edition

>>6260579
He could send Jordan sather.

#6246449 at 2019-04-20 00:54:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7987: Time For Congress To Do Its Job Edition

>>6246403

you had me with this

sather is a name of ancient Anglo-Saxon origin and comes from the family once having lived in the ancient chapelry of Satterthwaite found near Hawkeshead in Lancashire. This surname was originally derived from the Old English elements soetr meaning shield and pveit meaning pasture.
if it is a code
i know shit
abracadabra

#6246402 at 2019-04-20 00:49:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7987: Time For Congress To Do Its Job Edition

>>6246389
only sather

#6225028 at 2019-04-18 15:26:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7960: Wounded Warrior Project Soldier Ride Edition

>>6225003
Q- please just take sather

#6213481 at 2019-04-17 20:07:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7945 Ambassadors of Freedom Edition

>>6213312
Yea I should have known when sather brought him onto his show immediately when he came out as muh hollyweird insider
Stopped paying attn to him awhile ago
Just found this interdasting

#6213167 at 2019-04-17 19:32:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7945 Ambassadors of Freedom Edition

>>6212773 (pb)
(from POTUS' use of the word "stigmacal")

The tower is called "sather Tower" and it's of the Gothic Revival style. (like notre dame cathedral)

Here's the map,
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22sather+Tower%22&ia=web&iax=about&iaxm=about

only thing interesting I can see is the "Advanced Light Source" to the east

#6178035 at 2019-04-14 22:13:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7900: All For A Larp. The 7900th Edition

In latest Jordan sather video, he mentions it odd that when JA was taken out of the embassy by British police, they didn't handcuff him behind his back. Then I was listening to another YT that played CBS clip where the news analysts specifically said he was taken out in handcuffs behind his back. Hmmmm….. So I went back and watched the video for myself, and although I couldn't detect handcuffs or not on his wrists, he definitely had his hands in the front (holding the book) and NOT behind his back. Something is sketchy….

#6171073 at 2019-04-14 03:56:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7891: Misspellings Matter Edition

Thanks to Jordan sather for providing this link in one of his YT videos. Confirmation of Round-up herbicide and glyphosate dangers. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/jennifer-sass/atsdr-report-confirms-glyphosate-cancer-risks

#6170417 at 2019-04-14 02:54:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7890: Fast Moving but Comfy Edition

Think about how blatant this Tweet is from CBS's show. Will the likes of PM, sather, Joe M, Bongino, Mitchell, etc. even call it out? Will POTUS even call it out?

#6135550 at 2019-04-11 14:24:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7846: Trust the Plan Edition

>>6135361

Broke fags always getting triggered by people getting paid.

We ain't no fucking commies.

If you get value from the man. Pay the man!

Goes for sather too. Broke ass bitches complain he's got ad deals. Dude puts out tons of quality content. Deserves to get paid.

BO deserves some $ for his effort too. Would donate crypto if he has a wallet

#6120557 at 2019-04-10 14:43:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7827: Momentum Building... Nowhere to Hide Edition

>>6120270
sather putting on the cortisol lbs…

#6119505 at 2019-04-10 12:11:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7826: FBI HRC Email Cover-Up Exposed Edition

Why Jordan sather is denying the existence of black holes?

Because they are also portals. ??

#6118473 at 2019-04-10 08:32:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7824: The Graveyard Edition

>>6118314
Just be glad he didnt interview jordan sather!

#6118223 at 2019-04-10 07:46:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7824: The Graveyard Edition

>>6118182
Oh get the fuck out of here with that Sitchin nonsense.

If you're gonna bullshit around, then do it.
Don't go all Podesta/sather on us, though.

#6109979 at 2019-04-09 18:10:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7813: Spoiler Alert: Unicorns Aren't Real Edition

>>6109970
(sather is a ufo guy, you illiterate puffed up crows cock)

#6109970 at 2019-04-09 18:08:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7813: Spoiler Alert: Unicorns Aren't Real Edition

>>6109949
sather? is that (You)?
They are BIG SCARY JELLYFISH just like the file says.
get some 1960s AAAY autopsy pics if you want to be real edgy

#6104700 at 2019-04-09 03:50:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7807: I Bake Two Breads In Time Of Peace, And Two In Time Of War Edition

>>6103658
I am the great and powerful Praying Medic. Let me be your Q translator and prophet. I see the future through my visions…donate to me now. I think it's best to claim donations for my wondrous visions via religious tax rules. I am most definitely not playing into the Q-cult shill claims or preparing to "accidentally" fall into a shill trap…just like sather kept accidentally going on mainstream stations pretending he is some official Q spokeman.

YOU NEED MY PSYCHIC POWERS! I NEED MOAR MONEY! WIN/WIN FOR EVERYONE!

#6102412 at 2019-04-09 00:35:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7804: Threat to Controlled Narrative Edition

>>6102130
notice the bearded lady behind sather, next o pelosi?

Ewww

#6100485 at 2019-04-08 21:36:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7802: Direct Current Panic Edition

>>6100190 (LB)
Thanks for your input, Anon. I follow everyone for their input (ex @InTheMatrixxx, @RealEyeTheSpy, sather, etc) because I appreciate other views than my own echo chamber, but when you pull the bullshit PM is accused of, infuriates me. We already have enough bullshit to deal with in this movement with criticism, accusations, and fake news about us, this just dumped gasoline on the fire if charges come against PM. WE DON'T NEED THESE PEOPLE, (((they))) are gonna make us all seem not only anti-semetic/racist/sexist/bigots (which is not true), but like we are only here for money. We already have MSM claiming that we kill our family because we believe their reptilians (NOT TRUE), believe we are going to try and blow the Hoover Dam (NOT TRUE), and that we promote racism and violence (ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE). Q said to be careful who you follow, so do you believe this can be used in the argument against Q himself? I'm sure I'm gonna get the redundant "you're a shill" & the "fuck off Jew" shit, but fuck you if you do, I'm just speaking out loud and asking questions.

#6091596 at 2019-04-08 02:33:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7790: Bigger Than You Can Imagine Edition

>>6091500
He was working on an anti-vax documentary with Weinstein when #MeToo came into play. I always suspected it was related.
I agree with sather. Trump1, Q2, anti-vax 3.
… over the target.

#6073371 at 2019-04-06 17:23:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7767: God's Gonna Cut You Down Edition

>>6073329
>There are no "ex" C_A

That's a meme and I think it's been misapplied to CIA officers when it's really more in reference to *assets*, I.e., if the CIA got you running numbers for them in the past, you'll have a hard time not complying if they want you to do stuff for them again in the future.

>RDS is a Jesuit shill
He has spoken out against the Jesuits multiple times.

>is trying to insert himself into and re-direct the Q movement
False. The one thing he has most consistently said about Q is "I don't have time for riddles," but he has indicated that he thinks Q is "real." He's mentioned that he listens to breakdowns/analysis of the drops from someone, but I don't remember who.

>being the first guest of Jordan sather, who was later interviewed by AJ. RDS is sather's handler, now Fuck OFF!
Weak-ass logic.

#6073329 at 2019-04-06 17:19:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7767: God's Gonna Cut You Down Edition

>>6073233
Oh-vey, dumb fucking shill.
There are no "ex" C_A. Just like Anderson Cooper they are re-tasked.

RDS is a Jesuit shill who is trying to insert himself into and re-direct the Q movement. He gave it away by heading up the Jesuit-backed ITNU (look at their original logo), that is trying to take away authority from other tribunals that are being effective against the Vatican, the ITCCS.

He also gave it away by being the first guest of Jordan sather, who was later interviewed by AJ. RDS is sather's handler, now Fuck OFF!

#6065722 at 2019-04-06 00:33:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7757: Going Going Back Back From Cali Cali. The DJ Trump Edition

>>6065646
I WILL JORDAN sather KNOW

#6049587 at 2019-04-04 21:56:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7737: Mueller Report Retort Edition

Many things about the Q movement and "great AwAkEnInG" that I used to love now only annoy the living shit out of me.

But, NOTHING, moreso than Jordan sather. He is the fucking worst. I don't even need to meet him to know that i hate him.

#6048364 at 2019-04-04 20:20:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7735: Tchencent Edition

ABOVE MAJESTIC 2018

Corey Goode, David Wilcock, Jordan sather, Roger R. Richards

#6038453 at 2019-04-04 00:15:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7723: Muh Tax Returns Edition

Mueller report turned in on 3/22 at 5:30 PM. This is a potential decode for another entity, posing as Majestic 12. Jordan sather HATES this account, and even posted on his instagram today about how this one theory about space that Maj12 pushes (Stargates, namely) is bullshit.

Well Jordan sather is bullshit to me, and this post tells me there's SOMETHING here.

#6034572 at 2019-04-03 19:05:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7718: Sons Of Kek : We Make The Magic Edition

Measles vaccine is demonstrably much more dangerous than wild-type measles infection. VAERS (vaccine adverse event reporting system) has been estimated to catch only about 1% of adverse events following vaccination. I have not yet checked this myself, but Jordan sather recently reported on his YT channel that when you look at CDC data for measles cases they are FAR FEWER than those reported by the media.

#6022443 at 2019-04-02 22:15:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7702: On The Move. The Rush Hour Edition

David Wilcock
Jordan sather
Outer Light
Suspicious Observers
Rap the news
Pies and cakes
Woodward TV
Ride the wind

#6013675 at 2019-04-02 04:19:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7691: Misspellings Matter Edition

>>6013459
Don't tell sather that I said so, but they are basically the same thing,

#5997577 at 2019-04-01 00:53:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7670: RBG Body Double Spotted in the Wild Edition

>>5997529
Noting that sather picked up the story.
Treading carefully.

https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/1112477145870155777

Did we get proof of life for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, or was this a (not so) elaborate fake? I think the mystery continues

#5969767 at 2019-03-29 23:50:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7635: Reconcile Using Logic Edition

If you guys are tired of being Grifted by sather, Joe, Dilly, Medic & Thomas.

Join us at the YangGang

#5968871 at 2019-03-29 22:57:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7634: Pathetic and Desperate Attacks On The Movement Edition

Are you done with bein Larped by sather, Joe, Medic and Dilly?

Join us over at the YangGang we are actually changing the future for the better instead of sitting around waiting for Boom Booms

#5950772 at 2019-03-28 22:39:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7610: BE LOUD!! MAKE US PROUD!! Edition

>>5950731
underculture retweets eyespot, dilley, sather, etc. as well. Very suspect account.

#5945157 at 2019-03-28 18:32:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7604: THEY DO NOT LOVE YOU OR AMERICA Edition

Fuck this account and whoever runs it…but he raises a good point…and sather is a fucking dweeb I used to like him now he really annoys the shit out of me

#5878686 at 2019-03-25 09:31:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7520: Spooks BTFO, The Graveyard Edition

>>5878654
>David Wilcock, sather, and a couple of others have "The Alliance" as the name, but I'm not sure on the validity of that moniker. It's a nice term, though.

I'm going with other anon's recommendation – Patriots. "Alliance" is too "space alien-Roswell-Star Trek" for what we're doing.

#5878654 at 2019-03-25 09:25:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7520: Spooks BTFO, The Graveyard Edition

>>5878567
David Wilcock, sather, and a couple of others have "The Alliance" as the name, but I'm not sure on the validity of that moniker. It's a nice term, though.
>>5878620
I'm not sure. Perhaps, the rebels? Remember, certain ways the term "patriot" can be used can portray a die-hard nationalist in the eyes of the media. In terms of getting this to the normies, I don't know if this would work.

#5878341 at 2019-03-25 08:24:50 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7520: Spooks BTFO, The Graveyard Edition

I don't listen or watch Jordan sather, I just caught this on my feed.

Didn't Q allude to this when he called out Freddy?

Note the dates.

2/17
3/17

https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/1109893159767597056

Jordan got this info off "the Chans".
At least he gave credit to Anons.

#5860911 at 2019-03-24 10:49:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7497: Long Weekend Edition

>>5860892
This is straight up sather level retardation.

#5843042 at 2019-03-23 10:04:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7475: Collapse of Propaganda Now Edition

>>5843036
>MSM FAILS


Jordan sather
@Jordan_sather_

We're approaching near 600,000 currently on QMap.

This is freaking exponential.

#QAnon
6:43 PM - 21 Mar 2019

#5833900 at 2019-03-23 00:01:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7463: Bahamas, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, and St Lucia Edition

You guys still over here getting larped by Jordan's sather, Joe M, Thomas, and Medic?

#5796791 at 2019-03-20 22:02:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7415: Follow the Motions Edition

I have had an epiphany about the day once this thing is all cleared up. Exchange BC for the Don and in walks the two greatest anons in the history of anon. No I am not talking about Nemos and sather of course since they are clearly lizards… no I am talking about you anon… yes you!

#5795855 at 2019-03-20 21:13:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7413: DJT The PEOPLES President... Edition:

>>5795836
sather awesome dude… smart kid…

#5795836 at 2019-03-20 21:13:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7413: DJT The PEOPLES President... Edition:

>>5795803
Running out of content, sather?

#5786192 at 2019-03-20 06:28:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7401: [+21][+2][+4] Edition

>>5786158
sather is controlled-op, of course he fell for it.

#5786158 at 2019-03-20 06:23:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7401: [+21][+2][+4] Edition

I am no fan of praying medic. But the idiocy that is going on, on twatter now is insane. At least 3 PM twitter accounts popped up.

Normies are falling for it. Freaking Jordan sather fell for it.

Something as simple as logic and research will tell you those accounts that popped up are fake and gay.

My point. Think for yourself. Research for yourself.

#5756754 at 2019-03-18 19:56:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7363: (((THEY))) NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE EDITION

Q, you've responded to me anonymously before so I have to ask… anything on Antarctica? Several months back 17 global pulses emanated from there. Jordan sather thought it might have been proof that US military white hats have taken control of global DS weather mod tech.

#5747164 at 2019-03-18 03:43:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7350: STRIKE Edition

>>5746738
Fuck sather. THAt secret space program parroting twitt

#5747004 at 2019-03-18 03:35:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7350: STRIKE Edition

>>5746979
Well, yes. He lurks here. But I'd rather have sather watching than the Krassensteins, Sommer or Travis View.

#5746979 at 2019-03-18 03:34:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7350: STRIKE Edition

I meant is sather watching us
>>5746906

#5746850 at 2019-03-18 03:29:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7350: STRIKE Edition

sather watching?

>>5746770

#5746770 at 2019-03-18 03:27:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7350: STRIKE Edition

>>5746738 sather noticing change in twitter algorithm
notable?

#5746738 at 2019-03-18 03:25:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7350: STRIKE Edition

https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/1107480889175347200
sather Noticed

#5743135 at 2019-03-18 01:00:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7345: 14+Fish & Skippy+Tarrant, The POTUS Digits Edition

Lot of Noble gold salesman on tonight.
Kek
Jordan sather wannabes

#5734797 at 2019-03-17 14:52:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7334: E-bake Edition

>>5734759
Another sather Derangement Syndrome Victim

#5734759 at 2019-03-17 14:48:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7334: E-bake Edition

>>5734675
sather should go back to giving slbbies to Corey Goode and David Wilcox…hes such a good goy

#5734717 at 2019-03-17 14:45:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7334: E-bake Edition

>>5734675
You're projecting. I don't have gay sex with Jordan sather, that would be you. I imagine when you put things in something designed to be a one-way passage, I imagine it hurts. You disinfo faggots are not good at your job.

#5734642 at 2019-03-17 14:39:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7334: E-bake Edition

>>5734552
I decided that graphic and it means you and Jordan sather are gay lovers who like to post retarded shit. "Big: proof (that Jordan sather and I are mouth breathers with caves in heads who get paid too much to post total bullshit)"

#5680274 at 2019-03-14 18:21:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7265: PANIC is GOOD Edition

>>5680264
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5679346 at 2019-03-14 17:16:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7263: Happy Hunting! Edition

>>5679332
>Research the nephilim
Is that you Mr sather?

#5671029 at 2019-03-14 02:15:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7253: Facebook Is My BITCH Edition

>>5671024
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5650864 at 2019-03-13 02:02:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7227: JUSTICE Edition

>>5650860
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5650090 at 2019-03-13 01:26:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7226: Fire Away By Any MEMES Necessary Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5647812 at 2019-03-12 23:17:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7223: It's All About The 12 Edition

>>5647801

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5639626 at 2019-03-12 15:16:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7212: Simpler Is Far Better Edition

>>5639602
put your dick away sather.

#5635568 at 2019-03-12 04:32:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7207: 1 = 2 Edition

Who's telling the truth?
Most truthful I know are Anons working hard.
Together they became #2, became the news.
Over time, respect earned, World started watching.
Who's reading the bread?
Is sather here, is Schiff here, is Obama here, is Snowden here, Is POTUS here?
Q is here.
Anons are here.
So I PRAY for Q and Anons, when I PRAY for the watching World.
Better to watch than war.
socialism will cause war, what is private and what is government?
Popcorn over bullets.
war is stupid.
Time to move on, as Q would say.
Night Shift makes a better day.

#5634772 at 2019-03-12 03:38:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7206: Memes, Memes, And More Memes Edition

>>5634764

sather for sho

#5634764 at 2019-03-12 03:37:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7206: Memes, Memes, And More Memes Edition

>>5634745
Potus.
Then probably Lisa Mei & sather.

#5632990 at 2019-03-12 01:52:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7204: [Michael Gaeta - FBI Rome] Edition

>>5632984
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5627519 at 2019-03-11 21:02:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7196: [-8] — Justitia Was a Smart & Beautiful Woman Edition

Initially baby sather was training coaching people on how to use their knees and hips properly. Then he deleted his domain. He was recruited…and he recruited other. sather is a tool of deepstate

#5627360 at 2019-03-11 20:50:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7196: [-8] — Justitia Was a Smart & Beautiful Woman Edition

>>5627298
Different Jordan sather maybe?

#5627298 at 2019-03-11 20:46:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7196: [-8] — Justitia Was a Smart & Beautiful Woman Edition

Why is Jordan sather such a pathological liar? He claims to have managed a health food business when in fact he worked for a private medical company like Meddata Inc. His Mom works for a medical company too.

#5627137 at 2019-03-11 20:34:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7196: [-8] — Justitia Was a Smart & Beautiful Woman Edition

>>5627121

sather just came twice.

#5626624 at 2019-03-11 19:54:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7195: Define 'Spook' Edition

>>5626345
Technically this is the second time Q has given a sather shout out. Q was asked a question about sather on Valentines day last month. He took the time to (you) the anon, and in a round about way, give a nod at sather.
Whether that nod is a good thing or bad thing, you got to ask sather or Q.

#5626556 at 2019-03-11 19:48:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7195: Define 'Spook' Edition

>>5626345

>Anyone else surprised that this orgonite-selling asshole got a 'you' from Q?

Surprise is born solely from the unexpected result of cause and effect.
Eye expect everything, so nothing surprises me.
On top of The Mountain of Wisdom Q sees all.
Q has posted other 'Paytriots' tweets as well prior to this.
All things have meaning, remember?
At this point I am convinced sather is a sellout to the Wilcock / Goode / Gaia crew, attempting to harness more followers through whatever means necessary.
Money and notoriety is more important than integrity.
More important than truth.
Patriots fight for truth above all else, above their own personal desires.
Patriots share their Time freely.
At the top of the Mountain of Coin and Fame, one will never find salvation.
Jordan has failed his tests…

#5626446 at 2019-03-11 19:37:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7195: Define 'Spook' Edition

Jordan sather is Scaring the Shills

#5626442 at 2019-03-11 19:37:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7195: Define 'Spook' Edition

>>5626380

(you) have a sather hard on. You should take care of that.
May I suggest you slam a door on your head or genitalia?

>>5626380

#5626380 at 2019-03-11 19:33:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7195: Define 'Spook' Edition

sather is learning well from his handlers. He is tweeting about cannabis use, alchemy and hermeticism. Alchemical (hermetic) information about cannabis use was reintroduced into Europe after the Dark Ages by the Knights Templar. So Modern Freemasonry derives from ancient Templar Knowledge. sather is an obedient puppet of Freemasons. Hermeticism, Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, Luciferianism and Satanism are part of the same gang. Good job sather! You are a Modern Freemason!

https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/992805583777554432
https://twitter.com/Jordan_sather_/status/1073655656173821952
http://archive.fo/XcA8z

#5624019 at 2019-03-11 16:21:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7192: Shadow Breakers -- Let's Shine the Light Edition

>>5623771
low IQ post
this anon needs to level up
this anon is probably at that level where anon bitches about Jordan sather the whole time and doesnt even read the article the twetertweted
it is already in the Q that POTUS bags on SESSIONS is OPTICS
at bare minimum it enters DISINFO via TWITTER BEEFING into the game

#5621782 at 2019-03-11 12:09:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7189: Sunshine Week Edition

Hmm yet another Q "shout-out" to Jordan sather…
why?
He researches wacko stuff like aliens and antigrav…

#5621677 at 2019-03-11 11:50:34 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7189: Sunshine Week Edition

>>5621649
They are fags, they don't even fucking work on these proofs, they stole data and pretended they were super duper spy kids, they made money, some now claim they are giving it to charity or other people (HAHAHAHAHAH) and it just goes right back to what Q said long ago about those types and it definitely goes back to what we have been farting out for months, years, for fucking ever… do not trust people on social media with high follower numbers who are selling shit on the side. If people want to trust people on social media it needs to be dudes that are clearly from some dump but are autists, go banana shits over problems, can verify they actually worked with people, have a stated love for something other than themselves and just come off as cool people. That guy is not a cool person and it is obvious. sather is clearly a closet pole smoker and it is obvious. One of them was literally fucking setup by Q after he tried to destroy the Q movement and that should sum up who they truly are.

#5619483 at 2019-03-11 05:42:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7186: RIP JBP - This IS NOT A Game Edition

Of all the (you)'s anyone could get from Q, sather gets a money shot to the face.

#5618309 at 2019-03-11 04:40:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

>>5618168
Many may not care for sather, (I don't) but we need a common group and stay together however tenuous.

Divided we fail. Find that common ground.

#5618278 at 2019-03-11 04:39:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

>>5617853

>Hmmm...
>Now why would Q be reposting sather...
>Especially considering what sather has been up to...

>>5618168

>Q has posted several BS accounts before.
>sather's no different.
>It seems counter-productive, but it might just be one of those give a dog a bone sort of things.
>Who knows!?

#5617853 at 2019-03-11 04:24:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

>>5617565 (pb&Q)
Hmmm…
Now why would Q be reposting sather…
Especially considering what sather has been up to…

#5617842 at 2019-03-11 04:23:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

Congrats sather for Q reply.
We all want 1, we all can't have 1, but if an Anon gets 1, I feel like I got 1.
Anons became #2, helping the World.
Changes happening in real time, before our families' eyes.
They see it come true on the news, and look at us cuz WE were right.
We were right cuz Anons were right.
Q Q+ with the sharp aim.
Anons learning focus fire.
FIRE!
BOOM!
Soon.
ds.
Soon.
Normies, enjoy the show, Newbies thanks for your support.
Anons, I can never thank enough.
o7

#5617672 at 2019-03-11 04:17:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

>>5617594
sather is the one that first hipped me to Q. Been following since like day 3. Its because of Jordan covering it.

#5617646 at 2019-03-11 04:16:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

>>5617618
sather is such a faggot though

#5617618 at 2019-03-11 04:15:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

sather tweet in Q crumb

#5617617 at 2019-03-11 04:15:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

>>5617565 (/pb)
>>5617594

>sather just gained about 1000 cred points. Eat shit aliensaredemonsshills!

To some, it's only about the money.

#5617594 at 2019-03-11 04:13:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7184: Brackektology Edition

sather just gained about 1000 cred points. Eat shit aliensaredemonsshills!

#5605376 at 2019-03-10 09:37:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7168: Something Very Serious To FEAR Edition

sather can take his anti-gravity and float his faggot ass away.

The reason for SpaceForce is real, wonder what it entails? Rod here..

A WAR FIGHTERS GUIDE TO SPACE

#5605013 at 2019-03-10 08:48:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7167: The Show Of All Shows Edition

>>5604985

I used to be a Jordan sather supporter, but recent revelations on twitter have me 99% sure he's with ((them))).

JuliansRumGlass on twitter has spent the entire weekend exposing sather.

#5598647 at 2019-03-10 01:46:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7159: TODAY THEY ARE LEARNING THE TRUTH Edition

>>5598530
Not a problem at all as night shift is my normal shift and (since I am a night owl) I tend to get on in full in about two hours as I both do real work while looking at the interesting things that comes up during that shift.

Of course it is the weekend so it's usually busy on the night shift given all the drunks, stoned and otherwise "I just got a mad skillz BJ" types who drop in. But just come back in 2-3 hours and ask, I will see it, and I will drop all the data again. Of course you could also just go to the notables, type in "Jordan sather" and it will come up if you do not want to wait.

#5598140 at 2019-03-10 01:24:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7158: Patriots Stand At The Ready Edition

>>5598116
Majestic 12 is Jordan sather btw.

#5585064 at 2019-03-09 04:33:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7142: POTUS Autograph Edition

Julian is HAMMERING Jordan sather right now on twitter and sather has gone radio silent.

I hate to say it, but I think Julian exposed sather.

I highly suggest anons read this thread:

https://twitter.com/JuliansRum/status/1104223544211316736

#5583460 at 2019-03-09 02:48:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7140: SOON Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5578763 at 2019-03-08 21:15:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7134: At What Stage In The Game Do You Play The TRUMP Card? Edition

>>5578752
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5575684 at 2019-03-08 17:11:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7130: Finland's Government Resigns Edition

>>5575679
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5570112 at 2019-03-08 05:09:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7122: Future Proves Past Edition

>>5569925
sather has used free energy to ascend to "The Great satherfag"

#5569925 at 2019-03-08 05:00:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7122: Future Proves Past Edition

Jordan sather has been doing a lot of redpilling about vaccine's…. I know people were doubting him after the Q I interview but he seems ligit. Can never tell anymore though.

#5568001 at 2019-03-08 03:17:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7120: That Friday Feeling Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5564903 at 2019-03-08 00:09:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7116: Manafort Sentenced Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5562607 at 2019-03-07 21:38:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7113: On Track To Apprehend Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5561880 at 2019-03-07 20:50:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7112: The More You Know Edition

>>5561875
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5561229 at 2019-03-07 20:08:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7111: Alcatraz Edition

Hey Nemos, since I know you are watching, we know all your sock puppets and we certainly know which of those Twitter accounts track back to those from your old friend lists before you took this new name to hide your previous crimes. If you don't want them involved in the upcoming exposure of you then you may want to tell them to stop their bullshit in trying to make you look like the next coming of Jesus Christ.

They do not deserve to be sucked into your issues but if you continue to bullshit them and continue to con them into what you have been doing then they will be added. Since you're too much of a pansy to come explain yourself infront of the actual people you stole data from and are trying to stand on the shoulders of then those looking into this issue will be smashing anyone and everyone involved in your situation if you continue your BS. I do have one question though for you - What has happened to every single person or group connected to InfoWars or those individuals who has done what you have done? Every single one of them have either been exposed, had their life destroyed, been arrested, or been brought in to be examined as traitors of the country and enemies of the state. You are now associated with them given your association with Pamphlet, sather, Kappy, and all the others. What do you think is going to happen now that you did what you did, are acting like a complete horses ass and are mocking anons who love their country? Do you think the POTUS is going to not notice? Good luck with that buddy.

#5560727 at 2019-03-07 19:28:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7110: Phone_wipe Edition

>>5560599
sather
dilley
nemo
many others
no way they got youtube promotions on their own merits
NO WAY
many more talented peeps get nothing

#5559566 at 2019-03-07 18:10:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7109: APPREHEND Edition

>>5559560
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5558752 at 2019-03-07 17:10:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7108: AOC vs Pelosi Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5557997 at 2019-03-07 16:23:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7107: Thankful Thursdays Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5557036 at 2019-03-07 15:10:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7105: Fresh Bread! Dig in! Edition

Noticed that Voat QRV (Q approved) is getting hit hard with Shilly posts. Newbies won't the difference. Attacking Jordan sather and Edge of Wonder, Corey Goode…
What happened to the mods?

WARNING: An alert to all Anons
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3080194

Q, We Need Proof You're a White Hat
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3080358


https://voat.co/v/QRV

#5556505 at 2019-03-07 14:23:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7105: Fresh Bread! Dig in! Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5554861 at 2019-03-07 10:10:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7103: Their Sybolism Will Be Their Downfall Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5547321 at 2019-03-07 01:59:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7093: IMG 45EXE Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5546254 at 2019-03-07 01:06:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7091: The Cost of Free Speech is Ignoring Shills Edition

>>5545713
Until Majestic 12, sather, wilcock, religion, "science' etc… tell you that "All worlds are bodies, and all bodies are worlds", they are not telling the truth.

The life is within the life. Just as we are host to multitudes of life within us, so to do we exist WITHIN a being.

The Sperm is the SPIRIT, the EGG (PIT) is the body. The VESSEL you, the anointed ONE got, as you had the 'key to that 'pit''.

#5543960 at 2019-03-06 22:57:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7088: Thank God For Patriots Edition

>>5543946
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5543418 at 2019-03-06 22:24:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7088: Thank God For Patriots Edition

>>5543367
>Brave Anons are hard to find
Untrue, we simply do not want to go onto the show of someone we do not know and discuss issues after some random comes on asking anons to come on their Youtube channel without even posting what their channel is so anons can look it over and do their due diligence. For fucks sake…. if you want to dupe an idiot go hang with Nemos and sather as their followers will buy any damn thing but this is research central right here and we have better things to do than go on your Youtube channel.

#5541666 at 2019-03-06 20:30:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7086: F(l)ailing Democrats Edition

>>5541606
From what I have read anons are not happy and he plagiarized the entire thing, claims General Flynn was connected and the guy is literally calling people "fake MAGA" or "Communists" who disagree with what he did and the fact he is saying it all about needing money. The guy comes off as a serious fool given what fellow anons have posted. He tried to start a commune cult, sold literature in the past on Ebay about magic and Wiccans. Claimed to be Q apparently long ago or, better stated, did not correct that narrative when he was called Q and is connected to shady fucking people like Kappy, Jones, sather and others. He comes off as a paytriot who gives no shits about the country and is only out for himself.

#5539220 at 2019-03-06 17:43:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7082: TIME = CORRUPTION Edition

>>5538957
Jordan sather
That face could give me Millennial Ass Cheek Burn.

#5537726 at 2019-03-06 16:36:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7081: Timing is Everything Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5536876 at 2019-03-06 15:45:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7079: Research & Thinking Causes Viruses Edition

>>5536835
No, a slide is what you are stating as you are, in essence, stating you support non anons stealing proofs to profit rather than supporting anons who did the work. No actual anon who actually investigates or researches anything would, in the slightest, make such a statement. The mere fact you are standing with Nemos, sather and those idiots who have done nothing in terms of investigating anything or helping brethren of this country speak volumes about those who make such statements.

#5529834 at 2019-03-06 02:17:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7071: Still Not Sorry, Haters Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5528259 at 2019-03-06 01:00:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7069: GenX Loves Ya Back Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
Do you ask?
FIGHT!
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5526709 at 2019-03-05 23:40:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7067: Crumbs Are Being Dropped Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5525893 at 2019-03-05 22:59:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7066: Crooked Hillary Will Be Sorely Missed! Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5522076 at 2019-03-05 19:33:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7061: MAGA2020 Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5520718 at 2019-03-05 18:04:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7059: In Search of a Crime Edition

>>5520688
… and yet still a 30 year old adult grown man who is claiming to be the media of Q and wrote the fucking book and is cashing in on the fucking book. I wouldn't care about any of those things and would even support the dude 100% but it is him who is claiming these things so I don't see why someone would defend that. He should have came out over the past few hours and put shit to bed but he is hiding out because all he cares about is the money like that asshole sather. They are legitimately traitors.

#5520564 at 2019-03-05 17:53:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7059: In Search of a Crime Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5520511 at 2019-03-05 17:49:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7058: Terrific Tuesday Edition

>>5520471
sather is a big alien superfag, fraud fraud fraud.

word has it, he's got a secret space ship.

#5520471 at 2019-03-05 17:47:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7058: Terrific Tuesday Edition

>>5519973
>Jordan sather

#5519973 at 2019-03-05 17:12:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7058: Terrific Tuesday Edition

>>5519924
Okay well then they have made 50 times the publisher cost already so it should be released online for free. Again though, we all know it won't because we all know sather, Nemos and the others are con artists and capitalizing on this. Whatever, it's clearly obvious now, case closed as far as I see it. Pretty fucked up to bring undue bullshit for no reason which is allowing stolen valor dipshits like Jack to chime in and the other gongshow shitheads. Stupid shit that was unneeded and done for the greed of people who I consider traitorous given that they shouldn't try to capitalize on the suffering this events legitimately have caused. It's fucked up no matter how you slice it. Whatever, enough about that.

#5519787 at 2019-03-05 16:59:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7058: Terrific Tuesday Edition

>>5519782
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5517308 at 2019-03-05 13:06:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7054: Avoiding Poached Bread Edition

>>5517280
>Lil ole Jordan
Kiddo, you should know that now you are being retarded.
Maybe take a break, or watch some more Jordan sather clips.

#5517238 at 2019-03-05 12:56:16 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7054: Avoiding Poached Bread Edition

>>5517224
sather is our guy

#5516847 at 2019-03-05 11:47:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7054: Avoiding Poached Bread Edition

>>5516832
sather is our guy

#5516832 at 2019-03-05 11:45:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7054: Avoiding Poached Bread Edition

>>5516795
This. Exactly this. Connected to Jones, connected to sather and it sets up a situation where all roads lead through the exact same business model while making one appear to stand in opposition to the other while, at the same time, they share the same connections, backgrounds and sponsorship. It's an old game.

But, fair enough, I know you're here "Dustin" so let's hear it, explain it away. I will readily admit (with no problem) any errors if you can explain them away but I will not accept the questions of questions as a response given your background as a shady "businessman" who has latched onto and tried to market every big thing for a long time now. So explain it, I can wait.

#5516533 at 2019-03-05 10:53:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7053: Gravy Yard Biscuits Edition

>>5516476
I bet sather wrote the Q book

#5516513 at 2019-03-05 10:50:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7053: Gravy Yard Biscuits Edition

>>5516488
Well yeah to be clear I have no issue with a book or books being written about the movement and my suspicion is about the people, who is connected and the response via media and social media controlling groups.

I absolutely love that people would take the time to write as that is something I respect in people who have the intelligence and perseverance to do so considering I know what it entails over many years as a pastime. However, when names like Jones, sather and Kappy are involved there is simply no way around the red flags being raised as they have attempted to cause a lot of issues and we know exactly what they are here and that is not friendly and we also know who they are connected to which is also not friendly.

#5516476 at 2019-03-05 10:41:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7053: Gravy Yard Biscuits Edition

>>5516459
BAKER

… and of course… he, a random nobody at that point… he somehow is connected to Jordan sather.

#5516136 at 2019-03-05 09:32:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7053: Gravy Yard Biscuits Edition

>>5516128
We've seen this before with people trying to either try to weasel into control of the notables or famefag. sather, this asshole here, that "R" bitch, the behemoth who was going to hit Trump, etc. We definitely have bad players watching and trying to break in, always trying.

#5515144 at 2019-03-05 06:42:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7052: Lights On, Nightshift Edition

>>5515096
Nassif has predicted things in the past and none of which have ever come to occur. He is a decent writer so that draws in the dingdongs thinking that he has some innate knowledge and he does nothing to discount that by merely saying "THIS IS A PREDICTION BASED ON BLAH BLAH". Now if he did that, fair enough, no problem. But he consistently pulls these things out of a hat, none of them occur and then the anti Trump/anti Q bandwagon points to it and says "look at these crazed cultists".

He should not be in notables in my opinion. If his prediction comes to pass, great, then add it to the notables with what came to pass but until then adding it to notables is akin to giving Jordan sather a forum outside his forum just to shift eyes to something that has not happened and is purely speculative and benefits a famefag.

#5512687 at 2019-03-05 03:28:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7048: The Night Train Is Comin' Edition

>>5512506

Richard.. can I call you DIck? Ok .. great, Dick.. I think we can work something out. Now, we don't come cheap. You might think we just want some YouTube money and Paytriot donations.. but seriously.. we are not so easy!

Now.. I am going to write a number on a piece of paper.. it will be code.. you will have to CLAS +2 and run thru Gematrix.. but then you will be able to take that message to your boss and release their answer at 4am through the normal method.

Ok?

I am sure we can make a deal.. but I warn you.. I can walk away!! Just look at what I did the other day with little slant eyed short-round himself!

Oh.. and HBO? Does that mean we can have nudity?

Awaiting your reply,

Q$$ (aka IntheMatrixx, Jerome Corsi, Jordan sather, Wardrummer, and the rest of the gang)

#5511207 at 2019-03-05 02:03:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7047: Symbolism Will Be Their Downfall Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5509683 at 2019-03-05 00:53:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7045: Decodes and Spitballs Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5508929 at 2019-03-05 00:20:05 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7044: Dark Pattern Active Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5508163 at 2019-03-04 23:52:38 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7043: Comey Still Shillin' Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5507390 at 2019-03-04 23:05:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7042: "On the Eve of" Anticipation Edition

>>5507383
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5506609 at 2019-03-04 22:21:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7041: Thank you for playing Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5502138 at 2019-03-04 18:35:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7035: NOTCH ACTIVATED Edition

>>5502129
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5501828 at 2019-03-04 18:09:56 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7034: P-A-N-I-C Monday Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5496288 at 2019-03-04 05:33:25 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7027: Are (you) READY? Edition

>>5496216
sather promotes many outer space crap theories, don't waste your time with him.

#5496283 at 2019-03-04 05:33:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7027: Are (you) READY? Edition

>>5496216

>sather is occupied just now, Anon...

Yes, selling his soul for more subscribers from the Corey Goode / David Wilcock camp.
Paytriots will be paytriots.

#5496216 at 2019-03-04 05:28:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7027: Are (you) READY? Edition

>>5496178

sather is occupied just now, Anon…

#5496179 at 2019-03-04 05:26:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7027: Are (you) READY? Edition

>>5496095
sather can bring his secret space ship, and we will sing Kumbaya

#5496178 at 2019-03-04 05:26:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7027: Are (you) READY? Edition

>>5496122
Jordan sather and Joe M know exactly who we are and should contact is via Twitter
- per the real
Q

#5496095 at 2019-03-04 05:21:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7027: Are (you) READY? Edition

Larping hard tonight Qanons ? - time to do something useful for a change… we would like to speak to Jordan sather and Joe M. Make it happen…it's time. They know how to contact us.

#5495205 at 2019-03-04 04:27:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7026: THE GREAT AWAKENING Edition

>>5495193
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5493780 at 2019-03-04 03:19:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7024: On The Schedule Edition

>>5493667

>sather has been tied to too much bullshit and should not be taken seriously in terms of his dedication to the country and fellow citizens.

Time reveals ALL…

#5493667 at 2019-03-04 03:13:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7024: On The Schedule Edition

>>5493520
sather has been tied to too much bullshit and should not be taken seriously in terms of his dedication to the country and fellow citizens. Originally I didn't mind him because he stayed to his research, posted interesting things and remained focused on those things. Then he began doing completely stupid shit to try to bring in attention such as his creation of the Majestic twitter sockpuppet which he was actively talking to (ie: talking to himself) and directly linked back to his publication which he was jockeying for attention at the same time period. So he came off as a money grubbing fraud at that point to me.

But worse yet was he decided to take the reigns as a spokesperson for the Q movement on a few occasions which was just ridiculous as it is the investigation and the research that we care about and the rest takes care of itself with no need for a spokesperson. All one need do is simply provide the facts in an intelligent way and other intelligent people will notice and jump on board but he did what he did for personal gain and I simply find that despicable due to the fact that these issues we go over are not just teehee giggle fart issues for TMZ but are literally societal changing and life altering issues that has seen people be harmed immeasurably by for a very long time period.

So his decision to play bullshit games and make his sockpuppet Majestic as someone "in the know but not connected to Q" while his publication comes out and then his attempt to be the spokesman just rubs me the wrong way. In my eyes it's quite simple, you research, you investigate, you report the facts, people recognize facts and join. You do not need to blow yourself and turn it into a discussion about all your other bullshit or the opposition begins to link your bullshit with the Q anons.

I have no issue with the man looking to make money and in fact, good for him, nice work. But I have a big issue when someone tries to play some stupid bullshit game to capitalize on serious shit that will determine the state of the world and if people (him likely included) are hunted down and massacred in about ten years. This is serious shit whether the shills, trolls, famefags or corrupt journalists want to recognize it or not or live in a fantasy world thinking things are unicorn farts and happy days. The extreme assholes out there aren't going to just stop when the POTUS term(s) end and any deviation from looking at facts and reporting them as they should be is something that should be looked down upon in my opinion. I don't hate the guy by any means but I wish he would pull his head from his ass, hear the pop, and refocus.

#5493520 at 2019-03-04 03:02:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7023: Cuck Todd Edition

>>5493184
>>5493243
>>5493367

>Love your work

>>5493499

>I can't stand sather at this point.

Deadpool agrees!

#5493499 at 2019-03-04 03:02:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7023: Cuck Todd Edition

>>5493487
I can't stand sather at this point.

#5492770 at 2019-03-04 02:23:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7023: Cuck Todd Edition

>>5492766
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5492103 at 2019-03-04 01:45:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7022: The POWER of THE PEOPLE Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5486624 at 2019-03-03 21:21:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7014: Between The Lines Edition

>>5486544

>Is Dr. Steven Greer legit?

>>5486562

>Not from what I can tell try edge of wonder/Jordan sather

JS is a paytriot.
Leeches off Wilcock + Goode material / fanbase to gain followers + money.
Fanbase + Money > Credibility.
FRAUDS.
>Be careful who you follow.
>The light will reveal those on the team, and those pretending to be.

#5486562 at 2019-03-03 21:17:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7014: Between The Lines Edition

>>5486544
Not from what I can tell try edge of wonder/Jordan sather

#5475571 at 2019-03-03 04:39:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7000: Thank You Anons Edition

>>5475321

If BILL HICKS IS ALEX JONES…

COULD JORDAN sather BE MATHEW POWERLAND???

#5475321 at 2019-03-03 04:25:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #7000: Thank You Anons Edition

Anons
A normie just asked if Jordan sather was Mathew Boyland…

Interdasting or nah?

#5474354 at 2019-03-03 03:27:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6999: Symbolism Will Be Their Downfall Edition

>>5474347
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5469713 at 2019-03-02 22:46:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6993: [-17] Edition

>>5469708
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5468154 at 2019-03-02 21:00:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6991: The Clock Is TICKING Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5465128 at 2019-03-02 17:52:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6987: The BULLSHIT Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5455208 at 2019-03-02 00:16:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6974: This Is Going To Be EPIC Edition

>>5455202
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5454397 at 2019-03-01 23:26:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6973: This Is Going To Be Glorious Edition

>>5454393
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5452880 at 2019-03-01 21:41:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6971: This Ain't No Party, This Ain't No Disco Edition

>>5452873
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5452036 at 2019-03-01 20:43:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6970: We Are At War Edition

>>5452032
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5448953 at 2019-03-01 17:09:03 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6966: First of March Madness Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5446659 at 2019-03-01 13:07:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6963: Friday Feeling Edition

>>5446657
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5441993 at 2019-03-01 02:46:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6957: Those Who Are The Loudest….. Edition

>>5441980
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5441169 at 2019-03-01 01:49:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6956: [INTERNAL CIVIL WAR] Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5440596 at 2019-03-01 01:06:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6955: Watch Hannity Edition

>>5440585
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5439632 at 2019-02-28 23:54:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6954: Democrat Trainwreck Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5437346 at 2019-02-28 20:59:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6951: MSM Bait Edition

>>5437340
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5437042 at 2019-02-28 20:32:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6950: Alaskan Pit Stop Edition

>>5436981
Put your dick away, sather.

#5436953 at 2019-02-28 20:25:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6950: Alaskan Pit Stop Edition

>>5436846

Contact Jordan sather, I hear he's into doing media interviews on Q.

#5436898 at 2019-02-28 20:20:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6950: Alaskan Pit Stop Edition

>>5436878

Probably.
"Dilley sent me" or "sather" or some other faggot would be more accurate.

#5436557 at 2019-02-28 19:52:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6950: Alaskan Pit Stop Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5435939 at 2019-02-28 18:50:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6949: Trudeau Problems Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Why do "WE" push this video? Did patriots decide this? How do you know?

#5434267 at 2019-02-28 16:23:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6947: Team Q Edition

>>5434235
HOW DO YOU CONTROL NARRATIVE?
Compare Mac Culk to this video:


Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5433430 at 2019-02-28 15:09:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6946: TRUST THE PLAN TRUST YOURSELF EDITION

>>5433424
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
Do patriots question anything?
Or are they passive?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5432749 at 2019-02-28 13:53:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6945: Be The Calm In The Shill Storm Edition

>>5432734
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

How come "we" promote this FAKE video here? Just like Jordan sather? Where are we getting "our" materials from? One common source feeds the whole "alt right internet"? FUCKING WAKE UP PEOPLE. WAKE UP. WAKE THE FUCK UP. YOU, PEOPLE. YOU MUST WAKE UP. WAKE UP AND FIGHT. STOP BEING SHEEP.

#5426622 at 2019-02-28 02:46:54 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6937: WRWY POTUS! Edition

>>5426599
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5424853 at 2019-02-28 00:58:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6935: Traditional America Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5424116 at 2019-02-28 00:16:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6934: How is that possible? Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5423305 at 2019-02-27 23:28:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6933: You Have More Than You Know Edition

>>5423299
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5422566 at 2019-02-27 22:42:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6932: Popcorn Poppin' Edition

>>5422559
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5421023 at 2019-02-27 21:12:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6930: Debunked Dossier Edition

>>5421018
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5420225 at 2019-02-27 20:11:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6929: Wednesday Winning Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5419589 at 2019-02-27 19:32:20 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6928: Peace is the PRIZE Edition

>>5419577
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5418707 at 2019-02-27 18:33:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6927: Congressional Circus Edition

>>5418706
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5413320 at 2019-02-27 11:48:23 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6920: Summit Begins Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5404932 at 2019-02-27 02:02:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6909: Cabal Don't Surf Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5403355 at 2019-02-27 00:42:49 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6907: Armor of God Edition

>>5403346
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5402600 at 2019-02-27 00:08:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6906: BIG BIG BIG HAPPENINGS [-21] Edition

>>5402584
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5400262 at 2019-02-26 21:55:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6903: Magic Wand Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5398745 at 2019-02-26 20:47:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6901: Truth v Lies Edition

>>5398735
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5397240 at 2019-02-26 19:25:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6899: Untied Edition

>>5397235
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5394848 at 2019-02-26 16:37:07 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6896: Vietnam Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5394111 at 2019-02-26 15:42:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6895: Live Happenings Edition

>>5394107
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5386396 at 2019-02-26 02:38:33 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6885: Nightshift Right Shift Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5384841 at 2019-02-26 01:22:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6883: Hanoi Education Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5384086 at 2019-02-26 00:41:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6882: Light Rain Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5383282 at 2019-02-25 23:48:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6881: Arrival Team Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5381998 at 2019-02-25 22:20:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6879: Truth Can Always Be Found Edition

>>5381989
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5380978 at 2019-02-25 21:16:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6878: Truth is the Standard Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5380214 at 2019-02-25 20:38:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6877: On the Right Track Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5379427 at 2019-02-25 20:00:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6876: Vietnam Meet 'n Greet Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5375140 at 2019-02-25 14:02:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6870: Shill Team 6 Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5360823 at 2019-02-24 16:27:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6852: Sunday Mornin' QNN News Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5354716 at 2019-02-24 03:42:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6844: The War Is Real Edition

>>5354708
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5353853 at 2019-02-24 02:38:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6843: Love is Patient Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?

#5353113 at 2019-02-24 01:47:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6842: Why Is The Rum Always Gone? Edition

>>5353088
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5352916 at 2019-02-24 01:34:24 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6841: We Have It All Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5351510 at 2019-02-23 23:48:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6840: Attacks Increasing Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5346403 at 2019-02-23 17:27:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6833: Knowing Is Half The Battle Edition

>>5346126
Fake Maga sather has a secret Space ship, ask his phony alien pushing loser.

#5341063 at 2019-02-23 05:43:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6826: IBOR not ICANN Edition

>>5341033
The fake maga sather has a secret space ship

#5335256 at 2019-02-23 00:34:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6819: Desperate DNS Device Edition

>>5335248
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5333743 at 2019-02-22 23:16:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6817: JUDGEMENT DAY COMING Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5332973 at 2019-02-22 22:36:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6816: Never Forget Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5329886 at 2019-02-22 19:43:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6812: Happy Friday! Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5328802 at 2019-02-22 18:57:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6810: Perp Walk Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5322542 at 2019-02-22 10:31:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6802: Our reach is a direct threat to their control Edition

LOOK AT SHIT GRIN ON POTUS AT PRESS BRIEFING HE ANNOUNCED "CALM BEFORE THE STORM

I'M ROFLMAO THEY'RE IN A KNOT ABOUT Q HOW DANGEROUS WE ARE, WE ARE DIVIDING, HISSEN MANIPULATORS.

AND THOSE GUYS sather &?? WENT ON INTERVIEW AND TRIED TO EXPLAIN WHAT Q IS…………… IT GOES BEYOND PEDO. REALLY?!?! YA! THEY LIKE DRINK THE BLOOD OF BABIES….. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
MY GUTS KILLING ME

#5317627 at 2019-02-22 03:57:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6796: WWG1WGA WW Edition

>>5317611
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5316798 at 2019-02-22 03:15:09 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6795: Be Ready For The 'Q', Anon(s) Edition

>>5316792
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5315739 at 2019-02-22 02:17:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6793: #WWG1WGA Edition

>>5315199
Who shills this every bread?
Do we Know?
It is amateur. Hardly slick.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was shilled?
Shilled by whom?
How do we know?
Who the fuck is Jordan sather?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
Who cares.?
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to shill the communication of those truths?
Might you shill A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the shill control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present AWESOME and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem true to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run train over the cabal?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy to digest, in many ways true, but in others outrageous - and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of shill?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex shill projection look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make anons look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also very fucking needed hopium on steriods?
Does it counter-shill in many subtle ways?
Who shilled it?
How would we know?
Does anyone else shill?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed from the bread?
Does its youtube origins and validity get shilled?
BO controls the board and decides?
Are the shills in control of this board?
How do you know?

>>5315536
For you Kanye!

#5315490 at 2019-02-22 02:02:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6793: #WWG1WGA Edition

>>5315199
Who shills this every bread?
Do we Know?
It is amateur. Hardly slick.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was shilled?
Shilled by whom?
How do we know?
Who the fuck is Jordan sather?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
Who cares.
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to shill the communication of those truths?
Might you shill A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the shill control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present AWESOME and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem true to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

And I lost interest in doing this.

#5315199 at 2019-02-22 01:44:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6793: #WWG1WGA Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5314075 at 2019-02-22 00:44:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6791: God Told Nehemiah "Build a Wall" Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5312864 at 2019-02-21 23:41:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6790: Dank Memes Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5311263 at 2019-02-21 22:26:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6788: #UnitedNotDivided Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5310455 at 2019-02-21 21:51:11 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6787: #Truth Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5309743 at 2019-02-21 21:25:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6786: Important Memes Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5309074 at 2019-02-21 21:01:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6785: Leaky Smollett Edition

>>5309066
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5308390 at 2019-02-21 20:35:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6784: MAGA Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5307427 at 2019-02-21 19:37:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6783: Chicago's Collective Crime Rate Edition

>>5307414
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5306594 at 2019-02-21 18:49:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6782: Careful Who You Follow Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5306312 at 2019-02-21 18:34:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6781: Eyes On Increasing Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5301506 at 2019-02-21 12:59:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6775: Slow and Steady Wins The Race Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5298425 at 2019-02-21 05:48:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6771: The Fun Begins Directly After Edition

>>5298383
sather has a secret space ship

#5296006 at 2019-02-21 03:28:36 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6768: Will Make The Super Bowl Look Like A Puppy Show Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5295965 at 2019-02-21 03:26:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6768: Will Make The Super Bowl Look Like A Puppy Show Edition

>>5295698 pb

Wapo hit piece (film) on Q

Re lack of evidence: Wapo never has good evidence. They use fake research; there's about 6 posts documenting that from December….use search term "hateful conspiracies" in the Archive and they will come up. Nobody has good evidence on either Q being wacko or patriots in general being hateful, etc. Just flashy graphics, stuff that sounds good but isn't solid.

I'm watching as I type….
Oh, this is the sather interview. sather was just talking about this….thought he was foolish to go for this, but he's a PR hound, can't turn it down…..I have a feeling they picked sather because he's articulate but not very warm; wouldn't attract people, a bit robotic.

Their weakness is the crap research. New Knowledge is another one of the fake research groups and they've been discredited now. Although people sort of pretend they haven't (ie, the MSM).

#5293879 at 2019-02-21 02:00:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6765: Smollett BTFO Part 2 Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5291821 at 2019-02-21 00:02:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6763: Nothing False About The Flag We Serve Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will it get removed?
Does its origins and validity get addressed?
What controls the board and decides?
Are the people in control of this board?
How do you know?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5291069 at 2019-02-20 23:14:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6762: Truth to Power Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5290251 at 2019-02-20 22:25:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6761: Weeks to Come Edition

>>5290247
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5289447 at 2019-02-20 21:35:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6760: Next Installment Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
Will patriots wake up?
Will patriots question?
Will patriots FIGHT?

I have a feeling we may be waiting for US…

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5286387 at 2019-02-20 18:57:51 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6756: What a coincidence! Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5286012 at 2019-02-20 18:31:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6755: Cabalists Trying To Flip The Script Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5284843 at 2019-02-20 17:04:46 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6754: Light And Heat Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5284049 at 2019-02-20 16:19:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6753: WE ARE THE NEWS NOW

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5283294 at 2019-02-20 15:47:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6752: No Opinions Allowed In Serfdom Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5282504 at 2019-02-20 14:36:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6751: Many References Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5281937 at 2019-02-20 13:31:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6750: Uh-Oh WaPo Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?
Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?
THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?
Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job- explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete- and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?
Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?
Does it undermine in many subtle ways?
Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?
https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5278600 at 2019-02-20 05:17:40 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6745: Hey There CBS Edition

>>5278570
>http://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1098084913973055490?s=09
"…if one of you mentions Area 51…"

The Jordan sather WaPo interview.
Predictive Programming for it.

#5278280 at 2019-02-20 04:55:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6745: Hey There CBS Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How would we know?
Does anyone ask?
Or just assume someone else did?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5276379 at 2019-02-20 03:17:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6743: (….AND WE WILL DELIVER) Edition

>>5276333
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5274808 at 2019-02-20 01:54:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6741: Libel Laws Activated Edition

>>5274803
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5273330 at 2019-02-20 00:44:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6739: Review Time Edition

>>5273294
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5272507 at 2019-02-20 00:07:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6738: Always On The Move Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5271761 at 2019-02-19 23:36:18 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6737: CONTROLLED AT THE TOP Edition

>>5271755
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5270934 at 2019-02-19 22:47:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6736: Biblical Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5270214 at 2019-02-19 21:59:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6735: Space Force Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Compare to patriot video Q shared– night and day

But will the slick video get changed on this board, to a patriot video?
I tend to doubt it. Or, it will take a long time.
The system responds slowly…

#5269016 at 2019-02-19 20:46:00 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6733: MSM Accidentally Does Its Job Edition

Compare PATRIOT video Q posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKR7Srh3uJI


To ultra slick "Q Plan to save the world" video we have ON THIS BOARD:

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ


INSTRODESTING

Why does one have millions of views, and the other a fraction?

Which is made by a patriot? Which is US?

WHY do we feature the same dubious content that "Jordan sather" does?

Why aren't the PEOPLE in control of this board, so we can have patriot things?

#5266669 at 2019-02-19 18:52:30 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6730: MSM Pushes Narrative that Trump is Anti-LGBT Edition

SGT

sather

ET AL


Q wants a Q video explaining the Q proofs.

Pretty please and thank you.

#5262540 at 2019-02-19 13:37:32 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6725: It's Not Journalism Edition

>>5262539
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5261928 at 2019-02-19 11:47:10 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6724: Ding Dong the "Global Warming" Professor is Dead Edition

>>5261903

Calling out StormIsUponUs and Jordan sather equates to me getting paid to post? Who's paying me?.. Q? Anons?

#5261877 at 2019-02-19 11:39:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6724: Ding Dong the "Global Warming" Professor is Dead Edition

>>5261752
This SHOULD BE A NOTEABLE. FUCK STORMISUPONUS AND FUCK sather. MOSSAD CIA FAGS SHOULD NOT BE TIED TO THIS MOVEMENT.
>>5261752

#5261752 at 2019-02-19 11:24:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6724: Ding Dong the "Global Warming" Professor is Dead Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

#5254984 at 2019-02-19 02:40:35 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6715: Reconcile Edition

"In The New York Times' article reporting on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsburg's return to work at the court, the paper used a stock photo of Ginsburg taken last November rather than a recent photo.

The Times reported on Ginsburg's return to the court without any recent visual aids to expand upon her return, after she missed over a month of hearings after medical scans taken after a fall last year led to an emergency surgery to remove cancerous nodules from her lungs.

Instead, the Times used a photo dating from last November. While the photo is several months old, the New York Times did not date the photo, leading some readers to believe it was current.

Social media users uncovered the possibly deceptive use of the image, with independent content creator Jordan sather posting to social media that the photo "was actually taken last November," and noting that he has "still seen no current photo."

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/new-york-times-passes-off-old-stock-rbg-photo-as-image-of-return-to-scotus/

#5254689 at 2019-02-19 02:23:04 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6715: Reconcile Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5253922 at 2019-02-19 01:43:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6714: Pick A Network Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5253141 at 2019-02-19 01:05:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6713: They Are Getting Super Desperate Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5252754 at 2019-02-19 00:44:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6712: Perp Walk Edition

>>5252746
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5251635 at 2019-02-18 23:41:13 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6711: Zombie RBG Edition

>>5251629
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5250862 at 2019-02-18 22:57:53 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6710: A New Day Is Coming Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5249336 at 2019-02-18 21:48:45 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6708: What does that tell you? Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5248560 at 2019-02-18 21:19:59 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6707: Yes, they are Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

#5246349 at 2019-02-18 19:39:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6704: GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

#5245830 at 2019-02-18 19:19:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6703: Trust Yourself Edition

Q who are attacking the big acounts, praying medic, sather, Matrix iPOT

All above say think for yourself

#5245764 at 2019-02-18 19:17:01 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6703: Trust Yourself Edition

>>5245499
Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?
Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?
Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?
Is this a form of control?

Is saying "criminals took over" a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?
Is the title "plan to save the world" also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

#5245528 at 2019-02-18 19:11:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6703: Trust Yourself Edition

HEY sather YOU WANNA USE ANON'S WORK GIVE US CRED FOR IT

"HAT TIP Qresearch"

UNDERSTAND FAGGOT????

#5243941 at 2019-02-18 17:45:02 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6701: Understand The GRAVITY Edition

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ
Who made this video?
Do we know?
It is very slick. Hardly amateur.
Do we know where it came from?
Or did it just show up, and was accepted?
Accepted by whom?
How do we know?

Does Jordan sather push this video?
Does Jordan sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:
If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?
Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?
Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?
Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video promote DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths with simplifications that make them seem absurd to many?
While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does it undermine in subtle ways?

Who made it?
How do we know?

#5242149 at 2019-02-18 15:54:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6698: Four Families Three Generations Edition

>>5242114
The statement was not a endorsement of sather,but many interviews have been done to make the media just ask the question. Why hasn't anyone taken that opportunity?

#5242114 at 2019-02-18 15:51:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6698: Four Families Three Generations Edition

>>5242093
Why is Jordan sather de facto spokesperson?
Is it a coincidence that
1. Alex Jones peddles cheesy wares
2. Joe Rogan peddles cheesy wares
3. Jordan sather peddles cheesy wares
?
What dictates who the spokesmen for "conspiracy theories" are?
Is this organic?
Why don't PATRIOTS have a voice?
Why are "spokesmen", peddling cheesy wares, imposed on all "conspiracy theorists"?

Does the same principle apply HERE?

#5242093 at 2019-02-18 15:48:47 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6698: Four Families Three Generations Edition

Why with all these interviews with people who follow Q doesn't people like sather dare the media to ask POTUS about it? They could push the question and don't. Why not? The media could clear all of this up if they just asked Trump.
Wouldn't it set the record straight? Why hasn't Q forced the question, whatever question it is he want forced. Everyone is avoiding this topic except anons

#5240579 at 2019-02-18 12:28:42 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6696: California Rigging Edition

>>5240517

This reeks of sather bullshit.

#5238258 at 2019-02-18 06:39:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6693: I love this Barr Edition

Something about sather doesn't sit well with me. He seems self-motivated and disingenuous. Is he a CIA/MKUltra puppet? Or is he just a sell out douche who's trying to make easy $? He red pills about vaccines but then hangs out with blue chickens Shillcock and Washington Post. What is sather's deal? I don't trust him.

#5224319 at 2019-02-17 17:33:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6675: eBake

True, sather, but did you notice the BACKGROUND?

#5220636 at 2019-02-17 09:28:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6670: You Are The News Now Edition

>>5220520
>>5220508
>>5220478
The company selling these seems to be using the Trump administration style on website to sell POTUS numismatic coins for a massive markup (as if donated to the Trump campaign). You can buy 1 oz of silver at your local dealer for about $17.50, not $35. This seems like a scam by Noble Gold who also sponsors Jordan sather. When investing in metal, you should aim to get the most weight and this provides you with 50% of the weight in silver you would of been able to buy otherwise This diminishes the damage done to the banksters, who need precious metal suppressed to maintain their fiat illusions.

However, if the money goes to the 2020 Trump campaign, then this is actually an awesome way to donate and I would fully support.

#5218711 at 2019-02-17 07:03:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6668: Information Waterfall Edition

Y'all know why they went with sather, right?
(And we'll ignore the Stone/Jones connections.)

It's because of his UFOlogy schtick.
The public is already primed against Muh UFOs.
We don't even talk about Ayy in anywhere near the capacity nor seriousness he does…
Yet…
Heeeeee's the one they go for?

It's just to make correlations to "conspiracy theorist/crazy person" nonsense the mockingbirds have been pushing since they murdered JFK.

#5207436 at 2019-02-16 18:00:22 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6653: Wake and Bake Edition

>>5207378
>sather. Be careful who you follow.
Not sure if Q meant him in that specific post, but we've got Jordan in our gallery of famewhores & traitors already.

#5207416 at 2019-02-16 17:58:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6653: Wake and Bake Edition

>>5207394
I am "anon" and sather IS a fucking tool. We are not playing games fuckface.

#5207378 at 2019-02-16 17:54:48 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6653: Wake and Bake Edition

>>5207335
sather. He is a stupid fuck. And a young "tool" of the cabal.

#5199521 at 2019-02-16 02:13:44 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6643: Be Careful Edition

>>5199442
Yes of course.
They want to discredit this movement as much as possible, this article will be another hit piece. Thanks sather

#5199495 at 2019-02-16 02:11:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6643: Be Careful Edition

>>5199381
sather asks the question to the media. Kek.

#5199176 at 2019-02-16 01:54:57 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6642: Memes Are Important Edition

>>5199081
That seems really relevant with Jordan sather interviewing with Washington Post…

#5190373 at 2019-02-15 16:20:19 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6631: NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED Edition

>>5190352
he has a secret space ship with sather

#5190302 at 2019-02-15 16:17:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6631: NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED Edition

>>5190279
he's fake maga, just like the phony sather

#5187604 at 2019-02-15 13:57:58 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6627: McCabe 23 Skidoo Edition

>>5187587
Yes, Anon asked Q, if sather talking to WaPo was a good thing.
And Q answered that WaPo might have an interest to entrap people like sather, people with a lot of followers, to destroy them.

#5187582 at 2019-02-15 13:55:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6627: McCabe 23 Skidoo Edition

>>5187566
Hi, Shill!
I talked about sather in context with Q's post and you changed the subject.

#5187556 at 2019-02-15 13:52:15 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6627: McCabe 23 Skidoo Edition

>>5187263
No.
People with a lot of followers, people like sather, will be targeted by the MSM, to destroy their message, Q and the people, who follow them.
People on YT or twitter, who have only few followers are not dangerous enough to the MSM and MSM's narrative.
MSM will only attack truthers will many followers.

#5187515 at 2019-02-15 13:47:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6627: McCabe 23 Skidoo Edition

>>5187263
Ok..so have a comment here or just an observation really…

I have long admired David Wilcock…have tried repeated to contact him with ZERO response…

Same with sather…

Same with Mike Adams (Health Ranger), Erin Elizabeth (Health Nut News), Dr. Mercola, Corey Goode, etc etc etc…

I DO NOT have difficulty getting response from others I have tried to contact on various things…some far more weighty and "popular" than those above are available via a phone call and will most always respond with an email or a TY…

Now WHY is this? Have these accounts been set up as "pretty lights.." to distract and CONTROL US?

Think most anons know the answers to that now…

WE ARE FAMILY
UNITY
WWG1WGA!

#5187331 at 2019-02-15 13:24:17 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6627: McCabe 23 Skidoo Edition

>>5187263
yes. I tink that Jordan sather is another AJ. IMO Q confirmed that last night, and this is our chance to show the world anons really don't give a FUK about "celebrities" or popularity contests. we follow the truth,
not the STARS!

#5187263 at 2019-02-15 13:13:28 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6627: McCabe 23 Skidoo Edition

>>5187214
>Sorry anon, can you explain just a little bit about Q's Deep in narrative" statement applies to FBIanon?
i'm not 100% certain, but in the context of sather & MSM coverage, the way i read it is to be wary of people with "high followers" & followings.
Basically the controlled op style tactics of AJ & others, but more deeply embedded in the culture.
Get a lot of followers, be "accepted", and when the time is right, strike to discredit, demoralize, or worse

<More importantly, why is the WASH POST leading the attack vs 'Q'?
<Who owns the WASH POST?
<Who funds Amazon?
<Who targeted NSA re: SURV expose/prevent pre U1 / IRAN?
<Why are we attacked daily by the largest news co's on the world?
<Use caution - high follower count targeting to direct 'deep in narrative' mob as method to remove.
<Q

#5184766 at 2019-02-15 07:46:26 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6623: P-A-I-N Edition

>>5184743
meant to say: "… how EVEN reasonable presenters... Inspire violence."

other words... Bring him into the spotlight for a second and make his fans think that his/their views are respected... When really, WAPO and sather are just setting them up (/us all)

#5184743 at 2019-02-15 07:43:37 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6623: P-A-I-N Edition

>>5184689
1. present sather as a face-guy for the movement. make him seem reasonable enough, 2. highlight the wide range of topics of his conspiracy theory conjecture
3. stage some actual event of violence or similar, citing Satuer's followers as responsible
4. lecture America on how reasonable presenters like sather inspire crackpot mob violence...
5. Censor "conspiracy theories"

#5184706 at 2019-02-15 07:39:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #6623: P-A-I-N Edition

>>5184689
>But what is "high follower count" targeting? That's what's got me stumped.
Use people with a 'high follower count' like sather to discredit Q.
e.g. sather talks to WaPo about Q but also spouts some bs about aliens and energy crystals. This makes us all look stoopid. Link Trump to Q in the hope of getting Trump removed. Get it?