QResear.ch

#60888 at 2018-01-16 00:43:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #72: No jelly, no jam, butter only, final destination edition.

>>60807
>>60610

>TRUST SESSIONS.
>TG departure [HEC].
>NOT to testify.
>NOT needed to testify.
>Think logically.
>NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY.
>DO NOT chase MISINFO.
>What ROLE might TG be walking into? >Who can WE TRUST?

Can you anons shed light on this? Trey Gowdy (TG) departure from house ethics committee [HEC], but his testimony is clearly not even necessary, so what would his next ROLE be?

How is this significant? Someone who is known as fierce fighter against clintonites and their corruption, specifically worked on Benghazi treason by HRC - could he be heading towards higher judicial role, or perhaps a role in the WH?

>Who can we TRUST?

POTUS, Q, MIL intelligence, No Such Agency members, SESSIONS.

TRAITORS
JAIL
DEATH

Imprisonment/death penalty for HRC/HUSSEIN/mudslime infiltrators?

I am personally aware that DC is HEAVILY compromised - anyone who has ever worked there or even lived in the metro area knows what a toxic shithole it is, with only thinest of veneer of normality covering it all. Delusion is strong here, along with denial, cuckholdry, weakness, corruption, general malaise and weakness of spirit.

What would be TG's next ROLE, and how would this be significant in the ongoing WAR?

>BEWARE of MAJOR FALSE FLAG attempts this week.

Today, one of DC metro rail cars derailed, though thankfully no serious injuries or deaths reported.

First in the long lines of FALSE FLAGS?

Thoughts, anons?

#60041 at 2018-01-15 22:50:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #71: Emergency Bake IDK WTF Im doing Edition

conservativestand. com/president-trump-just-made-trey-gowdy-powerful-man-capitol-hill/

President Trump has just removed that blockade. By executive order, Trey Gowdy has been given the highest security clearance possible. He could now sit in on presidential intel briefings if he felt he needed to.The first thing Gowdy did with his newfound ability to investigate is to re-open the Benghazi case. There was a 6-hour window that Clinton never answered for because she said she was in meetings with the president and joint chiefs that were highly classified. Gowdy will begin his investigation by revisiting those discussions and finding out exactly why four men were left to die.

Next, with his newfound freedom of information, he'll look into just how far Obama went when he sent weapons and cash to the Muslim Brotherhood after they took Egypt by force.

#58370 at 2018-01-15 19:12:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #69 Not as dirty as the Clintons Edition

>>58119
May have been given an offer to make things right.
When media asked him if he would be interested in FBI director job, he implied he wouldn't be confirmed…like maybe he's made some mistakes (Benghazi, emails, Lois Lerner, etc)

#55660 at 2018-01-15 07:51:39 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #66: From The Chans With Love Edition!

>>55650
>>55634
And remember the whole "Anti-muslim" movie that supposedly started the riots at Benghazi.

#55128 at 2018-01-15 06:10:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #65: Load The Meme Cannons Edition!

>>55058
How about the fake media lie saying Benghazi was the fault of a "film maker". It's an oldy but a goody.

#54815 at 2018-01-15 05:36:27 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #65: Load The Meme Cannons Edition!

>>54713
>>54474
and this fucking judge
involved with Benghazi hearings

#50536 at 2018-01-14 22:09:52 (UTC+1)
Q Research #60: Another BIG Week Edition

>>50514
if those 33,000 emails include the ones she deleted when Benghazi was happening then I think yes

#50514 at 2018-01-14 22:08:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research #60: Another BIG Week Edition

>>50497
Maybe they are going to reopen the Benghazi investigation too.

#50429 at 2018-01-14 22:00:43 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #59: Control The Message Edition

>>50414
and 9/11 and Benghazi and ISIS and Muslim Brotherhood

#43121 at 2018-01-14 05:02:12 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #51: WE LISTENED [40/60] Edition

Ed Mezvinsky is a former Democrat congressman who represented Iowa's 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977. He sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of Richard Nixon. He was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to politics and the nation and should be impeached. As many of us know Hillary was fired from the Watergate Committee for unethical behavior during the investigation. Ed Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue Margolies and later married her after his wife divorced him. I know, I know what does this have to do with anything Hillary Clinton? He and the Clintons were friends and politically intertwined for many years. Moving on, in 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in Congress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton's controversial tax package through the House of Representatives. Can you all see the dots connecting?

In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Ed Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams. He was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison. After serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in
April 2008 and remains on federal probation. To this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims. About now I can imagine you all are saying "So What!" Be patient I am not finished connecting the dots. Do any of you know who Marc Mezvinsky is or why? July 31, 2010, Chelsea Clinton married Marc Mezvinsky in a lavish ceremony held in George Soros' mansion. That's right Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton's father-in law.
You can tell everything about a person by who their friends are. Hillary Clinton has a long list of lies and unethical behavior that can be traced all the way back to Watergate. More recently there was Benghazi and the YouTube cover-up lie, her private email server and the lies she told to the FBI to cover that up. In fact, the Director of the FBI James Comey, wrote in his statement that Hillary lied and broke the law. Today we are looking at Hillary as the next President, scary thought. The cycle never ends! Lying and corruption seem to make Democrat candidates more popular.

http:// www.michellemorin.org/clinton-friends-crime-family/

#38339 at 2018-01-13 20:33:06 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #45: Trouble In A Hawaiian Paradise Edition!

This is a link to the FBI Anon drops from July of 2016…as I have been researching it is remarkable how much of what he said is coming out every day. One of the most interesting and probably underanalyzed things he says is that at the time of his posting Trump had some of the Clinton Foundation documents retrieved from the Benghazi server and that he would start leaking them to his benefit BUT the leaks would have to be non-transparent in nature.

I would say what the Q group is doing is rather non-transparent and is obviously taking place on behalf of Trump so….my questions to you Anons are 1. have we gone back over the FBI Anon drops looking for anything helpful to answer Qs questions and 2. Is it possible FBI Anon was a dry run for the Q Group Operation?
https:// archive.is/Znz2i

#30480 at 2018-01-12 20:22:14 (UTC+1)
Q Research #35: Cast-Iron Cornbread Edition

In the last bread Libya was mentioned, don't hear much about Ambassador Chris Stevens. Is Benghazi not important in the Redpill arena?You hear about Seth Rich a lot, justifiably so.. but Chris Stevens didn't just get 2 to the back, he was beaten, burned, cattle-prodded and who knows what else before they killed him. The reason behind Benghazi and Chris Stevens torture/murder deserves some memes, No?

#28470 at 2018-01-12 13:44:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #32: Through The Night Edition!

>>27888

Regarding McKinsey and Company,
Chelsea Clinton worked there.
So did Eric Braverman.
Braverman was head of CF.
Tried to audit it, then resigned.
Disappeared for a while.
Then Braverman was allegedly hired to head Google head's charitable foundation.

Is McKinsey clown school?

FBIAnon emphasized CF and "follow the money"?
FBIAnon said CF was way bigger scandal than Benghazi.

Where's Braverman today?

#3751 at 2018-01-09 14:22:41 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #4: Q Research Confirmed Edition

>>3747
News changed in 2009. The first black US President is a story of a lifetime. Obama has qualities that draw people in. He is eloquent, charismatic. Liberals in the media love him. They didn't want to cloud the world's perception of the first black president. When the Obama White House made a statement, media delivered it to their audience. They didn't question motivations. They became a propaganda tool. The opinion panels ran wild to fill time because experts didn't want to publicly go against first black president. Who funds the experts? Government does in some form or fashion. Experts didn't want to piss their boss off. Foxnews used retired military experts to constructively inform audience of all sides of issue. CNN added more opinion panelists. Popular opinionated people started own shows. They put on the talk host hat, but audiences still view them as journalists.

The media got lazy during the Obama years. They ditched their reliable sources list. They stopped journalism techniques because ratings dipped if coverage examined to how and why questions. Take any story based on WH statement. It starts with "the President announced…." then 20 minute opinion panel who agree with statements, tell audience why it's monumental, necessary, and correct. After years of war stories, the audience became addicted to the blue pill haze-safely tucked a fuzzy warm blanket. The media stayed the course because it really didn't matter any more. Hillary would be first woman president for next 8 years, then maybe Michelle or Oprah would be first black woman president for 8 years. Most media types in journalism would retire on huge pensions by then. Who cares, right?


Social media's role in politics changed so dramatically. When Wikileaks dropped emails, msm barely touched the story. Whether manipulation of DNC, Ancient history of Benghazi, their audience didn't want to hear about HRC misdeeds. It is mind boggling when you stop and think about it.

Social media changed the direction of a presidency and the world. Trump's brilliant use of twitter to force msm to report the news is amazing. The vast majority of social media participants are red pilled. They seek knowledge, information, and unvarnished truth. Social media is more trustworthy than the free press.

Where do we go from here? Bloggers became journalists in sense of news delivery with readily searchable sources. Some have risen to fame and fortune. They are mixing pills. Even Wikileaks/Assange. The media, even CNN, is reinventing themselves as journalists. The old guard. Trusted source media anchors. Gone for most part. Popular panelists are fighting each other to be next big time, highly paid news anchor. Were all the alleged sexual accusations towards coworkers a way to hasten exit? I'm not saying a lot of them were true. I can rationally picture a young, ambitious woman thinking of ways to achieve power with little chance of blowback.